Part, Question

 1   2, 70  | hundredfold, sixtyfold," and ~"thirtyfold." Therefore one should not
 2   2, 70  |    hundredfold, sixtyfold, and thirtyfold fruits do not ~differ as
 3   2, 70  |    said to be signified by the thirtyfold fruit; the contingency of ~
 4   2, 150 |      to ~which is ascribed the thirtyfold fruit. But according to
 5   2, 150 |  sixtyfold to virgins, and the thirtyfold to married persons." Wherefore ~
 6 Suppl, 93|   where He divides ~fruit into thirtyfold, sixtyfold, and hundredfold.
 7 Suppl, 93|       stars those who have the thirtyfold fruit." ~Now this difference
 8 Suppl, 93|       excess of sixtyfold over thirtyfold ~is not as the excess of
 9 Suppl, 93|      in Luc. iii, 8) that "the thirtyfold fruit is assigned to married ~
10 Suppl, 93|      conjugal ~continence, the thirtyfold fruit is awarded; to those