1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-2000 | 2001-2098
Part, Question
501 1, 32 | Reply OBJ 2: The divine essence is signified as a reality;
502 1, 32 | God is one by unity ~of essence, and trine by trinity of
503 1, 33 | by ~relation but also by essence. Therefore the name "Father"
504 1, 33 | for it belongs to the essence of a generator to generate
505 1, 33 | neither is the ~divine essence. Therefore to be unbegotten
506 1, 33 | unbegotten belongs also to the essence; ~thus it is not proper
507 1, 33 | it belong to the divine ~essence, of which it may be said
508 1, 34 | creatures, so far as the essence is included in its meaning: ~
509 1, 34 | themselves, but by His own essence. Hence it is not ~necessary
510 1, 36 | there ~would not be one essence of the three persons: since
511 1, 36 | belongs to the unity of essence. ~Therefore it must be said
512 1, 36 | God, but by reason of the essence. Hence, ~as the Father is
513 1, 36 | persons, but as united in essence. It ~seems, however, better
514 1, 37 | is applied only to ~the essence; because it does not import
515 1, 37 | to love" are said of the essence, as ~"understanding" and "
516 1, 37 | as it means the ~divine essence, as was said above (here
517 1, 37 | and this belongs to the essence. Therefore this ~also is
518 1, 37 | Holy Ghost, but by their essence. ~Hence Augustine says (
519 1, 38 | name belongs to the divine essence. But the ~divine essence
520 1, 38 | essence. But the ~divine essence is the Gift which the Father
521 1, 38 | Reply OBJ 2: The divine essence is the Father's gift in
522 1, 38 | essential in its meaning; as the essence is included ~in the idea
523 1, 39 | PERSONS IN RELATION TO THE ESSENCE (EIGHT ARTICLES)~Those things
524 1, 39 | person in reference to the essence, to ~the properties, and
525 1, 39 | inquiry:~(1) Whether the essence in God is the same as the
526 1, 39 | three persons are of one essence?~(3) Whether essential names
527 1, 39 | 1/1~Whether in God the essence is the same as the person?~
528 1, 39 | would seem that in God the essence is not the same as person. ~
529 1, 39 | as person. ~For whenever essence is the same as person or "
530 1, 39 | But in God there is ~one essence and three persons, as is
531 1, 39 | Q[30], A[2]). Therefore essence is not the same as person.~
532 1, 39 | and negation are true ~of essence and of person. For person
533 1, 39 | person is distinct, whereas essence is not. ~Therefore person
534 1, 39 | not. ~Therefore person and essence are not the same.~Aquin.:
535 1, 39 | But person is subject ~to essence; whence it is called "suppositum"
536 1, 39 | person is not the same as essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
537 1, 39 | simplicity requires that in God essence is the same as ~"suppositum,"
538 1, 39 | persons are multiplied, the essence nevertheless retains its ~
539 1, 39 | have thought that in God essence and person ~differ, forasmuch
540 1, 39 | God they are the divine ~essence itself. Thence it follows
541 1, 39 | Thence it follows that in God essence is not really ~distinct
542 1, 39 | relation as referred to ~the essence does not differ therefrom
543 1, 39 | opposition. Thus there are one essence and ~three persons.~Aquin.:
544 1, 39 | supposita"; and yet the essence is not distinguished, ~because
545 1, 39 | are identified with the essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
546 1, 39 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: As essence and person in God differ
547 1, 39 | three persons are of one essence?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
548 1, 39 | three persons are of one ~essence. For Hilary says (De Synod.)
549 1, 39 | substance of ~God is His essence. Therefore the three persons
550 1, 39 | three persons are not of one essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
551 1, 39 | and Holy Ghost are ~of one essence. Therefore this should not
552 1, 39 | is the same as the divine essence. It ~suffices therefore
553 1, 39 | that the person is of the ~essence; but rather that the essence
554 1, 39 | essence; but rather that the essence is of the person. Therefore
555 1, 39 | three persons are of one essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
556 1, 39 | three persons are "from one essence [ex una essentia]," lest
557 1, 39 | distinction between the essence and the persons ~in God.
558 1, 39 | three persons are "of ~one essence [unius essentiae]."~Aquin.:
559 1, 39 | three persons are of one essence or ~substance, furnishes
560 1, 39 | three persons are of one essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
561 1, 39 | form; so also in God the essence is taken as the form ~of
562 1, 39 | are multiplied, and the essence is not multiplied, we ~speak
563 1, 39 | multiplied, we ~speak of one essence of the three persons, and
564 1, 39 | three persons of the one ~essence, provided that these genitives
565 1, 39 | hypostasis," and not for ~the essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
566 1, 39 | three persons are of one essence, nevertheless we ~find it
567 1, 39 | principle of action while ~"essence" comes from being [essendo],
568 1, 39 | can be said to be of "one essence" which have one ~being.
569 1, 39 | three ~persons are "of one essence," than by saying they are "
570 1, 39 | So, because the divine essence signifies a form ~as regards
571 1, 39 | properly be said that the essence is of the ~person; but we
572 1, 39 | some term to ~designate the essence; as, for instance, the Father
573 1, 39 | a person of the ~"divine essence"; or, the three persons
574 1, 39 | three persons are "of one essence."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
575 1, 39 | three persons of one ~essence," taking essence as having
576 1, 39 | of one ~essence," taking essence as having the habitude of
577 1, 39 | form, we do not mean ~that essence is different from person,
578 1, 39 | three persons from the same essence."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
579 1, 39 | essential names signify the essence after the manner ~of substantives;
580 1, 39 | Those which signify ~the essence as adjectives are predicated
581 1, 39 | collegians. Now in God the divine essence is signified by way of a ~
582 1, 39 | which signify ~the divine essence in a substantive manner
583 1, 39 | there is but one divine ~essence. On the other hand, the
584 1, 39 | the names which signify essence in an ~adjectival manner
585 1, 39 | the word "person" is not essence or ~nature, but personality.
586 1, 39 | since it signifies the ~essence, it stands for essence,
587 1, 39 | essence, it stands for essence, and not for person.~Aquin.:
588 1, 39 | name "God" stands for ~the essence. So when we say "God begot,"
589 1, 39 | their nature, stand for the essence, but by reason ~of some
590 1, 39 | God" signifies the divine essence as in ~Him Who possesses
591 1, 39 | sometimes stands for the essence, as when ~we say "God creates";
592 1, 39 | not always stand for the essence it ~signifies.~Aquin.: SMT
593 1, 39 | God" - that is, the divine essence - is really one and common.
594 1, 39 | this proposition is true, "Essence begets essence." For ~Augustine
595 1, 39 | is true, "Essence begets essence." For ~Augustine says (De
596 1, 39 | Wisdom, because they are one essence; and taken singly Wisdom
597 1, 39 | Wisdom is from ~Wisdom, as essence from essence."~Aquin.: SMT
598 1, 39 | Wisdom, as essence from essence."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
599 1, 39 | Therefore ~since the divine essence is in the Son, it seems
600 1, 39 | it seems that the divine essence ~is generated.~Aquin.: SMT
601 1, 39 | Further, God and the divine essence are the same, as is clear ~
602 1, 39 | Therefore this is also true: "Essence ~begets essence."~Aquin.:
603 1, 39 | also true: "Essence ~begets essence."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
604 1, 39 | the Father is the divine essence; therefore essence can ~
605 1, 39 | divine essence; therefore essence can ~stand for the person
606 1, 39 | of the Father. Thus the essence begets.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
607 1, 39 | 1/1~OBJ 5: Further, the essence is "a thing begetting,"
608 1, 39 | begetting," because the essence ~is the Father who is begetting.
609 1, 39 | begetting. Therefore if the essence is not ~begetting, the essence
610 1, 39 | essence is not ~begetting, the essence will be "a thing begetting,"
611 1, 39 | begets ~itself." But if the essence begets the essence, it begets
612 1, 39 | if the essence begets the essence, it begets itself only, ~
613 1, 39 | distinguished from the divine essence. ~Therefore the essence
614 1, 39 | essence. ~Therefore the essence does not beget essence.~
615 1, 39 | the essence does not beget essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
616 1, 39 | begot God," so we can say "Essence begot ~essence": considering
617 1, 39 | can say "Essence begot ~essence": considering that, by reason
618 1, 39 | nothing else but the divine essence. In this he was wrong, because
619 1, 39 | God" signifies the divine essence in Him that possesses ~it,
620 1, 39 | explained (A[4]). The word ~"essence," however, in its mode of
621 1, 39 | because it signifies the essence as an abstract form. ~Consequently,
622 1, 39 | cannot be attributed to the essence. For ~that would imply distinction
623 1, 39 | distinction in the divine essence, in the same way as ~there
624 1, 39 | OBJ 1: To express unity of essence and of person, the holy
625 1, 39 | names; ~as when we find "essence from essence"; or "wisdom
626 1, 39 | when we find "essence from essence"; or "wisdom from wisdom";
627 1, 39 | to be, "the Son" who is essence and wisdom, is from ~the
628 1, 39 | from ~the Father who is essence and wisdom. Nevertheless,
629 1, 39 | are less inexact than "essence from essence."~Aquin.: SMT
630 1, 39 | inexact than "essence from essence."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
631 1, 39 | Although God and the divine essence are really the same, ~nevertheless,
632 1, 39 | Reply OBJ 4: The divine essence is predicated of the Father
633 1, 39 | can be predicated of the essence, because they are really
634 1, 39 | property makes a distinct essence; but it belongs to the ~"
635 1, 39 | cannot be predicated of the essence unless we add some ~substantive.
636 1, 39 | We cannot say that the "essence is begetting"; yet we can ~
637 1, 39 | yet we can ~say that the "essence is a thing begetting," or
638 1, 39 | but not if they stand ~for essence. Consequently there exists
639 1, 39 | contradiction in saying that ~"essence is a thing begetting," and "
640 1, 39 | second it stands ~for the essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
641 1, 39 | cannot be predicated of the essence, ~nevertheless substantive
642 1, 39 | to the real ~identity of essence and person. The divine essence
643 1, 39 | essence and person. The divine essence is not only really the ~
644 1, 39 | can be predicated of the essence ~as if we were to say, "
645 1, 39 | if we were to say, "The essence is the Father, and the Son,
646 1, 39 | of itself stand for the ~essence, as above explained (A[4],
647 1, 39 | it is true to say, ~"The essence is the three persons"; so
648 1, 39 | be taken for the divine essence. So, although to ~say of
649 1, 39 | it is true of the divine essence. This was denied ~by Porretanus
650 1, 39 | say, "God," or "the divine essence is the Father," ~the predication
651 1, 39 | wisdom which is His ~own essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
652 1, 39 | belongs to the operation. But essence and operation ~are not found
653 1, 39 | to ~the persons, but not essence or operation; because, being
654 1, 39 | meaning, are ~referred to the essence, and not to the persons,
655 1, 39 | by another is not of the essence of a book considered ~as
656 1, 39 | and stands for the divine essence, the latter ~may be designated
657 1, 40 | relation would be also in the essence. Therefore relation, or
658 1, 40 | existing in God, is the divine essence Itself, and ~the essence
659 1, 40 | essence Itself, and ~the essence is the same as person, as
660 1, 40 | persons; as we ~say that the essence is in God, and yet is God.~
661 1, 40 | attributed to God, is His essence Itself; and ~so, wisdom
662 1, 40 | are both in the ~divine essence. According to this twofold
663 1, 40 | attributed to God is His ~own essence. Thus, common spiration
664 1, 40 | but that as there is one essence in the two persons, so also ~
665 1, 40 | properties are said to be in the essence, only by mode ~of identity;
666 1, 40 | the ~persons, but not the essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[40] A[
667 1, 40 | persons agree in the unity of essence, we must seek to ~know the
668 1, 40 | nothing to presuppose but essence, and relation or ~property.
669 1, 40 | since the persons agree in essence, it only remains to ~be
670 1, 40 | divided, because ~the common essence remains undivided; but the
671 1, 40 | particular, the common universal essence remains in ~the intellect
672 1, 41 | attributed to God belongs to His essence, and not to ~a notion.~Aquin.:
673 1, 41 | from Him, ~belong to His essence. Another order of origin
674 1, 41 | generate the Son from His ~own essence or nature, it follows that
675 1, 41 | nature, it follows that the essence or nature of the ~Father
676 1, 41 | Thus it follows that the essence generates, which was disproved ~
677 1, 41 | persons ~are not from the same essence; because the essence is
678 1, 41 | same essence; because the essence is not another thing ~from
679 1, 41 | thing from the ~Father's essence. Therefore the Son is not
680 1, 41 | is not from the Father's essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41] A[
681 1, 41 | produced. But the divine essence ~is unchangeable, and is
682 1, 41 | the Son is begotten of the essence of the ~Father, as the Master
683 1, 41 | the Son is begotten of the essence of the Father" - that is,
684 1, 41 | is, of the ~Father Who is essence; and so Augustine says (
685 1, 41 | say of the Father Who is essence, it is the same as if I
686 1, 41 | more ~explicitly, of the essence of the Father."~Aquin.:
687 1, 41 | creature is from God Who is essence; but not that ~it is from
688 1, 41 | not that ~it is from the essence of God. So we may explain
689 1, 41 | Son is begotten 'of' the essence of the Father, inasmuch
690 1, 41 | Father, inasmuch as the essence of the Father, communicated
691 1, 41 | the Son is begotten of the essence of the ~Father, a term is
692 1, 41 | persons are 'of' the divine essence, there is nothing expressed ~
693 1, 41 | distinction, God by His ~essence is distinct from those things
694 1, 41 | understanding is His very ~essence which has no principle.~
695 1, 41 | a relation, and not the essence?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41] A[
696 1, 41 | the relation and not the essence. For power signifies a ~
697 1, 41 | power does not signify essence but relation.~Aquin.: SMT
698 1, 41 | Further, terms signifying the essence in God, are common to the ~
699 1, 41 | it does not signify the ~essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41] A[
700 1, 41 | will to beget signifies the essence. Therefore, ~also, the power
701 1, 41 | principally the divine essence as the Master says (Sent.
702 1, 41 | Nor does it signify the essence as identified with ~the
703 1, 41 | we say ~that the divine essence "is the principle by which
704 1, 41 | not follow that the divine essence is distinct (from the ~Begotten):
705 1, 41 | were to say that the divine essence ~begets.~Aquin.: SMT FP
706 1, 41 | begetting, so the divine essence is the same in reality as
707 1, 41 | if I were to say, the ~"essence of the Father." Wherefore
708 1, 41 | Wherefore in respect of the essence, which is ~signified, the
709 1, 42 | divine persons are of one essence, as we have said ~(Q[39],
710 1, 42 | said ~(Q[39], A[2]). Now essence is signified by way of form.
711 1, 42 | is nothing else than His essence. Wherefore it ~follows,
712 1, 42 | would not have the same essence; and thus the three persons
713 1, 42 | This is because the divine ~essence is not more the Father's
714 1, 42 | us to consider ~but the essence which they have in common
715 1, 42 | to itself; and unity of ~essence, since for this reason are
716 1, 42 | of the same greatness and essence. Now it is clear that the ~
717 1, 42 | persons, and the unity of essence. For this reason the Master
718 1, 42 | whatever exists in God is the essence, or a ~person, or a notion.
719 1, 42 | nature does not signify the ~essence, nor any of the persons,
720 1, 42 | divine nature is the divine essence. But there is no ~order
721 1, 42 | But there is no ~order of essence in God. Therefore neither
722 1, 42 | idea of a principle, ~but essence does not; and so the order
723 1, 42 | nature than the order of essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[42] A[
724 1, 42 | 1), and ~belongs to the essence. Thus equality and likeness
725 1, 42 | God have reference ~to the essence; nor can there be inequality
726 1, 42 | dignity, as also the Father's essence: since dignity is ~something
727 1, 42 | absolute, and pertains to the essence. As, therefore, the same ~
728 1, 42 | As, therefore, the same ~essence, which in the Father is
729 1, 42 | and the Son have the same essence ~and dignity, which exist
730 1, 42 | the relations are one in ~essence and being, which is irreconcilable
731 1, 42 | Father and the Son; the essence, the relation and the origin;
732 1, 42 | Father is ~in the Son by His essence, forasmuch as the Father
733 1, 42 | as the Father is His own essence and ~communicates His essence
734 1, 42 | essence and ~communicates His essence to the Son not by any change
735 1, 42 | follows that as the Father's essence is in the Son, the Father
736 1, 42 | since the Son is His own essence, it follows ~that He Himself
737 1, 42 | the Father in Whom is His essence. This is ~expressed by Hilary (
738 1, 42 | except that ~the unity of essence between the principle and
739 1, 42 | as ~He communicates His essence. The command of the Father
740 1, 42 | Reply OBJ 3: As the same essence is paternity in the Father,
741 1, 43 | is in all things by His essence, power and presence, according ~
742 1, 44 | which does not belong to its essence, as a man can be found ~
743 1, 44 | on what ~belongs to its essence; because from the fact that
744 1, 44 | does not enter into the essence of ~being as such, therefore
745 1, 44 | not apart from the divine essence, according as the ~likeness
746 1, 44 | as the ~likeness to that essence can be shared diversely
747 1, 45 | action, which ~is God's essence, with a relation to the
748 1, 45 | His being, that is, His essence, which is common to the ~
749 1, 45 | Trinity but of the ~unity of essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[45] A[
750 1, 46 | of demonstration is the essence of a thing. Now ~everything
751 1, 47 | perfectly, which is the ~divine essence; and, therefore, it can
752 1, 51 | because it is not of the ~essence of an animal, does not belong
753 1, 52 | whereas the ~Divine power and essence, which is the universal
754 1, 53 | angel is moved locally, his essence is applied to ~various places:
755 1, 53 | various places: but the soul's essence is not applied to the things ~
756 1, 54 | it seems that life is essence. ~Therefore the action of
757 1, 54 | of the intellect is the essence of an angel who ~understands. ~
758 1, 54 | as he understands his own essence. Therefore the act of ~understanding,
759 1, 54 | of a substance ~or of an essence. Now it is impossible for
760 1, 54 | the same ~as that between "essence" and "to be"; but rather
761 1, 54 | to ~be," that "life" is "essence." Although life is sometimes
762 1, 54 | is sometimes put for the ~essence, as Augustine says (De Trin.
763 1, 54 | understanding and ~will are one essence, one life": yet it is not
764 1, 54 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The essence of an angel is the reason
765 1, 54 | understand everything by his essence. Consequently in its own ~
766 1, 54 | specific nature as such an essence, it is compared to the existence
767 1, 54 | power of intelligence is his essence?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[54] A[
768 1, 54 | is not different from his essence. For, "mind" and ~"intellect"
769 1, 54 | be anything besides ~his essence, then it must needs be an
770 1, 54 | that which is besides ~the essence of anything, we call it
771 1, 54 | faculty the same as its essence: which is made evident thus. ~
772 1, 54 | But in every creature ~the essence differs from the existence,
773 1, 54 | existence. Hence the angel's essence is not his power of ~intelligence:
774 1, 54 | intelligence: nor is the essence of any creature its power
775 1, 55 | the angel's nature is his essence. Therefore the angel knows
776 1, 55 | angel knows things ~by his essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[55] A[
777 1, 55 | universal ~truth. The angel's essence, however, does not comprise
778 1, 55 | itself, since it is an essence restricted to a genus and
779 1, 55 | is ~proper to the Divine essence, which is infinite, simply
780 1, 55 | knows all things by ~His essence. But an angel cannot know
781 1, 55 | cannot know all things by his essence; and his ~intellect must
782 1, 55 | formality - because the angel's essence, as ~being finite, is distinguished
783 1, 55 | their own formality in God's essence, as in ~the first and universal
784 1, 55 | of all ~things by His own essence: and this the angel has
785 1, 55 | is to say, in the Divine essence, by which God knows all ~
786 1, 55 | of the rest. ~The Divine essence, on account of Its eminence,
787 1, 56 | angel ~does not know his own essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[56] A[
788 1, 56 | to another angel by the ~essence of the one knowing; because
789 1, 56 | of a ~likeness. But the essence of the angel knowing is
790 1, 56 | knowing is not like the essence of ~the angel known, except
791 1, 56 | angel knows another ~by the essence of the angel known; because
792 1, 56 | whereby He is seen in His ~essence, according to which He is
793 1, 56 | by the presence of its essence in the knower, ~as light
794 1, 56 | He is ~seen through His essence; and knowledge such as this
795 1, 56 | nature of the angel in his ~essence, the angel knows God in
796 1, 56 | he ~does not behold God's essence; because no created likeness
797 1, 56 | to represent the Divine essence. Such knowledge then approaches
798 1, 56 | an angel's intellect and essence are infinitely ~remote from
799 1, 56 | Him; nor can he see God's essence through his own nature.
800 1, 57 | within the soul by their essence, as is said in the gloss [*
801 1, 57 | things cannot enter by their essence into man's soul, nor into
802 1, 57 | knows material things by His essence, so do the ~angels know
803 1, 57 | Therefore as by His essence, by which He causes all
804 1, 57 | representations of that one simple essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[57] A[
805 1, 57 | images ~drawn from the Divine essence, are the images of things
806 1, 57 | s wisdom, which is His ~essence. Therefore they know the
807 1, 57 | knows things both by his ~essence, and by innate species.
808 1, 58 | species, which is the ~Divine essence. Therefore, as regards such
809 1, 58 | only by ~understanding the essence. Thus it is evident that
810 1, 58 | when we understand the ~essence of a thing by some kind
811 1, 58 | the (knowledge of the) ~essence of a thing they know everything
812 1, 59 | this, that the nature or essence of a thing is ~completely
813 1, 59 | anything ~beyond it, is not its essence. Hence we see in natural
814 1, 59 | anything superadded to the ~essence, but from the matter which
815 1, 59 | something ~superadded to the essence; as tendency to a place
816 1, 59 | Consequently there ~alone are essence and will identified where
817 1, 59 | is contained within ~the essence of him who wills; that is
818 1, 59 | be the same thing as its essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[59] A[
819 1, 59 | according as what, in its essence, is outside it is ~disposed
820 1, 60 | of every subject is its essence. Consequently whatever ~
821 1, 60 | he knows himself by his ~essence, while he knows another
822 1, 60 | he knows himself by his ~essence, and the other not by the
823 1, 60 | other not by the other's essence. In like manner he does ~
824 1, 60 | same, all who behold God's essence are by the same movement
825 1, 60 | moved towards the Divine essence as it is distinct from other
826 1, 60 | whoever ~sees Him in His essence should not love Him. But
827 1, 60 | such as do not behold ~His essence, know Him by some particular
828 1, 61 | in ~everything else the essence differs from the existence,
829 1, 61 | alone exists of His ~own essence: while all other things
830 1, 61 | through something besides His essence. But His being is eternal. ~
831 1, 62 | knows the Word ~through His essence. By both kinds of knowledge
832 1, 62 | that to see God in His essence, wherein the ultimate beatitude ~
833 1, 62 | beatitude by the vision of His essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[62] A[
834 1, 62 | angel can know God by His essence, and this appertains to
835 1, 62 | can know God by his own ~essence, which belongs to his natural
836 1, 62 | in seeing God through His essence. Now, ~God's essence is
837 1, 62 | His essence. Now, ~God's essence is the very essence of goodness.
838 1, 62 | God's essence is the very essence of goodness. Consequently
839 1, 62 | the vision of the Supreme Essence, it should be led ~on in
840 1, 65 | that ~which is such by its essence. But spiritual substances
841 1, 66 | does ~not admit a fifth essence. Or we may say that formless
842 1, 75 | CONCERNING WHAT BELONGS TO THE ESSENCE OF THE SOUL ~(SEVEN ARTICLES)~
843 1, 75 | in spiritual substances - essence, power, and operation -
844 1, 75 | first of what belongs to the essence of the soul; secondly, ~
845 1, 75 | the body is outside the essence ~of the soul, it seems that
846 1, 75 | The body is not of the essence of the soul; but the soul
847 1, 75 | soul by ~the nature of its essence can be united to the body,
848 1, 76 | or more simple than the essence from which ~the faculty
849 1, 76 | quality, but by its own essence; otherwise matter and form ~
850 1, 76 | individual in a ~nature of one essence composed of matter and form,
851 1, 76 | that it must be outside the essence, and then ~the intellect
852 1, 76 | by something outside the ~essence of each. The distinction
853 1, 76 | Therefore in man the essence of the ~intellectual soul,
854 1, 76 | not move the body by its essence, as the form ~of the body,
855 1, 76 | although it be one in its essence, yet on ~account of its
856 1, 76 | the nature of the fifth essence; so ~that the vegetative
857 1, 76 | not a body; and the fifth essence does not enter materially
858 1, 76 | the soul are rooted in the essence of ~the soul. If, therefore,
859 1, 76 | whiteness, as far as its essence is ~concerned, is equally
860 1, 76 | totality of species and essence, then the whole ~whiteness
861 1, 76 | totality of perfection and ~of essence, but not by totality of
862 1, 77 | inquiry:~(1) Whether the essence of the soul is its power?~(
863 1, 77 | the powers flow from the essence of the soul?~(7) Whether
864 1, 77 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the essence of the soul is its power?~
865 1, 77 | It would seem that the essence of the soul is its power.
866 1, 77 | one life, one ~mind, one essence." ~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[77]
867 1, 77 | whatever does not belong to the essence is an accident. ~Therefore
868 1, 77 | something else besides the essence ~thereof, it is an accident,
869 1, 77 | power of the soul is its own essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[77] A[
870 1, 77 | spirits ~are divided into essence, power, and operation."
871 1, 77 | then, in the ~soul is the essence distinct from the virtue
872 1, 77 | power of the soul is ~its essence, although some have maintained
873 1, 77 | operation is the Divine Essence itself. This cannot be true
874 1, 77 | For the soul by its very essence is an act. Therefore if
875 1, 77 | Therefore if the ~very essence of the soul were the immediate
876 1, 77 | belong to it according to its essence, as a form, but according
877 1, 77 | Therefore it follows that the ~essence of the soul is not its power.
878 1, 77 | for the very ~substance or essence of the soul is known and
879 1, 77 | one life, one mind, one essence." Or, as some say, this
880 1, 77 | according to its entire essence and ~power; as animal in
881 1, 77 | neither according to its whole essence, nor according to its whole
882 1, 77 | part according to its whole essence, not, ~however, according
883 1, 77 | and the will ~are the one essence of the soul.~Aquin.: SMT
884 1, 77 | is nothing else ~but its essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[77] A[
885 1, 77 | power of the soul is not its essence, it must be an accident;
886 1, 77 | all that ~belongs to the essence of a thing; whereas whatever
887 1, 77 | whereas whatever is beyond the essence ~of a thing cannot be called
888 1, 77 | does ~not belong to the essence of a thing, but is caused
889 1, 77 | is a medium between the essence ~and accident thus understood.
890 1, 77 | in act. But by the one ~essence of the soul, man has actual
891 1, 77 | or action beyond His ~own Essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[77] A[
892 1, 77 | operations. So there is one essence of the soul, with several ~
893 1, 77 | be one according to its essence, has a ~certain aptitude
894 1, 77 | of the soul flow from its essence?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[77] A[
895 1, 77 | soul do not flow from its ~essence. For different things do
896 1, 77 | one simple thing. But ~the essence of the soul is one and simple.
897 1, 77 | cannot proceed from its essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[77] A[
898 1, 77 | proceeds is its cause. But the ~essence of the soul cannot be said
899 1, 77 | soul do not flow from its essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[77] A[
900 1, 77 | the soul proceed from its essence ~as their cause.~Aquin.:
901 1, 77 | composite, ~flow from the essence of the soul, as from their
902 1, 77 | recipients. Thus, from ~the one essence of the soul many and various
903 1, 77 | we may ~gather that the essence of the soul is the cause
904 1, 77 | soul proceeds from ~the essence of the soul by the medium
905 1, 77 | of another. But since the essence ~of the soul is compared
906 1, 77 | the soul flows from the essence, not by a ~transmutation,
907 1, 37 | is applied only to ~the essence; because it does not import
908 1, 37 | to love" are said of the essence, as ~"understanding" and "
909 1, 37 | as it means the ~divine essence, as was said above (here
910 1, 37 | and this belongs to the essence. Therefore this ~also is
911 1, 37 | Holy Ghost, but by their essence. ~Hence Augustine says (
912 1, 38 | name belongs to the divine essence. But the ~divine essence
913 1, 38 | essence. But the ~divine essence is the Gift which the Father
914 1, 38 | Reply OBJ 2: The divine essence is the Father's gift in
915 1, 38 | essential in its meaning; as the essence is included ~in the idea
916 1, 39 | PERSONS IN RELATION TO THE ESSENCE (EIGHT ARTICLES)~Those things
917 1, 39 | person in reference to the essence, to ~the properties, and
918 1, 39 | inquiry:~(1) Whether the essence in God is the same as the
919 1, 39 | three persons are of one essence?~(3) Whether essential names
920 1, 39 | 1/1~Whether in God the essence is the same as the person?~
921 1, 39 | would seem that in God the essence is not the same as person. ~
922 1, 39 | as person. ~For whenever essence is the same as person or "
923 1, 39 | But in God there is ~one essence and three persons, as is
924 1, 39 | Q[30], A[2]). Therefore essence is not the same as person.~
925 1, 39 | and negation are true ~of essence and of person. For person
926 1, 39 | person is distinct, whereas essence is not. ~Therefore person
927 1, 39 | not. ~Therefore person and essence are not the same.~Aquin.:
928 1, 39 | But person is subject ~to essence; whence it is called "suppositum"
929 1, 39 | person is not the same as essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
930 1, 39 | simplicity requires that in God essence is the same as ~"suppositum,"
931 1, 39 | persons are multiplied, the essence nevertheless retains its ~
932 1, 39 | have thought that in God essence and person ~differ, forasmuch
933 1, 39 | God they are the divine ~essence itself. Thence it follows
934 1, 39 | Thence it follows that in God essence is not really ~distinct
935 1, 39 | relation as referred to ~the essence does not differ therefrom
936 1, 39 | opposition. Thus there are one essence and ~three persons.~Aquin.:
937 1, 39 | supposita"; and yet the essence is not distinguished, ~because
938 1, 39 | are identified with the essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
939 1, 39 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: As essence and person in God differ
940 1, 39 | three persons are of one essence?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
941 1, 39 | three persons are of one ~essence. For Hilary says (De Synod.)
942 1, 39 | substance of ~God is His essence. Therefore the three persons
943 1, 39 | three persons are not of one essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
944 1, 39 | and Holy Ghost are of one essence. Therefore this should not
945 1, 39 | is the same as the divine essence. It ~suffices therefore
946 1, 39 | that the person is of the ~essence; but rather that the essence
947 1, 39 | essence; but rather that the essence is of the person. Therefore
948 1, 39 | three persons are of one essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
949 1, 39 | three persons are "from one essence [ex una essentia]," lest
950 1, 39 | distinction between the essence and the persons ~in God.
951 1, 39 | three persons are "of ~one essence [unius essentiae]."~Aquin.:
952 1, 39 | three persons are of one essence or ~substance, furnishes
953 1, 39 | three persons are of one essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
954 1, 39 | form; so also in God the essence is taken as the form ~of
955 1, 39 | are multiplied, and the essence is not multiplied, we ~speak
956 1, 39 | multiplied, we ~speak of one essence of the three persons, and
957 1, 39 | three persons of the one ~essence, provided that these genitives
958 1, 39 | hypostasis," and not for ~the essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
959 1, 39 | three persons are of one essence, nevertheless we ~find it
960 1, 39 | principle of action while ~"essence" comes from being [essendo],
961 1, 39 | can be said to be of "one essence" which have one ~being.
962 1, 39 | three ~persons are "of one essence," than by saying they are "
963 1, 39 | So, because the divine essence signifies a form ~as regards
964 1, 39 | properly be said that the essence is of the ~person; but we
965 1, 39 | some term to ~designate the essence; as, for instance, the Father
966 1, 39 | a person of the ~"divine essence"; or, the three persons
967 1, 39 | three persons are "of one essence."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
968 1, 39 | three persons of one ~essence," taking essence as having
969 1, 39 | of one ~essence," taking essence as having the habitude of
970 1, 39 | form, we do not mean ~that essence is different from person,
971 1, 39 | three persons from the same essence."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
972 1, 39 | essential names signify the essence after the manner ~of substantives;
973 1, 39 | Those which signify ~the essence as adjectives are predicated
974 1, 39 | collegians. Now in God the divine essence is signified by way of a ~
975 1, 39 | which signify ~the divine essence in a substantive manner
976 1, 39 | there is but one divine ~essence. On the other hand, the
977 1, 39 | the names which signify essence in an ~adjectival manner
978 1, 39 | the word "person" is not essence or ~nature, but personality.
979 1, 39 | since it signifies the ~essence, it stands for essence,
980 1, 39 | essence, it stands for essence, and not for person.~Aquin.:
981 1, 39 | name "God" stands for ~the essence. So when we say "God begot,"
982 1, 39 | their nature, stand for the essence, but by reason ~of some
983 1, 39 | God" signifies the divine essence as in ~Him Who possesses
984 1, 39 | sometimes stands for the essence, as when ~we say "God creates";
985 1, 39 | not always stand for the essence it ~signifies.~Aquin.: SMT
986 1, 39 | God" - that is, the divine essence - is really one and common.
987 1, 39 | this proposition is true, "Essence begets essence." For ~Augustine
988 1, 39 | is true, "Essence begets essence." For ~Augustine says (De
989 1, 39 | Wisdom, because they are one essence; and taken singly Wisdom
990 1, 39 | Wisdom is from Wisdom, as essence from essence."~Aquin.: SMT
991 1, 39 | Wisdom, as essence from essence."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
992 1, 39 | Therefore ~since the divine essence is in the Son, it seems
993 1, 39 | it seems that the divine essence ~is generated.~Aquin.: SMT
994 1, 39 | Further, God and the divine essence are the same, as is clear ~
995 1, 39 | Therefore this is also true: "Essence ~begets essence."~Aquin.:
996 1, 39 | also true: "Essence ~begets essence."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
997 1, 39 | the Father is the divine essence; therefore essence can ~
998 1, 39 | divine essence; therefore essence can ~stand for the person
999 1, 39 | of the Father. Thus the essence begets.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
1000 1, 39 | 1/1~OBJ 5: Further, the essence is "a thing begetting,"
1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-2000 | 2001-2098 |