1-500 | 501-574
Part, Question
1 1, 1 | faculty, extends to all the ~objects of the five senses. Similarly,
2 1, 1 | five senses. Similarly, objects which are the ~subject-matter
3 1, 1 | dazzled by the clearest objects of nature; as the ~owl is
4 1, 1 | colored things are the proper objects of ~sight. But in sacred
5 1, 1 | truths through sensible ~objects, because all our knowledge
6 1, 3 | participated; as fire in ignited objects is ~posterior to fire that
7 1, 9 | their powers to ~divers objects, as in the case with the
8 1, 12 | we can understand these objects as universal; and this is ~
9 1, 12 | supreme of intelligible objects, i.e. to the ~divine essence.~
10 1, 12 | things not seen are the objects of faith, and not of knowledge." ~
11 1, 12 | derived from the sensible ~objects; and the natural intelligible
12 1, 12 | we receive from sensible objects, as appears in ~prophetic
13 1, 14 | according to the different objects of His knowledge. He has ~"
14 1, 14 | relation to intelligible objects as ~primary matter has to
15 1, 14 | as ~regards intelligible objects, just as primary matter
16 1, 14 | concerning ~intelligible objects only so far as it is perfected
17 1, 14 | the order of ~intelligible objects; therefore He understands
18 1, 14 | knowledge. Hence, as the natural objects of knowledge ~are prior
19 1, 14 | exist in any time, as to objects ~present to Him. But there
20 1, 16 | regards their proper sensible objects, so ~is the intellect as
21 1, 17 | and of other ~sensible objects proper to it. Secondly,
22 1, 17 | and of other ~sensible objects common to more than one
23 1, 17 | knowledge about its proper objects, except ~accidentally and
24 1, 17 | person. But as to common objects of ~sense, and accidental
25 1, 17 | of ~sense, and accidental objects, even a rightly disposed
26 1, 17 | there ~is composition of objects understood, there is truth
27 1, 17 | object; or about accidental ~objects of sense. Now as the sense
28 1, 17 | or ~accidental, sensible objects. There is, however, this
29 1, 18 | sense, of which the proper objects are ~external accidents.
30 1, 18 | connection and touch, but also objects apart from ~themselves,
31 1, 19 | to the number ~of their objects. If, therefore, God wills
32 1, 20 | evil, as to their proper objects: and since good is ~essentially
33 1, 20 | include in their meaning objects from the diversity of which
34 1, 22 | knowledge of art to the objects ~of art, all things must
35 1, 23 | predestination, as regards its objects, is a part ~of providence.~
36 1, 23 | all the predestinate are objects of election and ~love.~Aquin.:
37 1, 27 | representation of divine objects. Procession, therefore,
38 1, 28 | operation alone in ~the objects understood are logical relations
39 1, 28 | as existing between two objects perceived by the mind. ~
40 1, 32 | they are found in sensible objects, whence its knowledge is
41 1, 37 | actions passing on to their objects, nevertheless they are actions
42 1, 39 | created. And ~as in the objects of the senses, whence the
43 1, 39 | The things that are ~the objects of our future glory are
44 1, 43 | to a greater number of ~objects. To Christ the invisible
45 1, 54 | knowledge: thirdly, into the objects known: and fourthly, into ~
46 1, 54 | experience when we know ~single objects through the senses: the
47 1, 54 | angels likewise know single ~objects, as we shall show (Q[57],
48 1, 55 | are taken from sensible ~objects. Therefore, if the angel
49 1, 55 | whole mass of intelligible objects. Therefore his ~forms must
50 1, 56 | angels with regard to the ~objects known by them. We shall
51 1, 57 | investigate the material objects which are known by the angels. ~
52 1, 58 | different intelligible objects.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[58] A[
53 1, 58 | time many intelligible ~objects under one species; as one
54 1, 58 | to the difference of ~the objects known: hence the Philosopher
55 1, 59 | to the ~diversity of the objects known; for sense judges
56 1, 59 | sense judges of particular objects, ~while reason judges of
57 1, 59 | material difference ~of their objects, but according to their
58 1, 59 | the formal distinction ~of objects, if to any faculty there
59 1, 62 | inclined freely towards the objects it desires. Consequently
60 1, 64 | sense ~apprehends particular objects, while the intellect considers
61 1, 65 | the ~more numerous the objects to which its causation extends.
62 1, 66 | similitude of ~well-known objects. Hence he uses a variety
63 1, 67 | forms are not of ~themselves objects of the senses; for the object
64 1, 67 | movement. But Augustine objects to this (Gen. ad lit. i),
65 1, 70 | most useful for perceiving objects. In reference to this he ~
66 1, 75 | since it ~requires external objects of the senses in order to
67 1, 75 | sensitive faculty to sensible ~objects is like the relation of
68 1, 75 | faculty to intelligible ~objects. But the intellect, apart
69 1, 75 | apprehends intelligible ~objects. Therefore the sensitive
70 1, 75 | body, perceives ~sensible objects. Therefore, since the souls
71 1, 75 | highest of intelligible objects is more able afterwards
72 1, 76 | immaterial and ~universal objects, but only of individuals,
73 1, 76 | on itself: otherwise, the objects of sciences ~would not be
74 1, 77 | distinguished by their acts and objects? ~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[77] A[
75 1, 77 | distinguished ~by acts and objects. For nothing is determined
76 1, 77 | specifically distinct by acts and objects.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[77] A[
77 1, 77 | are distinguished by their objects, it follows ~that the same
78 1, 77 | could not have contrary objects. This is clearly ~false
79 1, 77 | came from the difference of objects, the same ~object would
80 1, 77 | wherever it is. But various objects which belong to ~various
81 1, 77 | the difference of their objects.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[77] A[
82 1, 77 | opposites," that is their objects. Therefore the powers ~are
83 1, 77 | according to their acts and objects.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[77] A[
84 1, 77 | the various natures of the objects. For every act is either
85 1, 77 | distinguished by their acts and objects. ~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[77] A[
86 1, 77 | therefore, not any variety of objects diversifies the powers of
87 1, 77 | Thus it is that various objects belong to ~various lower
88 1, 77 | various lower powers; which objects, however, are subject to
89 1, 77 | soul are referred to their objects and ~to the soul itself.
90 1, 77 | one. In like manner the objects are various and ~dissimilar,
91 1, 77 | taken from the ~order of the objects. Now the dependence of one
92 1, 77 | and on the part of ~the objects, and furthermore on the
93 1, 37 | actions passing on to their objects, nevertheless they are actions
94 1, 39 | created. And ~as in the objects of the senses, whence the
95 1, 39 | The things that are ~the objects of our future glory are
96 1, 43 | to a greater number of ~objects. To Christ the invisible
97 1, 55 | knowledge: thirdly, into the objects known: and fourthly, into ~
98 1, 55 | experience when we know ~single objects through the senses: the
99 1, 55 | angels likewise know single ~objects, as we shall show (Q[57],
100 1, 56 | are taken from sensible ~objects. Therefore, if the angel
101 1, 56 | whole mass of intelligible objects. Therefore his ~forms must
102 1, 57 | angels with regard to the ~objects known by them. We shall
103 1, 58 | investigate the material objects which are known by the angels. ~
104 1, 59 | different intelligible objects. ~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[58] A[
105 1, 59 | time many intelligible ~objects under one species; as one
106 1, 59 | to the difference of ~the objects known: hence the Philosopher
107 1, 60 | to the ~diversity of the objects known; for sense judges
108 1, 60 | sense judges of particular objects, ~while reason judges of
109 1, 60 | material difference ~of their objects, but according to their
110 1, 60 | the formal distinction ~of objects, if to any faculty there
111 1, 63 | inclined freely towards the objects it desires. Consequently
112 1, 65 | sense ~apprehends particular objects, while the intellect considers
113 1, 66 | the ~more numerous the objects to which its causation extends.
114 1, 67 | similitude of ~well-known objects. Hence he uses a variety
115 1, 68 | forms are not of ~themselves objects of the senses; for the object
116 1, 68 | movement. But Augustine objects to this (Gen. ad lit. i),
117 1, 71 | most useful for perceiving objects. In reference to this he ~
118 1, 74 | since it ~requires external objects of the senses in order to
119 1, 74 | sensitive faculty to sensible ~objects is like the relation of
120 1, 74 | faculty to intelligible ~objects. But the intellect, apart
121 1, 74 | apprehends intelligible ~objects. Therefore the sensitive
122 1, 74 | body, perceives ~sensible objects. Therefore, since the souls
123 1, 74 | highest of intelligible objects is more able afterwards
124 1, 75 | immaterial and ~universal objects, but only of individuals,
125 1, 75 | on itself: otherwise, the objects of sciences ~would not be
126 1, 76 | distinguished by their acts and objects? ~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[77] A[
127 1, 76 | distinguished ~by acts and objects. For nothing is determined
128 1, 76 | specifically distinct by acts and objects.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[77] A[
129 1, 76 | are distinguished by their objects, it follows ~that the same
130 1, 76 | could not have contrary objects. This is clearly ~false
131 1, 76 | came from the difference of objects, the same ~object would
132 1, 76 | wherever it is. But various objects which belong to ~various
133 1, 76 | the difference of their objects.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[77] A[
134 1, 76 | opposites," that is their objects. Therefore the powers ~are
135 1, 76 | according to their acts and objects.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[77] A[
136 1, 76 | the various natures of the objects. For every act is either
137 1, 76 | distinguished by their acts and objects. ~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[77] A[
138 1, 76 | therefore, not any variety of objects diversifies the powers of
139 1, 76 | Thus it is that various objects belong to ~various lower
140 1, 76 | various lower powers; which objects, however, are subject to
141 1, 76 | soul are referred to their objects and ~to the soul itself.
142 1, 76 | one. In like manner the objects are various and ~dissimilar,
143 1, 76 | taken from the ~order of the objects. Now the dependence of one
144 1, 76 | and on the part of ~the objects, and furthermore on the
145 1, 77 | distinguished generically by their ~objects. For the higher a power
146 1, 77 | distinguished ~by their objects, it seems that the senses
147 1, 77 | Now ~the diversity of objects, as such, diversifies the
148 1, 77 | suchlike qualities are the objects of the ~senses; because "
149 1, 77 | sensibles," which are the objects of the senses. For the proper
150 1, 78 | different formalities of their ~objects. But the appetitive power
151 1, 78 | rather is it that whereby the objects are made to be in act: for
152 1, 78 | formal aspects of their objects: ~since each power is defined
153 1, 79 | differentiated by their objects. But what we ~desire is
154 1, 79 | diversity of aspect in the objects, and not material diversity, ~
155 1, 79 | apprehended, as their ~proper objects.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[80] A[
156 1, 81 | compare their ~respective objects to one another. For the
157 1, 81 | good and evil," which are objects of the ~will, "are in things,"
158 1, 81 | truth and error," which are objects of the ~intellect, "are
159 1, 81 | universality of their respective objects, then, as we have said above ~(
160 1, 81 | appetite, because their objects are not sensible, but intellectual. ~
161 1, 82 | relations to their respective objects and acts. For the act of ~"
162 1, 83 | through the action of sensible objects on his senses, to the act ~
163 1, 83 | unreasonable that the sensible objects which are outside the soul ~
164 1, 83 | its first and ~principal objects are founded in sensible
165 1, 84 | the body, held that the objects of ~the intellect are separate
166 1, 84 | things we understand are the objects of science; therefore if
167 1, 84 | would not be concerned with objects outside the ~soul, but only
168 1, 84 | regards common sensible objects, as size or figure; when,
169 1, 84 | concerning ~accidental sensible objects, as when it judges that
170 1, 84 | Hence as regards simple ~objects not subject to composite
171 1, 85 | natural ~aptitude for material objects only. Therefore we cannot
172 1, 85 | says (Ethic. vi, 6), the objects of ~understanding, wisdom
173 1, 85 | the moral sciences, the objects of which ~are human actions
174 1, 85 | Hence if we consider the objects ~of science in their universal
175 1, 85 | intellect and become the objects of science.~Aquin.: SMT
176 1, 86 | essentially to the order of the ~objects of knowledge, the one which
177 1, 86 | not belong to the order of objects of knowledge; ~nor are things
178 1, 86 | Philosopher assert that objects ~are known before acts,
179 1, 86 | the "true" which are the objects of the will ~and of the
180 1, 86 | good is true. Therefore the objects of the will ~fall under
181 1, 87 | Further, the fact that objects which are in themselves
182 1, 87 | understood by us, but are the objects we understand first of all. ~
183 1, 87 | Ideas," are the proper objects of our intellect, and thus
184 1, 87 | further, that material objects are known by ~the soul inasmuch
185 1, 87 | intellect and intelligible objects, as, for instance, we ~understand
186 1, 87 | must be compared to the objects understood, either as ~the
187 1, 87 | numerous the intelligible objects ~received, so much the nearer
188 1, 87 | understand all the intelligible objects, the active intellect becomes
189 1, 87 | regard to all ~intelligible objects. But all such objects together
190 1, 87 | intelligible objects. But all such objects together do not equal the ~
191 1, 87 | itself actively ~to the same objects to which the passive intellect
192 1, 87 | perfectible. Hence that sensible objects of great power ~are not
193 1, 88 | to ~simply intelligible objects, as is proper to other separate
194 1, 88 | turning to simply intelligible objects than by ~turning to the
195 1, 88 | turning to simply intelligible objects; hence in that ~state it
196 1, 90 | animals take delight in the objects of the senses only as ordered
197 1, 90 | in the beauty of sensible objects for ~its own sake. Therefore,
198 1, 90 | freely survey the sensible objects around him, both heavenly
199 1, 92 | consideration, they are objects of our memory only, which,
200 1, 92 | even as regards temporal objects.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[93] A[
201 1, 92 | soul, in respect of other objects.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[93] A[
202 1, 92 | clear that diversity of objects diversifies the species
203 1, 110 | changed ~by the external objects themselves. Indeed, the
204 1, 110 | naturally moved by the sensible objects. ~But an angel cannot change
205 2, 1 | OBJ 1: All these several objects were considered as one perfect ~
206 2, 1 | tend to ~several diverse objects as last ends, as has been
207 2, 1 | mover. Therefore secondary objects of the ~appetite do not
208 2, 4 | are ~determined by their objects: and there are two universal
209 2, 4 | there are two universal objects, the ~true and the good:
210 2, 8 | 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, "For objects differing in genus there
211 2, 8 | are different powers for objects that differ in genus ~and
212 2, 8 | another. Now such like ~objects are always referred to the
213 2, 8 | diversified according to their objects. But ~the end is a different
214 2, 12 | distinct according to their objects. But the ~end and the means
215 2, 12 | and the means are distinct objects. Therefore the intention
216 2, 12 | that end, ~are distinct objects of the will. But in so far
217 2, 14 | before deciding on the ~objects of choice; and this inquiry
218 2, 16 | enjoyment in respect of their objects, enjoyment is better than
219 2, 17 | freely towards ~various objects, precisely because the reason
220 2, 17 | account of the diversity of objects subject to the act ~of the
221 2, 18 | is according to the evil objects that man loves. And the
222 2, 18 | as they are considered as objects of such ~actions, they have
223 2, 18 | actions. Nor again have the objects of the active powers always
224 2, 18 | observed that a ~difference of objects causes a difference of species
225 2, 18 | of the soul, the proper ~objects of which are the objects
226 2, 18 | objects of which are the objects of their particular acts.~
227 2, 19 | in acts is according to objects, ~as stated above (Q[18],
228 2, 19 | derived properly from the objects.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[19] A[
229 2, 22 | good and evil," i.e. the objects of the appetitive ~power, "
230 2, 23 | specifically according to ~their objects. But the objects of the
231 2, 23 | their objects. But the objects of the irascible and concupiscible ~
232 2, 23 | different powers have ~different objects, as stated in the FP, Q[
233 2, 23 | be referred to different objects. Much ~more, therefore,
234 2, 23 | regarding ~different specific objects, included under the one
235 2, 23 | differ according to their objects; just as ~movements differ
236 2, 23 | passions, save ~that of the objects. Now the object of the appetite
237 2, 23 | according to contrariety of objects, i.e. of good and evil;
238 2, 23 | that which is based on the objects: whereas in the irascible ~
239 2, 23 | for these are the common objects of the appetitive part.
240 2, 23 | differ according to their objects. Now the ~objects of the
241 2, 23 | their objects. Now the ~objects of the soul's passions are
242 2, 23 | passions of the soul, are their objects. Now, ~the difference in
243 2, 25 | passions is that of their ~objects. But the object of the irascible
244 2, 26 | differ by reason of their ~objects. But the objects of dilection
245 2, 26 | their ~objects. But the objects of dilection and love are
246 2, 27 | in reference to the other objects of the other ~senses, we
247 2, 30 | are distinguished by their objects. But ~the object of the
248 2, 30 | only in respect of their objects; which amounts to a material ~
249 2, 30 | and the ~like, which are objects of the natural appetite.~
250 2, 31 | differ according to their objects. But delight ~and joy have
251 2, 31 | and not only from their objects.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[31] A[
252 2, 31 | More firm; because the objects of bodily pleasure are corruptible,
253 2, 31 | nature. Now the sensible ~objects of touch bear the closest
254 2, 31 | subordinated to the sensible objects of the touch: "for ~dogs
255 2, 31 | contrariety ~from their objects. Now the object of pleasure
256 2, 31 | pleasure, since they are the ~objects of pleasure, cause not only
257 2, 32 | above (Q[31], A[1]). But the objects of operations ~are knowable
258 2, 32 | from work: and ~they are objects of pleasure (Rhet. i, 11).
259 2, 32 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The objects of operations are not pleasurable
260 2, 35 | and evil, as such, are objects of the appetite. Consequently
261 2, 35 | pain, and extends to more objects.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[35] A[
262 2, 35 | apprehension extends to more objects than the exterior apprehension: ~
263 2, 35 | contrary to nature: whereas the objects of the other senses ~can
264 2, 35 | takes ~pleasure in the objects of the other senses for
265 2, 35 | Accordingly, in referring to the ~objects of the other senses, we
266 2, 35 | although, on the part ~of the objects, pleasure extends further
267 2, 35 | Consequently, since the ~objects of pleasure and sorrow or
268 2, 35 | species from their terms or objects. Accordingly in those ~things
269 2, 35 | are specified by their objects. ~According to their respective
270 2, 35 | pleasure in respect of objects that are not contrary but
271 2, 35 | however, those diverse objects be contrary to one another,
272 2, 40 | differ according to their objects. But the ~object of hope
273 2, 40 | contrary to hope, because their objects, i.e. good ~and evil, are
274 2, 41 | their species from their ~objects: hence that is a special
275 2, 41 | derived from ~the diversity of objects, but from the diversity
276 2, 42 | according to the various objects of fear. Nothing, then,
277 2, 43 | 1/2~I answer that, The objects of the soul's passions stand
278 2, 43 | their species from their objects, as the ~aforesaid things
279 2, 45 | Therefore they ~have different objects and are not in the same
280 2, 45 | evil were not ~co-ordinate objects. But because evil has a
281 2, 46 | anger always regards two objects: whereas love and ~hatred
282 2, 46 | difference is, ~that both the objects of love are good: since
283 2, 46 | himself: while both the objects of ~hatred bear the character
284 2, 46 | concupiscible faculty, in ~that the objects of the concupiscible passions
285 2, 46 | considered, whereas the objects of the irascible passions
286 2, 46 | that anger regards two objects: viz. the vengeance that
287 2, 46 | magnitude about both these objects; since "we ~make no ado
288 2, 50 | inwardly prepare their ~proper objects for the "possible intellect,"
289 2, 51 | inclination to its proper objects, which seems to be the ~
290 2, 54 | are distinguished by their objects?~(3) Whether habits are
291 2, 54 | thing, viz. their acts and objects. ~Therefore they are multiplied
292 2, 54 | Wherefore, just as several objects can move one passive ~power,
293 2, 54 | too, generic diversity of objects entails a ~difference of
294 2, 54 | Ethic. vi, 1, ~that "those objects that differ generically
295 2, 54 | while specific difference of objects entails a ~specific difference
296 2, 54 | are distinguished by their objects?~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[54] A[
297 2, 54 | not distinguished by their objects. ~For contraries differ
298 2, 54 | are not distinguished by objects specifically distinct.~Aquin.:
299 2, 54 | not distinguished by their objects.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[54] A[
300 2, 54 | not follow ~diversity of objects.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[54] A[
301 2, 54 | the diversity of ~their objects, as stated above (Q[18],
302 2, 54 | according to the ~diversity of objects.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[54] A[
303 2, 54 | specifically ~different objects, as will appear from what
304 2, 54 | Moreover the ~ends are objects of the internal acts, with
305 2, 54 | only in respect of their objects and active principles, but
306 2, 56 | generic conditions of the objects, while diversity of habits ~
307 2, 57 | acts in respect of ~their objects, we consider chiefly the
308 2, 57 | the formal aspect of these objects, as ~we have already explained (
309 2, 57 | not from their material objects, but from the formal ~aspect
310 2, 57 | formal ~aspect of those objects. Now the principle of a
311 2, 57 | according to their different ~objects. "{Synesis}" and "{gnome}"
312 2, 59 | moral virtue is about ~objects of pleasure and sorrow."
313 2, 60 | in point of the various objects of ~the passions?~Aquin.:
314 2, 60 | respect of their material objects, ~but according to the formal
315 2, 60 | the formal aspect of their objects. Now the formal ~aspect
316 2, 60 | specific differences of their objects, as stated above ~(Q[54],
317 2, 60 | Ethic. i, 13). Consequently objects made appetible by the direction
318 2, 60 | in point of the various objects of the ~passions?~Aquin.:
319 2, 60 | differ according to ~the objects of the passions. For just
320 2, 60 | passions. For just as there are objects of passions, ~so are there
321 2, 60 | passions, ~so are there objects of operations. Now those
322 2, 60 | differ according to the objects of those ~operations: for
323 2, 60 | differ according to the objects of ~those passions.~Aquin.:
324 2, 60 | than ~acts. Hence diverse objects which do not diversify the
325 2, 60 | one moral virtue about all objects of pleasure, and the same
326 2, 60 | a species. Now various ~objects of pleasure differ only
327 2, 60 | pleasurable. Therefore all objects of pleasure belong to one
328 2, 60 | reason so do all fearful objects, and the same ~applies to
329 2, 60 | diversified according to ~the objects of the passions.~Aquin.:
330 2, 60 | the ~appetite. Hence the objects of the passions, according
331 2, 60 | hinders a ~difference of objects from causing diversity of
332 2, 60 | and again, a difference of objects from causing ~different
333 2, 60 | therefore a difference of ~objects that corresponds to a difference
334 2, 60 | no place in ~pleasurable objects of touch; since such are
335 2, 60 | diverse matter, passions, or objects: so that if we add "justice,"
336 2, 60 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: All objects of the same specific operation
337 2, 60 | to reason: not so all the objects of the same specific passion; ~
338 2, 61 | respect of their diverse objects.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[61] A[
339 2, 62 | formal ~difference of their objects. Now the object of the theological
340 2, 63 | formal aspects of their objects. Now the object of ~every
341 2, 63 | relation to their proper objects, as stated.~Aquin.: SMT
342 2, 64 | in ~respect of appetible objects is the reason. But the good
343 2, 64 | quantity of the respective objects of these virtues, ~we shall
344 2, 65 | conclusions, ~which are the objects of the other intellectual
345 2, 66 | Yet it is evident that the objects of the sciences, which ~
346 2, 66 | are more lasting than the objects of moral ~virtue, which
347 2, 66 | of wisdom surpasses ~the objects of all the intellectual
348 2, 66 | more certain." Hence if the objects be equally ~good and sublime,
349 2, 67 | differentiated by their objects. But ~the object of love
350 2, 72 | distinguished specifically by their objects?~(2) Of the distinction
351 2, 72 | species according to their objects?~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[72] A[
352 2, 72 | species, according to ~their objects. For acts are said to be
353 2, 72 | than according to their objects. ~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[72] A[
354 2, 72 | than according to their objects.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[72] A[
355 2, 72 | specifically according to their ~objects, it would be impossible
356 2, 72 | specific sin with ~diverse objects: and yet such sins are to
357 2, 72 | species according to their objects.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[72] A[
358 2, 72 | according to their various ~objects: since acts differ by their
359 2, 72 | since acts differ by their objects, as stated above (Q[18],
360 2, 72 | species according to their objects.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[72] A[
361 2, 72 | species according to their objects, as was ~proved above (Q[
362 2, 72 | distinguished in species by their objects.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[72] A[
363 2, 72 | whether sins differ by their objects or by their ends.~Aquin.:
364 2, 72 | specifically according to their objects of their ~acts rather than
365 2, 72 | specifically according to their ~objects, as stated above (Q[60],
366 2, 72 | their species from ~their objects. Now every sin consists
367 2, 72 | specifically according to their ~objects, it seems that much more
368 2, 72 | taken not only ~from the objects, which are the ends or terms
369 2, 72 | 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Objects, in relation to external
370 2, 72 | is in respect of their ~objects, according to which the
371 2, 72 | with regard to different ~objects: for instance one may be
372 2, 73 | varies according to their objects?~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[73] A[
373 2, 73 | vary according to ~their objects. Because the gravity of
374 2, 73 | according to their various objects.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[73] A[
375 2, 73 | according to their ~various objects.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[73] A[
376 2, 73 | sins that have different objects are of different kinds. ~
377 2, 73 | reason of the difference of objects.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[73] A[
378 2, 73 | their species from their objects, as was ~shown above (Q[
379 2, 73 | varies according to their objects.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[73] A[
380 2, 73 | in sins depends on their objects. Thus it is clear that external ~
381 2, 73 | their species from their ~objects, the difference of gravity
382 2, 73 | which is derived from the objects is ~first and foremost,
383 2, 73 | 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: All the objects of human acts are related
384 2, 74 | to the will as its proper objects; ~but the other powers have
385 2, 74 | a mortal ~sin about the objects of the sensuality, e.g.
386 2, 74 | the direction of all the objects of those lower powers ~that
387 2, 74 | delectation about ~sensible objects comes also under the direction
388 2, 74 | object otherwise than ~the objects of the lower powers that
389 2, 74 | For it does not regard the objects of the lower powers, except
390 2, 77 | above ~(Q[30], A[2]). Now objects of pleasure are perceived
391 2, 80 | him, or by offering him ~objects of appetite.~Aquin.: SMT
392 2, 80 | the action ~of sensible objects, which impressions are preserved
393 2, 85 | weakened in respect of the objects of his concupiscence.~Aquin.:
394 2, 88 | malice, not only from their objects, but also from some disposition
395 2, 94 | good, and ~consequently as objects of pursuit, and their contraries
396 2, 94 | contraries as evil, and ~objects of avoidance. Wherefore
397 2, 96 | distinguished by their ~objects, as explained above (Q[54],
398 2, 96 | 62], A[2]). Now ~all the objects of virtues can be referred
399 2, 100 | good, are of ~themselves, objects of appetite: and for this
400 2, 100 | falsehood are, of themselves, objects of repulsion (since it is
401 2, 102 | contracted even by ~inanimate objects; for whatever was touched
402 2, 107 | eternal promises, which are objects of the virtues, chiefly
403 2, 107 | inclined of themselves to those objects, not ~as to something foreign
404 2, 108 | certain external sensible objects; and that from this inward ~
405 2, 112 | should ~have certitude of the objects of knowledge; and again,
406 2, 113 | considered on the part of the objects; ~and thus they differ by
407 2, 1 | principles; wherefore all objects of science must needs be,
408 2, 2 | are proposed to man ~as objects of faith, in like manner
409 2, 2 | properly and directly the objects of charity, namely, God
410 2, 2 | as a consequence, to the objects of charity.~Aquin.: SMT
411 2, 4 | different virtues have different objects. Now things to ~be hoped
412 2, 4 | acts, and acts by their objects, faith, being a habit, should ~
413 2, 4 | directed, as to its end, to the objects of those ~virtues which
414 2, 4 | of one act to different objects, as is clear from ~what
415 2, 4 | is related to ~opposite objects, a disposition to act well
416 2, 4 | of any doubt about ~their objects; whereas the believer may
417 2, 4 | intellect, whereas the objects of the aforesaid three virtues
418 2, 7 | by the rule of sensible objects. But when it is ~quickened
419 2, 12 | blasphemy as regards the objects ~of those sins, it is clear
420 2, 14 | perceive, except sensible objects ~that are near at hand,
421 2, 14 | are cognizant of sensible objects as of certain principles
422 2, 16 | are distinguished by their objects, as ~stated above (FS, Q[
423 2, 18 | that, Just as hope has two objects, one of which is the future ~
424 2, 18 | too, ~fear may have two objects, one of which is the very
425 2, 18 | and species from their ~objects. Now the proper object of
426 2, 18 | are diversified by their objects. Now the same ~thing is
427 2, 18 | are diversified by their objects, as shown above (FS, Q[54],
428 2, 18 | fear differ as to their objects: and hence the comparison
429 2, 22 | habits are specified by their objects, as shown ~above (FS, Q[
430 2, 22 | distinct according to their objects. Now there are two objects
431 2, 22 | objects. Now there are two objects of ~charity - God and our
432 2, 22 | our neighbor were ~equally objects of charity. But this is
433 2, 23 | virtual quantity regards the objects in respect of ~which charity
434 2, 23 | not only on the number of objects, ~namely whether they be
435 2, 23 | habits follows diversity of objects, while numeric ~distinction
436 2, 23 | increase through extending to objects to which it did not extend ~
437 2, 23 | has its quantity from its objects, and ~accordingly it increases
438 2, 24 | rightly ~distinguished as objects to be loved out of charity.~
439 2, 24 | are reckoned as distinct objects of love, for the ~love of
440 2, 26 | things known he indicates the objects of the senses. ~Therefore
441 2, 26 | its heat to more ~distant objects. Hence our love for God
442 2, 28 | appetitive power tends to diverse objects of appetite, which it cannot ~
443 2, 29 | different aspects of ~their objects. Now the formal aspect of
444 2, 33 | first flies from unpleasant objects, and secondly he even ~struggles
445 2, 33 | has recourse to eternal objects of pleasure, ~the daughter
446 2, 34 | to pity, their principal objects being contrary to ~one another,
447 2, 37 | Reply OBJ 3: Charity has two objects; one is its principal object
448 2, 42 | distinguished by ~their objects. Since, then, man is bound
449 2, 45 | whereby we know sensible objects, but in ~the interior sense,
450 2, 45 | their species from their ~objects, as shown above (FS, Q[1],
451 2, 45 | object, distinct from other ~objects, must needs be a special
452 2, 45 | a material difference of objects. "Wisdom," "knowledge" and ~"
453 2, 47 | to particulars which are objects of sense: hence many ~things
454 2, 47 | greater hold on sensible objects. For this reason memory
455 2, 47 | universal and immaterial ~objects (De Anima iii, 4). Therefore
456 2, 48 | distinguished by their various ~objects. Now what the ruler has
457 2, 49 | one ~judges well of the objects of appetite: and thus a
458 2, 51 | abstraction from ~sensible objects. Wherefore, since the aforesaid
459 2, 56 | external things as being their objects, it follows that, ~external
460 2, 57 | habits are specified by their objects, as stated above (FS, Q[
461 2, 80 | of ~devotion, the higher objects of contemplation would arouse
462 2, 80 | means ~of certain sensible objects known to us. Chief among
463 2, 81 | words, like other sensible objects, prevent man from ~ascending
464 2, 90 | is ~referred to diverse objects, for diverse ends: since
465 2, 93 | distinguished by their proper objects or matters, according ~as
466 2, 94 | They are enticed by various objects differing according to ~
467 2, 97 | are distinguished by their objects. Now ~the sacred thing is
468 2, 100 | are distinguished by their objects. But the ~object of observance
469 2, 102 | species according to their objects. ~Now the object of obedience
470 2, 109 | deeds, or any sensible ~objects are considered in every
471 2, 115 | are distinguished by their objects. But external things are
472 2, 116 | their species from their objects, as stated ~above (FS, Q[
473 2, 116 | in respect of ~spiritual objects (thus pride is about excellence),
474 2, 117 | fearless of spending on objects of pleasure, to which the
475 2, 119 | gifts ~according to their objects and acts: and thus the fourth
476 2, 121 | and toils, these being the objects of those passions.~Aquin.:
477 2, 127 | the things that are the objects ~of the passions. The passions
478 2, 127 | themselves that are the objects of those passions: such ~
479 2, 127 | regards ~contrariety of objects it is opposed to fear, because
480 2, 139 | daring, which ~attacks the objects of fear in the hope of attaining
481 2, 139 | just as daring presupposes objects of fear, so ~too such like
482 2, 139 | in so far as the sensible objects of the other senses ~are
483 2, 139 | inasmuch as the sensible objects of these ~senses conduce
484 2, 139 | Now all the pleasurable objects that ~are at man's disposal,
485 2, 139 | rule ~of the pleasurable objects of which it makes use, and
486 2, 139 | them, and because their objects are more necessary to the
487 2, 139 | the irascible. But ~the objects of desires and pleasures
488 2, 149 | judgment concerning the objects of touch. which ~judgment
489 2, 149 | character concerning all such objects, but as ~regards the use
490 2, 149 | the use itself of those objects, as stated in Ethic. iii,
491 2, 151 | strongly moved towards their ~objects, the result is that the
492 2, 151 | fortitude regards ~hardships and objects of fear; but constancy in
493 2, 152 | reason turning ~to sensible objects, which are the first principles
494 2, 153 | Ethic. vii, 4), seem to be objects of choice in ~themselves
495 2, 162 | consequently a mean between ~objects of touch: and this was impossible,
496 2, 165 | the vice ~concerned about objects of touch and taste is not
497 2, 165 | the ~knowledge of sensible objects. ~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[167]
498 2, 165 | like particular sensible objects.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[167] A[
499 2, 165 | all these are particular objects of sense. ~Therefore since
500 2, 165 | arising from the use ~of objects of touch, whereas curiosity
1-500 | 501-574 |