1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-2000 | 2001-2380
Part, Question
1501 3, 3 | the Father than to ~the Son to become incarnate.~Aquin.:
1502 3, 3 | rather than the Person of the Son to ~become incarnate.~Aquin.:
1503 3, 3 | are ~appropriated to the Son, according to 1 Cor. 1:24: "
1504 3, 3 | that the Person of ~the Son should become incarnate.~
1505 3, 3 | fitting that the Person of the Son should ~become incarnate.
1506 3, 3 | united. Now the Person of the Son, Who is the Word ~of God,
1507 3, 3 | by Him Who is the natural Son, men should share this likeness
1508 3, 3 | conformable to the ~image of His Son."~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[
1509 3, 3 | of ~error, as though the Son were not able to restore
1510 3, 3 | gift of the Father and the Son is proper to the ~Holy Ghost.
1511 3, 3 | justification ~that the Son should become incarnate,
1512 3, 4 | Out. Para. 2/3~Now the Son of God assumed human nature
1513 3, 4 | was more assumable by the Son of God than any other ~nature?~
1514 3, 4 | of being ~assumed by the Son of God than any other nature.
1515 3, 4 | fitness in the union of the Son of God with human ~nature.~
1516 3, 4 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the Son of God assumed a person? ~
1517 3, 4 | It would seem that the Son of God assumed a person.
1518 3, 4 | Orth. iii, 11) that the Son of God "assumed human nature ~'
1519 3, 4 | Duab. Nat.). Therefore the Son ~of God assumed a person.~
1520 3, 4 | Fide Orth. iii, 6) that the Son of ~God "assumed what He
1521 3, 4 | personality there. Therefore the Son of God assumed a person.~
1522 3, 4 | Hence it follows that the Son of God nowise assumed a ~
1523 3, 4 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The Son of God assumed human nature "
1524 3, 4 | suppositum, the Person ~of the Son of God. Hence it does not
1525 3, 4 | Agone ~Christ. xi): "The Son of God assumed a man, and
1526 3, 4 | a human nature. But the Son of ~God assumed a human
1527 3, 4 | 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, the Son of God is a man. But He
1528 3, 4 | because He is the Eternal Son and Word of God, ~and not
1529 3, 4 | another besides ~Him. For the Son of God did not assume a
1530 3, 4 | properly ~be said that the Son assumed a man, granted (
1531 3, 4 | properly be said that the Son of God assumed a man. ~Hence
1532 3, 4 | terminated in this - that the Son of God is man.~Aquin.: SMT
1533 3, 4 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: The Son of God is not the man whom
1534 3, 4 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the Son of God ought to have assumed
1535 3, 4 | It would seem that the Son of God ought to have assumed
1536 3, 4 | universality. Therefore the Son of God ought to have assumed
1537 3, 4 | itself is best. Therefore the Son of ~God ought to have assumed
1538 3, 4 | individuals. Therefore ~the Son of God ought to have assumed
1539 3, 4 | nature was not assumed by the Son of God in the ~concrete
1540 3, 4 | said (A[3]). Therefore the Son of God assumed ~human nature
1541 3, 4 | iii, 11). Therefore the Son of God did not ~assume human
1542 3, 4 | place in order that the Son ~of God, having assumed
1543 3, 4 | but intelligible. But the Son ~of God assumed human nature
1544 3, 4 | have been assumed by the Son of ~God, as it is in the
1545 3, 4 | nature would be in the ~Son of God from eternity. Neither
1546 3, 4 | Neither can we say that the Son of God assumed ~human nature
1547 3, 4 | Reply OBJ 1: The incarnate Son of God is the common Saviour
1548 3, 4 | whereby the ~incarnate Son of God is the universal
1549 3, 4 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the Son of God ought to have assumed
1550 3, 4 | It would seem that the Son of God ought to have assumed
1551 3, 4 | give His ~only-begotten Son." But love makes us give
1552 3, 4 | it was possible for the Son of God to assume several ~
1553 3, 4 | Hence it was fitting for the Son of God to assume human nature
1554 3, 4 | sonship than for one natural Son to lead many to ~the adoption
1555 3, 4 | Orth. iii, 11) that the Son of ~God "did not assume
1556 3, 4 | dignity of the incarnate ~Son of God, as He is the First-born
1557 3, 4 | Whether it was fitting for the Son of God to assume human nature
1558 3, 4 | was not fitting for the Son of God to ~assume human
1559 3, 5 | inquiry:~(1) Whether the Son of God ought to have assumed
1560 3, 5 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the Son of God ought to have assumed
1561 3, 5 | It would seem that the Son of God did not assume a
1562 3, 5 | thereof. ~Therefore the Son of God did not assume a
1563 3, 5 | that the apparition of the Son of God in the world was
1564 3, 5 | De Eccles. Dogm. ii). The Son of God was not ~born in
1565 3, 5 | that it was fitting for the Son of God to ~assume human
1566 3, 5 | body the dignity of the Son of God is ~nowise lessened.
1567 3, 5 | the form of God." ~For the Son of God assumed a true body,
1568 3, 5 | that the apparition of the Son of God in the ~world should
1569 3, 5 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the Son of God ought to have assumed
1570 3, 5 | De ~Coel. i, 20, if the Son of God had assumed a heavenly
1571 3, 5 | truthfulness. ~For since the Son of God showed Himself to
1572 3, 5 | Dogm. ii) it is said: "The Son of God ~was born, taking
1573 3, 5 | descended from heaven, the Son of Man, ~Who is in heaven."~
1574 3, 5 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the Son of God assumed a soul?~Aquin.:
1575 3, 5 | It would seem that the Son of God did not assume a
1576 3, 5 | of Apollinaris that the Son of God assumed ~only flesh,
1577 3, 5 | Felician. xiii): "If the Son of God in taking flesh passed
1578 3, 5 | the authority quoted, the Son of God became visible by
1579 3, 5 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the Son of God assumed a human mind
1580 3, 5 | It would seem that the Son of God did not assume a
1581 3, 5 | Hence it would seem that the Son of ~God did not assume a
1582 3, 5 | nowise doubt that Christ the Son of God has true flesh ~and
1583 3, 5 | would have followed that the Son ~of God "took an animal
1584 3, 6 | inquiry:~(1) Whether the Son of God assumed flesh through
1585 3, 6 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the Son of God assumed flesh through
1586 3, 6 | It would seem that the Son of God did not assume flesh
1587 3, 6 | For the mode in which the Son of God is united to ~human
1588 3, 6 | more, therefore, is the Son of God united to ~flesh
1589 3, 6 | to be matter. Hence the Son ~of God did not assume flesh
1590 3, 6 | it may be said that the Son of God united flesh to Himself, ~
1591 3, 6 | flesh being united to ~the Son of God. For the flesh would
1592 3, 6 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the Son of God assumed a soul through
1593 3, 6 | It would seem that the Son of God did not assume a
1594 3, 6 | 1], ad 1). Therefore the Son of ~God did not assume a
1595 3, 6 | Hence it seems that the Son of God did not ~assume a
1596 3, 6 | it would ~seem that the Son of God did not assume a
1597 3, 6 | stated above (A[1]), the Son of God is said to have ~
1598 3, 6 | before the flesh by the Son of God?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
1599 3, 6 | flesh by the Word. For the Son of God assumed flesh through
1600 3, 6 | the ~end. Therefore the Son of God assumed the soul
1601 3, 6 | It would seem that the Son of God assumed the whole
1602 3, 6 | 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, the Son of God assumed flesh through
1603 3, 6 | as parts. Therefore the Son of God ~assumed the parts
1604 3, 6 | It would seem that the Son of God assumed human nature
1605 3, 6 | the soul. Therefore the Son of God assumed the soul
1606 3, 7 | as were co-assumed by the Son of God in ~human nature;
1607 3, 7 | of His being the natural Son of God; and by the fact
1608 3, 7 | inasmuch as He is the natural Son of God, is due ~an eternal
1609 3, 7 | according to Mt. ~8:20: "The Son of man hath not where to
1610 3, 7 | inasmuch as He is the Eternal Son of God. But in this respect
1611 3, 7 | Spirit by measure to ~His Son [*'To His Son' is lacking
1612 3, 7 | measure to ~His Son [*'To His Son' is lacking in the Vulgate],
1613 3, 7 | personally united to the Son ~of God, which union has
1614 3, 7 | graced us in His beloved Son"; thus we might say ~that
1615 3, 7 | from ~all eternity gave the Son, viz. the Divine Nature,
1616 3, 7 | certain gloss: "So that the Son may be as ~great as the
1617 3, 7 | with the ~Only-begotten Son of the Father; and to this
1618 3, 7 | union is the Person of the Son assuming human nature, Who
1619 3, 7 | Now the mission of the Son is prior, in the order of
1620 3, 7 | Ghost proceeds from the Son, and love from wisdom. Hence
1621 3, 7 | which the mission of the Son took place, is prior in ~
1622 3, 8 | conformable to the image of ~His Son; that He might be the first-born
1623 3, 8 | humanity of Christ by the Son of God; but that the devil
1624 3, 9 | As said above (Q[5]), the Son of God assumed an entire ~
1625 3, 9 | it ~was fitting that the Son of God should assume, not
1626 3, 9 | Whereas . . . He was the Son ~of God, He learned obedience
1627 3, 10 | belongs by nature to the Son of God belongs by ~grace
1628 3, 10 | belongs by ~grace to the Son of Man, as Augustine says (
1629 3, 10 | belongs by nature to the Son of God. ~Therefore it belongs
1630 3, 10 | belongs by grace to the Son of Man; and thus it seems
1631 3, 10 | in the one Person of the Son, yet ~the whole power of
1632 3, 10 | all that is said of the Son of God in His ~Divine Nature
1633 3, 10 | Nature is also said of the Son of Man on account of the
1634 3, 10 | it may be said that the Son of Man is a ~comprehensor
1635 3, 10 | we may also say that the Son of Man is the Creator.~Aquin.:
1636 3, 10 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the Son of God knew all things in
1637 3, 10 | angels in heaven nor the Son, but the Father." ~Therefore
1638 3, 10 | God, ~"because He is the Son of Man," as is said Jn.
1639 3, 10 | Divine knowledge of the Son, Whom ~they held to be less
1640 3, 10 | imparted this ~knowledge to the Son. Hence, by saying but the
1641 3, 10 | to ~understand that the Son knows, not merely in the
1642 3, 10 | and not of the natural Son ~of God.~Aquin.: SMT TP
1643 3, 12 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: The Son of God assumed a passible
1644 3, 13 | 32: "The power which the Son of God ~had naturally, the
1645 3, 13 | of man. Hence ~since the Son of God had omnipotence from
1646 3, 13 | omnipotence in ~time, which the Son of God had from eternity;
1647 3, 13 | Godhead) ~from that of the Son of God, but because there
1648 3, 14 | DEFECTS OF BODY ASSUMED BY THE SON OF GOD (FOUR ARTICLES)~We
1649 3, 14 | inquiry:~(1) Whether the Son of God should have assumed
1650 3, 14 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the Son of God in human nature ought
1651 3, 14 | It would seem that the Son of God ought not to have
1652 3, 14 | have ~been fitting that the Son of God assumed human nature
1653 3, 14 | Therefore it was fitting for the Son of God to assume ~flesh
1654 3, 14 | the body assumed by the Son of God to ~be subject to
1655 3, 14 | the ~human race that the Son of God, having taken flesh,
1656 3, 14 | to these ~defects, if the Son of God had assumed human
1657 3, 14 | that "God" sent "His own Son ~in the likeness of sinful
1658 3, 15 | in the man ~Christ the Son of God gave Himself to us
1659 3, 16 | Whether what belongs to the Son of Man may be predicated
1660 3, 16 | may be predicated of the Son ~of God, and conversely?~(
1661 3, 16 | Whether what belongs to the Son of Man may be predicated
1662 3, 16 | and what belongs to the Son of God of the human nature?~(
1663 3, 16 | Whether this is true: "The Son of God was made man"?~(7)
1664 3, 16 | that the Father is the Son, or conversely. Therefore
1665 3, 16 | inasmuch as they say that the Son of God assumed an imaginary
1666 3, 16 | stand for the Person of the Son of God, as was said in ~
1667 3, 16 | since the Person of the Son of God for Whom this word "
1668 3, 16 | stands for the Person of the Son of ~God.~Aquin.: SMT TP
1669 3, 16 | stand for the ~Person of the Son of God, Whom we say is a
1670 3, 16 | predicated ~of the Person of the Son of God, as was said in the
1671 3, 16 | predicated of the Person of the Son, because the ~Person of
1672 3, 16 | because the ~Person of the Son is not the Person of the
1673 3, 16 | stands ~for the Person of the Son.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
1674 3, 16 | which is the Person of ~the Son of God, because there is
1675 3, 16 | predicated essentially of the Son of God; and hence ~they
1676 3, 16 | nature is predicated ~of the Son of God, and of God. But
1677 3, 16 | this word "God" or "the Son of God"; or to the manhood
1678 3, 16 | the same ~is altogether Son of Man by His flesh, and
1679 3, 16 | His flesh, and altogether Son of God by the ~Godhead which
1680 3, 16 | Nature is predicated of the Son of ~God. Nevertheless, its
1681 3, 16 | certain things are said of the Son of God which are not said
1682 3, 16 | Nature; thus we say that the Son of God is born, yet we do
1683 3, 16 | Incarnation we say that the Son of God ~suffered, yet we
1684 3, 16 | stands for the Person of the ~Son of God. But this is false: "
1685 3, 16 | was made the Person of the Son of ~God." Therefore this
1686 3, 16 | for the bare Person of the Son of God, but ~inasmuch as
1687 3, 16 | was made the Person of the Son of God," yet this is true: "
1688 3, 16 | Scriptures, concerning His Son Who was made to Him of the
1689 3, 16 | Therefore man was made the Son of God.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
1690 3, 16 | viz. the Person of the Son of God, ~was eternally God,
1691 3, 16 | hypostasis or Person ~of the Son of God, Who was always God.
1692 3, 16 | refers to the Person of the Son of God ought not to be considered
1693 3, 16 | the flesh" was made the Son of God - and it is in ~this
1694 3, 16 | this meaning - that the "Son of God was made ~to Him ('
1695 3, 16 | flesh," as if to say "the Son ~of God having flesh of
1696 3, 16 | human nature ~was made the Son of God's."~Aquin.: SMT TP
1697 3, 16 | predicate of Christ whatever the Son of God became by the Incarnation. ~
1698 3, 16 | applies ~to the Person of the Son of God, as there can be
1699 3, 16 | pretended that the Person of the Son of God is a creature, and
1700 3, 16 | that you may know that ~the Son of Man hath power on earth
1701 3, 16 | Christ is the Person of the Son of God, ~to Whom it essentially
1702 3, 16 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The Son of Man has on earth the
1703 3, 16 | else than the Person of the Son of ~God. But if it be taken
1704 3, 16 | apart from the Person of the Son of God, so likewise it is
1705 3, 17 | of Person, the Father and Son are one, according to Jn. ~
1706 3, 17 | concrete, for we say ~that the Son of God, Who is signified
1707 3, 17 | individual properties, as "Son of ~God" implies one having
1708 3, 17 | mediator of God and man, the Son of God ~is one thing, and
1709 3, 17 | God ~is one thing, and the Son of Man another," he adds: "
1710 3, 17 | abstract of the Father and Son. But when it is said: "Christ
1711 3, 17 | which is the Person of the Son ~of God, does not reckon
1712 3, 17 | predicated of the Father and Son.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[17] A[
1713 3, 17 | Further, the being of the Son of God is the Divine Nature
1714 3, 17 | human nature accrued to the Son of God, not ~hypostatically
1715 3, 17 | nature is united to the Son of God, ~hypostatically
1716 3, 17 | The eternal being of the Son of God, which is the Divine ~
1717 3, 17 | nature is assumed ~by the Son of God to unity of Person.~
1718 3, 18 | it is manifest that the Son of God assumed a perfect
1719 3, 18 | Hence we must say that the Son of God ~assumed a human
1720 3, 18 | assumption ~of human nature the Son of God suffered no diminution
1721 3, 18 | Maxim. ii, 20): "Where the Son says to the Father, 'Not
1722 3, 18 | was said (Q[9], A[1]), the Son of God assumed human ~nature
1723 3, 18 | its species. Hence the Son of God must have assumed
1724 3, 18 | certain ~dispensation the Son of God before His Passion "
1725 3, 19 | But because Christ is ~the Son of God by nature, the eternal
1726 3, 19 | nature Christ is God and the Son of God, the ~Divine glory
1727 3, 19 | they shall deliver ~neither son nor daughter; but they shall
1728 3, 20 | subdued unto Him, then the Son also Himself shall be subject
1729 3, 20 | mentions both, that the Son is equal to the Father and
1730 3, 20 | Father greater than the Son, for the first is said on
1731 3, 20 | confessed Him to be God or the Son of God, learns ~that no
1732 3, 20 | Creator." And in this way the Son of God ~(Phil. 2:7) is said
1733 3, 20 | error of Arius, who held the Son to ~be less than the Father.~
1734 3, 20 | common to the Father and the Son: and then He will be totally
1735 3, 20 | human nature) ~"that the Son is less than Himself."~Aquin.:
1736 3, 20 | servant was so ~taken by the Son of God that the form of
1737 3, 20 | common to the Father and the Son, the Father is ~greater
1738 3, 20 | Father is ~greater than the Son in human nature. Therefore
1739 3, 20 | human nature. Therefore the Son is greater than ~Himself
1740 3, 20 | Father is the ~servant of the Son; otherwise not everything
1741 3, 20 | Father ~would belong to the Son. Therefore Christ is His
1742 3, 20 | Augustine says that "the Son is ~less than Himself."~
1743 3, 20 | Person, even as the name "Son," those things can be predicated ~
1744 3, 20 | Augustine asserts that the Son is less than, or subject
1745 3, 21 | us He ~prayed, lest the Son should be unknown." Secondly,
1746 3, 21 | deceived, nor think ~that the Son of God prays as a weakling,
1747 3, 21 | written (Phil. 2:7) that the Son of God in the ~nature that
1748 3, 21 | Jn. 17:1): ~"Glorify Thy Son."~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[21] A[
1749 3, 22 | the heavens, Jesus, ~the Son of God."~Aquin.: SMT TP
1750 3, 22 | which was since the Law, the Son Who ~is perfected for evermore." ~(
1751 3, 22 | be referred only to the ~Son of God. Therefore Christ
1752 3, 22 | he is "likened unto the ~Son of God," Who had no earthly
1753 3, 23 | can be called the adopted Son?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[23] A[
1754 3, 23 | anyone but a stranger as his son. But ~no one is a stranger
1755 3, 23 | man adopts someone as his son forasmuch as out of ~goodness
1756 3, 23 | conformable to the image of His ~Son."~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[23] A[
1757 3, 23 | 4:4,5,6): "God sent His Son . . . ~that we might receive
1758 3, 23 | hath sent the Spirit of His Son into your hearts, crying: '
1759 3, 23 | Him to adopt, Who has the Son and the ~Holy Ghost. But
1760 3, 23 | difference between an adopted son of God ~and the natural
1761 3, 23 | of God ~and the natural Son of God, that the latter
1762 3, 23 | Yet sometimes the adopted son is said to be ~begotten,
1763 3, 23 | Father doth, these the Son also doth in like manner."
1764 3, 23 | common to Him and to the Son and Holy ~Ghost: so that
1765 3, 23 | so that Christ is not the Son of the whole Trinity, as
1766 3, 23 | splendor of the Eternal Son by reason of the light of
1767 3, 23 | Father as its author; to the Son, ~as its exemplar; to the
1768 3, 23 | natural sonship. Now the Son of God proceeds ~naturally
1769 3, 23 | Christ as man is the adopted Son of God?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
1770 3, 23 | Christ as man is the adopted Son of God. For ~Hilary says (
1771 3, 23 | Christ as man is the adopted Son of God.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
1772 3, 23 | would seem ~to be an adopted son.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[23] A[
1773 3, 23 | dignity to be an adopted son than to be a servant. Therefore
1774 3, 23 | Christ, as man, an adopted Son.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[23] A[
1775 3, 23 | do not call an ~adopted son a natural son: the natural
1776 3, 23 | an ~adopted son a natural son: the natural son is a true
1777 3, 23 | natural son: the natural son is a true son." But Christ
1778 3, 23 | the natural son is a true son." But Christ is ~the true
1779 3, 23 | is ~the true and natural Son of God, according to 1 Jn.
1780 3, 23 | may . ~. . be in His true Son, Jesus Christ." Therefore
1781 3, 23 | Man, is not ~an adopted Son.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[23] A[
1782 3, 23 | belongs by nature to be ~the Son. But it has been said above (
1783 3, 23 | Christ, Who ~is the natural Son of God, can nowise be called
1784 3, 23 | nowise be called an adopted Son.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[23] A[
1785 3, 23 | being called the adopted ~Son of God.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
1786 3, 23 | nature to the Person of the Son.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[23] A[
1787 3, 23 | union Christ is the natural Son; whereas ~another man by
1788 3, 23 | habitual grace is an adopted son. Yet habitual grace in ~
1789 3, 23 | not make one who was not a son to be an adopted son, but
1790 3, 23 | not a son to be an adopted son, but is a ~certain effect
1791 3, 24 | Christ to be an adopted Son, as ~stated above (Q[23],
1792 3, 24 | The human ~nature is Son of God." In like manner
1793 3, 24 | for this person is the Son of God, not by grace, but
1794 3, 24 | predestinated to be the Son of God.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
1795 3, 24 | Christ was always God and the Son of God, it ~cannot be said
1796 3, 24 | that that Man was "made the Son of God." Therefore, for
1797 3, 24 | Christ was "predestinated the Son ~of God."~Aquin.: SMT TP
1798 3, 24 | Who ~was predestinated the Son of God in power."~Aquin.:
1799 3, 24 | all others is the natural Son of God, so in a singular ~
1800 3, 24 | grace of being united to the Son of God in unity of Person.~
1801 3, 24 | special ~reason. Because to be Son of God is not befitting
1802 3, 24 | The human nature is the Son of God": unless ~one were
1803 3, 24 | Who was predestinated ~the Son of God in power" - that
1804 3, 24 | should be united to the Son of God in the Person."~Aquin.:
1805 3, 24 | Who ~was predestinated the Son of God in power": so as
1806 3, 24 | He was predestinated the Son of God in power. For although
1807 3, 24 | considered in Himself, to be the Son of God in ~power, yet this
1808 3, 24 | Who was destined to be the Son of God in ~power"; so that
1809 3, 24 | to the fact of being the Son of God, but to the ~manifestation
1810 3, 24 | to be made ~known as the Son of God." But this is an
1811 3, 24 | although that Person ~was the Son of God from eternity, it
1812 3, 24 | in human nature was the Son of God. Hence Augustine
1813 3, 24 | the flesh was to be the son of David, should be nevertheless
1814 3, 24 | should be nevertheless Son of ~God in power."~Aquin.:
1815 3, 24 | that He began to be the Son of God, yet this is becoming
1816 3, 24 | in human nature was the Son of God; ~therefore this
1817 3, 24 | Christ was predestinated the Son of ~God" - is truer than
1818 3, 24 | this - "Christ was made the Son of God."~Aquin.: SMT TP
1819 3, 24 | predestinated to be ~the Son of God"?~Aquin.: SMT TP
1820 3, 24 | predestinated to be the Son of God." For at some time
1821 3, 24 | man was predestinated the Son of God, it seems to ~follow
1822 3, 24 | follow that as man He is the Son of God. But the latter is
1823 3, 24 | man, was predestinated the Son of God, it will follow that ~
1824 3, 24 | But this proposition, "The Son of God was made man," ~is
1825 3, 24 | this, "Man was made the Son of God." Therefore this ~
1826 3, 24 | proposition, "Christ, as the Son of God, was predestinated
1827 3, 24 | predestinated to be the Son of God."~Aquin.: SMT TP
1828 3, 24 | Forasmuch as ~God the Son was made Man, we say that
1829 3, 24 | united in Person to the Son of ~God. Consequently, by
1830 3, 24 | Man, was predestinated the Son of God."~Aquin.: SMT TP
1831 3, 24 | Man, was predestinated the Son of ~God," this qualification, "
1832 3, 24 | Christ, as Man, should be the Son of God. ~And in this sense
1833 3, 24 | and correctly called the Son of Man, ~because He assumed
1834 3, 24 | Men to Himself; and the Son of God, because it was the ~
1835 3, 24 | we can say both that the Son of God was predestinated
1836 3, 24 | to be man, and that ~the Son of Man was predestinated
1837 3, 24 | predestinated to be the Son of God. But because grace ~
1838 3, 24 | was not bestowed on the Son of God that He might be
1839 3, 24 | it might be united to the Son of God; it is more ~proper
1840 3, 24 | predestinated to be the Son of ~God," than that, "Christ,
1841 3, 24 | than that, "Christ, as Son of God, was predestinated
1842 3, 24 | Christ was ~predestinated "Son of God in power," as is
1843 3, 24 | predestinated to be the natural Son of God, ~whereas we are
1844 3, 24 | conformable to ~the image of His Son." Secondly, in respect of
1845 3, 24 | merits, was united to the Son ~of God: and of the fulness
1846 3, 24 | away; since even if the Son of God were not incarnate,
1847 3, 25 | being common to Father and Son; wherefore it is written (
1848 3, 25 | That ~all may honor the Son, as they honor the Father."
1849 3, 25 | latria." For no dutiful son honors that which dishonors ~
1850 3, 25 | inasmuch as it is united to the Son of God in Person. But this ~
1851 3, 25 | called "the Sign of the Son of ~Man" that "will appear
1852 3, 25 | Mother reflects on the Son." But the Son is worshiped
1853 3, 25 | reflects on the Son." But the Son is worshiped with the adoration ~
1854 3, 25 | the Mother reflects on her Son, because ~the Mother is
1855 3, 25 | is to be honored for her Son's sake. But not in the same
1856 3, 26 | denied, He be called the Son either of God alone, or ~
1857 3, 26 | God alone, or ~merely the Son of a man." But He is the
1858 3, 26 | of a man." But He is the Son of God and man, not as man, ~
1859 3, 26 | Ghost anything that the Son has not, so that He ~be
1860 3, 26 | supreme prerogative of ~her Son may be seen from the following
1861 3, 27 | what things the ~Incarnate Son of God did or suffered in
1862 3, 27 | born spiritually ~into a son of God according to Jn.
1863 3, 27 | thee, ~shall be called the Son of God." But the Blessed
1864 3, 27 | before she conceived the ~Son of God. But this can only
1865 3, 27 | when she ~conceived the Son of God, it was entirely
1866 3, 27 | might be conformed ~to her Son, from "whose fulness" her
1867 3, 27 | esteem, by means of her Son: and ~perchance she succumbed
1868 3, 27 | would ~have reflected on her Son. Secondly, because of the
1869 3, 27 | singular manner in which the Son of God, who is the "Divine
1870 3, 27 | to ~be "predestinated the Son of God in power . . . of
1871 3, 27 | through the presence of the Son of God Incarnate in her
1872 3, 27 | in ~the conception of the Son of God, she was entirely
1873 3, 27 | in the conception of the Son of God she received consummate ~
1874 3, 27 | is specially called the Son of David ~and of Abraham,
1875 3, 28 | proved that Christ was the Son of Abraham ~and David, through
1876 3, 28 | Gal. 4:4): "God sent His Son, made of a ~woman." But
1877 3, 28 | is the true and natural Son of God, it was not fitting
1878 3, 28 | befitting to a property of the Son Himself, Who is ~sent. For
1879 3, 28 | as it was supposed, the son of Joseph."~Aquin.: SMT
1880 3, 28 | father even of an adopted son not born of his wife."~Aquin.:
1881 3, 28 | adds: "and shall bear a son." This ~indeed was befitting
1882 3, 28 | brought forth her first-born Son." Now this conjunction ~"
1883 3, 28 | conformable to the image of His Son; that He ~might be the first-born
1884 3, 28 | the Father, being thus His Son in every ~respect perfect,
1885 3, 28 | should be the Only-begotten ~son of His Mother, as being
1886 3, 28 | not content with ~such a Son; and were she, of her own
1887 3, 28 | wife of Alphaeus, whose son was ~James the less, known
1888 3, 29 | fashion knew that He was the Son of God, makes no ~difficulty:
1889 3, 30 | the ~Incarnation of her Son to be announced to her.~
1890 3, 30 | she was to conceive the Son of ~God in her womb.~Aquin.:
1891 3, 30 | and shalt bring forth a son."~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[30] A[
1892 3, 30 | order in the union of the Son of God with the ~Virgin -
1893 3, 30 | spiritual wedlock ~between the Son of God and human nature.
1894 3, 30 | to Zachary that a prophet son would be born ~to him; and,
1895 3, 30 | apparition in which the Son of God appeared in the flesh.~
1896 3, 30 | who was to receive the Son of God not only in her mind,
1897 3, 31 | doth He" - that ~is, the Son of God - "take hold of the
1898 3, 31 | is said to have been the son especially of two of ~the
1899 3, 31 | 21:9): ~"Hosanna to the Son of David."~Aquin.: SMT TP
1900 3, 31 | in a most special way the Son ~of both, in order to show
1901 3, 31 | that Christ is not the Son of David, because He was
1902 3, 31 | says ~that Joseph was the son of Heli. Therefore they
1903 3, 31 | who was ~succeeded by his son Joas: who was succeeded
1904 3, 31 | who was succeeded by his son Amasius: after ~whom reigned
1905 3, 31 | after ~whom reigned his son Azarias, called Ozias; who
1906 3, 31 | who was succeeded by his son ~Joathan. But Matthew says
1907 3, 31 | as ~it was supposed) the son of Joseph." For among the
1908 3, 31 | is said by Luke to be the son of Heli: but that at the
1909 3, 31 | been supposed to be the son of Joseph, and also to have
1910 3, 31 | and also to have been ~the son of Heli as though (the Evangelist)
1911 3, 31 | the fact that He was the son of Joseph, could be called
1912 3, 31 | Joseph, could be called the son of Heli ~and of all those
1913 3, 31 | his married his ~wife, the son born of the latter union
1914 3, 31 | union being reckoned as the son of the ~former": which is
1915 3, 31 | different times, each begot a son of one and the ~same wife,
1916 3, 31 | first, and died, leaving one son, whose name was ~Jacob:
1917 3, 31 | his widow, who ~bore him a son, called Heli; so that Jacob
1918 3, 31 | the law, of whom he had a son, Joseph, who by nature was ~
1919 3, 31 | who by nature was ~his own son, but by law was accounted
1920 3, 31 | by law was accounted the son of Heli. Wherefore Matthew ~
1921 3, 31 | by carnal generation the ~Son of God became the Son of
1922 3, 31 | the ~Son of God became the Son of Man. Moreover he shows
1923 3, 31 | say that Joseph was the son of Heli as though begotten
1924 3, 31 | he says that Adam was the son of ~God, inasmuch as he
1925 3, 31 | is, Jechonias, father and son: both of whom are mentioned ~
1926 3, 31 | merits of Asa," who was son of his ~(Roboam's) son,
1927 3, 31 | was son of his ~(Roboam's) son, Abiam. "But the impiety
1928 3, 31 | Gal. 4:4): "God sent His Son, made of a ~woman."~Aquin.:
1929 3, 31 | answer that, Although the Son of God could have taken
1930 3, 31 | despise not yourselves: ~the Son of God became a man: despise
1931 3, 31 | not yourselves, women; the Son of ~God was born of a woman."~
1932 3, 31 | believes that Christ the Son of God was born of a virgin, ~
1933 3, 31 | flesh, suppose that the same Son of God was so shut up ~in
1934 3, 31 | Fide Orth. iii) that "the Son of ~God, from the Virgin'
1935 3, 31 | priest ~does not hinder his son, the bishop, from being
1936 3, 31 | the ~greater, and yet his son, if he be a bishop, is greater
1937 3, 32 | than to the Father or ~the Son.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[32] A[
1938 3, 32 | was come, God sent His Son, made of a woman"; which
1939 3, 32 | But the sending of the Son is especially attributed
1940 3, 32 | attributed ~principally to the Son, and not, therefore, to
1941 3, 32 | the ~love of Father and Son, as stated in the FP, Q[
1942 3, 32 | 37], A[1]. Now, that the ~Son of God took to Himself flesh
1943 3, 32 | to give His only-begotten Son."~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[32] A[
1944 3, 32 | nature was assumed by the Son of God into the unity of
1945 3, 32 | He Himself should be the Son of ~God."~Aquin.: SMT TP
1946 3, 32 | be the Holy one and the Son of God. Now, both of these
1947 3, 32 | sent the Spirit of ~His Son into your [Vulg.: 'our']
1948 3, 32 | so as to be the natural Son of God. Hence, according
1949 3, 32 | Who was predestinated the Son of God, in power," are ~
1950 3, 32 | thee shall be called the Son of God."~Aquin.: SMT TP
1951 3, 32 | regard to the Person of the Son, ~who by this conception
1952 3, 32 | nature) is attributed to the Son: but the formation of the
1953 3, 32 | of the body ~taken by the Son is attributed to the Holy
1954 3, 32 | Ghost is ~the Spirit of the Son, according to Gal. 4:6: "
1955 3, 32 | sent the Spirit of His ~Son." For just as the power
1956 3, 32 | Power of God, which is the Son Himself, according to 1
1957 3, 32 | Father, whose Power is the Son.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[32] A[
1958 3, 32 | flesh is attributed to the Son.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[32] A[
1959 3, 32 | Holy ~Ghost is done by the Son of God, because Theirs is
1960 3, 32 | habitude to Christ. For to the Son of God Himself, ~who is
1961 3, 32 | from his substance, as the Son who is from the Father;
1962 3, 32 | Holy Ghost, or also the Son, who is the Power of ~the
1963 3, 32 | Christ should be called the Son of the Holy Ghost, forasmuch ~
1964 3, 32 | the Holy Ghost not as a Son, and of the Virgin Mary
1965 3, 32 | of the Virgin Mary as a Son."~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[32] A[
1966 3, 32 | that fire generated ~is the son of the fire generating it,
1967 3, 32 | Nevertheless, the word "son" is not applied to everything
1968 3, 32 | generated in a man is his son; nor do we say ~that a man
1969 3, 32 | a man who is born is the son of the seed; for neither
1970 3, 32 | ways man can be ~called His son, both because he is created
1971 3, 32 | man. Now, Christ is the Son of God in the perfect sense
1972 3, 32 | ought not to be called the Son of God, either in respect
1973 3, 32 | reason of which He is the Son of the Father alone. ~Therefore
1974 3, 32 | should Christ be called the Son of the Holy Ghost, nor ~
1975 3, 32 | reason He is ~called her Son. But as man He was conceived
1976 3, 32 | Christ is not called the Son of ~the Holy Ghost.~Aquin.:
1977 3, 33 | part of the Person of the Son, whose body was being ~formed.
1978 3, 33 | not ~be attributed to the Son of God, since it is not
1979 3, 33 | assumed. And thus is the Son of God said to have been
1980 3, 33 | be attributed to the very Son of ~God, as we confess in
1981 3, 33 | For Christ is ~called the Son of Man by reason of His
1982 3, 33 | He is ~a true and natural Son of Man: as also is He the
1983 3, 33 | He the true and natural Son of ~God. Therefore His conception
1984 3, 33 | is said to be a natural Son of Man, by reason of His ~
1985 3, 33 | nature, through which He is a Son of Man, although He ~had
1986 3, 34 | thee shall be called the Son of God"; and (Jn. 10:36): "
1987 3, 34 | creates things through the Son, and the whole ~Trinity
1988 3, 34 | does not work through the Son as an instrument, which
1989 3, 35 | 5) Whether Christ is the Son of God the Father and of
1990 3, 35 | inasmuch as the Person of the Son was conceived and born in
1991 3, 35 | But the ~Person of the Son of God was perfect from
1992 3, 35 | way much more sublime, the Son of God was ~born as man,
1993 3, 35 | Yet we do not say that the Son of God began thus to ~exist:
1994 3, 35 | acknowledge the flesh of the Son of God to have been from
1995 3, 35 | We do ~not say that the Son of God had need, for His
1996 3, 35 | should Christ be called the Son of the Blessed Virgin.~Aquin.:
1997 3, 35 | predicated in common of Father, Son, ~and Holy Ghost. If, therefore,
1998 3, 35 | was the Mother of Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, ~which
1999 3, 35 | before this man were the Son of ~God, as Photinus said;
2000 3, 35 | only ~for the Person of the Son or of the Holy Ghost, as
1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-2000 | 2001-2380 |