1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-2000 | 2001-2303
Part, Question
1 1, 1 | above whatsoever we may ~say or think of Him. Thirdly,
2 1, 2 | not in space." Therefore I say that this proposition, "
3 1, 3 | individual matter - that is to say, to ~"this" matter - the
4 1, 3 | form about God ~when we say "God is," is true; and this
5 1, 3 | accurate, ~it is better to say that they are, not different,
6 1, 4 | not belong to God. For we say a ~thing is perfect if it
7 1, 4 | likeness. Thus we do not say that sweetness is like ~
8 1, 4 | which is ~caused." For, we say that a statue is like a
9 1, 6 | 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: When we say that good is what all desire,
10 1, 6 | different genera. Now we say that God is ~not in the
11 1, 6 | essentially, it is necessary to say ~that its goodness is not
12 1, 8 | in ~their nature, we must say absolutely that God is.~
13 1, 8 | Therefore it is ~superfluous to say that God is present in things
14 1, 8 | these it is necessary to say that ~God is in all things
15 1, 8 | these it is necessary to say that God is in all things
16 1, 8 | these it is necessary to say that He is in all things
17 1, 9 | wisdom to ~things; as when we say that the sun proceeds to
18 1, 10 | together; ~nevertheless, we may say that a day or an hour are
19 1, 10 | before" and "after." We say ~then that since eternity
20 1, 10 | accidental ~change. Now to say that an angel was, or is,
21 1, 10 | parts of ~time. But when we say that an angel is, or was,
22 1, 10 | power. ~Whereas when we say he will be, we do not as
23 1, 10 | exists on this subject. Some say there ~is only one aeviternity;
24 1, 10 | Body Para. 2/3~Now some say that there is only one time
25 1, 10 | it would be necessary to say ~that there is one aeviternity
26 1, 10 | s duration; and thus we say many aeviternities when
27 1, 11 | statement; therefore we must say that the "one" which is ~
28 1, 11 | follow that it is nugatory to say "being" is ~"one"; forasmuch
29 1, 12 | some like thing. ~Hence to say that God is seen by some
30 1, 12 | by some similitude, is to say that the ~divine essence
31 1, 12 | receiving, if it is right to say so, the whole ~beauty of
32 1, 12 | 1~OBJ 3: Further, if we say that He is seen as a "whole,"
33 1, 12 | both see that ~what you say is true, and we both see
34 1, 12 | we both see that what I say is true; where, I ~ask,
35 1, 12 | of prophecy. We may also say that ~Jacob spoke thus to
36 1, 13 | or whatever else we may say of that ~simplicity whereby
37 1, 13 | they assert that when we say that God lives, we mean
38 1, 13 | taught by Rabbi Moses. Others say that these names ~applied
39 1, 13 | cause of bodies. So also to say that He is a body ~implies
40 1, 13 | assuredly mean more than to say the He is the ~cause of
41 1, 13 | imperfectly. So when we say, "God is good," the meaning
42 1, 13 | in ~English]. So we must say that these kinds of divine
43 1, 13 | themselves, as if when we say "God ~lives," the sense
44 1, 13 | metaphorically, as ~when we say, God is a stone, or a lion,
45 1, 13 | are redundant, as ~when we say, "vesture clothing." Therefore
46 1, 13 | synonymous, we cannot properly say "good God" or the like,
47 1, 13 | apprehension of ~reason; as when we say a thing "the same as itself."
48 1, 13 | as for instance when we say, "Lord, Thou art ~become [
49 1, 13 | the opinion of ~those who say there are many suns. Therefore,
50 1, 13 | asked, "If they should ~say to me, What is His name?
51 1, 13 | is His name? what shall I say to them?" The Lord answered ~
52 1, 13 | answered ~him, "Thus shalt thou say to them, HE WHO IS hath
53 1, 13 | The same applies when I say, "man is an ~animal"; since
54 1, 14 | 5] Body Para. 3/3~So we say that God sees Himself in
55 1, 14 | R.O. 1 Para. 2/2~We must say therefore that God not only
56 1, 14 | 1~OBJ 2: Further, if we say that things infinite in
57 1, 14 | infinite things, as some say, for we ~do not say that
58 1, 14 | some say, for we ~do not say that the world is eternal,
59 1, 14 | present within Him, as some ~say; but because His glance
60 1, 14 | Para. 1/2~Reply OBJ 2: Some say that this antecedent, "God
61 1, 14 | On the ~other hand some say that this antecedent is
62 1, 14 | no purpose; for when we ~say, "God knew this contingent
63 1, 14 | does it follow, as some say, that the consequent is ~
64 1, 14 | soul. ~For example, when I say, "What the soul understands
65 1, 14 | in itself. Likewise if I say, "If God knew anything,
66 1, 14 | some urge an objection and say that this distinction holds
67 1, 14 | themselves. We may also say that "Lord", "Creator" ~
68 1, 14 | it was the same thing to ~say "Christ is born" and "will
69 1, 14 | on the contrary, we must say that perfect ~knowledge
70 1, 15 | being nor decay, yet ~we say that in accordance with
71 1, 15 | by matter, which, as some say, he held to be ~uncreated
72 1, 16 | knowable; even as we may say ~that a house is related
73 1, 16 | however, do not follow, if we say ~that the truth of things
74 1, 16 | its principle, that is to say, to the things from which
75 1, 16 | existed, it was not true to say ~that such a truth did exist,
76 1, 16 | eternal. But it is true now to say that that truth ~did not
77 1, 16 | it. Hence it is true ~to say that truth did not exist,
78 1, 16 | every change it is true to say that a thing is, or is not.
79 1, 17 | we find truth; that is to say, in the intellect. Now,
80 1, 17 | possessed by it; as if we should say ~that a diameter is a false
81 1, 17 | Jer. 8:5), that is to say, "an idol," as ~a gloss
82 1, 18 | first and remains last. We say then that an animal begins
83 1, 18 | Or it would be better to say that sensation and intelligence
84 1, 18 | the perfect, that is to say, of what is in act as stated
85 1, 18 | divine power; ~even as we say that things that are in
86 1, 18 | natural things, we must say that those things ~have
87 1, 19 | 13], A[4]). For when we say that God exists, no relation
88 1, 19 | as we do imply when we say that God wills. Therefore, ~
89 1, 19 | intellect has nothing to say to operation. ~But the power
90 1, 19 | Who would venture to say that God made ~all things
91 1, 19 | Yet it will be true to say ~that he wills to order
92 1, 19 | Thus, for example, we may say that God willed man to ~
93 1, 19 | will conversely. We may say, then, that God sometimes
94 1, 19 | His counsel" - that is to say, the counsel of His will. ~
95 1, 19 | It is better therefore to say ~that this happens on account
96 1, 20 | it is ~not admissible to say that God is placed outside
97 1, 20 | Therefore it is inadmissible to say that God loves ~things other
98 1, 20 | truth we must make ~bold to say even this, that He Himself,
99 1, 20 | this ~way we must needs say that God loves some things
100 1, 20 | more. For it is said: "I say to you that there ~shall
101 1, 20 | 4] R.O. 3 Para. 2/2~Some say that Peter loved Christ
102 1, 20 | mother to his care. Others ~say that it is uncertain which
103 1, 20 | and purity. ~While others say that Christ loved Peter
104 1, 21 | the ultimate end. We may say, for ~instance, that to
105 1, 22 | for oxen?']": and we may say the same of ~other irrational
106 1, 22 | Body Para. 2/2~We must say, however, that all things
107 1, 23 | election; whether, that is to ~say, the predestined are chosen?~(
108 1, 23 | has been so insane as to say that merit is the cause
109 1, 23 | predestination. We ~must say, therefore, that the effect
110 1, 23 | the matter. Thus we might say that God pre-ordained to
111 1, 23 | Wherefore one ought not to say that God is able ~not to
112 1, 23 | certain; as if we were to say ~that it was certain that
113 1, 23 | A[6]). Therefore we must say ~that to God the number
114 1, 23 | knowledge, ~because, that is to say, He knows how many will
115 1, 23 | that ~universe - that is to say, which have in some way
116 1, 23 | all the predestined, some say that so many men ~will be
117 1, 23 | is, however, ~better to say that, "to God alone is known
118 1, 23 | Para. 3/3~Wherefore we must say otherwise that in predestination
119 1, 24 | book of life: for we do not say that anyone is chosen to ~
120 1, 24 | relatively; that is to ~say, that it is in the ordination
121 1, 24 | customary in the Scriptures to say that something is done when
122 1, 25 | are identified. Or we may say, that the knowledge or will
123 1, 25 | the word 'all' when we ~say that God can do all things.
124 1, 25 | If, however, we were to say that ~God is omnipotent
125 1, 25 | Hence it ~is better to say that such things cannot
126 1, 25 | instance, if ~we were to say that God can do evil things
127 1, 25 | impossible: as if one were to say: "If man ~is a donkey, he
128 1, 25 | implies a contradiction to say that Socrates is sitting,
129 1, 25 | sitting, so does it to say that he sat, and did not
130 1, 25 | and did not sit. But to say that ~he did sit is to say
131 1, 25 | say that ~he did sit is to say that it happened in the
132 1, 25 | happened in the past. To say that he did not ~sit, is
133 1, 25 | that he did not ~sit, is to say that it did not happen.
134 1, 25 | not see that this is to say: If God is almighty let
135 1, 25 | some ~power, that is to say, some natural power; for
136 1, 25 | Wherefore ~we must simply say that God can do other things
137 1, 25 | In this manner, we must say that God can do other things
138 1, 27 | otherwise we could not say that the whole substance
139 1, 28 | of a ~principle. But to say that God is the principle
140 1, 28 | formal meaning, that is to say, in so far as its proper ~
141 1, 28 | of His substance, for we say some things relatively, ~
142 1, 29 | excluded. For we do not say that man in general is an
143 1, 29 | It is, however, better to say that substance is ~here
144 1, 29 | as, for example, we may say that fire is a ~simple,
145 1, 29 | 1~OBJ 2: Further, as we say there are three persons
146 1, 29 | three persons in God, so we say ~there are three subsistences
147 1, 29 | definition, and thus we say that the definition means
148 1, 29 | called ~"subsistence"; as we say that those things subsist
149 1, 29 | 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: As we say "three persons" plurally
150 1, 29 | subsistences," so the Greeks say "three hypostases." But
151 1, 29 | one should ever dare to say or think ~anything of the
152 1, 29 | the Creed of Athanasius we say: "One is the person ~of
153 1, 29 | There are some, however, who say that the ~definition of
154 1, 29 | Augustine says: "When we say there are three who bear
155 1, 29 | distinguishing adjective; as when we ~say, "Three persons," or, "one
156 1, 29 | itself. Thus it is true to say ~that the name "person"
157 1, 29 | indirectly. Thus we can say that this signification
158 1, 30 | hypostasis." So, as we say, "Three ~persons," they
159 1, 30 | Three ~persons," they say "Three hypostases." We are
160 1, 30 | however, accustomed to ~say Three substances, lest we
161 1, 30 | persons are immense, as we say in the ~Creed of Athanasius: "
162 1, 30 | says (De Fide i): "When we say one God, unity ~excludes
163 1, 30 | 3] Body Para. 4/5~But we say that numeral terms predicated
164 1, 30 | being. So, of whatever ~we say "one," we imply its undivided
165 1, 30 | Sent. i, D, 24). So when we say, ~the essence is one, the
166 1, 30 | undivided; and ~when we say the person is one, it signifies
167 1, 30 | undivided; and ~when we say the persons are many, we
168 1, 30 | we ask, ~"Three what?" we say, "Three persons," because
169 1, 30 | common to the three when we say "three persons"; for when
170 1, 30 | three persons"; for when we ~say "three men" we show that "
171 1, 30 | word "individual"; as we say that ~to be a "species"
172 1, 31 | Trinity";~(2) Whether we can say that the Son is other than
173 1, 31 | this account we ~cannot say that the Father is the Trinity,
174 1, 31 | persons numbered. So when we say, "Trinity in Unity," we
175 1, 31 | nature. On the other hand, we say ~"Unity in Trinity"; meaning
176 1, 31 | 1/1~Reply OBJ 5: When we say, "Trinity is trine," by
177 1, 31 | the Trinity; as when we say, "God is trine," it follows ~
178 1, 31 | uniqueness." ~Nevertheless, we say "the only Son," for in God
179 1, 31 | of ~Sons. Yet, we do not say "the only God," for the
180 1, 31 | and hence we can properly say that "the Son ~is other
181 1, 31 | essence. Thus ~we cannot say that the Son is diverse
182 1, 31 | alius]; and therefore we say ~that the Son is "other"
183 1, 31 | and not by the essence, we say that the ~Father is other
184 1, 31 | else; while conversely we ~say that they are one thing,
185 1, 31 | saints. Therefore we cannot say that God ~is alone.~Aquin.:
186 1, 31 | for, as we can properly say that God is wise, we can
187 1, 31 | that God is wise, we can say the Father is a ~wise God;
188 1, 31 | former, as it is false to ~say, "God alone is Father,"
189 1, 31 | white" to man, as when we say a "white man." If the term ~"
190 1, 31 | predicate. Thus, when we say, "Socrates alone writes,"
191 1, 31 | or predicate. For we can say, "Only Socrates" - that
192 1, 31 | sense it can be true to say that the Father is that
193 1, 31 | Likewise it is true to ~say God alone creates; nor,
194 1, 31 | because, as logicians say, an exclusive diction so
195 1, 31 | does not follow that if we say ~"Socrates alone is white,"
196 1, 31 | conversely. Therefore, when ~we say, The Father alone is God,
197 1, 31 | 1~I answer that, When we say, "The Father alone is God,"
198 1, 31 | says (De ~Trin. vi, 6): "We say the Father alone, not because
199 1, 31 | 1/2~Reply OBJ 1: When we say, "Thee the only true God,"
200 1, 31 | 1~Reply OBJ 4: We do not say absolutely that the Son
201 1, 32 | God, but that he wished to say that ~the ancients used
202 1, 32 | excludes the error of those who say that God produced things
203 1, 32 | things by ~necessity. When we say that in Him there is a procession
204 1, 32 | i): "We must not dare to say anything of God but what
205 1, 32 | Holy Scripture does not say ~anything concerning notions.
206 1, 32 | for instance, we do ~not say that paternity is wise or
207 1, 32 | for example, we do not say that paternity ~begets,
208 1, 32 | as we ~are accustomed to say, "I beseech your kindness" -
209 1, 32 | the concrete, as when we say Deity and God; or wisdom
210 1, 32 | personal names, so that we may say paternity and ~Father.~Aquin.:
211 1, 32 | signification. Hence we cannot say that paternity ~begets,
212 1, 32 | the notions; for we can say ~that paternity is eternal,
213 1, 32 | the notions; for we can say that paternity is God, ~
214 1, 32 | another, so that we can say that as the divine goodness
215 1, 32 | the ~persons; as we do not say that the attribute of power
216 1, 32 | knowledge, although we do say that knowledge is power.~
217 1, 33 | Metaph. iv). But we do not say that the ~Father is the
218 1, 33 | Son. Therefore we must not say that He is the ~principle
219 1, 33 | to each other; as when we say ~that a point is the principle
220 1, 33 | a line; or also when we say that the ~first part of
221 1, 33 | custom with the Greeks to say that the Son and ~the Holy
222 1, 33 | the ~whole Trinity; for we say "Our Father" to the whole
223 1, 33 | OBJ 1: Some there are who say that innascibility, signified
224 1, 33 | origin. We must ~therefore say with Augustine (De Trin.
225 1, 34 | word; thus we are wont to say, "this is the word I have
226 1, 34 | agent. ~Therefore when we say that word is knowledge,
227 1, 35 | is more absurd ~than to say that an image is referred
228 1, 35 | The Greek Doctors commonly say that the Holy Ghost is the ~
229 1, 35 | essential to image. Hence others say ~that the Holy Ghost cannot
230 1, 36 | When we ask, Three what? we say, Three ~persons." Therefore
231 1, 36 | reverse. Therefore we can say "our Father," and "our Spirit"; ~
232 1, 36 | Spirit"; ~but we cannot say "our Son."~Aquin.: SMT FP
233 1, 36 | i): "We must not dare to say anything ~concerning the
234 1, 36 | says (De Fide Orth. i): "We say that the Holy ~Ghost is
235 1, 36 | the Father; but ~we do not say that the Holy Ghost is from
236 1, 36 | Therefore it is superfluous to say that He proceeds from the
237 1, 36 | that it ~is necessary to say that either the Son is from
238 1, 36 | kind of origin; as when we say that a line proceeds from
239 1, 36 | Reply OBJ 1: We ought not to say about God anything which
240 1, 36 | excluded. So therefore when we say that the Holy Ghost proceeds
241 1, 36 | is it not superfluous to say He proceeds from the ~Son,
242 1, 36 | said ~conversely. For as we say that the king acts through
243 1, 36 | king. But we can ~never say that the Son spirates the
244 1, 36 | is a final ~cause when we say, for instance, that the
245 1, 36 | is a formal cause when we say that he works through his
246 1, 36 | is a motive cause when we say that he works through the
247 1, 36 | as, for instance, when we say, the artisan acts through
248 1, 36 | direct ~authority, as when we say, the king works through
249 1, 36 | indirect authority, as when we say, the bailiff works through ~
250 1, 36 | always true. For we do not say that the mallet works ~through
251 1, 36 | carpenter; whereas we can say that the bailiff acts through ~
252 1, 36 | supposita'; and hence we say that the ~Father spirates
253 1, 36 | Father. Therefore we cannot say ~that the Father and the
254 1, 36 | Ghost, it seems necessary to say, conversely, that the one
255 1, 36 | might be equally right to say that the Father is two principles
256 1, 36 | ways. Therefore, we must say ~that, although this word "
257 1, 36 | the spiration, then we may say that the Holy Ghost ~proceeds
258 1, 36 | other of them. For when we say the Father and the Son are ~
259 1, 36 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 7: Some say that although the Father
260 1, 36 | seems, however, better to say that because spirating is
261 1, 36 | spirator a substantive, we can say that the Father and the
262 1, 37 | subsistent. Therefore, when we say that the Holy Ghost is ~
263 1, 37 | in the ~same way we might say that "the Father understands
264 1, 37 | the ~effect that when we say, "the Father loves the Son
265 1, 37 | Wisdom begotten." Others say that ~the proposition is
266 1, 37 | Holy Ghost. Others further say that ~this ablative should
267 1, 37 | as Love. Others, again, say that ~this ablative must
268 1, 37 | each other. Others, again, say that it should be construed ~
269 1, 37 | relation of form. So when ~I say, "this man is clothed with
270 1, 37 | idea of the action. For we say that fire ~warms by heating,
271 1, 37 | proceeding from the fire; and we say that a ~tree flowers with
272 1, 37 | way, therefore, we ~must say that since in God "to love"
273 1, 37 | Trin. xv, 7): "Who dares to say that the Father ~loves neither
274 1, 37 | flowers. As therefore we say that a tree flowers by ~
275 1, 37 | by ~its flower, so do we say that the Father, by the
276 1, 37 | God; ~therefore we cannot say that "the Father is wise
277 1, 37 | and in this way, we can say that the Father and the
278 1, 37 | from the effect; so we can say, for instance, that a tree
279 1, 37 | the action. ~For we do not say that the tree produces the
280 1, 37 | of the flower. So when we say, "spirates" or "begets," ~
281 1, 37 | notional act. Hence we cannot say that the Father ~spirates
282 1, 37 | begets by the Son. But we can say that the ~Father speaks
283 1, 38 | than yourself?" Or we might say, and more fittingly, that
284 1, 39 | person?~(2) Whether we should say that the three persons are
285 1, 39 | De Trin. vi, 7): "When we say the ~person of the Father
286 1, 39 | would seem not right to say that the three persons are
287 1, 39 | It ~suffices therefore to say that the three persons are
288 1, 39 | Further, it is not usual to say that the person is of the ~
289 1, 39 | does ~not seem fitting to say that the three persons are
290 1, 39 | vii, 6) that we do not say that ~the three persons
291 1, 39 | Therefore it is equally wrong to say that the three persons are "
292 1, 39 | occasion of ~error. Now, to say that the three persons are
293 1, 39 | signification. Now in ~creatures we say that every form belongs
294 1, 39 | to the man. But we do not say ~of that which has a form,
295 1, 39 | qualifies the form; as when we say: "That woman is of a ~handsome
296 1, 39 | which it is the form, as we say "the virtue of ~Peter."
297 1, 39 | as, for instance, when we say, "Peter is of great virtue [
298 1, 39 | the ~person; but we cannot say the converse, unless we
299 1, 39 | immaterial things. So, when we say, "three persons of one ~
300 1, 39 | intellectual ~nature. But we say there are three persons.
301 1, 39 | the same reason we can ~say there are "three Gods."~
302 1, 39 | they adjectives. For we say that ~many men are a college,
303 1, 39 | army, or a people; but we say that many men ~are collegians.
304 1, 39 | then, is the reason ~why we say that Socrates, Plato and
305 1, 39 | men"; whereas we do ~not say the Father, Son and Holy
306 1, 39 | plurality of "supposita." For we say there are three "existent"
307 1, 39 | a substantive sense, we say "one uncreated, immense,
308 1, 39 | person, so that we can truly say "God begot God." For, as
309 1, 39 | For, as the ~logicians say, "a singular term signifies
310 1, 39 | the predicate. But when I say, "God creates," this name "
311 1, 39 | the essence. So when we say "God begot," this term "
312 1, 39 | Therefore it is false to ~say, "God begot God."~Aquin.:
313 1, 39 | the essence, as when ~we say "God creates"; because this
314 1, 39 | for only one, as when we say, "God begets," ~or for two,
315 1, 39 | or for two, as when we say, "God spirates"; or for
316 1, 39 | holds good against those who say that the word "God" ~does
317 1, 39 | some adjunct, ~as when we say, "man is a species"; whereas
318 1, 39 | the person. So, when we say, "God ~generates," by reason
319 1, 39 | the Father. But when we say, "God does not generate,"
320 1, 39 | instance, if we were to say, "the Father is God the ~
321 1, 39 | Likewise also it is false to say, "He begot ~another God,"
322 1, 39 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 5: To say, "God begot God Who is God
323 1, 39 | so that it is better to say simply that the affirmative ~
324 1, 39 | was shown, it is true ~to say that "God begets God." Therefore
325 1, 39 | asserting ~that as we can say "God begot God," so we can
326 1, 39 | God begot God," so we can say "Essence begot ~essence":
327 1, 39 | as, for instance, we can say "God is ~begotten" or is "
328 1, 39 | Whence ~logicians are wont to say that the substantive is
329 1, 39 | substantive. We cannot say that the "essence is begetting";
330 1, 39 | begetting"; yet we can ~say that the "essence is a thing
331 1, 39 | collective term. So when we say, ~"the Father is the principle
332 1, 39 | of himself. We may also say that He is the principle
333 1, 39 | essential names; so that we can say for instance, "God is three ~
334 1, 39 | Trinity." For it is false to say, "man is every ~man," because
335 1, 39 | is the Holy Ghost. So to say, "God is ~the Trinity,"
336 1, 39 | accidental predication; as when I say, "animal is man"; for it
337 1, 39 | essence ~as if we were to say, "The essence is the Father,
338 1, 39 | hence, as it is true to say, ~"The essence is the three
339 1, 39 | so likewise it is true to say, "God ~is the three persons."~
340 1, 39 | nature. So it is false to say, "Man is every man"; because
341 1, 39 | essence. So, although to ~say of any of the "supposita"
342 1, 39 | 1/2~Reply OBJ 2: When we say, "God," or "the divine essence
343 1, 39 | power; for instance, we say that ~the strong work done
344 1, 39 | intermediate cause; thus we may say that a smith works "by" ~
345 1, 39 | an agent works; thus we say that an ~artificer works
346 1, 39 | points of inquiry, we can say that since "truth" ~belongs
347 1, 39 | for instance, were we to say, "The Son is ~the begotten '
348 1, 39 | not a person; as we may say, "this ~stone," and "this
349 1, 40 | of His property. For we say that the Father begets; ~
350 1, 40 | A[2]). We must, however, say that there are properties
351 1, 40 | it is the form, we must say that the ~properties are
352 1, 40 | are the persons; as we ~say that the essence is in God,
353 1, 40 | by origin, so that we may say ~that the Father is distinguished
354 1, 40 | It is therefore better to say that the persons or hypostases
355 1, 40 | Augustine does not mean to say that the hypostasis of the ~
356 1, 40 | constituted, we must absolutely say that the ~relations in our
357 1, 40 | notional acts, so ~that we can say, without qualifying the
358 1, 40 | it would be necessary to say ~conversely that because
359 1, 41 | only concomitance, as I can say that I am a man by my ~will -
360 1, 41 | it is said: "If anyone say that the Son was made by
361 1, 41 | generated therefrom just as we ~say, "The man is white," since
362 1, 41 | 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: When we say that the Son was born of
363 1, 41 | 1/2~Reply OBJ 2: When we say the Son is begotten of the
364 1, 41 | Trin. xv, 13): "When I ~say of the Father Who is essence,
365 1, 41 | of the words. ~For we can say that the creature is from
366 1, 41 | consubstantiality. We do not say that a house is "of" [de]
367 1, 41 | consubstantial cause. We can say, however, that ~something
368 1, 41 | accidental to another, for we can say that ~an angel is "of" an
369 1, 41 | nature. In this way, then, we say that ~the Son is begotten '
370 1, 41 | 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: When we say that the Son is begotten
371 1, 41 | distinction. But when we say that ~the three persons
372 1, 41 | 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: When we say "Wisdom was created," this
373 1, 41 | Therefore, from the fact that we say ~that the divine essence "
374 1, 41 | would follow if we were to say that the divine essence ~
375 1, 41 | indirectly: just as if I were to say, the ~"essence of the Father."
376 1, 41 | Augustine does not mean to say by those words that the
377 1, 42 | perfect equality, therefore we say not only that the Son is
378 1, 42 | conversely, for this reason we say that the Son is equalled
379 1, 42 | further relation: for when we say that ~paternity is opposed
380 1, 42 | from the Father, we must say that He is less than the
381 1, 42 | 1~I answer that, We must say that the Son is co-eternal
382 1, 42 | permanence of eternity, we can say that "He is ever ~being
383 1, 42 | 7] said, it is better to say "ever ~born," so that "ever"
384 1, 42 | and ~filiation. Nor can we say that the power of generation
385 1, 42 | change. Therefore we must say that the Son was eternally ~
386 1, 42 | filiation. It is thus true to say that the Son possesses whatever
387 1, 42 | giving" signified when we say that He is able to beget;
388 1, 43 | only temporal. Or we may say that it includes the eternal
389 1, 43 | the error of ~those who say that the Holy Ghost is not
390 1, 43 | opinions on this point. Some say that ~the divine person
391 1, 44 | objection has led some to say that what is necessary ~
392 1, 44 | thus ~it is necessary to say that also primary matter
393 1, 44 | things. And therefore we must say that ~in the divine wisdom
394 1, 45 | material cause; as when we say that a statue ~is made from
395 1, 45 | improvement in things; as when we ~say that a bishop is created.
396 1, 45 | only ~order; as when we say, "from morning comes midday"--
397 1, 45 | negation implied when I say the word "nothing," or can
398 1, 45 | anything" - as if we were to say, "He speaks of nothing,"
399 1, 45 | but it is necessary to say that all things were created
400 1, 45 | Hence it is ~necessary to say that God brings things into
401 1, 45 | way of speaking when we say that "the ~first visible
402 1, 45 | added perfection; as we may say that a ~superior angel illuminates
403 1, 45 | Nor ~is it necessary to say that their forms are created
404 1, 46 | which we have nothing to say from reason, as, "whether
405 1, 46 | especially about heaven. But we say that matter and heaven were
406 1, 46 | Hence it is correct to say ~that it introduces the
407 1, 46 | But it is not correct to say so ~of God Who produces
408 1, 46 | whereas it is correct to ~say of Him that He produces
409 1, 46 | of eternity. Or we may ~say that it signifies the eternity
410 1, 46 | existing; thus, when we say that above heaven there
411 1, 46 | the ~world, we should not say that the world was produced
412 1, 46 | Further, if it is necessary to say that the world was made
413 1, 46 | article of ~faith; for we say, "I believe in one God,"
414 1, 46 | illumination. Hence they say that it does not follow
415 1, 46 | Reply OBJ 2: Those who would say that the world was eternal,
416 1, 46 | world was eternal, would say ~that the world was made
417 1, 46 | above (Q[7], A[4]). Some say that the soul is corrupted
418 1, 46 | with the body. ~And some say that of all souls only one
419 1, 46 | particular case. Hence one might say that the world was eternal,
420 1, 47 | Para. 5/6~Hence we must say that the distinction and
421 1, 47 | be more foolish than to say that the divine Architect ~
422 1, 47 | 46), it is unfitting to say that ~God has created things
423 1, 47 | matter. Thus as ~when I say "man" I mean the form, and
424 1, 47 | mean the form, and when I say "this man," I mean the ~
425 1, 47 | form in matter; so when we say "world," the form is signified,
426 1, 47 | signified, and when ~we say "this world," the form in
427 1, 48 | way, ~formally, as when we say that whiteness makes white;
428 1, 48 | invokes woe to those who say that good as such ~is evil.
429 1, 48 | poena." In this sense we say "Pain of death, Pain of
430 1, 49 | instance, if one should ~say that the nature of fire
431 1, 49 | evil is impossible. And ~to say that evil is in the greater
432 1, 50 | angels; and this is what some say, that an angel ~is composed
433 1, 50 | anything else; as if we were to say, for example, that whiteness ~
434 1, 50 | noblest in them - that is to say, in intellectuality. ~Therefore
435 1, 50 | degrees; for instance, if we say that fire ~is more perfect
436 1, 51 | Origen, while refusing to say such a thing of God, followed
437 1, 53 | nows" of time: hence they say that a last "now" ~cannot
438 1, 53 | Consequently it is impossible to say ~that he is in any place
439 1, 54 | something for certain, to say that we "sense it." And
440 1, 55 | precisely the same thing to say ~"in things which are without
441 1, 55 | object understood," as to say that "the intellect in act
442 1, 55 | substances - that ~is to say, human souls - have a power
443 1, 55 | in ~one thing, that is to say, in the Divine essence,
444 1, 56 | furthermore they," that is to say the ~angels, "knew their
445 1, 57 | the text of Eccles. 5:5: "Say not before the angel: There
446 1, 57 | nature, it is unreasonable to say that a man knows by any
447 1, 57 | pronounces it ~ridiculous to say that a discord, which is
448 1, 58 | intellectual operation; that is to say, ~as they advance from one
449 1, 58 | follows, then, that when we say "in their ~proper nature"
450 1, 58 | of knowledge; that is to say, that the evening knowledge
451 1, 59 | him who wills; that is to say, in God, Who wills nothing ~
452 1, 60 | nature by its Author. To say that a natural inclination
453 1, 61 | De Fide Orth. ii): "Some ~say that the angels were begotten
454 1, 61 | was nothing," unless we say ~"Before which there was
455 1, 62 | as ~also, if one were to say that he had grace in any
456 1, 62 | Consequently it is better to say that the angel had grace
457 1, 62 | day. Hence some writers say that they can merit as to
458 1, 62 | reward. But it is better to say that the Blessed can in
459 1, 63 | bodies. But ~philosophers say that there cannot be evil
460 1, 63 | proper order, that is ~to say, that he may obtain it of
461 1, 63 | Manichean ~heretics who say that the devil's nature
462 1, 63 | beginning ~of sin": that is to say, because he never went back
463 1, 63 | Reply OBJ 4: It is true to say that there is a middle time
464 1, 64 | upon the demons which, we say, have not been changed at
465 1, 64 | immovably. So it is customary to say that man's free-will is
466 1, 64 | demons. But it is better to say that the same judgment is
467 1, 64 | in the same way as ~we say that the bishop's honor
468 1, 65 | good" (Gn. 1), as if to say that everything was brought
469 1, 65 | intellect only. Thus they say that from forms existing
470 1, 65 | heretics of modern times, ~who say that God indeed created
471 1, 65 | understands the angels, we say that from them come material ~
472 1, 66 | understand it ~we cannot say that the formlessness of
473 1, 66 | act itself is a form. To say, then, that matter preceded,
474 1, 66 | but ~without form, is to say that being existed actually,
475 1, 66 | creation. Accordingly ~they say that the formlessness of
476 1, 66 | in the contrary sense, we say that if, ~according to some
477 1, 66 | the second argument, we say that certain of the ancient ~
478 1, 66 | successive ~forms - that is to say, it would be corruption,
479 1, 66 | Para. 3/3~Neither can we say, as Averroes [*De Substantia
480 1, 66 | fifth essence. Or we may say that formless matter is
481 1, 66 | blessed. Strabus and Bede ~say that as soon as created
482 1, 66 | intervening heavens), we may also say that the empyrean has light,
483 1, 67 | in two ways - that is to say, either ~in its original
484 1, 67 | the ~other senses. Thus we say, "Seeing how it tastes,"
485 1, 67 | form. But unless we are to say that darkness is a body, ~
486 1, 67 | Also it would be absurd to say that a body of so great
487 1, 67 | Body Para. 2/2~We must say, then, that as heat is an
488 1, 67 | light. ~Augustine seems to say (De Civ. Dei xi, 9,33) that
489 1, 67 | production of light, that is to say, of spiritual ~light. For
490 1, 67 | endure. We ~cannot, then, say that what was made at that
491 1, 67 | But this is as much as to say that it is superfluous,
492 1, 68 | A[1] Body Para. 2/8~We say, therefore, that the words
493 1, 68 | because its parts are, so ~to say, not in disunion, but in
494 1, 68 | the same way as one might say: ~"This house was constructed
495 1, 68 | 1 Para. 2/3~We may also say that the heaven recorded
496 1, 68 | which the rain falls. But to say, as ~some writers alluded
497 1, 68 | Nor ~is it less absurd to say, in support of this opinion,
498 1, 68 | by Aristotle, that is to say, that the ~waters surrounding
499 1, 68 | those ~within - that is to say, from all bodies under the
500 1, 68 | air as attendant, so to ~say, upon the water. For it
1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-2000 | 2001-2303 |