1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-1589
Part, Question
1 1, 1 | For man should not seek to know what is above ~reason: "
2 1, 1 | OBJ 1: Although we cannot know in what consists the essence
3 1, 1 | which they were able to know the truth by natural reason,
4 1, 2 | not to those who do not know the meaning of the predicate
5 1, 2 | Now because we do not know the essence of God, the ~
6 1, 2 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: To know that God exists in a general
7 1, 2 | This, however, is not to know absolutely that God ~exists;
8 1, 2 | God ~exists; just as to know that someone is approaching
9 1, 2 | approaching is not the same as to ~know that Peter is approaching,
10 1, 2 | demonstration. But we ~cannot know in what God's essence consists,
11 1, 2 | the first thing we must know of ~anything is whether
12 1, 2 | them we ~cannot perfectly know God as He is in His essence.~
13 1, 3 | existence, in order that we may ~know its essence. Now, because
14 1, 3 | Now, because we cannot know what God is, but rather ~
15 1, 3 | Hell, and how wilt thou know? The measure of Him is ~
16 1, 3 | 1~OBJ 2: Further, we can know "whether" God exists as
17 1, 3 | A[2]); but we cannot know "what" He is. Therefore
18 1, 3 | in ~the second sense. We know that this proposition which
19 1, 3 | is," is true; and this we know from His effects (Q[2], ~
20 1, 6 | because all things do not know Him; and nothing is ~desired
21 1, 6 | things which desire God, some know Him as He is ~Himself, and
22 1, 6 | rational creature; others know some ~participation of His
23 1, 10 | eternal life, that they ~may know Thee the only true God,"
24 1, 12 | by natural reason we can know God in this life?~(13) Whether
25 1, 12 | man a natural desire ~to know the cause of any effect
26 1, 12 | intellect can be proportioned to know God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[12]
27 1, 12 | For it is written: "We know that when He shall appear, ~
28 1, 12 | says (De Trin. v): "When we know God, some ~likeness of God
29 1, 12 | eternal life, that they may ~know Thee the only true God,"
30 1, 12 | in individual matter we know naturally, ~forasmuch as
31 1, 12 | as our soul, whereby we know, is the form of certain
32 1, 12 | follows therefore that to know self-subsistent being is ~
33 1, 12 | to an angel - namely, ~to know Him by His own likeness
34 1, 12 | the angel himself. But to ~know God by any created similitude
35 1, 12 | created similitude is not to know the essence of God, as ~
36 1, 12 | follow that an angel can know ~the essence of God by his
37 1, 12 | sight cannot in any way know abstractedly what it knows
38 1, 12 | by grace be raised up to ~know separate subsisting substance,
39 1, 12 | eternal life, that they may know Thee the only true ~God,"
40 1, 12 | no created intellect can know God infinitely. For the ~
41 1, 12 | any created intellect to ~know God in an infinite degree.
42 1, 12 | to enable the ~knower to know infinitely; thus, for instance,
43 1, 12 | although he himself ~does not know it as demonstrated.~Aquin.:
44 1, 12 | creature naturally desires to know all ~things. Therefore if
45 1, 12 | in seeing God it does not know all things, its ~natural
46 1, 12 | essence of God; and yet do not know ~all things. For as Dionysius
47 1, 12 | essence of ~God, does not know all things.~Aquin.: SMT
48 1, 12 | And so an intellect can know all the effects of a ~cause
49 1, 12 | intellect in seeing ~God can know all that God does or can
50 1, 12 | can do any intellect can know the ~more, the more perfectly
51 1, 12 | rational creature is to know ~everything that belongs
52 1, 12 | will see in God. But to know other singulars, ~their
53 1, 12 | again, does it desire to know things that exist not as
54 1, 12 | knoweth Thee although he know not these. And ~whoso knoweth
55 1, 12 | him in his image. Hence to know things thus by their ~likeness
56 1, 12 | the one who knows, is to know them in themselves or in
57 1, 12 | own nature; whereas to know them by their similitudes
58 1, 12 | but we shall see ~all we know at one glance."~Aquin.:
59 1, 12 | whereof, we ourselves cannot know many things all ~at once,
60 1, 12 | knowledge, whereby they know ~things by diverse ideas
61 1, 12 | them, the angels do not know all things ~simultaneously,
62 1, 12 | Further, that wherein we know all other things, and whereby
63 1, 12 | itself to us. But even now we know all ~things in God; for
64 1, 12 | participation of His light, we know and ~judge all things; for
65 1, 12 | natural reason we cannot know God in this life. ~For Boethius
66 1, 12 | reason cannot attain to know Him.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[12]
67 1, 12 | incorporeal. Therefore we cannot know God by natural knowledge.~
68 1, 12 | from them so far as to know of God "whether He exists,"
69 1, 12 | whether He exists," and to know of ~Him what must necessarily
70 1, 12 | Body Para. 2/2~Hence we know that His relationship with
71 1, 12 | to simple form, so as to know "what ~it is"; but it can
72 1, 12 | what ~it is"; but it can know "whether it is."~Aquin.:
73 1, 12 | that only the pure should know truth.' For it can be answered ~
74 1, 12 | many who are not pure can know many truths," i.e. by natural
75 1, 12 | veils." Therefore we cannot know God ~more fully by grace
76 1, 12 | in this life we cannot ~know of God "what He is," and
77 1, 12 | to one unknown; ~still we know Him more fully according
78 1, 13 | essence of ~God; but we know God from creatures as their
79 1, 13 | Reply OBJ 2: Because we know and name God from creatures,
80 1, 13 | our intellect ~does not know Him in this life as He is.~
81 1, 13 | so far as our intellects know Him. Now ~since our intellect
82 1, 13 | 1~Reply OBJ 3: We cannot know the essence of God in this
83 1, 13 | really is in Himself; but we know Him accordingly as He is
84 1, 13 | anything accordingly as we know it, since ~"names", as the
85 1, 13 | signs of ideas." But we know ~creatures before we know
86 1, 13 | know ~creatures before we know God. Therefore the names
87 1, 13 | us to creatures which we know first. Hence they ~have
88 1, 13 | Nevertheless it is necessary to know that since relation has ~
89 1, 13 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 6: To know whether relations are simultaneous
90 1, 13 | thing is named by us as we know it. But the divine ~nature
91 1, 13 | the same thing. For as we know substance from its properties ~
92 1, 13 | effects. Hence because we can know ~what stone is in itself
93 1, 13 | definition of stone, ~by which we know what it is, for the idea
94 1, 13 | divine effects we cannot know the divine nature in itself,
95 1, 13 | nature in itself, so as to know what it is; but ~only by
96 1, 13 | lions metaphorically. ~To know, however, what names are
97 1, 13 | signify what he does not know. But the heathen does ~not
98 1, 13 | But the heathen does ~not know the divine nature. So when
99 1, 13 | the meaning of which we know not.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[13]
100 1, 13 | Now ~our intellect cannot know the essence of God itself
101 1, 13 | To ~prove this we must know that in every true affirmative
102 1, 14 | Anima ii ~that plants do not know, because they are wholly
103 1, 14 | essence. Therefore He does not know His own essence.~Aquin.:
104 1, 14 | why we actually feel or know a thing is because our ~
105 1, 14 | acts of organs, do not ~know themselves, as in the case
106 1, 14 | faculties which are subsisting, know themselves; hence it is ~
107 1, 14 | seems that God does not know things besides Himself.
108 1, 14 | Therefore He does not know things other than Himself.~
109 1, 14 | God must necessarily know things other than ~Himself.
110 1, 14 | Para. 2/3~Now in order to know how God knows things other
111 1, 14 | seems that God does not know things other than Himself
112 1, 14 | universal cause. This is to know them by general, and not
113 1, 14 | follows that He ~does not know what the creature is in
114 1, 14 | in its essence, so as to know "what it ~is," which is
115 1, 14 | seems that ~He does not know each thing by its proper
116 1, 14 | general knowledge; for to know things ~otherwise than by
117 1, 14 | knowledge of things is to know them ~not only in general,
118 1, 14 | But this cannot be. For to know a thing in general and not
119 1, 14 | centre knew itself, ~it would know all lines that proceed from
120 1, 14 | light knew ~itself, it would know all colors.~Aquin.: SMT
121 1, 14 | being, and far more, God can know ~in Himself all of them
122 1, 14 | God could not be said to know Himself perfectly unless
123 1, 14 | others. ~Neither could He know the very nature of being
124 1, 14 | 1/2~Reply OBJ 1: So to know a thing as it is in the
125 1, 14 | the knower does not always know the object known according
126 1, 14 | since the eye does not know a stone ~according to the
127 1, 14 | discursive knowledge is to know the effect through its ~
128 1, 14 | creature more perfectly than we know it. ~But we know the effects
129 1, 14 | than we know it. ~But we know the effects in their created
130 1, 14 | Reply OBJ 2: God does not know by their cause, known, as
131 1, 14 | because they are, ~does God know all creatures spiritual
132 1, 14 | will be; and God is said to know all these ~with the knowledge
133 1, 14 | seems that God does not know evil things. For the Philosopher ~(
134 1, 14 | in potentiality does ~not know privation. But "evil is
135 1, 14 | seems that God does not know evil things.~Aquin.: SMT
136 1, 14 | Therefore God does not know evil things.~Aquin.: SMT
137 1, 14 | Therefore God ~does not know evil things.~Aquin.: SMT
138 1, 14 | Therefore God does not know evil ~things.~Aquin.: SMT
139 1, 14 | a thing perfectly, must know all that can ~be accidental
140 1, 14 | accidental. Hence God would not know good things ~perfectly,
141 1, 14 | in potentiality, does not know privation ~by privation
142 1, 14 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: To know a thing by something else
143 1, 14 | seems that God does not know singular things. For the
144 1, 14 | its immateriality does not know singular things; ~but as
145 1, 14 | Therefore God does not know singular things.~Aquin.:
146 1, 14 | us those faculties alone know the singular, which ~receive
147 1, 14 | Therefore God does not know singular things.~Aquin.:
148 1, 14 | act. Therefore God cannot know singular things.~Aquin.:
149 1, 14 | foregoing (Q[4], A[2]). Now to know singular things is part
150 1, 14 | perfection. Hence God must know singular things. Even the
151 1, 14 | most ignorant if He did not know discord. Now the ~perfections
152 1, 14 | although by one faculty we know the universal and ~immaterial,
153 1, 14 | immaterial, and by another we know singular and material things, ~
154 1, 14 | of that kind, would not know him in so far as he is this ~
155 1, 14 | aforesaid mode, God would not know ~singular things in their
156 1, 14 | account our intellect does not know the singular. But the ~intelligible
157 1, 14 | Para. 1/1~Whether God can know infinite things?~Aquin.:
158 1, 14 | It seems that God cannot know infinite things. For the
159 1, 14 | of ~parts. Therefore to know the infinite according to
160 1, 14 | mode of the ~infinite is to know part after part; and in
161 1, 14 | outside. But God does not know the infinite or ~infinite
162 1, 14 | even what we ourselves know, must necessarily be; and,
163 1, 14 | certain, forasmuch as we know future contingent ~things
164 1, 14 | seems that God does not know enunciable things. For to
165 1, 14 | enunciable things. For to know ~enunciable things belongs
166 1, 14 | Therefore God does ~not know enunciable things.~Aquin.:
167 1, 14 | Therefore God does not know enunciable things.~Aquin.:
168 1, 14 | whatever God can make, He can know. But God can make ~more
169 1, 14 | He does. Therefore He can know more than He knows. Thus
170 1, 14 | be born. But He does not know ~now that Christ will be
171 1, 14 | Therefore God does not know everything He once knew;
172 1, 14 | not follow ~that He can know more than He knows, unless
173 1, 14 | according to which He is said to know those things ~which are
174 1, 14 | which God did not previously know, and afterwards knew, then
175 1, 14 | be granted that God ~can know more than He knows; because
176 1, 14 | first of all He did not know, and then afterwards knew.~
177 1, 14 | of operation, but only to know (how to do it), this would
178 1, 14 | the mode; for whatever we know ~speculatively in things
179 1, 14 | every way perfect, He must know what is operable by Him,
180 1, 15 | vii), that God does not know things by ideas. But ideas
181 1, 15 | A[5]). But He does not know Himself through an idea;
182 1, 16 | who is willing and able to know," for hence it ~would follow
183 1, 16 | true, unless someone could know it. ~Therefore he defines
184 1, 16 | and thing; and hence to know this conformity is ~to know
185 1, 16 | know this conformity is ~to know truth. But in no way can
186 1, 16 | But in no way can sense know this. For although sight
187 1, 16 | visible thing, yet it does not know the comparison ~which exists
188 1, 16 | it. But the intellect can know its own conformity with
189 1, 16 | but it does not thereby know or affirm truth. ~This is
190 1, 17 | are ~affected, I do not know what more we can require
191 1, 17 | way as that the senses ~know truth, but in so far as
192 1, 18 | 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, to know God is an operation. But
193 1, 18 | eternal life, that they ~may know Thee, the only true God."
194 1, 18 | the active, and thus to know God is said to be life ~
195 1, 18 | whose province it is to know the proportion between the
196 1, 19 | for him, though he did not know it before; hence we take
197 1, 19 | take counsel in ~order to know what is good for us. Now
198 1, 19 | not put into act what we know, unless we will ~to do so.
199 1, 20 | images of things within us, know things existing ~in themselves.~
200 1, 20 | But God is not said to know some things more ~than others;
201 1, 20 | which God may be ~said to know or will more or less, as
202 1, 22 | ignorant of some things than to know them, for example, vile
203 1, 22 | is better for us not to know low and vile things, ~because
204 1, 23 | that is of God: that we may know the things that are given
205 1, 26 | knoweth Thee, though he ~know nought else." But as regards
206 1, 27 | Ghost it is also said, "Know you not that your members ~
207 1, 27 | show the same, whereby we know that the ~Father is not
208 1, 31 | Father, said: "That they may know Thee, the only true God" (
209 1, 31 | alone knows the Son. But to know the ~Son is common (to the
210 1, 32 | 5), "It is impossible to know the secret of generation.
211 1, 32 | Since, therefore, man cannot know, and with his understanding
212 1, 32 | by natural reason we can know of God that ~only which
213 1, 32 | by natural reason we can know what ~belongs to the unity
214 1, 32 | The philosophers did not know the mystery of the trinity
215 1, 32 | the proper idea whereby we know a divine ~Person. Now the
216 1, 34 | how this is true, we must know that our own word taken
217 1, 34 | by God. But God does not know beings only; ~He knows also
218 1, 34 | abides in the agent - as to know and to will: such are not
219 1, 37 | three Wisdoms, but one; I know not ~why the Father, Son
220 1, 37 | 2/3~To see this we must know that since as shown above (
221 1, 38 | proceeding, so as freely to ~know God truly and to love God
222 1, 38 | In proof of this we must know that a gift is properly
223 1, 40 | essence, we must seek to ~know the principle of distinction
224 1, 43 | have ~prophecy, and should know all mysteries, and all knowledge,
225 1, 44 | God, for all do not even know Him. Therefore God is not
226 1, 49 | In proof of this, we must know that evil is caused in the
227 1, 49 | particular effects, they did not know how to reduce these ~contrary
228 1, 50 | true, to the effect that we know earth ~by earth, and fire
229 1, 50 | sensible things can we come to know ~intelligible ones.~Aquin.:
230 1, 51 | Medes?" he ~answered: "I know it; and I have often walked
231 1, 54 | have experience when we know ~single objects through
232 1, 54 | senses: the angels likewise know single ~objects, as we shall
233 1, 55 | inquiry:~(1) Do the angels know everything by their substance,
234 1, 55 | 3) Do the higher angels know by more universal species
235 1, 55 | 1/1~Whether the angels know all things by their substance?~
236 1, 55 | would seem that the angels know all things by their substance. ~
237 1, 55 | proper nature of a mind, know the things which are happening
238 1, 55 | things." Therefore they know by the forms of ~things,
239 1, 55 | essence. But an angel cannot know all things by his essence;
240 1, 55 | some species in order to know things. ~Aquin.: SMT FP
241 1, 55 | all things which they can ~know naturally.~Aquin.: SMT FP
242 1, 55 | generically; because to know anything generically is,
243 1, 55 | therefore, the higher ~angels know by more universal species
244 1, 55 | lower intelligences to know by many forms what God knows
245 1, 55 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: To know anything universally can
246 1, 55 | of the thing is known. To know a thing thus is something
247 1, 55 | way it is more perfect to know a thing in the ~universal;
248 1, 55 | one universal medium can know each ~of the things which
249 1, 56 | inquiry: ~(1) Does an angel know himself?~(2) Does one angel
250 1, 56 | himself?~(2) Does one angel know another?~(3) Does the angel
251 1, 56 | another?~(3) Does the angel know God by his own natural principles?~
252 1, 56 | seem that an angel does not know himself. For Dionysius ~
253 1, 56 | that "the angels do not know their own powers" (Coel.
254 1, 56 | Therefore an angel ~does not know his own essence.~Aquin.:
255 1, 56 | intellectual, no angel can know himself.~Aquin.: SMT FP
256 1, 56 | furthermore they do not know their own powers." Although
257 1, 56 | that the ~angels do not know their own power perfectly;
258 1, 56 | that one angel does not know another. For the ~Philosopher
259 1, 56 | Therefore one angel does not know another.~Aquin.: SMT FP
260 1, 56 | higher angels could not know the lower, ~from whom they
261 1, 56 | impressed ~species he might know corporeal and spiritual
262 1, 56 | does not lead one angel to ~know another, except on account
263 1, 56 | will suffice for one to know another.~Aquin.: SMT FP
264 1, 56 | seem that the angels cannot know God by their natural ~principles.
265 1, 56 | appears that an ~angel cannot know God by his natural principles.~
266 1, 56 | Therefore the angels cannot know God ~by their natural powers.~
267 1, 56 | knowledge than men. Yet men ~can know God through their natural
268 1, 56 | the knowledge whereby we know God while we are ~on earth,
269 1, 57 | 1) Whether the angels know the natures of material
270 1, 57 | things?~(2) Whether they know single things?~(3) Whether
271 1, 57 | things?~(3) Whether they know the future?~(4) Whether
272 1, 57 | future?~(4) Whether they know secret thoughts?~(5) Whether
273 1, 57 | thoughts?~(5) Whether they know all mysteries of grace?~
274 1, 57 | 1/1~Whether the angels know material things?~Aquin.:
275 1, 57 | seem that the angels do not know material things. For ~the
276 1, 57 | Therefore the angels do not know material things.~Aquin.:
277 1, 57 | Therefore the angels cannot know material things.~Aquin.:
278 1, 57 | Therefore angels do not know material things.~Aquin.:
279 1, 57 | inferior ~to the angel's, can know material things. Therefore
280 1, 57 | essence, so do the ~angels know them, forasmuch as they
281 1, 57 | seem that angels do not know singulars. For the ~Philosopher
282 1, 57 | Consequently they do not know ~singulars.~Aquin.: SMT
283 1, 57 | Therefore the ~angel cannot know singulars.~Aquin.: SMT FP
284 1, 57 | Further, if an angel does know singulars, it is either
285 1, 57 | Therefore the angel does ~not know singulars.~Aquin.: SMT FP
286 1, 57 | can guard what he does not know. But angels ~guard individual
287 1, 57 | Consequently the angels know singulars.~Aquin.: SMT FP
288 1, 57 | implications; because, to know a singular, merely in ~its
289 1, 57 | universal causes, is not to know it as singular, that is,
290 1, 57 | universal; yet he does not know it as taking place now,
291 1, 57 | the intellect, does not know. Hence Aristotle pronounces
292 1, 57 | much as He causes, does He know; for ~His knowledge is the
293 1, 57 | imparted to them do the angels know things, not only as to their ~
294 1, 57 | 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Angels know singulars by universal forms,
295 1, 57 | Para. 1/1~Whether angels know the future?~Aquin.: SMT
296 1, 57 | would seem that the angels know future events. For angels
297 1, 57 | knowledge than men. But some men know many future events. ~Therefore
298 1, 57 | appears that the ~angels know indifferently things past,
299 1, 57 | reason of place. But angels know things which are distant ~
300 1, 57 | Therefore they likewise know things distant according ~
301 1, 57 | belong to the angels. But to know future events is the exclusive ~
302 1, 57 | hereafter, and we shall know that ye are gods." Therefore
303 1, 57 | Therefore the ~angels do not know future events.~Aquin.: SMT
304 1, 57 | known in themselves. To know the future ~in this way
305 1, 57 | alone; and not merely to know those events ~which happen
306 1, 57 | Reply OBJ 1: Men cannot know future things except in
307 1, 57 | s revelation. The angels know the future in the same way,
308 1, 57 | Para. 1/1~Whether angels know secret thoughts?~Aquin.:
309 1, 57 | would seem that the angels know secret thoughts. For Gregory ~(
310 1, 57 | seems that an angel can know the thoughts of the intellect.~
311 1, 57 | and unsearchable; who can ~know it? I am the Lord, Who search
312 1, 57 | Therefore angels do not ~know the secrets of hearts.~Aquin.:
313 1, 57 | and thus God alone can know the ~thoughts of hearts
314 1, 57 | therefore, the angels know corporeal things and their
315 1, 57 | dispositions, they ~can thereby know what is passing in the appetite
316 1, 57 | angels do ~not necessarily know the movement of the sensitive
317 1, 57 | 1/1~Whether the angels know the mysteries of grace?~
318 1, 57 | would seem that the angels know mysteries of grace. For,
319 1, 57 | Therefore the angels know the mysteries of grace.~
320 1, 57 | essence. Therefore they know the mysteries of grace.~
321 1, 57 | prophets." Therefore angels know ~the mysteries of grace.~
322 1, 57 | Therefore the angels do not ~know mysteries of grace.~Aquin.:
323 1, 57 | knowledge the angels cannot know ~mysteries of grace. For
324 1, 57 | Word. By ~such vision they know mysteries of grace, but
325 1, 57 | mysteries: nor do ~they all know them equally; but just as
326 1, 57 | not necessary for them to know ~everything hidden in it.~
327 1, 57 | which the prophets did not know. Thus we ~read (Eph. 3:4,
328 1, 57 | what the former did not know; according to Ps. ~118:100: "
329 1, 58 | have, whoever desires to know anything is in potentiality
330 1, 58 | it may happen ~that we know many things, but understand
331 1, 58 | through the ~Word, they know all things under one intelligible
332 1, 58 | regards such knowledge, they know all ~things at once: just
333 1, 58 | knowledge wherewith the angels know things by ~innate species,
334 1, 58 | species, they can at one time know all things which can be ~
335 1, 58 | another. But the angels know one thing through another;
336 1, 58 | through another; for they ~know creatures through the Word.
337 1, 58 | intellect can syllogize, and know causes in effects; all of ~
338 1, 58 | in the truths which ~they know naturally, they at once
339 1, 58 | And in this way the angels know things in ~the Word.~Aquin.:
340 1, 58 | similitude, forasmuch as they know sensible things which are
341 1, 58 | 2]). ~Therefore he must know affirmation and negation
342 1, 58 | speech, shows that they know both composition and division:
343 1, 58 | division: yet not that ~they know by composing and dividing,
344 1, 58 | grasped at ~all, and so we know nothing respecting them;
345 1, 58 | essence of a thing they know everything that can be said
346 1, 58 | in ~their principle, they know all things. Consequently
347 1, 58 | that by ~which the angels know things in their proper nature.
348 1, 58 | angels in so far as they know the being of things which
349 1, 58 | Body Para. 2/2~Now they know this through a twofold medium,
350 1, 58 | beholding the Word, ~they know not merely the being of
351 1, 58 | angels ~behold the Word, they know the being which things have
352 1, 58 | through innate ideas they know the being ~which things
353 1, 59 | knowledge; not ~that they know the aspect of goodness,
354 1, 59 | angels by their intellect know the ~universal aspect of
355 1, 59 | discursion reason comes to know what intellect learns without
356 1, 59 | and bad things, for they know both. ~Therefore the will
357 1, 59 | every truth which he can know naturally. ~But the act
358 1, 60 | to everything they can ~know, as our intellect is disposed
359 1, 60 | principles, which it can ~know naturally. Now love follows
360 1, 60 | But an angel does ~not know another as he knows himself:
361 1, 60 | thus one ~angel does not know another as himself, because
362 1, 60 | not behold ~His essence, know Him by some particular effects,
363 1, 62 | like ~manner, an angel can know God by His essence, and
364 1, 62 | at the same time he can know God by his own ~essence,
365 1, 64 | they would most of all know themselves; which is to
366 1, 64 | themselves; which is to know separated ~substances. But
367 1, 64 | But ~the demons cannot know God, Who is most manifest
368 1, 64 | Therefore neither can they know other ~things.~Aquin.: SMT
369 1, 64 | either naturally, ~as we know first principles; or by
370 1, 64 | from someone else, as we ~know by learning; or by long
371 1, 64 | Now, the demons cannot know the truth by their own nature, ~
372 1, 64 | one separate substance to know ~another; as it is natural
373 1, 64 | it is natural for us to know sensible natures. Hence,
374 1, 64 | angel can of his own nature know God's ~substance. Yet on
375 1, 64 | Reply OBJ 5: The demons know a truth in three ways: first
376 1, 64 | by others: thirdly, they know by ~long experience; not
377 1, 64 | individual things, they know some things as present,
378 1, 64 | they ~previously did not know would come to pass, as we
379 1, 64 | truth, ~saying to Christ: "I know Who Thou art, the holy one
380 1, 64 | the less; ~because they know that such confinement is
381 1, 74 | angelic mind; which can ~know many things at the same
382 1, 75 | are formed in ~order to know all bodies.~Aquin.: SMT
383 1, 75 | body it would be unable to know all bodies. Now ~every body
384 1, 75 | individuals, and so it would only know the individual: just as
385 1, 75 | The senses indeed do not know existence, except under
386 1, 77 | Whereas the mind can ~love and know other things" (De Trin.
387 1, 77 | act. Wherefore we seek ~to know the nature of a power from
388 1, 37 | three Wisdoms, but one; I know not ~why the Father, Son
389 1, 37 | 2/3~To see this we must know that since as shown above (
390 1, 38 | proceeding, so as freely to ~know God truly and to love God
391 1, 38 | In proof of this we must know that a gift is properly
392 1, 40 | essence, we must seek to ~know the principle of distinction
393 1, 43 | have ~prophecy, and should know all mysteries, and all knowledge,
394 1, 45 | God, for all do not even know Him. Therefore God is not
395 1, 50 | In proof of this, we must know that evil is caused in the
396 1, 50 | particular effects, they did not know how to reduce these ~contrary
397 1, 51 | true, to the effect that we know earth ~by earth, and fire
398 1, 51 | sensible things can we come to know ~intelligible ones.~Aquin.:
399 1, 52 | Medes?" he ~answered: "I know it; and I have often walked
400 1, 55 | have experience when we know ~single objects through
401 1, 55 | senses: the angels likewise know single ~objects, as we shall
402 1, 56 | inquiry:~(1) Do the angels know everything by their substance,
403 1, 56 | 3) Do the higher angels know by more universal species
404 1, 56 | 1/1~Whether the angels know all things by their substance?~
405 1, 56 | would seem that the angels know all things by their substance. ~
406 1, 56 | proper nature of a mind, know the things which are happening
407 1, 56 | things." Therefore they know by the forms of ~things,
408 1, 56 | essence. But an angel cannot know all things by his essence;
409 1, 56 | some species in order to know things. ~Aquin.: SMT FP
410 1, 56 | all things which they can ~know naturally.~Aquin.: SMT FP
411 1, 56 | generically; because to know anything generically is,
412 1, 56 | therefore, the higher ~angels know by more universal species
413 1, 56 | lower intelligences to know by many forms what God knows
414 1, 56 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: To know anything universally can
415 1, 56 | of the thing is known. To know a thing thus is something
416 1, 56 | way it is more perfect to know a thing in the ~universal;
417 1, 56 | one universal medium can know each ~of the things which
418 1, 57 | inquiry: ~(1) Does an angel know himself?~(2) Does one angel
419 1, 57 | himself?~(2) Does one angel know another?~(3) Does the angel
420 1, 57 | another?~(3) Does the angel know God by his own natural principles?~
421 1, 57 | seem that an angel does not know himself. For Dionysius ~
422 1, 57 | that "the angels do not know their own powers" (Coel.
423 1, 57 | Therefore an angel ~does not know his own essence.~Aquin.:
424 1, 57 | intellectual, no angel can know himself.~Aquin.: SMT FP
425 1, 57 | furthermore they do not know their own powers." Although
426 1, 57 | that the ~angels do not know their own power perfectly;
427 1, 57 | that one angel does not know another. For the ~Philosopher
428 1, 57 | Therefore one angel does not know another.~Aquin.: SMT FP
429 1, 57 | higher angels could not know the lower, ~from whom they
430 1, 57 | impressed ~species he might know corporeal and spiritual
431 1, 57 | does not lead one angel to ~know another, except on account
432 1, 57 | will suffice for one to know another.~Aquin.: SMT FP
433 1, 57 | seem that the angels cannot know God by their natural ~principles.
434 1, 57 | appears that an ~angel cannot know God by his natural principles.~
435 1, 57 | Therefore the angels cannot know God ~by their natural powers.~
436 1, 57 | knowledge than men. Yet men ~can know God through their natural
437 1, 57 | the knowledge whereby we know God while we are ~on earth,
438 1, 58 | 1) Whether the angels know the natures of material
439 1, 58 | things?~(2) Whether they know single things?~(3) Whether
440 1, 58 | things?~(3) Whether they know the future?~(4) Whether
441 1, 58 | future?~(4) Whether they know secret thoughts?~(5) Whether
442 1, 58 | thoughts?~(5) Whether they know all mysteries of grace?~
443 1, 58 | 1/1~Whether the angels know material things?~Aquin.:
444 1, 58 | seem that the angels do not know material things. For ~the
445 1, 58 | Therefore the angels do not know material things.~Aquin.:
446 1, 58 | Therefore the angels cannot know material things.~Aquin.:
447 1, 58 | Therefore angels do not know material things.~Aquin.:
448 1, 58 | inferior ~to the angel's, can know material things. Therefore
449 1, 58 | essence, so do the ~angels know them, forasmuch as they
450 1, 58 | seem that angels do not know singulars. For the ~Philosopher
451 1, 58 | Consequently they do not know ~singulars.~Aquin.: SMT
452 1, 58 | Therefore the ~angel cannot know singulars.~Aquin.: SMT FP
453 1, 58 | Further, if an angel does know singulars, it is either
454 1, 58 | Therefore the angel does ~not know singulars.~Aquin.: SMT FP
455 1, 58 | can guard what he does not know. But angels ~guard individual
456 1, 58 | Consequently the angels know singulars.~Aquin.: SMT FP
457 1, 58 | implications; because, to know a singular, merely in ~its
458 1, 58 | universal causes, is not to know it as singular, that is,
459 1, 58 | universal; yet he does not know it as taking place now,
460 1, 58 | the intellect, does not know. Hence Aristotle pronounces
461 1, 58 | much as He causes, does He know; for ~His knowledge is the
462 1, 58 | imparted to them do the angels know things, not only as to their ~
463 1, 58 | 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Angels know singulars by universal forms,
464 1, 58 | Para. 1/1~Whether angels know the future?~Aquin.: SMT
465 1, 58 | would seem that the angels know future events. For angels
466 1, 58 | knowledge than men. But some men know many future events. ~Therefore
467 1, 58 | appears that the ~angels know indifferently things past,
468 1, 58 | reason of place. But angels know things which are distant ~
469 1, 58 | Therefore they likewise know things distant according ~
470 1, 58 | belong to the angels. But to know future events is the exclusive ~
471 1, 58 | hereafter, and we shall know that ye are gods." Therefore
472 1, 58 | Therefore the ~angels do not know future events.~Aquin.: SMT
473 1, 58 | known in themselves. To know the future ~in this way
474 1, 58 | alone; and not merely to know those events ~which happen
475 1, 58 | Reply OBJ 1: Men cannot know future things except in
476 1, 58 | s revelation. The angels know the future in the same way,
477 1, 58 | Para. 1/1~Whether angels know secret thoughts?~Aquin.:
478 1, 58 | would seem that the angels know secret thoughts. For Gregory ~(
479 1, 58 | seems that an angel can know the thoughts of the intellect.~
480 1, 58 | and unsearchable; who can ~know it? I am the Lord, Who search
481 1, 58 | Therefore angels do not ~know the secrets of hearts.~Aquin.:
482 1, 58 | and thus God alone can know the ~thoughts of hearts
483 1, 58 | therefore, the angels know corporeal things and their
484 1, 58 | dispositions, they ~can thereby know what is passing in the appetite
485 1, 58 | angels do ~not necessarily know the movement of the sensitive
486 1, 58 | 1/1~Whether the angels know the mysteries of grace?~
487 1, 58 | would seem that the angels know mysteries of grace. For,
488 1, 58 | Therefore the angels know the mysteries of grace.~
489 1, 58 | essence. Therefore they know the mysteries of grace.~
490 1, 58 | prophets." Therefore angels know ~the mysteries of grace.~
491 1, 58 | Therefore the angels do not ~know mysteries of grace.~Aquin.:
492 1, 58 | knowledge the angels cannot know ~mysteries of grace. For
493 1, 58 | Word. By ~such vision they know mysteries of grace, but
494 1, 58 | mysteries: nor do ~they all know them equally; but just as
495 1, 58 | not necessary for them to know ~everything hidden in it.~
496 1, 58 | which the prophets did not know. Thus we ~read (Eph. 3:4,
497 1, 58 | what the former did not know; according to Ps. ~118:100: "
498 1, 59 | have, whoever desires to know anything is in potentiality
499 1, 59 | it may happen ~that we know many things, but understand
500 1, 59 | through the ~Word, they know all things under one intelligible
1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-1589 |