Part, Question

501 Suppl, 65|            she ~cannot transfer her husband's body to another to the
502 Suppl, 65|             a wife is unlawful to a husband." But it is never ~lawful
503 Suppl, 65|           wife to put aside her own husband and have intercourse with ~
504 Suppl, 65|           it was never lawful for a husband to have a ~concubine.~Aquin.:
505 Suppl, 65|              the ~union of wife and husband is indissoluble or at least
506 Suppl, 65|          the wife is united to the ~husband as his mate: and this was
507 Suppl, 65|          with the ~disposition of a husband towards his wife. For these
508 Suppl, 66|         does not thereby become the husband of more than one wife, so ~
509 Suppl, 66|          the sacrament requires the husband to have only ~one wife,
510 Suppl, 66|            the wife to have but one husband; and consequently bigamy, ~
511 Suppl, 66|       results from bigamy, when one husband has two wives, ~one in law,
512 Suppl, 66|        result from bigamy when ~one husband has two wives at the same
513 Suppl, 66|   intercourse with another man, her husband does not become irregular, ~
514 Suppl, 66|           flesh on the ~part of the husband, or on the part of the wife,
515 Suppl, 66|         because on the part of the ~husband it is required that he should
516 Suppl, 66|            Eph. 5:23): "Because the husband is the head ~of the wife,
517 Suppl, 66|         receive orders, just as her husband ~becomes irregular through
518 Suppl, 66|           after being married, her ~husband does not become irregular
519 Suppl, 66|            the marriage act of the ~husband. But though he be compelled
520 Suppl, 66|         Epistle to Titus (1:6, "the husband of one ~wife") that if a
521 Suppl, 66|            a bishop to be . . . the husband of one wife," it would ~
522 Suppl, 67|           divorced may take another husband? ~(5) Whether the husband
523 Suppl, 67|           husband? ~(5) Whether the husband can marry again the wife
524 Suppl, 67|     offspring is the common good of husband and ~wife, the dictate of
525 Suppl, 67|          with the disposition of a ~husband towards his wife, as stated
526 Suppl, 67|       divorced wife to have another husband?~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[67] A[
527 Suppl, 67|      divorced wife to have ~another husband. For in divorce the husband
528 Suppl, 67|         husband. For in divorce the husband did a greater wrong by ~
529 Suppl, 67|             being divorced. But the husband ~could, without sin, marry
530 Suppl, 67|         without ~sin, marry another husband.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[67] A[
531 Suppl, 67|           divorce to marry ~another husband: "When she is departed and
532 Suppl, 67|       departed and marrieth another husband," ~etc. Therefore the wife
533 Suppl, 67|             not by marrying another husband.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[67] A[
534 Suppl, 67|     divorced wife marry not another husband (Mt. 5:32). ~Therefore it
535 Suppl, 67|      divorced ~wife to have another husband.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[67] A[
536 Suppl, 67|          woman who ~marries another husband "is defiled, and is become
537 Suppl, 67|          sinned by marrying another husband.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[67] A[
538 Suppl, 67|          sinned by marrying another husband after being divorced, because
539 Suppl, 67|          the woman . . . whilst her husband ~liveth, is bound to the
540 Suppl, 67|             bound to the law of her husband" (Rm. 7:2): and she could
541 Suppl, 67|           Divine dispensation for a husband ~to divorce his wife, so
542 Suppl, 67|        could the wife marry another husband, because the ~indissolubility
543 Suppl, 67|          OBJ 1: It was lawful for a husband to have several wives at
544 Suppl, 67|           Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether a husband could lawfully take back
545 Suppl, 67|             1: It would seem that a husband could lawfully take back
546 Suppl, 67|          was ill done. But for the ~husband to divorce his wife was
547 Suppl, 67|      obtains in every law. Now the ~husband by taking back the wife
548 Suppl, 67|          except by marrying another husband. Therefore at ~least it
549 Suppl, 67|              24:4) that "the former husband cannot ~take her again,"
550 Suppl, 67|           permitted, namely for the husband to put away the wife, and
551 Suppl, 67|       divorced wife to take another husband; and two things were commanded, ~
552 Suppl, 67|              and secondly that the ~husband who divorced his wife could
553 Suppl, 67|           others it was done that a husband might not ~be too ready
554 Suppl, 67|             it was ordered that the husband could not take back ~his
555 Suppl, 67|             to be reconciled to her husband, unless ~she were joined
556 Suppl, 67|       joined in marriage to another husband. For then, on account of ~
557 Suppl, 67|            not return to her former husband. Since, ~however, the law
558 Suppl, 67|          Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 5: The husband was punished in that case
559 Suppl, 67|           in the ~bill: because the husband was absolved from the punishment
560 Suppl, 67|        divorce, might take another ~husband, else she would not have
561 Suppl, 67|         cause a delay, and that the husband might be ~dissuaded by the
562 Suppl, 92|            bride is adorned and the husband provided with an adequate
563 Suppl, 92|          who are on the part of the husband, in view of the marriage
564 Suppl, 92|          marriage burden ~which the husband has to bear; while that
565 Suppl, 92|         wife's side to those on the husband's side, for the ~bearing