Part, Question

 1   1, 16  |      be understood while its ~intelligibility is not understood. Similarly,
 2   1, 28  |   only differs in its mode of intelligibility; as ~in relation is meant
 3   1, 85  |      3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Intelligibility is incompatible with the
 4   1, 87  |     in the highest degree of ~intelligibility, are likewise to us most
 5   1, 88  |     in the highest degree ~of intelligibility. Therefore much more can
 6   1, 88  |      are in a lower degree of intelligibility.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[89] A[
 7   3, 23  |       not on the part of its ~intelligibility: thus the form of a house
 8   3, 23  |    specific form, but not in ~intelligibility, because the material form
 9   3, 23  |     form, ~but also as to its intelligibility: thus the knowledge which
10 Suppl, 89| surpasses it in the point of ~intelligibility, since it is pure act without