1-500 | 501-859
Part, Question
1 1, 3 | i.e. God, "nor any other union with Him by mingling part ~
2 1, 8 | God's existence in man by union, ~which will be treated
3 1, 12 | viz. power of sight, and union of the thing seen ~with
4 1, 20 | and, so far as possible, union with that good. So ~love
5 1, 20 | especially on the ground of the union with the Godhead. But ~speaking
6 1, 39 | result from division, or from union or from community of possession,
7 1, 39 | to the Son, "concord" or "union" to the Holy Ghost. It is ~
8 1, 39 | principle from a principle." "Union" implies the unity of two;
9 1, 39 | Holy Ghost, Who is the union of the two, be excluded,
10 1, 39 | understand the oneness of the union between the Father and the
11 1, 43 | mission takes place by way of union to a ~visible creature,
12 1, 44 | rarefaction and condensation, by union and separation. And supposing
13 1, 51 | assumption is terminated in some union; because to ~assume implies
14 1, 54 | for it really follows the union of the object with the ~
15 1, 54 | is brought about by the union of the ~object understood
16 1, 60 | one with it by ~natural union, it loves it with natural
17 1, 60 | with it by ~non-natural union, then it loves it with non-natural
18 1, 60 | love rests ~upon natural union. Now the Divine nature is
19 1, 62 | fail. But from its ~perfect union with the uncreated good,
20 1, 62 | uncreated good, such as is the union of beatitude, ~it is rendered
21 1, 64 | Christ on account of the union of ~the Word. Such a statement
22 1, 70 | to bear in mind that the union of soul and body ~exists
23 1, 70 | bodies. Accordingly, the union of a soul to ~a heavenly
24 1, 70 | to show the nature of the union between these two parts.
25 1, 70 | Platonists ~explain the union of soul and body in the
26 1, 70 | mover and moved; not by the union of the mover, as the ~form,
27 1, 75 | itself; the second is the union of the ~soul with the body.
28 1, 75 | the soul by virtue of its union with the body. After separation
29 1, 75 | an angel ~except in its union with the body. But as the
30 1, 76 | Out. Para. 1/1 - OF THE UNION OF BODY AND SOUL (EIGHT
31 1, 76 | ARTICLES)~We now consider the union of the soul with the body;
32 1, 76 | Commentator held that this union is through the intelligible ~
33 1, 76 | particular man. But this link or union does not sufficiently ~explain
34 1, 76 | be a whole composed of a union of the intellect with ~whatever
35 1, 76 | as to the ~manner of the union of the intellect to this
36 1, 76 | involves the cessation of their union. But when ~breathing ceases,
37 1, 76 | subtle body, is the means of union between soul and ~body.~
38 1, 76 | there any other cause of union ~except the agent, which
39 1, 76 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The union of soul and body ceases
40 1, 76 | because this is the means of union, but because of the ~removal
41 1, 76 | is disposed for such a ~union. Nevertheless the breath
42 1, 39 | result from division, or from union or from community of possession,
43 1, 39 | to the Son, "concord" or "union" to the Holy Ghost. It is ~
44 1, 39 | principle from a principle." "Union" implies the unity of two;
45 1, 39 | Holy Ghost, Who is the union of the two, be excluded,
46 1, 39 | understand the oneness of the union between the Father and the
47 1, 43 | mission takes place by way of union to a ~visible creature,
48 1, 45 | rarefaction and condensation, by union and separation. And supposing
49 1, 52 | assumption is terminated in some union; because to ~assume implies
50 1, 55 | for it really follows the union of the object with the ~
51 1, 55 | is brought about by the union of the ~object understood
52 1, 61 | one with it by ~natural union, it loves it with natural
53 1, 61 | with it by ~non-natural union, then it loves it with non-natural
54 1, 61 | love rests ~upon natural union. Now the Divine nature is
55 1, 63 | fail. But from its ~perfect union with the uncreated good,
56 1, 63 | uncreated good, such as is the union of beatitude, ~it is rendered
57 1, 65 | Christ on account of the union of ~the Word. Such a statement
58 1, 71 | to bear in mind that the union of soul and body ~exists
59 1, 71 | bodies. Accordingly, the union of a soul to ~a heavenly
60 1, 71 | to show the nature of the union between these two parts.
61 1, 71 | Platonists ~explain the union of soul and body in the
62 1, 71 | mover and moved; not by the union of the mover, as the ~form,
63 1, 74 | itself; the second is the union of the ~soul with the body.
64 1, 74 | the soul by virtue of its union with the body. After separation
65 1, 74 | an angel ~except in its union with the body. But as the
66 1, 75 | Out. Para. 1/1 - OF THE UNION OF BODY AND SOUL (EIGHT
67 1, 75 | ARTICLES)~We now consider the union of the soul with the body;
68 1, 75 | Commentator held that this union is through the intelligible ~
69 1, 75 | particular man. But this link or union does not sufficiently ~explain
70 1, 75 | be a whole composed of a union of the intellect with ~whatever
71 1, 75 | as to the ~manner of the union of the intellect to this
72 1, 75 | involves the cessation of their union. But when ~breathing ceases,
73 1, 75 | subtle body, is the means of union between soul and ~body.~
74 1, 75 | there any other cause of union ~except the agent, which
75 1, 75 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The union of soul and body ceases
76 1, 75 | because this is the means of union, but because of the ~removal
77 1, 75 | is disposed for such a ~union. Nevertheless the breath
78 1, 83 | forgetfulness, through its union with the body: and thus
79 1, 83 | soul encounters through its union with the body. ~Consequently
80 1, 83 | Consequently the reason of the union of the soul with the body
81 1, 87 | to the point of perfect union ~between ourselves and the
82 1, 88 | that case, however, the union of soul and body would not ~
83 1, 88 | this does not mean that its union with the body is an accidental
84 1, 88 | for, on the contrary, such union belongs to its very nature,
85 1, 91 | not found in continual union with the female in perfect
86 1, 91 | First, to signify the social union of man and woman, for the
87 1, 93 | of separate substances by union with a corruptible body
88 1, 95 | others; nor would sexual union have been ~sterile.~Aquin.:
89 1, 97 | comes from nature, is ~the union of man and woman; for in
90 1, 97 | maturity; so in conceiving, the union was one, not of ~lustful
91 1, 107 | abide with ~him, in a close union. According to this similitude,
92 1, 116 | is hindered, through its union with the body, from the
93 1, 116 | But ~the Church is the union of all the faithful. Therefore
94 1, 117 | man ~who results from this union is a being by accident;
95 1, 117 | chance: since for this union to take place two wills
96 1, 117 | begetter. If, ~however, this union be neither voluntary nor
97 2, 3 | intellect to God is one of union and "information"; which
98 2, 3 | contemplation of the angels, in the union, as it were, of man with ~
99 2, 3 | the human intellect is by union with ~God, Who is the first
100 2, 3 | its ~perfection through union with God as with that object,
101 2, 4 | the lifting up of man to union of God.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[
102 2, 5 | sever the mind from that union. Therefore it seems unreasonable
103 2, 14 | one with us; either by union of affection - thus a ~man
104 2, 15 | and this implies a certain union to the object of consent.
105 2, 17 | which follows ~from the union of soul and body. Thus the
106 2, 18 | inasmuch as it implies union of male and female, but
107 2, 25 | love implies a certain union; since it is a "uniting
108 2, 25 | desire is a movement towards union with the thing coveted or
109 2, 25 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The union of lover and beloved is
110 2, 25 | twofold. There is real ~union, consisting in the conjunction
111 2, 25 | one with the other. This union ~belongs to joy or pleasure,
112 2, 25 | There is also an ~affective union, consisting in an aptitude
113 2, 25 | and love betokens such a union. ~This union precedes the
114 2, 25 | betokens such a union. ~This union precedes the movement of
115 2, 26 | Further, love is a kind of union or bond, as Augustine says (
116 2, 26 | Trin. viii, 10). But a union or bond is not a passion,
117 2, 26 | 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Union belongs to love in so far
118 2, 26 | not the very relation of union, but that union is a result ~
119 2, 26 | relation of union, but that union is a result ~of love. Hence,
120 2, 26 | says (Polit. ii, 1) that union is the work ~of love.~Aquin.:
121 2, 28 | of inquiry:~(1) Whether union is an effect of love?~(2)
122 2, 28 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether union is an effect of love?~Aquin.:
123 2, 28 | OBJ 1: It would seem that union is not an effect of love.
124 2, 28 | absence is ~incompatible with union. But love is compatible
125 2, 28 | present with you." Therefore union is not an effect of love.~
126 2, 28 | 1~OBJ 2: Further, every union is either according to essence,
127 2, 28 | But love does not cause union of essence; ~else love could
128 2, 28 | hand, love does not cause union of likeness, but rather
129 2, 28 | Q[27], A[3]). Therefore union is not an effect of love.~
130 2, 28 | beloved in act. Therefore union is the effect of knowledge ~
131 2, 28 | 1/2 ~I answer that, The union of lover and beloved is
132 2, 28 | twofold. The first is ~real union; for instance, when the
133 2, 28 | the lover. The ~second is union of affection: and this union
134 2, 28 | union of affection: and this union must be considered in ~relation
135 2, 28 | belonging to him. The second union is caused "formally" by ~
136 2, 28 | because love itself is this union or bond. In this sense Augustine ~
137 2, 28 | uniting" he refers to the union of affection, ~without which
138 2, 28 | unite," ~he refers to real union.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[28] A[
139 2, 28 | argument is true of real union. That is necessary to ~pleasure
140 2, 28 | 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Union has a threefold relation
141 2, 28 | relation to love. There is union ~which causes love; and
142 2, 28 | and this is substantial union, as regards the love ~with
143 2, 28 | other things, it is the union of likeness, as stated above (
144 2, 28 | A[3]). There is also a union which is essentially love
145 2, 28 | essentially love itself. This union ~is according to a bond
146 2, 28 | is likened to substantial union, ~inasmuch as the lover
147 2, 28 | concupiscence. Again there is a union, which is the effect of ~
148 2, 28 | effect of ~love. This is real union, which the lover seeks with
149 2, 28 | his ~love. Moreover this union is in keeping with the demands
150 2, 28 | a suitable and becoming ~union - to live together, speak
151 2, 28 | above. Consequently the union caused by love is closer
152 2, 28 | to the beloved. But the union itself is love, ~as stated
153 2, 31 | pleasure arises from union with a ~suitable object
154 2, 31 | as those of food, sexual union, and the ~like, are ordained.
155 2, 32 | since love is a kind of ~union or connaturalness of lover
156 2, 36 | since it is a ~kind of union; so separation is contrary
157 2, 36 | OBJ 1: Not every kind of union causes perfect goodness,
158 2, 36 | eating; because repletion ~or union of this kind, is repugnant
159 2, 36 | or because it has some union ~connected with it, such
160 2, 36 | connected with it, such as union of the sense to its object.~
161 2, 62 | to a certain spiritual ~union, whereby the will is, so
162 2, 66 | lover is ~drawn by desire to union with the beloved; hence
163 2, 68 | contact or some other kind of union between ~them. Now the primal
164 2, 68 | between ~them. Now the primal union of man with God is by faith,
165 2, 68 | hence fear does not denote union with God, but withdrawal
166 2, 69 | consisting in perfect ~union with God through consummate
167 2, 86 | viz. the privation of union with the Divine light.~Aquin.:
168 2, 87 | may be one in will by the union of love, it happens that
169 2, 102 | turtledove and dove denoted the union of the ~two natures"; or
170 2, 102 | as the sacrament of the union of Christ with ~the Church,
171 2, 102 | with ~the Church, for that union was not as yet brought about.
172 2, 102 | garments signified ~inordinate union of sexes, while the use
173 2, 103 | in order to further the union of Gentiles ~and Jews living
174 2, 105 | the ~offspring of this union "would not be looked upon
175 2, 111 | ordains a man immediately to a union with ~his last end, whereas
176 2, 111 | cannot cause ~another to have union with God, which he himself
177 2, 3 | proper end of faith is ~the union of the human mind with Divine
178 2, 9 | we believe, by a kind of union with them, ~belongs to the
179 2, 10 | none should be compelled to union ~with Christ, that we should
180 2, 12 | to the different kinds of union between man and ~God. For,
181 2, 16 | this, that love denotes union ~between lover and beloved,
182 2, 16 | towards an arduous good. Now union is of things ~that are distinct,
183 2, 16 | Yet if we presuppose the union of ~love with another, a
184 2, 18 | she binds herself in ~the union of love. Hence filial and
185 2, 18 | 3: Further, love implies union, whereas fear implies separation.
186 2, 18 | separation decreases when union increases. Therefore fear
187 2, 22 | hope: but ~charity implies union with that good, whereas
188 2, 23 | pursuit is to aim chiefly at union with and ~enjoyment of God:
189 2, 23 | principally directed towards union ~with God. And though both
190 2, 23 | Reply OBJ 5: Charity denotes union with God, whereas faith
191 2, 24 | since friendship implies union, for Dionysius says (Div. ~
192 2, 24 | unity ~is the principle of union, so the love with which
193 2, 25 | love according to a certain union in relation to God. ~Wherefore
194 2, 25 | just as unity surpasses union, the fact that man himself
195 2, 25 | of love arises from the union of lover and beloved: and ~
196 2, 25 | the different kinds of union, so that a man is more loved
197 2, 25 | touching that particular union in respect of which he is
198 2, 25 | love we should compare one union with ~another. Accordingly
199 2, 25 | 3~If however we compare union with union, it is evident
200 2, 25 | however we compare union with union, it is evident that the
201 2, 25 | it is evident that the union ~arising from natural origin
202 2, 25 | which is loved), or from the union between those who love. ~
203 2, 25 | 2~But on the part of the union, the wife ought to be loved
204 2, 25 | his wife as regards the union of carnal connection and ~
205 2, 25 | regards the closeness of the union.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[26] A[
206 2, 26 | because it denotes a certain union of affections between the ~
207 2, 26 | presupposing the aforesaid union of the ~affections with
208 2, 26 | such dilection or love adds union of ~affections, wherefore
209 2, 26 | but it adds a certain union with the beloved, which
210 2, 26 | with the beloved, which union is not denoted ~by goodwill.~
211 2, 26 | belongs to the ~aforesaid union of the affections.~Aquin.:
212 2, 26 | with a chain of spiritual union.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[27] A[
213 2, 26 | Further, love is a kind of union, as Dionysius shows (Div.
214 2, 28 | OBJ 2: Further, concord is union of wills. Now the nature
215 2, 28 | peace ~consists in such like union, for Dionysius says (Div.
216 2, 28 | of the appetite. Now the union of such movements is ~essential
217 2, 28 | On ~the other hand this union is not essential to concord:
218 2, 28 | wherefore concord ~denotes union of appetites among various
219 2, 28 | denotes, in ~addition to this union, the union of the appetites
220 2, 28 | addition to this union, the union of the appetites even in
221 2, 28 | Reply OBJ 1: Peace denotes union not only of the intellective
222 2, 28 | where "consent" ~denotes the union of appetites proceeding
223 2, 28 | and ~"connaturalness," the union of natural appetites.~Aquin.:
224 2, 28 | Peace implies a twofold union, as stated above (A[1]). ~
225 2, 28 | iv): and peace is ~the union of the appetite's inclinations.~
226 2, 28 | two ways: first, through union of the affections, ~which
227 2, 28 | it happens through real union, for instance when another'
228 2, 35 | an ~effect of charity, is union of wills not of opinions.
229 2, 42 | united to God, and this ~union is effected by charity,
230 2, 42 | life are ordained to this union, as to their end. Hence
231 2, 43 | intimately by a kind of ~union of the soul with Him, it
232 2, 43 | certain connaturalness ~or union with Divine things, which
233 2, 43 | degrees of wisdom through union with Divine things. For
234 2, 71 | measured, not from its being a union of bodies, but from being
235 2, 80 | God, adhering to Him by a union of the spirit; but it belongs ~
236 2, 81 | unite ourselves to Him." Now union with God is effected by
237 2, 81 | such as ~charity which is union with God. Now prayer tends
238 2, 108 | whereby the soul lives in union with God, as stated above ~(
239 2, 139 | nature of the species by the union of the sexes. Hence temperance
240 2, 149 | vice, so too the spiritual union of the mind with ~certain
241 2, 149 | delight in the ~spiritual union with that to which it behooves
242 2, 149 | refrains from delighting in union with other things against
243 2, 149 | mind from delighting in a union ~with unlawful things. Nevertheless,
244 2, 149 | not only of this sexual union but also of all the signs
245 2, 149 | chastity ~regards rather sexual union. Therefore purity is directed
246 2, 152 | fornication," which ~is the union of an unmarried man with
247 2, 152 | offspring to be born of this union. For ~we find in all animals
248 2, 152 | offspring's upbringing, the union is ~indeterminate, as in
249 2, 152 | against an indeterminate union of the ~sexes and demands
250 2, 152 | certainly would cease if the union of sexes were ~indeterminate.~
251 2, 152 | A[2] Body Para. 2/3~This union with a certain definite
252 2, 152 | law. Since, however, ~the union of the sexes is directed
253 2, 152 | it follows that this union of man and ~woman, which
254 2, 152 | fornication is an indeterminate union of the sexes, as ~something
255 2, 152 | imaginary ~from the real union of bodies, the flesh is
256 2, 152 | is unbecoming to venereal union on three ~counts. First,
257 2, 152 | debarred from venereal ~union, opportunities of venereal
258 2, 152 | Dei xv, 16), whereas the union of brothers and ~sisters
259 2, 162 | bearing and conceiving the union of ~both sexes would be
260 2, 163 | because, ~on account of her union with man, the devil was
261 2, 170 | knowledge is obscured in them by union with the body; yet in ~some
262 2, 170 | not much ~obscured through union with the body, are able
263 2, 178 | occupation"; ~and the third is "union with those things that are
264 2, 178 | i.e. conformably, "by the union of its powers, it is conducted
265 2, 182 | unites them in a ~Godlike union and a perfection beloved
266 2, 184 | Now the use ~of sexual union hinders the mind from giving
267 3, 1 | Incarnation; secondly, the mode of union of the Word ~Incarnate;
268 3, 1 | thirdly, what follows this union.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[1] Out.
269 3, 1 | it would not be a fitting union if one were "to paint a ~
270 3, 1 | capable of the grace of union, which is the ~greatest
271 3, 1 | Hence, on ~account of the union of charity, what is vouchsafed
272 3, 1 | s ultimate perfection in union with God follows.~Aquin.:
273 3, 1 | human nature is in the union with the Word, because "
274 3, 1 | is ~shown first from the union of the Divine and human
275 3, 2 | Para. 1/2 - OF THE MODE OF UNION OF THE WORD INCARNATE (TWELVE
276 3, 2 | must consider the mode of union of the Incarnate Word; and, ~
277 3, 2 | Incarnate Word; and, ~first, the union itself; secondly, the Person
278 3, 2 | inquiry:~(1) Whether the union of the Word Incarnate took
279 3, 2 | Incarnation?~(5) Whether any union of body and soul took place
280 3, 2 | accidentally?~(7) Whether the union itself is something created?~(
281 3, 2 | assumption?~(9) Whether the union of the two natures is the
282 3, 2 | natures is the greatest union?~(10) Whether the union
283 3, 2 | union?~(10) Whether the union of the two natures in Christ
284 3, 2 | 12) Whether the grace of union was natural to the man Christ?~
285 3, 2 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the Union of the Incarnate Word took
286 3, 2 | It would seem that the Union of the Word Incarnate took
287 3, 2 | could not be unless the ~union took place in the nature.
288 3, 2 | the nature. Therefore the union of the Word Incarnate ~took
289 3, 2 | one nature; therefore the union took place in the nature.~
290 3, 2 | having been taken away by the union." Therefore the union did
291 3, 2 | the union." Therefore the union did not take ~place in the
292 3, 2 | it is impossible that the union of ~the Incarnate Word took
293 3, 2 | in this way some said the union was by manner of confusion ~(
294 3, 2 | it would ~follow that the union of the Incarnation was not
295 3, 2 | some have said ~that the union of the Incarnation was brought
296 3, 2 | Divine and human natures (a union in ~subsistence having taken
297 3, 2 | not by change, but by ~union with the Word, its natural
298 3, 2 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the union of the Incarnate Word took
299 3, 2 | It would seem that the union of the Incarnate Word did
300 3, 2 | 1]). If, therefore, the union did not ~take place in the
301 3, 2 | it does not seem that the union took place in the person.~
302 3, 2 | of God." ~Therefore the union took place in the person.~
303 3, 2 | Nature, it follows that the union took ~place in the Person
304 3, 2 | change, it follows ~that the union of human nature to the Word
305 3, 2 | in man, on account of its union ~with the nobler form which
306 3, 2 | the Word. Therefore the ~union took place in the person.~
307 3, 2 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the union of the Word Incarnate took
308 3, 2 | It would seem that the union of the Word Incarnate did
309 3, 2 | suppositum. Therefore the union of the Word Incarnate did
310 3, 2 | man, and ~hence that the union took place in the person
311 3, 2 | hypostasis something in which the union can take ~place, this something
312 3, 2 | dignity." If, therefore, the ~union took place in the person
313 3, 2 | hypostasis, it follows that ~the union only took place in regard
314 3, 2 | only joining them in a union of dignity ~or authority
315 3, 2 | in a concourse of natural union, ~let him be anathema."
316 3, 2 | two supposita, or that the union did not take place in the ~
317 3, 2 | complement. Yet as it is in union with something ~more complete,
318 3, 2 | suppositum, ~seeing that it is in union with a completed thing,
319 3, 2 | a nature; and hence the union in Christ will ~take place
320 3, 2 | Whether in Christ there is any union of soul and body?~Aquin.:
321 3, 2 | that in Christ there was no union of soul and body. ~For from
322 3, 2 | and body. ~For from the union of soul and body in us a
323 3, 2 | hypostasis resulted from their union. But this was not the ~hypostasis
324 3, 2 | OBJ 2: Further, from the union of soul and body results
325 3, 2 | Therefore ~there was no union of soul and body in Him.~
326 3, 2 | in ~Christ there was no union of soul and body.~Aquin.:
327 3, 2 | be animated save from its union ~with the soul. Now the
328 3, 2 | Therefore in Christ ~there was a union of soul and body.~Aquin.:
329 3, 2 | with ~such as denied the union of the soul and body in
330 3, 2 | since they saw that the union of soul and body in mere
331 3, 2 | them. And hence from the union of the ~soul and body in
332 3, 2 | therefore follow that the union of the soul and body ~in
333 3, 2 | effect than in us, for its union with something ~nobler does
334 3, 2 | and this because of its union with a further ~and nobler
335 3, 2 | human nature, as if from the union of soul and body one common
336 3, 2 | but as referring to the union of the two ~natures Divine
337 3, 2 | the Son of God, for the union did not take place in the
338 3, 2 | regard to the mystery of the union of the two ~natures in Christ.
339 3, 2 | were distinct ~before the union), but not "in" two natures (
340 3, 2 | coming to an end after the union). The second was the heresy
341 3, 2 | of man, on account of His union with ~the Son of God; fifthly, "
342 3, 2 | modes imply an accidental union.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[2] A[6]
343 3, 2 | maintaining an accidental ~union. For there is no difference
344 3, 2 | does not affirm that the union of God and man took place
345 3, 2 | both ~natures), "confess a union by mingling; but the followers
346 3, 2 | maintaining division, introduce a union of purpose. But the ~Holy
347 3, 2 | these treasons, ~confesses a union of the Word of God with
348 3, 2 | which holds an accidental union, are not to be ~styled opinions,
349 3, 2 | in regard to accidental union, but inasmuch as the ~Word
350 3, 2 | or hypostasis - hence the union having ~taken place in the
351 3, 2 | it is not an ~accidental union, although the union did
352 3, 2 | accidental union, although the union did not take place in the
353 3, 2 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the union of the Divine nature and
354 3, 2 | It would seem that the union of the Divine and human
355 3, 2 | is in God is God. But the union is in God, for God Himself
356 3, 2 | Therefore it seems that the union is not anything ~created.~
357 3, 2 | everything. But the end of ~the union is the Divine hypostasis
358 3, 2 | hypostasis or Person in which the union is ~terminated. Therefore
359 3, 2 | Therefore it seems that this union ought chiefly to be judged ~
360 3, 2 | anything created. Therefore the union is nothing created.~Aquin.:
361 3, 2 | Creator on account of the ~union. Therefore much more is
362 3, 2 | Therefore much more is the union itself nothing created,
363 3, 2 | time is created. Now this ~union was not from eternity, but
364 3, 2 | began in time. Therefore the union is ~something created.~Aquin.:
365 3, 2 | 1/1~I answer that, The union of which we are speaking
366 3, 2 | hence we ~must say that the union of which we are speaking
367 3, 2 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: This union is not really in God, but
368 3, 2 | subject. And since this union has its being nowhere save
369 3, 2 | and is God because of the union, ~inasmuch as it is terminated
370 3, 2 | does not ~follow that the union itself is the Creator or
371 3, 2 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether union is the same as assumption?~
372 3, 2 | OBJ 1: It would seem that union is the same as assumption.
373 3, 2 | term of ~assumption and union is one and the same, viz.
374 3, 2 | Therefore it seems that union and assumption are not different.~
375 3, 2 | and what is ~assumed. But union and assumption seem to follow
376 3, 2 | the ~assumed. Therefore union seems to be the same as
377 3, 2 | De Fide Orth. iii, 11): "Union is one ~thing, incarnation
378 3, 2 | incarnation is another; for union demands mere copulation,
379 3, 2 | Therefore it seems that union is the ~same as assumption.~
380 3, 2 | was stated above (A[7]), union implies a certain ~relation
381 3, 2 | difference between assumption and union must be ~said to be that
382 3, 2 | must be ~said to be that union implies the relation: whereas
383 3, 2 | implies "becoming," whereas ~union implies "having become,"
384 3, 2 | oneself from another. ~But union determines none of these
385 3, 2 | 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Union and assumption have not
386 3, 2 | determines with whom the union is made on the ~part of
387 3, 2 | determine ~with whom the union is made) on the part of
388 3, 2 | differs logically both from ~union and from incarnation or
389 3, 2 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the union of the two natures in Christ
390 3, 2 | It would seem that the union of the two natures in Christ
391 3, 2 | of number. ~Therefore the union of which we are speaking
392 3, 2 | things united, the less ~the union. Now, the things united
393 3, 2 | the things united by this union are most ~distant - namely,
394 3, 2 | apart. Therefore their union is the least of all.~Aquin.:
395 3, 2 | 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, from union there results one. But from
396 3, 2 | results one. But from the union of soul ~and body in us
397 3, 2 | nature; whereas ~from the union of the Divine and human
398 3, 2 | person only. Therefore the union of soul and body is greater
399 3, 2 | human natures; and hence the union of which we speak ~does
400 3, 2 | man is in the Son by the union of the Incarnation. ~Therefore
401 3, 2 | Incarnation. ~Therefore the union of the Incarnation is greater
402 3, 2 | nevertheless is the greatest union; and thus the ~union of
403 3, 2 | greatest union; and thus the ~union of the Incarnation implies
404 3, 2 | Para. 1/1~I answer that, Union implies the joining of several
405 3, 2 | one thing. ~Therefore the union of the Incarnation may be
406 3, 2 | And in this regard this union has a pre-eminence over
407 3, 2 | hence in this respect ~the union of the Incarnation is higher
408 3, 2 | the Person ~in Whom the union takes place.~Aquin.: SMT
409 3, 2 | nature in us; and hence the union of the Incarnation is ~greater
410 3, 2 | Incarnation is ~greater than the union of soul and body in us.~
411 3, 2 | untrue - namely, that the union of the Incarnation is greater ~
412 3, 2 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the union of the Incarnation took
413 3, 2 | It would seem that the union of the Incarnation did not
414 3, 2 | Q[110], ~A[2]). But the union of the human nature to the
415 3, 2 | Therefore it seems that the ~union of the Incarnation did not
416 3, 2 | Therefore it seems that this union did not take ~place by grace. ~
417 3, 2 | grace. If, therefore, ~the union of the Incarnation was by
418 3, 2 | this man became Christ ~by union with the Divine Nature.
419 3, 2 | Divine Nature. Therefore this union was by grace.~Aquin.: SMT
420 3, 2 | acceptable to Him, the union of the Incarnation took
421 3, 2 | place by grace, even ~as the union of the saints with God by
422 3, 2 | grace, by means of which the union took place.~Aquin.: SMT
423 3, 2 | saints; ~thirdly, by personal union, which is proper to Christ.~
424 3, 2 | manifest, viz. because the union of the ~Incarnation did
425 3, 2 | any merits preceded the union of the Incarnation?~Aquin.:
426 3, 2 | It would seem that the union of the Incarnation followed
427 3, 2 | could have preceded the union. For we do ~not hold that
428 3, 2 | of this man followed the union. Therefore no operation
429 3, 2 | been meritorious of the union.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[2] A[11]
430 3, 2 | whatsoever have merited this ~union condignly: first, because
431 3, 2 | enjoyment of God. Whereas the union of the ~Incarnation, inasmuch
432 3, 2 | personal being, transcends the ~union of the beatified mind with
433 3, 2 | 1/1~Whether the grace of union was natural to the man Christ?~
434 3, 2 | would seem that the grace of union was not natural to the man ~
435 3, 2 | the man ~Christ. For the union of the Incarnation did not
436 3, 2 | nature. But the ~grace of union is not natural to Christ
437 3, 2 | seem that the ~grace of union is nowise natural to Christ.~
438 3, 2 | grace of Christ, whether of union or habitual, cannot be ~
439 3, 2 | Reply OBJ 1: Although the union did not take place in the
440 3, 2 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The union is not said to be grace
441 3, 2 | Reply OBJ 3: The grace of union is not natural to Christ
442 3, 3 | Para. 1/1 - OF THE MODE OF UNION ON THE PART OF THE PERSON
443 3, 3 | We must now consider the union on the part of the Person
444 3, 3 | above (Q[2], AA[1]~,2), the union took place in the Person,
445 3, 3 | addition"; ~just as in the union of man with God, nothing
446 3, 3 | Itself human nature, for ~the union did not take place in the
447 3, 3 | assumption implies the term of union, as was said above ~(A[1]).
448 3, 3 | said above ~(A[1]). But the union cannot take place in the
449 3, 3 | of the Person in Whom the union is terminated, as stated
450 3, 3 | which is by the grace of union is common on the part of
451 3, 3 | 2], A[5], ad 1), by the union of the ~soul and body in
452 3, 3 | is the ~principle of the union, or in regard to His Personality,
453 3, 3 | which is the ~term of the union, it has to be said that
454 3, 3 | mystery of the Incarnation the union of form and ~matter, i.e.
455 3, 3 | be united by a personal union with the whole nature assumed,
456 3, 3 | First, on the part of the union; for such as are ~similar
457 3, 3 | non-participated and personal ~union of the Word with a creature,
458 3, 3 | taken from the end of the ~union, which is the fulfilling
459 3, 4 | Para. 1/3 - OF THE MODE OF UNION ON THE PART OF THE HUMAN
460 3, 4 | We must now consider the union on the part of what was
461 3, 4 | seem some fitness in the union of the Son of God with human ~
462 3, 4 | natural order, as the personal union of a creature with ~God
463 3, 4 | some fitness for such a union. Now this fitness in human ~
464 3, 4 | and more perfect is the union with ~God in personal being
465 3, 4 | personal being than the union by operation. And hence
466 3, 4 | which falls short of the union with God by operation ~has
467 3, 4 | or it remains after the union - and thus there would be
468 3, 4 | human nature, ~viz. the union with a Divine Person.~Aquin.:
469 3, 4 | the Divine Person by His union hindered the human nature
470 3, 5 | 1~OBJ 3: Further, by the union of soul and body is constituted
471 3, 5 | lxxxiii, qu. 80), "in all that union the Word is the highest,
472 3, 6 | there still remained the union of the Word to the flesh,
473 3, 6 | soul was separated, the union of the ~Word with flesh
474 3, 6 | the soul of Christ from union with the Word, according ~
475 3, 6 | by the Word, either the union did not take ~place in the
476 3, 6 | to be ~the medium in the union of the flesh with the Word,
477 3, 6 | and precedes it in its union with ~the effect. But the
478 3, 6 | intellectual soul." Therefore the union of the Word with the flesh ~
479 3, 6 | flesh ~did not precede the union with the soul.~Aquin.: SMT
480 3, 6 | soul. ~But by the personal union we understand the flesh
481 3, 6 | Word, for it is from its union with the soul ~that it is
482 3, 6 | the whole results from the union of parts. But the union ~
483 3, 6 | union of parts. But the union ~is taken to be the term
484 3, 6 | OBJ 3: It is a personal union wherein the assumption is ~
485 3, 6 | assumption is ~terminated, not a union of nature, which springs
486 3, 6 | united to God. Therefore the union took ~place by grace.~Aquin.:
487 3, 6 | Q[110], A[2]). Now the union of the Word with human nature
488 3, 6 | Christ there was the grace of union and habitual ~grace. Therefore
489 3, 6 | we speak of the grace of union or of ~habitual grace. For
490 3, 6 | grace. For the grace of union is the personal being that
491 3, 6 | an effect following the union, ~according to Jn. 1:14: "
492 3, 6 | Man (as a result of the union) is ~the Only-begotten of
493 3, 6 | bestowing something gratis, ~the union took place by grace, not
494 3, 6 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Our union with God is by operation,
495 3, 6 | love Him; and hence this union is by habitual grace, inasmuch
496 3, 6 | proceeds from a habit. Now the union of the human ~nature with
497 3, 6 | ordain ~the soul to personal union, which is not accidental,
498 3, 6 | medium in the aforesaid union.~
499 3, 7 | Church. ~Of the grace of union we have already spoken (
500 3, 7 | grace stood towards the union?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[7] A[1]
1-500 | 501-859 |