1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1221
Part, Question
1 1, 1 | principles is worthy of the name of wisdom; ~seeing that
2 1, 2 | which everyone gives the name of God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
3 1, 3 | gave the ~incommunicable name to stones and wood" (Wis.
4 1, 5 | meaning ~signified by the name of a thing is that which
5 1, 5 | relation in God; for we name God, as he says, from ~creatures,
6 1, 11 | to call ~"being" by the name of "being"; therefore it
7 1, 12 | intelligible object itself by the name of light of ~illumination.
8 1, 12 | the ~Lord of hosts is Thy Name. Great in counsel, and incomprehensible
9 1, 13 | from time?~(8) Whether this name "God" is a name of nature,
10 1, 13 | Whether this name "God" is a name of nature, or of the operation?~(
11 1, 13 | operation?~(9) Whether this name "God" is a communicable
12 1, 13 | God" is a communicable name?~(10) Whether it is taken
13 1, 13 | opinion?~(11) Whether this name, "Who is," is the supremely
14 1, 13 | the supremely appropriate name of ~God?~(12) Whether affirmative
15 1, 13 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether a name can be given to God?~Aquin.:
16 1, 13 | OBJ 1: It seems that no name can be given to God. For
17 1, 13 | Of Him there is neither name, nor can one be found ~of
18 1, 13 | is written: "What is His name, and what is the name of ~
19 1, 13 | His name, and what is the name of ~His Son, if thou knowest?" (
20 1, 13 | 1~OBJ 2: Further, every name is either abstract or concrete.
21 1, 13 | subsisting thing. Therefore no name can be said of God.~Aquin.:
22 1, 13 | of war, ~Almighty is His name."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[13] A[
23 1, 13 | therefore that we can give a ~name to anything in as far as
24 1, 13 | creatures, yet not so that the name which signifies Him expresses ~
25 1, 13 | essence in itself. Thus the name "man" expresses the essence ~
26 1, 13 | the idea expressed by the name is the ~definition.~Aquin.:
27 1, 13 | The reason why God has no name, or is said to be above ~
28 1, 13 | OBJ 2: Because we know and name God from creatures, the
29 1, 13 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether any name can be applied to God substantially?~
30 1, 13 | OBJ 1: It seems that no name can be applied to God substantially.
31 1, 13 | Therefore ~neither is any name we can use applied substantially
32 1, 13 | names, that from which the name is ~derived is different
33 1, 13 | as ~for instance, this name "stone" [lapis] is imposed
34 1, 13 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether any name can be applied to God in
35 1, 13 | OBJ 1: It seems that no name is applied literally to
36 1, 13 | 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, no name can be applied literally
37 1, 13 | very ~signification of the name itself as "stone" signifies
38 1, 13 | the reason that what the name signifies does not belong
39 1, 13 | the Lord of hosts is ~Thy name" (Jer. 32:18).~Aquin.: SMT
40 1, 13 | the idea signified by the ~name is the conception in the
41 1, 13 | thing signified by the ~name. But our intellect, since
42 1, 13 | reduced to one; for if the name "dog" be said equivocally
43 1, 13 | agree with their ~effects in name and definition, as man generates
44 1, 13 | various things under the same ~name but not in the same sense,
45 1, 13 | predicated equivocally. But no name ~belongs to God in the same
46 1, 13 | the signification of ~the name. Hence it is evident that
47 1, 13 | to other terms. Hence ~no name is predicated univocally
48 1, 13 | univocal sense. For we can name God only ~from creatures (
49 1, 13 | rather ~than of God. For we name anything accordingly as
50 1, 13 | says (Div. Nom. i): "We name God from ~creatures." But
51 1, 13 | since that ~expressed by the name is the definition, as the
52 1, 13 | says (Metaph. ~iv), such a name must be applied primarily
53 1, 13 | proportionate ~likeness, so the name of "lion" applied to God
54 1, 13 | Hence as regards what the name signifies, these names are
55 1, 13 | to the imposition of the name.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[13] A[
56 1, 13 | Ambrose (De Fide i) that ~this name "Lord" is the name of power,
57 1, 13 | this name "Lord" is the name of power, which is the divine
58 1, 13 | Para. 1/1~Whether this name "God" is a name of the nature?~
59 1, 13 | Whether this name "God" is a name of the nature?~Aquin.: SMT
60 1, 13 | OBJ 1: It seems that this name, "God," is not a name of
61 1, 13 | this name, "God," is not a name of the nature. For ~Damascene
62 1, 13 | operation. Therefore this name "God" signifies His ~operation
63 1, 13 | unknown to us. Therefore this name "God" does not signify the ~
64 1, 13 | Fide i) that "God" is a name of the ~nature.~Aquin.:
65 1, 13 | I answer that, Whence a name is imposed, and what the
66 1, 13 | is imposed, and what the name signifies are ~not always
67 1, 13 | properties ~and operations, so we name substance sometimes for
68 1, 13 | or its ~property; e.g. we name the substance of a stone
69 1, 13 | loedit pedem]; but still this name is ~not meant to signify
70 1, 13 | things the meaning of the name and its source are the same.~
71 1, 13 | operations or effects, we name Him from these, as ~said
72 1, 13 | said in A[1]; hence this name "God" is a name of operation
73 1, 13 | hence this name "God" is a name of operation so far as ~
74 1, 13 | of its meaning. For this name is imposed from His ~universal
75 1, 13 | speak of God intend ~to name God as exercising providence
76 1, 13 | from this operation, this name "God" is imposed to ~signify
77 1, 13 | the signification of the name "God."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
78 1, 13 | 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: We can name a thing according to the
79 1, 13 | from its property, this name "stone" signifies ~the nature
80 1, 13 | for the idea which the name signifies is the ~definition,
81 1, 13 | Q[12], A[12]). Thus the name "God" signifies the divine ~
82 1, 13 | divine ~nature, for this name was imposed to signify something
83 1, 13 | all things; for ~those who name God intend to signify all
84 1, 13 | Para. 1/1~Whether this name "God" is communicable?~Aquin.:
85 1, 13 | OBJ 1: It seems that this name "God" is communicable. For
86 1, 13 | the thing signified by a name shares in the name itself.
87 1, 13 | by a name shares in the name itself. But ~this name "
88 1, 13 | the name itself. But ~this name "God" signifies the divine
89 1, 13 | Pt. 1:4). Therefore this name "God" ~can be communicated
90 1, 13 | not communicable. Now this name ~"God" is not a proper,
91 1, 13 | Ps. 81:6). Therefore this name "God" is communicable.~Aquin.:
92 1, 13 | 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, this name "God" comes from operation,
93 1, 13 | the like. Therefore this name "God" is ~communicable.~
94 1, 13 | gave the incommunicable name to ~wood and stones" (Wis.
95 1, 13 | reference to the divine name. Therefore ~this name "God"
96 1, 13 | divine name. Therefore ~this name "God" is incommunicable.~
97 1, 13 | Para. 1/3~I answer that, A name is communicable in two ways:
98 1, 13 | the signification of the name. For instance ~this name "
99 1, 13 | name. For instance ~this name "lion" is properly communicable
100 1, 13 | all others. Hence ~every name imposed to signify any singular
101 1, 13 | conceived in idea. Hence no name signifying any ~individual
102 1, 13 | Para. 2/3~Since, then, this name "God" is given to signify
103 1, 13 | it follows that this name "God" is ~incommunicable
104 1, 13 | in the same ~way as this name "sun" would be communicable
105 1, 13 | opinion." Nevertheless this name "God" is ~communicable,
106 1, 13 | Body Para. 3/3~But if any name were given to signify God
107 1, 13 | this something," ~that name would be absolutely incommunicable;
108 1, 13 | and this is like giving a name to ~the sun as signifying
109 1, 13 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: This name "God" is an appellative
110 1, 13 | God" is an appellative name, and not a proper ~name,
111 1, 13 | name, and not a proper ~name, for it signifies the divine
112 1, 13 | said above concerning the name "sun."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
113 1, 13 | communicable to many. But ~this name "God" is given to God from
114 1, 13 | Para. 1/1 ~Whether this name "God" is applied to God
115 1, 13 | OBJ 1: It seems that this name "God" is applied to God
116 1, 13 | not in ~truth. But this name "beatitude" is applied univocally
117 1, 13 | happiness. Therefore also this name "God" is ~applied univocally
118 1, 13 | he understands by the name God an omnipotent being,
119 1, 13 | is God." Therefore this name ~"God" is applied univocally
120 1, 13 | equivocal. Therefore this name ~"God" applied to the true
121 1, 13 | one God. Therefore this name "God" is ~not applied univocally,
122 1, 13 | 1/2~I answer that, This name "God" in the three aforesaid
123 1, 13 | question at issue. For this name "God," as ~signifying the
124 1, 13 | participation. For when we name anyone god by ~participation,
125 1, 13 | participation, we understand by the name of god some likeness of
126 1, 13 | call an idol god, by this name god we understand ~and signify
127 1, 13 | it is manifest that ~the name has different meanings,
128 1, 13 | the ~predication of the name, but on the signification:
129 1, 13 | signification: for this name "man," ~of whomsoever it
130 1, 13 | be multiplied if by the name "man" we meant to ~signify
131 1, 13 | meant to signify by this ~name "man" what man really is,
132 1, 13 | to signify by the same ~name a stone, or something else.
133 1, 13 | because each of them uses this name GOD to signify the true
134 1, 13 | God, he does not use this name as meaning ~God in opinion,
135 1, 13 | Catholics ~sometimes use the name in the sense, as in the
136 1, 13 | different predication of the name, and not from ~its various
137 1, 13 | So a pagan can take ~this name "God" in the same way when
138 1, 13 | altogether, he could not even name Him, unless, perhaps, ~as
139 1, 13 | Para. 1/1~Whether this name, HE WHO IS, is the most
140 1, 13 | WHO IS, is the most proper name of God?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
141 1, 13 | OBJ 1: It seems that this name HE WHO IS is not the most
142 1, 13 | IS is not the most proper name of God. For this name "God"
143 1, 13 | proper name of God. For this name "God" is an incommunicable
144 1, 13 | God" is an incommunicable name. But this name HE WHO ~IS,
145 1, 13 | incommunicable name. But this name HE WHO ~IS, is not an incommunicable
146 1, 13 | is not an incommunicable name. Therefore this name HE
147 1, 13 | incommunicable name. Therefore this name HE WHO IS is not ~the most
148 1, 13 | is not ~the most proper name of God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
149 1, 13 | Div. Nom. iii) that "the name of good ~excellently manifests
150 1, 13 | things. Therefore ~this name "good" is supremely proper
151 1, 13 | proper to God, and not this name HE WHO IS. ~Aquin.: SMT
152 1, 13 | 3: Further, every divine name seems to imply relation
153 1, 13 | through creatures. But this name HE WHO IS ~imports no relation
154 1, 13 | creatures. Therefore this name HE WHO IS is not ~the most
155 1, 13 | say to me, What is His name? what shall I say to them?"
156 1, 13 | 3:13,14). Therefor this name HE WHO IS most properly
157 1, 13 | 1/4~I answer that, This name HE WHO IS is most properly
158 1, 13 | substance." Now by any other name some mode of substance is
159 1, 13 | determined, ~whereas this name HE WHO IS, determines no
160 1, 13 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: This name HE WHO IS is the name of
161 1, 13 | This name HE WHO IS is the name of God more properly than ~
162 1, 13 | more properly than ~this name "God," as regards its source,
163 1, 13 | the object intended by the name, this name "God" is more
164 1, 13 | intended by the name, this name "God" is more proper, ~as
165 1, 13 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: This name "good" is the principal
166 1, 13 | good" is the principal name of God in so far as ~He
167 1, 13 | existence, from which comes this name, HE WHO IS.~Aquin.: SMT
168 1, 13 | incongruous," inasmuch as no name ~can be applied to God according
169 1, 14 | Q[4], A[2]), whenever a name taken from ~any created
170 1, 18 | of things. And because we name a thing in ~accordance with
171 1, 18 | must be said of life. The name is given from a certain ~
172 1, 18 | operations from ~which its name is taken, and thus the Philosopher
173 1, 19 | metaphorically in God under ~the name of that passion. Thus with
174 1, 19 | that, By these signs we name the expression of will by
175 1, 20 | greater good in giving Him "a name that is above ~all names,"
176 1, 21 | the defect we call by that name. ~Now defects are not removed,
177 1, 24 | and I will not blot ~his name out of the book of life" (
178 1, 27 | ought to be some special name ~besides this common name
179 1, 27 | name ~besides this common name of procession. But no other
180 1, 27 | procession. But no other name is applicable ~but generation.
181 1, 27 | rather as spirit; which name expresses a certain ~vital
182 1, 27 | procession in God takes its name from the ~proper notion
183 1, 27 | will and intellect; the name being imposed to signify ~
184 1, 27 | 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: We can name God only from creatures (
185 1, 27 | has no proper or special name, except that of ~generation.
186 1, 27 | remained ~without a special name; but it can be called spiration,
187 1, 28 | is not expressed ~in the name of essence. Thus it is clear
188 1, 28 | can be signified by any name. Hence it does not follow
189 1, 28 | than can be included in any name, it does not follow, ~if
190 1, 28 | relative term or any other name applied to God signify something ~
191 1, 28 | paternity and filiation are by name distinguished ~from the
192 1, 28 | procession of Love has no proper ~name of its own (Q[27], A[4]);
193 1, 28 | ensuing relations ~a proper name of their own. The relation
194 1, 29 | hypostasis.~(3) Whether the name of person is becoming to
195 1, 29 | definition; since man is the name of a thing, and ~"species"
196 1, 29 | thing, and ~"species" is a name of an intention. Therefore,
197 1, 29 | Therefore, since person is the name ~of a thing (for it signifies
198 1, 29 | which is an intentional name comes improperly into the ~
199 1, 29 | substance should have a special name of their ~own; for they
200 1, 29 | rational nature have a special name even ~among other substances;
201 1, 29 | other substances; and this name is "person."~Aquin.: SMT
202 1, 29 | added, forasmuch as by the ~name of hypostasis or first substance
203 1, 29 | neither the definition nor the name of person belongs to it.~
204 1, 29 | the rational nature by the name ~hypostasis." But this with
205 1, 29 | sense, can be applied a name expressive of an intention;
206 1, 29 | genus of substances, this name "person" signifies in the
207 1, 29 | It would seem that the name "person" should not be said
208 1, 29 | by the oracles." But the name "person" is ~not expressed
209 1, 29 | contains every perfection, this name "person" is fittingly ~applied
210 1, 29 | Reply OBJ 2: Although this name "person" may not belong
211 1, 29 | comedies and tragedies, the name "person" was given to signify
212 1, 29 | other dignity; and thus the name "person" ~pre-eminently
213 1, 29 | divine essence; as this name "God" and this word "Wise"; ~
214 1, 29 | is true to say ~that the name "person" signifies relation
215 1, 30 | understood, the Greeks use the name "hypostasis." So, as we
216 1, 30 | 1~OBJ 3: Further, if the name "person" is common to the
217 1, 30 | fact that "person" is not a name of ~exclusion nor of intention,
218 1, 30 | nor of intention, but the name of a reality. We must therefore ~
219 1, 30 | even in human affairs this name "person" is common by a ~
220 1, 30 | distinct from others. But the name of a designated ~singular
221 1, 30 | determinate thing; ~as the name Socrates signifies this
222 1, 30 | singular things; while this name "person" is not given to
223 1, 30 | divine nature. Thus this ~name "person" is common in idea
224 1, 31 | joined to an essential name in God?~(4) Whether it can
225 1, 31 | trinity in God. For every name in God ~signifies substance
226 1, 31 | substance or relation. But this name "Trinity" does not signify ~
227 1, 31 | for it does not express a name ~that refers to another.
228 1, 31 | the unity ~of a collective name is the least of unities,
229 1, 31 | 1/1~I answer that, The name "Trinity" in God signifies
230 1, 31 | Other," being like the name of a particular thing, refers ~
231 1, 31 | Socrates, which is the name of the "suppositum"; whereas,
232 1, 32 | forasmuch as we always name a thing as we understand
233 1, 33 | properly signified by this name ~"Father"?~(3) Whether "
234 1, 33 | Para. 1/1~Whether this name "Father" is properly the
235 1, 33 | Father" is properly the name of a divine person? ~Aquin.:
236 1, 33 | It would seem that this name "Father" is not properly
237 1, 33 | Father" is not properly the name of ~a divine person. For
238 1, 33 | a divine person. For the name "Father" signifies relation.
239 1, 33 | substance. Therefore this name "Father" is not ~properly
240 1, 33 | Father" is not ~properly a name signifying a Person.~Aquin.:
241 1, 33 | Therefore the ~more proper name of the divine person is
242 1, 33 | term cannot be the proper name of anyone. ~But the word
243 1, 33 | by essence. Therefore the name "Father" taken from ~generation
244 1, 33 | not seem to be the proper name of any divine person.~Aquin.:
245 1, 33 | answer that, The proper name of any person signifies
246 1, 33 | other persons. ~Hence this name "Father," whereby paternity
247 1, 33 | signified, is the proper ~name of the person of the Father.~
248 1, 33 | subsisting person. So this name ~"father" among us does
249 1, 33 | relation signified by the name "Father" is a subsisting
250 1, 33 | explained (Q[29], A[4]), this name "person" in God ~signifies
251 1, 33 | generation; and therefore the name ~"Father" is more expressive
252 1, 33 | Para. 1/1~Whether this name "Father" is applied to God,
253 1, 33 | God, firstly as a personal name?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[33] A[
254 1, 33 | It would seem that this name "Father" is not applied
255 1, 33 | firstly as a personal name. For in the intellect the
256 1, 33 | the ~particular. But this name "Father" as a personal name,
257 1, 33 | name "Father" as a personal name, belongs to the ~person
258 1, 33 | comes first as an essential name before its personal sense.~
259 1, 33 | not taken as an essential name before it is ~taken personally.~
260 1, 33 | Para. 1/2~I answer that, A name is applied to that wherein
261 1, 33 | for the latter bears the name by reason of a kind ~of
262 1, 33 | the signification of the ~name; since all imperfect things
263 1, 33 | perfect things. Hence ~this name "lion" is applied first
264 1, 33 | the creature, to which the name of filiation is applied
265 1, 33 | further understood that the name "unbegotten" belongs ~to
266 1, 33 | Holy Ghost has no special name, as stated above (Q[27], ~
267 1, 34 | Whether it is the proper name of the Son?~(3) Whether
268 1, 34 | Son?~(3) Whether in the name of Word is expressed relation
269 1, 34 | Word in God is a personal name?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[34] A[
270 1, 34 | in God is not a personal name. For ~personal names are
271 1, 34 | Therefore Word is not a personal name in ~God.~Aquin.: SMT FP
272 1, 34 | spoken. Therefore, the name Word is used as an essential
273 1, 34 | the Word is not a personal name in ~God.~Aquin.: SMT FP
274 1, 34 | But ~the Son is a personal name, since it is said relatively.
275 1, 34 | 1/3~I answer that, The name of Word in God, if taken
276 1, 34 | proper sense, is ~a personal name, and in no way an essential
277 1, 34 | and in no way an essential name.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[34] A[
278 1, 34 | Word" is the Son's proper name?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[34] A[
279 1, 34 | Word" is not the proper name of the Son. For ~the Son
280 1, 34 | word cannot be the ~proper name of the person of the Son.~
281 1, 34 | 3: Further, every proper name of a person signifies some
282 1, 34 | Word is the Son's proper name, it ~signifies some property
283 1, 34 | personally, and is the proper name of the person of the Son.
284 1, 34 | is comprised as in the ~name Son. Hence Augustine says (
285 1, 34 | be expressed by only one name.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[34] A[
286 1, 34 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the name "Word" imports relation
287 1, 34 | It would seem that the name 'Word' does not import relation
288 1, 34 | to ~creatures. For every name that connotes some effect
289 1, 34 | lxxxiii, qu. 63), that "the name ~Word signifies not only
290 1, 34 | included indirectly in the name of the ~person; for person
291 1, 34 | rational nature. ~Therefore the name of a divine person, as regards
292 1, 34 | begotten; and in this ~way the name Word imports relation to
293 1, 34 | creatures is implied in the ~name of the Word. Nor is it true
294 1, 34 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: The name of Idea is imposed chiefly
295 1, 34 | said personally. But the name of Word is imposed chiefly
296 1, 35 | personally?~(2) Whether this name belongs to the Son alone?~
297 1, 35 | Image cannot be a personal name in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
298 1, 35 | and is thus a personal name.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[35] A[
299 1, 35 | the ~persons. Hence the name "Image" is a personal name.~
300 1, 35 | name "Image" is a personal name.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[35] A[
301 1, 35 | Augustine (Fulgentius) uses the name of Image in this ~sense
302 1, 35 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the name of Image is proper to the
303 1, 35 | It would seem that the name of Image is not proper to
304 1, 35 | Latin Doctors attribute ~the name Image to the Son alone.
305 1, 36 | of God. ~Concerning the name "Holy Ghost" there are four
306 1, 36 | inquiry:~(1) Whether this name, "Holy Ghost," is the proper
307 1, 36 | Holy Ghost," is the proper name of one divine ~Person?~(
308 1, 36 | Para. 1/1~Whether this name "Holy Ghost" is the proper
309 1, 36 | Holy Ghost" is the proper name of one divine person?~Aquin.:
310 1, 36 | It would seem that this name, "Holy Ghost," is not the
311 1, 36 | Ghost," is not the proper ~name of one divine person. For
312 1, 36 | one divine person. For no name which is common to the three ~
313 1, 36 | three ~persons is the proper name of any one person. But this
314 1, 36 | any one person. But this name of 'Holy ~Ghost' [*It should
315 1, 36 | all flesh." Therefore this name 'Holy Ghost' is not the
316 1, 36 | Ghost' is not the proper name of a ~divine person.~Aquin.:
317 1, 36 | says (De Trin.). But this name "Holy Ghost" is not a relative ~
318 1, 36 | relative ~term. Therefore this name is not the proper name of
319 1, 36 | this name is not the proper name of a divine Person.~Aquin.:
320 1, 36 | because the Son is the name of a divine Person He cannot ~
321 1, 36 | not seem to be the proper name of a divine Person.~Aquin.:
322 1, 36 | Therefore the Holy Ghost is the name of a divine person.~Aquin.:
323 1, 36 | procession of love, has no proper name of its own, as stated above (
324 1, 36 | procession ~are without a name (Q[28], A[4]): for which
325 1, 36 | manner has not a proper name. But as some names are accommodated ~
326 1, 36 | proceeds by way of love, this name "Holy ~Ghost" is by the
327 1, 36 | appropriateness of this name may be shown in two ways.
328 1, 36 | proper signification of the name. For the name ~spirit in
329 1, 36 | signification of the name. For the name ~spirit in things corporeal
330 1, 36 | Reply OBJ 2: Although this name "Holy Ghost" does not indicate
331 1, 36 | relation ~only. Yet this name may be understood as including
332 1, 36 | 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: In the name Son we understand that relation
333 1, 36 | that principle: but in the ~name "Father" we understand the
334 1, 36 | principle; and likewise in ~the name of Spirit inasmuch as it
335 1, 36 | from the Father, and we name Him the spirit of the Father;
336 1, 36 | is from the Son, yet we name Him the ~Spirit of the Son."
337 1, 36 | not hold good as to the name "Creator"; ~because the
338 1, 37 | Out. Para. 1/1 - OF THE NAME OF THE HOLY GHOST - LOVE (
339 1, 37 | now inquire concerning the name "Love," on which arise two
340 1, 37 | Whether it is the proper name of the Holy Ghost?~(2) Whether
341 1, 37 | Whether "Love" is the proper name of the Holy Ghost?~Aquin.:
342 1, 37 | Love" is not the proper name of the Holy ~Ghost. For
343 1, 37 | together one Charity." But no name which is predicated in the
344 1, 37 | all together, is a proper name of a person. Therefore ~
345 1, 37 | person. Therefore ~this name, "Love," is not the proper
346 1, 37 | Love," is not the proper name of the Holy Ghost.~Aquin.:
347 1, 37 | Therefore Love is not the proper name of the ~Holy Ghost.~Aquin.:
348 1, 37 | 1/3~I answer that, The name Love in God can be taken
349 1, 37 | personally it is the proper name of the Holy Ghost; ~as Word
350 1, 37 | as Word is the proper name of the Son.~Aquin.: SMT
351 1, 37 | that sense "love" is the name of ~the person and "to love"
352 1, 38 | Out. Para. 1/1 - OF THE NAME OF THE HOLY GHOST, AS GIFT (
353 1, 38 | Gift" can be a personal name?~(2) Whether it is the proper
354 1, 38 | Whether it is the proper name of the Holy Ghost? ~(tm)
355 1, 38 | Whether "Gift" is a personal name?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[38] A[
356 1, 38 | Gift" is not a personal name. For every ~personal name
357 1, 38 | name. For every ~personal name imports a distinction in
358 1, 38 | distinction in God. But the name of "Gift" does ~not import
359 1, 38 | Gift" is not a personal name.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[38] A[
360 1, 38 | 2: Further, no personal name belongs to the divine essence.
361 1, 38 | Gift" is not a personal name.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[38] A[
362 1, 38 | Gift" is not a personal name.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[38] A[
363 1, 38 | Gift" is not a personal name.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[38] A[
364 1, 38 | Holy Ghost is a personal name; so also therefore is ~"
365 1, 38 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The name "Gift" imports a personal
366 1, 38 | giver, ~and is a personal name.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[38] A[
367 1, 38 | OBJ 3: Gift as a personal name in God does not imply subjection, ~
368 1, 38 | that it is an ~essential name because it imports relation
369 1, 38 | Whether "Gift" is the proper name of the Holy Ghost?~Aquin.:
370 1, 38 | that Gift is not the proper name of the Holy Ghost. ~For
371 1, 38 | the Holy Ghost. ~For the name Gift comes from being given.
372 1, 38 | 2: Further, every proper name of a person signifies a
373 1, 38 | Therefore ~Gift is not a proper name of the Holy Ghost.~Aquin.:
374 1, 38 | Therefore Gift is not the proper name of the Holy Ghost.~Aquin.:
375 1, 38 | Ghost ~receives His proper name from the fact that He proceeds
376 1, 38 | Therefore Gift is the proper name of the Holy Ghost.~Aquin.:
377 1, 38 | personally in God, is the proper name of the ~Holy Ghost.~Aquin.:
378 1, 38 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The name Gift involves the idea of
379 1, 39 | essential names, as the name "God," should not ~be predicated
380 1, 39 | plurality of a substantive name depends upon the form ~signified
381 1, 39 | the form ~signified by the name. But as accidents have their
382 1, 39 | Reply OBJ 1: Though the name "God" signifies a being
383 1, 39 | signification is different. For the name "God" ~is used substantively;
384 1, 39 | it stands for." But this ~name "God" seems to be a singular
385 1, 39 | say, "God creates," this name "God" stands for ~the essence.
386 1, 39 | Some have said that this name "God" and the like, ~properly
387 1, 39 | which is signified by the name God, is the same ~as Godhead.
388 1, 39 | possesses it, just as the name "man" signifies humanity
389 1, 39 | Reply OBJ 1: Although this name "God" agrees with singular
390 1, 39 | the form signified by the ~name "God" - that is, the divine
391 1, 39 | of the notional act this name "God" stands for the ~person
392 1, 39 | adjunct to determine this name to the person of the Son,
393 1, 39 | animal to be man. But this name "God" as regards the three ~
394 1, 39 | cannot be predicated of this name "God," except in an accidental
395 1, 39 | proper to the ~persons: the name of the "Father," the name "
396 1, 39 | name of the "Father," the name "Image" proper to the Son ~(
397 1, 39 | Q[35], A[2]), and the name "Bounty" or "Gift," which
398 1, 40 | by relations; whence this name ~"Father" signifies not
399 1, 40 | only; forasmuch as ~this name "Father" signifies the relation
400 1, 41 | whereto, as ~is evident, the name of filiation would not apply
401 1, 42 | impassibility of His birth; let the name Son insinuate ~His consubstantiality."
402 1, 43 | doctrine is ~according to her name."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[43] A[
403 1, 45 | emanation we designate by the name of creation. Now what proceeds
404 1, 48 | Therefore it must be that by the name of evil is signified the ~
405 1, 58 | is comprised ~under the name of day, as the middle between
406 1, 59 | Reply OBJ 2: Although the name of the appetitive part is
407 1, 59 | many other things; thus the name of a ~stone [lapis] is derived
408 1, 60 | love has been called by the name "concupiscence" while the ~
409 1, 61 | but are ~designated by the name "heavens" or of "light."
410 1, 62 | 2 ~I answer that, By the name of beatitude is understood
411 1, 63 | sphere, and calling by the name of "demons" the ~intellectual
412 1, 66 | fire are not mentioned ~by name is due to the fact that
413 1, 66 | since spirit is another name for ~air, and considered
414 1, 67 | First, because light gives a name to the air, since by ~it
415 1, 68 | which has received ~the name firmament from the firmness
416 1, 68 | the heavens ~praise the name of the Lord," and (Dn. 3:
417 1, 68 | express mention of air by name, to avoid setting before
418 1, 68 | fittingly designated under the name of ~waters. For the starry
419 1, 68 | and included under that name.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[68] A[
420 1, 68 | all such bodies under the name of water, and ~thus it is
421 1, 68 | In the second place, the name heaven is applied to a body
422 1, 68 | lofty mountain of that name: the higher region of air
423 1, 68 | word heaven, as when this ~name is applied to the Blessed
424 1, 69 | the earth is given its name at its first creation by
425 1, 69 | Therefore the ~imposition of its name on the third day seems to
426 1, 69 | an equivocal use of the name ~imposed. Thus we find it
427 1, 69 | from the sea; ~although the name earth is equally applied
428 1, 69 | bestowed corresponded to the name He gave.~Aquin.: SMT FP
429 1, 74 | entire period takes its ~name, as is customary, from its
430 1, 37 | Out. Para. 1/1 - OF THE NAME OF THE HOLY GHOST - LOVE (
431 1, 37 | now inquire concerning the name "Love," on which arise two
432 1, 37 | Whether it is the proper name of the Holy Ghost?~(2) Whether
433 1, 37 | Whether "Love" is the proper name of the Holy Ghost?~Aquin.:
434 1, 37 | Love" is not the proper name of the Holy ~Ghost. For
435 1, 37 | together one Charity." But no name which is predicated in the
436 1, 37 | all together, is a proper name of a person. Therefore ~
437 1, 37 | person. Therefore ~this name, "Love," is not the proper
438 1, 37 | Love," is not the proper name of the Holy Ghost.~Aquin.:
439 1, 37 | Therefore Love is not the proper name of the ~Holy Ghost.~Aquin.:
440 1, 37 | 1/3 ~I answer that, The name Love in God can be taken
441 1, 37 | personally it is the proper name of the Holy Ghost; ~as Word
442 1, 37 | as Word is the proper name of the Son.~Aquin.: SMT
443 1, 37 | that sense "love" is the name of ~the person and "to love"
444 1, 38 | Out. Para. 1/1 - OF THE NAME OF THE HOLY GHOST, AS GIFT (
445 1, 38 | Gift" can be a personal name?~(2) Whether it is the proper
446 1, 38 | Whether it is the proper name of the Holy Ghost? ~(tm)
447 1, 38 | Whether "Gift" is a personal name?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[38] A[
448 1, 38 | Gift" is not a personal name. For every ~personal name
449 1, 38 | name. For every ~personal name imports a distinction in
450 1, 38 | distinction in God. But the name of "Gift" does ~not import
451 1, 38 | Gift" is not a personal name.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[38] A[
452 1, 38 | 2: Further, no personal name belongs to the divine essence.
453 1, 38 | Gift" is not a personal name.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[38] A[
454 1, 38 | Gift" is not a personal name. ~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[38] A[
455 1, 38 | Gift" is not a personal name.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[38] A[
456 1, 38 | Holy Ghost is a personal name; so also therefore is ~"
457 1, 38 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The name "Gift" imports a personal
458 1, 38 | giver, ~and is a personal name.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[38] A[
459 1, 38 | OBJ 3: Gift as a personal name in God does not imply subjection, ~
460 1, 38 | that it is an ~essential name because it imports relation
461 1, 38 | Whether "Gift" is the proper name of the Holy Ghost?~Aquin.:
462 1, 38 | that Gift is not the proper name of the Holy Ghost. ~For
463 1, 38 | the Holy Ghost. ~For the name Gift comes from being given.
464 1, 38 | 2: Further, every proper name of a person signifies a
465 1, 38 | Therefore ~Gift is not a proper name of the Holy Ghost.~Aquin.:
466 1, 38 | Therefore Gift is not the proper name of the Holy Ghost.~Aquin.:
467 1, 38 | Ghost ~receives His proper name from the fact that He proceeds
468 1, 38 | Therefore Gift is the proper name of the Holy Ghost.~Aquin.:
469 1, 38 | personally in God, is the proper name of the ~Holy Ghost.~Aquin.:
470 1, 38 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The name Gift involves the idea of
471 1, 39 | essential names, as the name "God," should not ~be predicated
472 1, 39 | plurality of a substantive name depends upon the form ~signified
473 1, 39 | the form ~signified by the name. But as accidents have their
474 1, 39 | Reply OBJ 1: Though the name "God" signifies a being
475 1, 39 | signification is different. For the name "God" ~is used substantively;
476 1, 39 | it stands for." But this ~name "God" seems to be a singular
477 1, 39 | say, "God creates," this name "God" stands for ~the essence.
478 1, 39 | Some have said that this name "God" and the like, ~properly
479 1, 39 | which is signified by the name God, is the same ~as Godhead.
480 1, 39 | possesses it, just as the name "man" signifies humanity
481 1, 39 | Reply OBJ 1: Although this name "God" agrees with singular
482 1, 39 | the form signified by the ~name "God" - that is, the divine
483 1, 39 | of the notional act this name "God" stands for the ~person
484 1, 39 | adjunct to determine this name to the person of the Son,
485 1, 39 | animal to be man. But this name "God" as regards the three ~
486 1, 39 | cannot be predicated of this name "God," except in an accidental
487 1, 39 | proper to the ~persons: the name of the "Father," the name "
488 1, 39 | name of the "Father," the name "Image" proper to the Son ~(
489 1, 39 | Q[35], A[2]), and the name "Bounty" or "Gift," which
490 1, 40 | by relations; whence this name ~"Father" signifies not
491 1, 40 | only; forasmuch as ~this name "Father" signifies the relation
492 1, 41 | whereto, as ~is evident, the name of filiation would not apply
493 1, 42 | impassibility of His birth; let the name Son insinuate ~His consubstantiality."
494 1, 43 | doctrine is ~according to her name."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[43] A[
495 1, 46 | emanation we designate by the name of creation. Now what proceeds
496 1, 49 | Therefore it must be that by the name of evil is signified the ~
497 1, 59 | is comprised ~under the name of day, as the middle between
498 1, 60 | Reply OBJ 2: Although the name of the appetitive part is
499 1, 60 | many other things; thus the name of a ~stone [lapis] is derived
500 1, 61 | love has been called by the name "concupiscence" while the ~
1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1221 |