1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1459
Part, Question
1 1, 1 | nobler bodies, and this for three reasons. Firstly, because
2 1, 1 | 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: These three - history, etiology, analogy -
3 1, 1 | allegory alone stands for the three spiritual senses. Thus Hugh
4 1, 1 | allegorical sense, laying down three senses only - the historical,
5 1, 2 | 26)~THE EXISTENCE OF GOD (THREE ARTICLES)~Because the chief
6 1, 2 | Concerning the first, there are three points of inquiry:~(1) Whether
7 1, 3 | body is that which has the ~three dimensions. But Holy Scripture
8 1, 3 | Scripture attributes the three dimensions to ~God, for
9 1, 3 | and this ~can be shown in three ways. First, because no
10 1, 3 | it attributes to God the three dimensions under the ~comparison
11 1, 3 | any genus may be ~shown in three ways. First, because a species
12 1, 3 | this point there have been three errors. Some have ~affirmed
13 1, 4 | THE PERFECTION OF GOD (THREE ARTICLES)~Having considered
14 1, 4 | Concerning the first there are three points of inquiry:~(1) Whether
15 1, 5 | Wis. 11:21). And to these three can be reduced species,
16 1, 5 | Nat. Boni. iii): "These ~three - mode, species and order -
17 1, 5 | made; thus, where these three abound the things are ~very
18 1, 5 | 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: These three only follow upon being,
19 1, 5 | by opposites. But these three do ~not seem to be opposites;
20 1, 5 | is not divided into these three as something ~univocal to
21 1, 6 | others; wherefore these three ~things are in God as in
22 1, 10 | difference between these three to consist in the fact ~
23 1, 11 | can be shown from these three sources that God is one. ~
24 1, 12 | demonstration that a triangle has three angles equal to two right
25 1, 12 | comprehension" is one of the three prerogatives of the soul, ~
26 1, 12 | the blessed possess these three things in God; because they ~
27 1, 12 | for instance, that God is Three and One.~Aquin.: SMT FP
28 1, 13 | however, seem to be untrue for three reasons. ~First because
29 1, 13 | extremes, it happens in three ways that a relation is
30 1, 13 | This name "God" in the three aforesaid significations
31 1, 13 | properly applied to God, for ~three reasons:~Aquin.: SMT FP
32 1, 13 | of faith; as that God is Three and One; and that He is ~
33 1, 14 | number ~six, knows the number three also by proper knowledge.~
34 1, 14 | thing is signified by these three - viz. the nativity of Christ. ~
35 1, 14 | be called speculative in ~three ways: first, on the part
36 1, 15 | Out. Para. 1/1 - OF IDEAS (THREE ARTICLES)~After considering
37 1, 15 | And about this there are three points of inquiry:~(1) Whether
38 1, 16 | and that two added to three make five." But the truth
39 1, 16 | and the fact that two and three ~make five, have eternity
40 1, 16 | cause of the truth of the three propositions, ~"Socrates
41 1, 16 | follow, though one of the ~three propositions is true, that
42 1, 17 | exist in ~the senses in three ways. In the first way,
43 1, 18 | fact of ~their possessing three dimensions: and is sometimes
44 1, 19 | 4 ~This can be shown in three ways: First, from the order
45 1, 19 | etc. can be understood in three ways. First, by a restricted ~
46 1, 24 | 1/1 - THE BOOK OF LIFE (THREE ARTICLES)~We now consider
47 1, 24 | concerning which there are three ~points of inquiry:~(1)
48 1, 25 | knowledge directs, which three things in ~God are identified.
49 1, 29 | Further, as we say there are three persons in God, so we say ~
50 1, 29 | God, so we say ~there are three subsistences in God; which
51 1, 29 | suppositum." It is also called by three names ~signifying a reality -
52 1, 29 | substance." What these three names signify in common
53 1, 29 | Reply OBJ 2: As we say "three persons" plurally in God,
54 1, 29 | persons" plurally in God, and "three ~subsistences," so the Greeks
55 1, 29 | subsistences," so the Greeks say "three hypostases." But because
56 1, 29 | When we say there are three who bear witness in heaven, ~
57 1, 29 | Ghost, and it is asked, Three what? ~the answer is, Three
58 1, 29 | Three what? ~the answer is, Three persons." Therefore person
59 1, 29 | predicated plurally of the ~Three in contrast to the nature
60 1, 29 | adjective; as when we ~say, "Three persons," or, "one is the
61 1, 29 | forasmuch as we speak of "three ~persons," so far from the
62 1, 29 | fish. So to those who ask, Three ~what? we answer, Three
63 1, 29 | Three ~what? we answer, Three persons.~Aquin.: SMT FP
64 1, 30 | hypostasis." So, as we say, "Three ~persons," they say "Three
65 1, 30 | Three ~persons," they say "Three hypostases." We are not,
66 1, 30 | however, accustomed to ~say Three substances, lest we be understood
67 1, 30 | we be understood to mean three essences or ~natures, by
68 1, 30 | or absolute, as two and three and ~four; and number as
69 1, 30 | part of two, and two of three, as one man is part of ~
70 1, 30 | of ~two men, and two of three; but this does not apply
71 1, 30 | Whether there are more than three persons in God?~Aquin.:
72 1, 30 | that there are more than three persons in God. For ~the
73 1, 30 | that there are not only three ~persons in God.~Aquin.:
74 1, 30 | contained within the ~number three.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[30] A[
75 1, 30 | It is said: "There are three who bear witness in ~heaven,
76 1, 30 | 7). To those ~who ask, "Three what?" we answer, with Augustine (
77 1, 30 | Augustine (De Trin. vii, 4), ~"Three persons." Therefore there
78 1, 30 | Therefore there are but three persons in God.~Aquin.:
79 1, 30 | above, there can be only three persons ~in God. For it
80 1, 30 | explained. ~Therefore only three persons exist in God, the
81 1, 30 | constituting a person. The three ~relations - paternity,
82 1, 30 | because the magnitude of the three persons is the same (Q[42], ~
83 1, 30 | person" can be common to the three persons?~Aquin.: SMT FP
84 1, 30 | cannot be common to the ~three persons. For nothing is
85 1, 30 | nothing is common to the three persons but the ~essence.
86 1, 30 | it is not common to all three.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[30] A[
87 1, 30 | is not common to all the three persons.~Aquin.: SMT FP
88 1, 30 | person" is common to the three, it is ~common either really,
89 1, 30 | so really; otherwise ~the three persons would be one person;
90 1, 30 | person' is not common to the three.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[30] A[
91 1, 30 | 4) that when we ask, ~"Three what?" we say, "Three persons,"
92 1, 30 | Three what?" we say, "Three persons," because what a
93 1, 30 | person" is common to the three when we say "three persons";
94 1, 30 | to the three when we say "three persons"; for when we ~say "
95 1, 30 | persons"; for when we ~say "three men" we show that "man"
96 1, 30 | that "man" is common to the three. Now it is ~clear that this
97 1, 30 | essence were ~common to the three; otherwise there would be
98 1, 30 | only one person of the ~three, as also one essence.~Aquin.:
99 1, 30 | is common in idea to the three divine persons.~Aquin.:
100 1, 31 | thus in God there ~would be three essential unities; which
101 1, 31 | signify the one essence of the three persons, according as trinity
102 1, 31 | the Trinity, as He is not three persons. ~Yet it does not
103 1, 31 | essence, as if we meant three times one; but ~we place
104 1, 31 | be trine, there would be three ~"supposita" of the Trinity;
105 1, 31 | follows ~that there are three "supposita" of the Godhead.~
106 1, 31 | that when we speak of ~three persons, "we do not mean
107 1, 31 | away ~the society of the three persons; for, as Hilary
108 1, 32 | Through this number" - namely, three - "we bring ourselves to ~
109 1, 32 | perfection residing in the number three. In the Platonic ~books
110 1, 32 | were appropriated to the three persons, yet they are said
111 1, 32 | i.e. of persons], in the three properties; i.e. ~in the
112 1, 32 | Ghost to be one God and three persons, to those who ask: "
113 1, 32 | God? and whereby are They three persons?" as we answer that ~
114 1, 32 | because in Him there are three persons, He is called the
115 1, 32 | are five notions for the three persons in God, ~there must
116 1, 32 | spiration. ~Either these three notions really differ, or
117 1, 32 | belongs to two persons. Three ~are personal notions -
118 1, 34 | OF THE PERSON OF THE SON (THREE ARTICLES)~We next consider
119 1, 34 | consider the person of the Son. Three names are attributed to ~
120 1, 34 | Concerning Word there are three points of inquiry:~(1) Whether
121 1, 34 | Damascene mentions these three kinds of words (De Fide
122 1, 36 | name which is common to the three ~persons is the proper name
123 1, 36 | Dictionary).] is common to the three ~persons; for Hilary (De
124 1, 36 | 1 Jn. 5:7): "There are three who bear ~witness in heaven,
125 1, 36 | vii, 4): "When we ask, Three what? we say, Three ~persons."
126 1, 36 | ask, Three what? we say, Three ~persons." Therefore the
127 1, 36 | accommodated to ~signify one of the three persons, the one who proceeds
128 1, 36 | not be one essence of the three persons: since everything
129 1, 36 | creature proceeds from ~the three persons not as distinct
130 1, 37 | called Wisdom, and are not three Wisdoms, but one; I know
131 1, 39 | Whether we should say that the three persons are of one essence?~(
132 1, 39 | there is ~one essence and three persons, as is clear from
133 1, 39 | there are one essence and ~three persons.~Aquin.: SMT FP
134 1, 39 | it must be said that the three persons are of one essence?~
135 1, 39 | not right to say that the three persons are of one ~essence.
136 1, 39 | Holy Ghost ~"are indeed three by substance, but one in
137 1, 39 | His essence. Therefore the three persons are not of one essence.~
138 1, 39 | therefore to say that the three persons are of one nature.~
139 1, 39 | fitting to say that the three persons are of one essence.~
140 1, 39 | we do not say that ~the three persons are "from one essence [
141 1, 39 | equally wrong to say that the three persons are "of ~one essence [
142 1, 39 | error. Now, to say that the three persons are of one essence
143 1, 39 | must not be said that the three persons are of ~one substance.~
144 1, 39 | Arians, ~means that the three persons are of one essence.~
145 1, 39 | taken as the form ~of the three persons, according to our
146 1, 39 | speak of one essence of the three persons, and three persons
147 1, 39 | of the three persons, and three persons of the one ~essence,
148 1, 39 | so ~many words that the three persons are of one essence,
149 1, 39 | described by saying that the three ~persons are "of one essence,"
150 1, 39 | divine essence"; or, the three persons are "of one essence."~
151 1, 39 | things. So, when we say, "three persons of one ~essence,"
152 1, 39 | should mean if we said, ~"three persons from the same essence."~
153 1, 39 | predicated in the singular of the three ~persons?~Aquin.: SMT FP
154 1, 39 | predicated in the singular of the three persons, but in the plural. ~
155 1, 39 | that has Godhead." But the three persons are three who have
156 1, 39 | But the three persons are three who have Godhead. ~Therefore
157 1, 39 | Godhead. ~Therefore the three persons are "three Gods."~
158 1, 39 | Therefore the three persons are "three Gods."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
159 1, 39 | of persons. Therefore the three persons are "several Gods,"
160 1, 39 | it is predicated of the three persons in the ~plural.
161 1, 39 | predicated in the plural of the ~three persons.~Aquin.: SMT FP
162 1, 39 | nature. But we say there are three persons. So for the same
163 1, 39 | reason we can ~say there are "three Gods."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
164 1, 39 | substantives are predicated of the three ~persons in the singular
165 1, 39 | adjectives are predicated of the three persons in the ~plural.
166 1, 39 | manner are predicated of the three ~persons in the singular,
167 1, 39 | Socrates, Plato and Cicero are "three men"; whereas we do ~not
168 1, 39 | Son and Holy Ghost are "three Gods," but "one God"; ~forasmuch
169 1, 39 | God"; ~forasmuch as in the three "supposita" of human nature
170 1, 39 | of human nature there are three ~humanities, whereas in
171 1, 39 | humanities, whereas in the three divine Persons there is
172 1, 39 | manner are predicated of the three persons plurally, by reason ~
173 1, 39 | supposita." For we say there are three "existent" or ~three "wise"
174 1, 39 | are three "existent" or ~three "wise" beings, or three "
175 1, 39 | three "wise" beings, or three "eternal," "uncreated,"
176 1, 39 | Consequently, although there are "three having Godhead," it does
177 1, 39 | not ~follow that there are three Gods.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39]
178 1, 39 | supposita" the Greeks said "three ~hypostases," so also in
179 1, 39 | personality. So, as there are three personalities - that is, ~
180 1, 39 | personalities - that is, ~three personal properties in the
181 1, 39 | it is ~predicated of the three, not in the singular, but
182 1, 39 | God spirates"; or for three, as when it is ~said: "To
183 1, 39 | say for instance, "God is three ~persons"; or "God is the
184 1, 39 | name "God" as regards the three ~persons is as a general
185 1, 39 | is really the same as the three persons. ~Whence, one person,
186 1, 39 | one person, and two, and three, can be predicated of the
187 1, 39 | say, ~"The essence is the three persons"; so likewise it
188 1, 39 | true to say, "God ~is the three persons."~Aquin.: SMT FP
189 1, 39 | which are common to the three ~persons, may verge on error
190 1, 39 | which words he designates three names proper to the ~persons:
191 1, 39 | 2]). He also designates three appropriated terms. ~For
192 1, 39 | he subjoins, "All these three are ~one by the Father;
193 1, 39 | Son. For beauty includes three conditions, ~"integrity"
194 1, 39 | is ~manifest that these three imply unity, but in different
195 1, 39 | Christ. i, 5) that "The Three are one, by reason of the ~
196 1, 40 | distinction. ~So, as the three persons agree in the unity
197 1, 41 | and this is common to the three persons; and so those actions
198 1, 41 | De Trin. vii, 6) that the three persons ~are not from the
199 1, 41 | But when we say that ~the three persons are 'of' the divine
200 1, 41 | God, are common to the ~three persons. But the power of
201 1, 41 | begetting is not common to the three ~persons, but proper to
202 1, 41 | begetting is common to the three persons: but in ~respect
203 1, 41 | there would be more ~than three Persons in God; which is
204 1, 42 | relation is common to the ~three persons; for the persons
205 1, 42 | Athanasius says that "the three persons are co-eternal ~
206 1, 42 | same essence; and thus the three persons would not be ~one
207 1, 42 | Athanasius declares that "all the three persons are ~co-eternal
208 1, 42 | or than fewer parts; as three men are more than two, ~
209 1, 42 | in the ~Father there are three notions, while in the Son
210 1, 42 | I answer that, There are three points of consideration
211 1, 44 | the ~first point there are three things to be considered: (
212 1, 45 | which is common to the ~three Persons. Hence to create
213 1, 45 | although common to the three Persons, ~still belongs
214 1, 45 | creation, whilst common to the three Persons, ~belongs to them
215 1, 45 | also are reduced ~those three, "number," "weight," and "
216 1, 45 | the ~order. And to these three are reduced the other three
217 1, 45 | three are reduced the other three mentioned by ~Augustine (
218 1, 45 | self-subsisting; ~and in such are the three above-mentioned things to
219 1, 45 | it ~necessary that these three things should be found in
220 1, 45 | ascribed in ~regard to those three things.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
221 1, 46 | THE DURATION OF CREATURES (THREE ARTICLES)~Next must be considered
222 1, 46 | about which there are three points for treatment:~(1)
223 1, 46 | manner. This appears in three ways. Firstly, because,
224 1, 46 | sense in order to exclude ~three errors. For some said that
225 1, 47 | DISTINCTION OF THINGS IN GENERAL (THREE ARTICLES)~After considering
226 1, 47 | the first head, there are three points of inquiry:~(1) The
227 1, 47 | be better if He had made three; and so on to ~infinite.~
228 1, 49 | 1/1 - THE CAUSE OF EVIL (THREE ARTICLES)~We next inquire
229 1, 49 | Concerning this there are three ~points of inquire:~(1)
230 1, 51 | COMPARISON WITH BODIES (THREE ARTICLES)~We next inquire
231 1, 51 | first heading there are three points of inquiry:~(1) Whether
232 1, 52 | ANGELS IN RELATION TO PLACE (THREE ARTICLES)~We now inquire
233 1, 52 | Touching this there are ~three subjects of inquiry:~(1)
234 1, 53 | MOVEMENT OF THE ANGELS (THREE ARTICLES)~We must next consider
235 1, 53 | which ~heading there are three points of inquiry:~(1) Whether
236 1, 55 | OF THE ANGELIC KNOWLEDGE (THREE ARTICLES)~Next in order,
237 1, 55 | Under this heading there are three points of inquiry:~(1) Do
238 1, 56 | KNOWLEDGE OF IMMATERIAL THINGS (THREE ARTICLES)~We now inquire
239 1, 56 | first heading ~there are three points of inquiry: ~(1)
240 1, 56 | that a thing is ~known in three ways: first, by the presence
241 1, 64 | Body Para. 2/2~Of these three kinds of knowledge the first
242 1, 64 | The demons know a truth in three ways: first of all by the ~
243 1, 65 | Scripture makes ~mention, three works are found, namely,
244 1, 67 | Light cannot be a body, for three evident reasons. First, ~
245 1, 68 | without form during the first three days, and ~afterwards, on
246 1, 68 | In this body there are three heavens; the first ~is the
247 1, 68 | to him, then, there are three heavens, ~the aerial, the
248 1, 68 | heavens are added to the three enumerated above, there
249 1, 68 | 4] Body Para. 6/6~Again, three kinds of supernatural visions,
250 1, 69 | already existed, since these three are named as already clearly ~
251 1, 69 | and in respect of these ~three Scripture mentions three
252 1, 69 | three Scripture mentions three kinds of formlessness. Heaven,
253 1, 69 | other writers there are three solutions, ~which Augustine
254 1, 70 | REGARDS THE FOURTH DAY (THREE ARTICLES)~We must next consider
255 1, 70 | the first head there are three points of inquiry:~(1) As
256 1, 70 | above (Q[69], A[1]), that three ~things are recorded as
257 1, 70 | and the ~earth; and these three received their form from
258 1, 70 | received their form from the three days' work of ~distinction,
259 1, 71 | distinction. Hence, as ~among the three days assigned to the work
260 1, 71 | intermediate body, so in the three days of the work of adornment,
261 1, 73 | BELONG TO THE SEVENTH DAY (THREE ARTICLES)~We must next consider
262 1, 73 | Under ~this head there are three points of inquiry:~(1) About
263 1, 74 | THE SEVEN DAYS IN COMMON (THREE ARTICLES)~We next consider
264 1, 74 | in common: and there are three ~points of inquiry:~(1)
265 1, 74 | creation is divided are three, according to some holy ~
266 1, 74 | that perfection consists in three things, the beginning, the ~
267 1, 74 | above writers as to the last three days, differs as to the
268 1, 74 | differs as to the first ~three, for, according to him,
269 1, 74 | aliquot parts, one, two, three; since ~one day is assigned
270 1, 74 | corporeal creatures, and three to the work of adornment.~
271 1, 74 | of the world. The above three reasons are given by ~Rabbi
272 1, 74 | Gen. ad lit. i, 8), these three ~phrases denote the threefold
273 1, 74 | with the eighth day. The three reasons assigned above are
274 1, 75 | Ang. Hier. xi) says that three things are ~to be found
275 1, 76 | attributed to anyone in ~three ways, as is clear from the
276 1, 76 | This can be made clear by three different reasons.~Aquin.:
277 1, 76 | divided into parts, there are three kinds ~of totality, corresponding
278 1, 76 | totality, corresponding to three kinds of division. There
279 1, 37 | called Wisdom, and are not three Wisdoms, but one; I know
280 1, 39 | Whether we should say that the three persons are of one essence?~(
281 1, 39 | there is ~one essence and three persons, as is clear from
282 1, 39 | there are one essence and ~three persons.~Aquin.: SMT FP
283 1, 39 | it must be said that the three persons are of one essence?~
284 1, 39 | not right to say that the three persons are of one ~essence.
285 1, 39 | Holy Ghost ~"are indeed three by substance, but one in
286 1, 39 | His essence. Therefore the three persons are not of one essence.~
287 1, 39 | therefore to say that the three persons are of one nature.~
288 1, 39 | fitting to say that the three persons are of one essence.~
289 1, 39 | we do not say that ~the three persons are "from one essence [
290 1, 39 | equally wrong to say that the three persons are "of ~one essence [
291 1, 39 | error. Now, to say that the three persons are of one essence
292 1, 39 | must not be said that the three persons are of ~one substance.~
293 1, 39 | Arians, ~means that the three persons are of one essence.~
294 1, 39 | taken as the form ~of the three persons, according to our
295 1, 39 | speak of one essence of the three persons, and three persons
296 1, 39 | of the three persons, and three persons of the one ~essence,
297 1, 39 | so ~many words that the three persons are of one essence,
298 1, 39 | described by saying that the three ~persons are "of one essence,"
299 1, 39 | divine essence"; or, the three persons are "of one essence."~
300 1, 39 | things. So, when we say, "three persons of one ~essence,"
301 1, 39 | should mean if we said, ~"three persons from the same essence."~
302 1, 39 | predicated in the singular of the three ~persons?~Aquin.: SMT FP
303 1, 39 | predicated in the singular of the three persons, but in the plural. ~
304 1, 39 | that has Godhead." But the three persons are three who have
305 1, 39 | But the three persons are three who have Godhead. ~Therefore
306 1, 39 | Godhead. ~Therefore the three persons are "three Gods."~
307 1, 39 | Therefore the three persons are "three Gods."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
308 1, 39 | of persons. Therefore the three persons are "several Gods,"
309 1, 39 | it is predicated of the three persons in the ~plural.
310 1, 39 | predicated in the plural of the ~three persons.~Aquin.: SMT FP
311 1, 39 | nature. But we say there are three persons. So for the same
312 1, 39 | reason we can ~say there are "three Gods."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
313 1, 39 | substantives are predicated of the three ~persons in the singular
314 1, 39 | adjectives are predicated of the three persons in the ~plural.
315 1, 39 | manner are predicated of the three ~persons in the singular,
316 1, 39 | Socrates, Plato and Cicero are "three men"; whereas we do ~not
317 1, 39 | Son and Holy Ghost are "three Gods," but "one God"; ~forasmuch
318 1, 39 | God"; ~forasmuch as in the three "supposita" of human nature
319 1, 39 | of human nature there are three ~humanities, whereas in
320 1, 39 | humanities, whereas in the three divine Persons there is
321 1, 39 | manner are predicated of the three persons plurally, by reason ~
322 1, 39 | supposita." For we say there are three "existent" or ~three "wise"
323 1, 39 | are three "existent" or ~three "wise" beings, or three "
324 1, 39 | three "wise" beings, or three "eternal," "uncreated,"
325 1, 39 | Consequently, although there are "three having Godhead," it does
326 1, 39 | not ~follow that there are three Gods.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39]
327 1, 39 | supposita" the Greeks said "three ~hypostases," so also in
328 1, 39 | personality. So, as there are three personalities - that is, ~
329 1, 39 | personalities - that is, ~three personal properties in the
330 1, 39 | it is ~predicated of the three, not in the singular, but
331 1, 39 | God spirates"; or for three, as when it is ~said: "To
332 1, 39 | say for instance, "God is three ~persons"; or "God is the
333 1, 39 | name "God" as regards the three ~persons is as a general
334 1, 39 | is really the same as the three persons. ~Whence, one person,
335 1, 39 | one person, and two, and three, can be predicated of the
336 1, 39 | say, ~"The essence is the three persons"; so likewise it
337 1, 39 | true to say, "God ~is the three persons."~Aquin.: SMT FP
338 1, 39 | which are common to the three ~persons, may verge on error
339 1, 39 | which words he designates three names proper to the ~persons:
340 1, 39 | 2]). He also designates three appropriated terms. ~For
341 1, 39 | he subjoins, "All these three are ~one by the Father;
342 1, 39 | Son. For beauty includes three conditions, ~"integrity"
343 1, 39 | is ~manifest that these three imply unity, but in different
344 1, 39 | Christ. i, 5) that "The Three are one, by reason of the ~
345 1, 40 | distinction. ~So, as the three persons agree in the unity
346 1, 41 | and this is common to the three persons; and so those actions
347 1, 41 | De Trin. vii, 6) that the three persons ~are not from the
348 1, 41 | But when we say that ~the three persons are 'of' the divine
349 1, 41 | God, are common to the ~three persons. But the power of
350 1, 41 | begetting is not common to the three ~persons, but proper to
351 1, 41 | begetting is common to the three persons: but in ~respect
352 1, 41 | there would be more ~than three Persons in God; which is
353 1, 42 | relation is common to the ~three persons; for the persons
354 1, 42 | Athanasius says that "the three persons are co-eternal ~
355 1, 42 | same essence; and thus the three persons would not be ~one
356 1, 42 | Athanasius declares that "all the three persons are ~co-eternal
357 1, 42 | or than fewer parts; as three men are more than two, ~
358 1, 42 | in the ~Father there are three notions, while in the Son
359 1, 42 | I answer that, There are three points of consideration
360 1, 45 | the ~first point there are three things to be considered: (
361 1, 46 | which is common to the ~three Persons. Hence to create
362 1, 46 | although common to the three Persons, ~still belongs
363 1, 46 | creation, whilst common to the three Persons, ~belongs to them
364 1, 46 | also are reduced ~those three, "number," "weight," and "
365 1, 46 | the ~order. And to these three are reduced the other three
366 1, 46 | three are reduced the other three mentioned by ~Augustine (
367 1, 46 | self-subsisting; ~and in such are the three above-mentioned things to
368 1, 46 | it ~necessary that these three things should be found in
369 1, 46 | ascribed in ~regard to those three things.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
370 1, 47 | THE DURATION OF CREATURES (THREE ARTICLES)~Next must be considered
371 1, 47 | about which there are three points for treatment:~(1)
372 1, 47 | manner. This appears in three ways. Firstly, because,
373 1, 47 | sense in order to exclude ~three errors. For some said that
374 1, 48 | DISTINCTION OF THINGS IN GENERAL (THREE ARTICLES)~After considering
375 1, 48 | the first head, there are three points of inquiry:~(1) The
376 1, 48 | be better if He had made three; and so on to ~infinite.~
377 1, 50 | 1/1 - THE CAUSE OF EVIL (THREE ARTICLES)~We next inquire
378 1, 50 | Concerning this there are three ~points of inquire:~(1)
379 1, 52 | COMPARISON WITH BODIES (THREE ARTICLES)~We next inquire
380 1, 52 | first heading there are three points of inquiry:~(1) Whether
381 1, 53 | ANGELS IN RELATION TO PLACE (THREE ARTICLES)~We now inquire
382 1, 53 | Touching this there are ~three subjects of inquiry:~(1)
383 1, 54 | MOVEMENT OF THE ANGELS (THREE ARTICLES)~We must next consider
384 1, 54 | which ~heading there are three points of inquiry:~(1) Whether
385 1, 56 | OF THE ANGELIC KNOWLEDGE (THREE ARTICLES)~Next in order,
386 1, 56 | Under this heading there are three points of inquiry:~(1) Do
387 1, 57 | KNOWLEDGE OF IMMATERIAL THINGS (THREE ARTICLES)~We now inquire
388 1, 57 | first heading ~there are three points of inquiry: ~(1)
389 1, 57 | that a thing is ~known in three ways: first, by the presence
390 1, 65 | Body Para. 2/2~Of these three kinds of knowledge the first
391 1, 65 | The demons know a truth in three ways: first of all by the ~
392 1, 66 | Scripture makes ~mention, three works are found, namely,
393 1, 68 | Light cannot be a body, for three evident reasons. First, ~
394 1, 69 | without form during the first three days, and ~afterwards, on
395 1, 69 | In this body there are three heavens; the first ~is the
396 1, 69 | to him, then, there are three heavens, ~the aerial, the
397 1, 69 | heavens are added to the three enumerated above, there
398 1, 69 | 4] Body Para. 6/6~Again, three kinds of supernatural visions,
399 1, 70 | already existed, since these three are named as already clearly ~
400 1, 70 | and in respect of these ~three Scripture mentions three
401 1, 70 | three Scripture mentions three kinds of formlessness. Heaven,
402 1, 70 | other writers there are three solutions, ~which Augustine
403 1, 71 | REGARDS THE FOURTH DAY (THREE ARTICLES)~We must next consider
404 1, 71 | the first head there are three points of inquiry:~(1) As
405 1, 71 | above (Q[69], A[1]), that three ~things are recorded as
406 1, 71 | and the ~earth; and these three received their form from
407 1, 71 | received their form from the three days' work of ~distinction,
408 1, 71 | distinction. Hence, as ~among the three days assigned to the work
409 1, 71 | intermediate body, so in the three days of the work of adornment,
410 1, 72 | BELONG TO THE SEVENTH DAY (THREE ARTICLES)~We must next consider
411 1, 72 | Under ~this head there are three points of inquiry:~(1) About
412 1, 73 | THE SEVEN DAYS IN COMMON (THREE ARTICLES)~We next consider
413 1, 73 | in common: and there are three ~points of inquiry:~(1)
414 1, 73 | creation is divided are three, according to some holy ~
415 1, 73 | that perfection consists in three things, the beginning, the ~
416 1, 73 | above writers as to the last three days, differs as to the
417 1, 73 | differs as to the first ~three, for, according to him,
418 1, 73 | aliquot parts, one, two, three; since ~one day is assigned
419 1, 73 | corporeal creatures, and three to the work of adornment.~
420 1, 73 | of the world. The above three reasons are given by ~Rabbi
421 1, 73 | Gen. ad lit. i, 8), these three ~phrases denote the threefold
422 1, 73 | with the eighth day. The three reasons assigned above are
423 1, 74 | Ang. Hier. xi) says that three things are ~to be found
424 1, 75 | attributed to anyone in ~three ways, as is clear from the
425 1, 75 | This can be made clear by three different reasons.~Aquin.:
426 1, 75 | divided into parts, there are three kinds ~of totality, corresponding
427 1, 75 | totality, corresponding to three kinds of division. There
428 1, 77 | specifically will be ~divided into three parts: first, we shall consider
429 1, 77 | called its ~parts. But only three parts of the soul are commonly
430 1, 77 | Therefore ~there are only three genera of powers in the
431 1, 77 | above ~numbered. Of these, three are called souls, and four
432 1, 77 | The vegetative part has three powers. For the vegetative ~
433 1, 77 | vii). Therefore, of these three powers, the ~generative
434 1, 77 | 4). Hence it is that the three other senses ~are not exercised
435 1, 77 | xii, 6,7,24) describes three ~kinds of vision; namely,
436 1, 78 | passive may be taken in three ways. Firstly, in its ~most
437 1, 78 | intellect, ~and will are three powers, this is not in accordance
438 1, 78 | does not take the above ~three for three powers; but by
439 1, 78 | take the above ~three for three powers; but by memory he
440 1, 78 | distinct from ~the passive. But three of these are distinct, as
441 1, 78 | of these are distinct, as three states of the ~passive intellect,
442 1, 78 | which application is made in three ~ways. One way in so far
443 1, 80 | THE POWER OF SENSUALITY (THREE ARTICLES)~Next we have to
444 1, 80 | concerning which there ~are three points of inquiry:~(1) Whether
445 1, 81 | it is necessary for the three angles of a triangle to
446 1, 83 | corporeal things there are three points ~to be considered: (
447 1, 83 | point the philosophers held three opinions. For ~Democritus
448 1, 84 | knowledge. Now there are three grades of ~the cognitive
449 1, 87 | KNOWS WHAT IS ABOVE ITSELF (THREE ARTICLES)~We must now consider
450 1, 87 | Under this head there are three points of inquiry:~(1) Whether
451 1, 89 | production of man, there are three things to be considered: (
452 1, 92 | image of God is in man in ~three ways. First, inasmuch as
453 1, 92 | applicable to any of the Three ~Persons, but only to the
454 1, 92 | there is one Nature in ~Three Persons.~Aquin.: SMT FP
455 1, 92 | image in the ~soul to these three things - mind, knowledge,
456 1, 92 | understanding, and will." But these three ~are "natural powers of
457 1, 92 | proportion to mind, he takes three things in the soul ~which
458 1, 92 | Trinity pre-eminently to these three, as though the first assignation ~
459 1, 92 | chiefly consists in these three things, memory, understanding, ~
460 1, 92 | understanding, and will are not three powers as stated in the ~
461 1, 93 | understanding, there are three degrees of ~movement in
462 1, 95 | man. This can be proved in three ~ways. First, from the order
463 1, 96 | may be incorruptible in three ways. First, on the ~part
464 1, 101 | Gen. ad lit. viii, 1): "Three general ~opinions prevail
465 1, 102 | the world may be taken in three ways. First, ~on the part
466 1, 102 | divides providence into three parts. The first he ascribes
467 1, 102 | design of government, into three parts.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
468 1, 104 | worker, according to these three ~things. First as an end.
469 1, 104 | of nature is surpassed in three ways: firstly, in ~the substance
470 1, 105 | the first point, there are three things to be considered: (
471 1, 106 | present to the intellect in three ways; first, ~habitually,
472 1, 107 | Hier. vi) distinguishes three ~hierarchies of angels.~
473 1, 107 | same manner we distinguish three angelic hierarchies. For
474 1, 107 | universal knowledge has three grades among the ~angels.
475 1, 107 | all may be reduced ~to three, when we consider that every
476 1, 107 | diversity is reduced to three - namely, to the ~summit,
477 1, 107 | hierarchy Dionysius ~places three orders (Coel. Hier. vi).~
478 1, 107 | several angels (for instance, three or four), are ~of one order,
479 1, 107 | Powers." Therefore these three ~names do not seem to be
480 1, 107 | to be properly applied to three orders.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
481 1, 107 | in fire we may ~consider three things. First, the movement
482 1, 107 | it is clear ~that these three things exist in every kind
483 1, 107 | 3/7~As regards the end, three things may be considered.
484 1, 107 | 7~As regards government, three things are comprised therein,
485 1, 111 | as ~six administer and three assist.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
486 1, 114 | of bodies there have been three errors. For ~some denied
487 1, 114 | answer that, There have been three opinions about the demons.
488 1, 117 | FROM MAN AS TO THE SOUL (THREE ARTICLES)~We next consider
489 1, 117 | the first head there are three points of inquiry:~(1) Whether
490 1, 117 | Thus there would be in ~man three souls of which one would
491 2, 1 | diverse things, as last ends. Three reasons may be assigned ~
492 2, 2 | may be said of the other three. ~Fourthly, because man
493 2, 3 | may belong to happiness in three ways: (1) ~essentially, (
494 2, 3 | intellect. This is evident for three ~reasons. First because
495 2, 3 | virtues, he gives no more than three speculative ~virtues - "
496 2, 4 | search for the end. To these three, there are a corresponding ~
497 2, 4 | there are a corresponding ~three in Happiness itself. For
498 2, 4 | 3). And therefore these three must concur with ~Happiness;
499 2, 7 | it. Now this happens in three ways: first, ~inasmuch as
500 2, 8 | REGARD TO WHAT IT WILLS (THREE ARTICLES)~We must now consider
1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1459 |