Part, Question
1 1, 2 | learned, as that incorporeal ~substances are not in space." Therefore
2 1, 3 | God is ~the measure of all substances, as the Commentator shows (
3 1, 4 | first ~and uniformly the substances of sensible things, and
4 1, 8 | in this way incorporeal substances, ~like God, angel and soul,
5 1, 8 | other hand, incorporeal substances have no totality either
6 1, 9 | to some, certain created substances, as angels and ~souls, have
7 1, 9 | other hand ~incorporeal substances, being subsistent forms
8 1, 9 | and so these kinds ~of substances are immutable and invariable
9 1, 9 | that "intellectual created ~substances are pure from generation
10 1, 9 | incorporeal and immaterial substances." Still, there remains in
11 1, 10 | is shared by ~immaterial substances. Hence, also, in the same
12 1, 10 | the measure of spiritual substances. ~Therefore time is the
13 1, 10 | and others are spiritual substances, as are the angels. Therefore
14 1, 10 | existed ~concerning spiritual substances. Some said that all proceeded
15 1, 10 | said that all spiritual substances ~proceeded from God in a
16 1, 10 | said that among spiritual ~substances there are the first, the
17 1, 11 | thought that numbers were the substances of ~all things. Avicenna,
18 1, 14 | things are known by separate substances. God therefore ~knows evil,
19 1, 18 | used to denote a genus of substances from the fact of ~their
20 1, 22 | that is, certain separate substances, which ~move corporeal things
21 1, 27 | creatures, the intellectual ~substances; while even the similitudes
22 1, 29 | contradiction of terms; since second substances are ~the "genera" or "species."
23 1, 29 | called "hypostases," or first substances.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[29] A[
24 1, 29 | are found in the rational substances which have dominion over ~
25 1, 29 | special name even ~among other substances; and this name is "person."~
26 1, 29 | the singular in rational ~substances.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[29] A[
27 1, 29 | which belongs to ~particular substances.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[29] A[
28 1, 29 | common to ~the whole genus of substances, this name "person" signifies
29 1, 29 | in the genus ~of rational substances.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[29] A[
30 1, 30 | God, there must be several substances; which ~appears to be heretical.~
31 1, 30 | accustomed to ~say Three substances, lest we be understood to
32 1, 36 | immaterial and ~invisible substances. And by adding the word "
33 1, 39 | the case of all ~separate substances. For in those things which
34 1, 39 | which in intellectual substances is nothing else than ~person.
35 1, 39 | divided into two ~imperfect substances; or a third prior substance
36 1, 40 | hypostasis are ~individual substances. Consequently, in God the
37 1, 44 | species, such as ~separate substances. The same applies to other
38 1, 45 | in the case of separate substances, or ~composite, as in the
39 1, 45 | in the case of material substances. For being belongs to ~that
40 1, 46 | bodies and all intellectual ~substances. Therefore the world did
41 1, 50 | Reply OBJ 1: Incorporeal substances rank between God and corporeal ~
42 1, 50 | exist in themselves. Angelic substances, on the other ~hand, are
43 1, 50 | But immaterial created substances are finite in their being; ~
44 1, 50 | proper effect of the separate substances seems to be ~the movements
45 1, 50 | intelligible and ~intellectual substances subsist because of the rays
46 1, 50 | ray, since intellectual substances are immaterial, as was ~
47 1, 50 | multiplication of ~intellectual substances can only be according to
48 1, 50 | number of the separate substances. Plato contended that the
49 1, 50 | contended that the separate ~substances are the species of sensible
50 1, 50 | number of the separate ~substances is the number of the species
51 1, 50 | Consequently the separate ~substances cannot be the exemplar species
52 1, 50 | number of ~the separate substances according to the number
53 1, 50 | they are styled immaterial substances, are multiplied according
54 1, 50 | as they are ~immaterial substances, exist in exceeding great
55 1, 50 | conclude that the immaterial substances as it were ~incomparably
56 1, 50 | incomparably exceed material substances as to multitude.~Aquin.:
57 1, 50 | necessarily if the separate substances were made for ~corporeal
58 1, 50 | were made for ~corporeal substances. For thus the immaterial
59 1, 50 | For thus the immaterial substances would exist to ~no purpose,
60 1, 50 | true that the immaterial substances exist on ~account of the
61 1, 50 | various orders of immaterial substances.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[50] A[
62 1, 50 | said that all spiritual substances, even souls, ~are of the
63 1, 50 | far as they are in several substances. And if the ~angels had
64 1, 50 | that the intellectual ~substances "have unfailing life, being
65 1, 51 | the genus of intellectual ~substances, not having the fulness
66 1, 51 | some perfectly intellectual substances, which do not need to acquire
67 1, 51 | Consequently not all intellectual substances are united ~to bodies; but
68 1, 51 | there were no incorporeal substances existing except as united
69 1, 51 | others regarding the other substances; being deceived here as ~
70 1, 52 | reason all ~other spiritual substances.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[52] A[
71 1, 54 | namely, that the ~separated substances are divided into intellect
72 1, 55 | distinction and order of spiritual substances ~and the distinction and
73 1, 55 | distinction and order of corporeal substances. The highest bodies ~have
74 1, 55 | also the lower intellectual substances - that ~is to say, human
75 1, 55 | in the higher spiritual ~substances - that is, the angels -
76 1, 55 | manner of existence of such substances. The ~lower spiritual substances -
77 1, 55 | substances. The ~lower spiritual substances - that is, souls - have
78 1, 55 | other hand, the higher ~substances - that is, the angels -
79 1, 56 | since He is above all substances, He is remote from all ~
80 1, 57 | proportioned to the rank of ~these substances according to greater or
81 1, 58 | that grade among spiritual substances which the heavenly bodies
82 1, 58 | bodies hold ~among corporeal substances: for Dionysius calls them "
83 1, 61 | 2 Para. 1/2~Reply OBJ 2: Substances that are subsisting forms
84 1, 61 | the angels are incorporeal substances. Now a substance which ~
85 1, 63 | demons are intellectual substances, they can in no wise ~have
86 1, 63 | gods' the intellectual substances ~which are above the lunar
87 1, 63 | demons" the ~intellectual substances which are beneath it, yet
88 1, 64 | which is to know separated ~substances. But this is not in keeping
89 1, 64 | knowledge of the separated ~substances. Therefore the demons are
90 1, 64 | something higher. ~The separated substances are above us in the order
91 1, 64 | by knowing the separated substances, ~although his perfect happiness
92 1, 64 | consist in knowing separated substances.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[64] A[
93 1, 65 | without matter are ~spiritual substances, and forms that are in matter
94 1, 65 | bodies are from spiritual substances.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[65] A[
95 1, 65 | its essence. But spiritual substances are forms ~essentially,
96 1, 65 | derived from spiritual ~substances.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[65] A[
97 1, 65 | OBJ 3: Further, spiritual substances have more power of causation
98 1, 65 | derived from spiritual ~substances. ~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[65] A[
99 1, 65 | derived from spiritual substances, which we call the angels.
100 1, 65 | order of those separate substances; for ~example, that there
101 1, 65 | derived from spiritual ~substances, not emanating from them,
102 1, 68 | firmament are "spiritual substances." Wherefore ~it is written (
103 1, 70 | means nothing else but that substances ~of spiritual nature are
104 1, 70 | moved by some ~intellectual substances. Augustine appears to be
105 1, 75 | to be found in spiritual substances - essence, power, and operation -
106 1, 75 | infinite. But in intellectual substances there is composition of ~
107 1, 75 | understanding, similar to other ~substances separated from bodies, as
108 1, 75 | supposed that in ~these substances the difference of degree
109 1, 75 | cannot be; for in incorporeal substances there cannot be diversity
110 1, 75 | follow if the aforesaid substances ~were composed of matter
111 1, 75 | place in these incorporeal substances, such as an ~angel and the
112 1, 76 | intellects are subsistent substances, and ~consequently individual,
113 1, 76 | place among intellectual substances; inasmuch as it is not ~
114 1, 77 | Dogm. xix) that "of two substances ~only does man consist;
115 1, 39 | the case of all ~separate substances. For in those things which
116 1, 39 | which in intellectual substances is nothing else than ~person.
117 1, 39 | divided into two ~imperfect substances; or a third prior substance
118 1, 40 | hypostasis are ~individual substances. Consequently, in God the
119 1, 45 | species, such as ~separate substances. The same applies to other
120 1, 46 | in the case of separate substances, or ~composite, as in the
121 1, 46 | in the case of material substances. For being belongs to ~that
122 1, 47 | bodies and all intellectual ~substances. Therefore the world did
123 1, 51 | Reply OBJ 1: Incorporeal substances rank between God and corporeal ~
124 1, 51 | exist in themselves. Angelic substances, on the other ~hand, are
125 1, 51 | But immaterial created substances are finite in their being; ~
126 1, 51 | proper effect of the separate substances seems to be ~the movements
127 1, 51 | intelligible and ~intellectual substances subsist because of the rays
128 1, 51 | ray, since intellectual substances are immaterial, as was ~
129 1, 51 | multiplication of ~intellectual substances can only be according to
130 1, 51 | number of the separate substances. Plato contended that the
131 1, 51 | contended that the separate ~substances are the species of sensible
132 1, 51 | number of the separate ~substances is the number of the species
133 1, 51 | Consequently the separate ~substances cannot be the exemplar species
134 1, 51 | number of ~the separate substances according to the number
135 1, 51 | they are styled immaterial substances, are ~multiplied according
136 1, 51 | as they are ~immaterial substances, exist in exceeding great
137 1, 51 | conclude that the immaterial substances as it were ~incomparably
138 1, 51 | incomparably exceed material substances as to multitude.~Aquin.:
139 1, 51 | necessarily if the separate substances were made for ~corporeal
140 1, 51 | were made for ~corporeal substances. For thus the immaterial
141 1, 51 | For thus the immaterial substances would exist to ~no purpose,
142 1, 51 | true that the immaterial substances exist on ~account of the
143 1, 51 | various orders of immaterial substances.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[50] A[
144 1, 51 | said that all spiritual substances, even souls, ~are of the
145 1, 51 | far as they are in several substances. And if the ~angels had
146 1, 51 | that the intellectual ~substances "have unfailing life, being
147 1, 52 | the genus of intellectual ~substances, not having the fulness
148 1, 52 | perfectly ~intellectual substances, which do not need to acquire
149 1, 52 | Consequently not all intellectual substances are united ~to bodies; but
150 1, 52 | there were no incorporeal substances existing except as united
151 1, 52 | others regarding the other substances; being deceived here as ~
152 1, 53 | reason all ~other spiritual substances.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[52] A[
153 1, 55 | namely, that the ~separated substances are divided into intellect
154 1, 56 | distinction and order of spiritual substances ~and the distinction and
155 1, 56 | distinction and order of corporeal substances. The highest bodies ~have
156 1, 56 | also the lower intellectual substances - that ~is to say, human
157 1, 56 | in the higher spiritual ~substances - that is, the angels -
158 1, 56 | manner of existence of such substances. The ~lower spiritual substances -
159 1, 56 | substances. The ~lower spiritual substances - that is, souls - have
160 1, 56 | other hand, the higher ~substances - that is, the angels -
161 1, 57 | since He is above all substances, He is remote from all ~
162 1, 58 | proportioned to the rank of ~these substances according to greater or
163 1, 59 | that grade among spiritual substances which the heavenly bodies
164 1, 59 | bodies hold ~among corporeal substances: for Dionysius calls them "
165 1, 62 | 2 Para. 1/2~Reply OBJ 2: Substances that are subsisting forms
166 1, 62 | the angels are incorporeal substances. Now a substance which ~
167 1, 64 | demons are intellectual substances, they can in no wise ~have
168 1, 64 | gods' the intellectual substances ~which are above the lunar
169 1, 64 | demons" the ~intellectual substances which are beneath it, yet
170 1, 65 | which is to know separated ~substances. But this is not in keeping
171 1, 65 | knowledge of the separated ~substances. Therefore the demons are
172 1, 65 | something higher. ~The separated substances are above us in the order
173 1, 65 | by knowing the separated substances, ~although his perfect happiness
174 1, 65 | consist in knowing separated substances.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[64] A[
175 1, 66 | without matter are ~spiritual substances, and forms that are in matter
176 1, 66 | bodies are from spiritual substances.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[65] A[
177 1, 66 | its essence. But spiritual substances are forms ~essentially,
178 1, 66 | derived from spiritual ~substances.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[65] A[
179 1, 66 | OBJ 3: Further, spiritual substances have more power of causation
180 1, 66 | derived from spiritual ~substances. ~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[65] A[
181 1, 66 | derived from spiritual substances, which we call the angels.
182 1, 66 | order of those separate substances; for ~example, that there
183 1, 66 | derived from spiritual ~substances, not emanating from them,
184 1, 69 | firmament are "spiritual substances." Wherefore ~it is written (
185 1, 71 | means nothing else but that substances ~of spiritual nature are
186 1, 71 | moved by some ~intellectual substances. Augustine appears to be
187 1, 74 | to be found in spiritual substances - essence, power, and operation -
188 1, 74 | infinite. But in intellectual substances there is composition of ~
189 1, 74 | understanding, similar to other ~substances separated from bodies, as
190 1, 74 | supposed that in ~these substances the difference of degree
191 1, 74 | cannot be; for in incorporeal substances there cannot be diversity
192 1, 74 | follow if the aforesaid substances ~were composed of matter
193 1, 74 | place in these incorporeal substances, such as an ~angel and the
194 1, 75 | intellects are subsistent substances, and ~consequently individual,
195 1, 75 | place among intellectual substances; inasmuch as it is not ~
196 1, 76 | Dogm. xix) that "of two substances ~only does man consist;
197 1, 78 | power belong to various ~substances.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[79] A[
198 1, 78 | the Arabic, the separate substances which we call angels ~are
199 1, 78 | this reason, that such ~substances are always actually understanding.
200 1, 83 | understands immaterial ~substances, which are above it.~Aquin.:
201 1, 83 | knowledge of those ~separate substances, we cannot for that reason
202 1, 83 | derived from some separate substances.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[84] A[
203 1, 83 | caused by some separate substances.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[84] A[
204 1, 83 | certain separate forms or substances. And this ~in two ways.
205 1, 83 | se" wisdom are creative substances, ~as Dionysius relates (
206 1, 83 | remotion. Other incorporeal ~substances we know, in the present
207 1, 86 | Consequently ~immaterial substances are intelligible by their
208 1, 86 | immaterial - as the separate substances called angels, each of which
209 1, 86 | is ~true only of separate substances; because in a sense it is
210 1, 86 | and not in regard of other substances, as already stated ~(Reply
211 1, 87 | itself, viz. ~immaterial substances. Under this head there are
212 1, 87 | understand ~the immaterial substances called angels, in themselves?~(
213 1, 87 | can understand ~immaterial substances in themselves?~Aquin.: SMT
214 1, 87 | can understand immaterial substances in themselves. For Augustine (
215 1, 87 | these are the immaterial ~substances. Therefore the human mind
216 1, 87 | mind understands immaterial substances.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[88] A[
217 1, 87 | it is clear that those ~substances are more intelligible in
218 1, 87 | unable to understand abstract substances, ~"because it would have
219 1, 87 | purposeless. ~Therefore immaterial substances can be understood by us.~
220 1, 87 | understand all intelligible substances, even the superior ~and
221 1, 87 | shall search out?" But these substances are said to be in ~heaven,
222 1, 87 | etc. Therefore ~immaterial substances cannot be known by human
223 1, 87 | opinion of Plato, immaterial substances are not ~only understood
224 1, 87 | appears ~that immaterial substances which do not fall under
225 1, 87 | the knowledge of separate ~substances by being coupled or united
226 1, 87 | naturally understand separate substances. Hence, when it is ~perfectly
227 1, 87 | able to understand separate substances, as in ~the present life
228 1, 87 | happiness understands separate ~substances by the instrumentality of
229 1, 87 | never understand separate substances (because according to him
230 1, 87 | man understands separate substances by means of the ~active
231 1, 87 | to understand immaterial substances; just as ~when we see colors
232 1, 87 | to ~understand separate substances than to understand all material
233 1, 87 | instrumentality to understand separate substances.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[88] A[
234 1, 87 | the knowledge of separate ~substances, obtainable by speculative
235 1, 87 | understand separate immaterial substances ~in themselves, either by
236 1, 87 | the knowledge of separate substances. For by knowing ~itself,
237 1, 87 | knowledge of incorporeal substances, such as ~is within its
238 1, 87 | rather than immaterial ~substances.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[88] A[
239 1, 87 | thus it is that immaterial substances are ~improportionate to
240 1, 87 | First, because if separate substances are not understood by us,
241 1, 87 | not the end of separate substances: ~while only that is vain
242 1, 87 | therefore, that immaterial substances are ~purposeless, even if
243 1, 87 | material and immaterial substances in the same way. The former ~
244 1, 87 | can understand immaterial substances through its ~knowledge of
245 1, 87 | intellect can know immaterial substances ~through the knowledge of
246 1, 87 | things to know immaterial substances.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[88] A[
247 1, 87 | definitions of immaterial substances; for Damascene defines an
248 1, 87 | philosophy. Therefore immaterial substances can be understood by us.~
249 1, 87 | the genus of immaterial ~substances. But it can be understood
250 1, 87 | Therefore also other material substances can ~be understood by us,
251 1, 87 | other created immaterial substances can be ~understood by us
252 1, 87 | understanding of natural substances we can be led, according
253 1, 87 | knowledge of immaterial substances. For ~since the nature of
254 1, 87 | be true, were immaterial substances the forms and ~species of
255 1, 87 | contrary, that immaterial substances differ altogether ~from
256 1, 87 | to understand immaterial substances through material ~substances.~
257 1, 87 | substances through material ~substances.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[88] A[
258 1, 87 | much ~less can immaterial substances be known by us in such a
259 1, 87 | and nature of immaterial substances cannot be ~perfectly known
260 1, 87 | OBJ 4: Created immaterial substances are not in the same natural ~
261 1, 87 | natural ~genus as material substances, for they do not agree in
262 1, 87 | because even ~immaterial substances are in the predicament of
263 1, 87 | even immaterial created substances (A[1]), much less ~can it
264 1, 88 | it understands separate substances?~(3) Whether it understands
265 1, 88 | case of other separate ~substances. In that case, however,
266 1, 88 | proper to other separate substances. ~Hence it is as natural
267 1, 88 | the superior intellectual substances ~understand by means of
268 1, 88 | therefore, the inferior substances received species in the ~
269 1, 88 | universality as the superior substances, since they are ~not so
270 1, 88 | place among intellectual ~substances. But the perfection of the
271 1, 88 | the same way ~as separate substances, it would follow that human
272 1, 88 | soul as by other separate substances; though in a ~lesser degree.
273 1, 88 | soul understands separate substances?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[89] A[
274 1, 88 | not understand ~separate substances. For the soul is more perfect
275 1, 88 | not understand separate substances ~as shown above (Q[88],
276 1, 88 | its species. But separate substances cannot be known to the soul
277 1, 88 | all understand separate ~substances.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[89] A[
278 1, 88 | the knowledge of separate substances. If, therefore, the ~separated
279 1, 88 | can understand separate substances, its happiness would be ~
280 1, 88 | knowledge of ~any separate substances; but in the knowledge of
281 1, 88 | knowledge of other separate substances if perfectly understood ~
282 1, 88 | things exist in separate substances. ~Therefore, as separated
283 1, 88 | separated souls know separate substances, they also know ~all natural
284 1, 88 | soul understands immaterial substances, which are in the highest
285 1, 88 | because it knows separate substances after a fashion.~Aquin.:
286 1, 88 | perfectly ~understand separate substances, so neither does it know
287 1, 88 | so likewise separate ~substances can know singulars by species
288 1, 88 | of incorporeal spiritual substances; and hence they are ignorant
289 1, 89 | existence. Wherefore ~only substances are properly and truly called
290 1, 89 | made through the composite substances being made. On ~the other
291 1, 89 | Metaph. v. But spiritual substances are much more perfect than ~
292 1, 89 | thought that all ~spiritual substances, whether souls or angels,
293 1, 90 | of the genus of spiritual substances, and in likeness to the
294 1, 90 | spiritual and corporeal substances.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[91] A[
295 1, 93 | he could see the separate substances, that is, the angels?~(3)
296 1, 93 | the ~knowledge of separate substances by union with a corruptible
297 1, 93 | separate soul can see separate substances, as above explained (Q[89], ~
298 1, 93 | was able to see separate ~substances.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[94] A[
299 1, 93 | Therefore it knew separate substances.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[94] A[
300 1, 93 | now understand separate substances. Therefore neither ~could
301 1, 93 | knowledge ~regarding separate substances, was not owing to the fact
302 1, 93 | the excellence of separate substances. We, in our present state, ~
303 1, 93 | at ~knowledge of separate substances by means of its self-knowledge,
304 1, 97 | other hand, incorruptible substances survive, not only ~in the
305 1, 101 | soul or to any spiritual substances, though some ~particular
306 1, 101 | in regard to spiritual ~substances. For the earthly paradise
307 1, 103 | corrupt; such are spiritual substances and heavenly bodies. ~Therefore
308 1, 105 | as the order of corporeal substances depends on the will ~of
309 1, 105 | does the order of spiritual substances. But, as was said ~above (
310 1, 105 | the order of corporeal ~substances. Therefore He also sometimes
311 1, 105 | the order of ~spiritual substances, by enlightening inferior
312 1, 105 | that belongs to spiritual substances in no way belongs ~to the
313 1, 105 | which belongs to spiritual substances is never passed over by
314 1, 109 | existence of ~incorporeal substances.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[110] A[
315 1, 109 | are moved by ~spiritual substances; the number of which he
316 1, 109 | there were any spiritual substances with immediate ~rule over
317 1, 109 | opinions about immaterial ~substances. For Plato laid down that
318 1, 109 | laid down that immaterial substances were types and ~species
319 1, 109 | he held that immaterial substances preside immediately ~over
320 1, 109 | Aristotle held that immaterial substances are not the species of sensible ~
321 1, 109 | derived from immaterial substances. But he differed ~from Plato
322 1, 109 | that different spiritual ~substances were placed over corporeal
323 1, 109 | locally by the spiritual substances; ~whence we see that the
324 1, 109 | the ~power of spiritual substances.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[110] A[
325 1, 112 | by immovable spiritual ~substances, and the inferior bodies
326 1, 114 | these are the ~spiritual substances."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[115]
327 1, 114 | are moved by spiritual ~substances, as stated above (Q[110],
328 1, 114 | instruments. But those spiritual substances are superior to our ~souls.
329 1, 114 | Reply OBJ 1: The spiritual substances, that move the heavenly
330 1, 114 | that demons are spiritual ~substances not united to bodies. Hence
331 1, 115 | glorification of spiritual substances, ~and the like. And this
332 1, 116 | participation of separate substances. But against this we have
333 1, 116 | does ~not obey spiritual substances at will, but the Creator
334 1, 116 | There are certain spiritual substances whose powers are not ~determinate
335 1, 117 | OBJ 2: Further, spiritual substances before all others belong
336 1, 117 | day innumerable spiritual substances would be added to the ~perfection
337 1, 117 | nature as those spiritual substances which are not united to
338 2, 3 | consideration of separate substances viz. ~angels?~(8) Whether
339 2, 3 | the ~knowledge of separate substances, which are above the human
340 2, 3 | participation of the higher substances, so the consideration ~of
341 2, 3 | the knowledge of separate substances, ~namely, angels?~Aquin.:
342 2, 3 | the knowledge of ~separate substances, namely, angels. For Gregory
343 2, 17 | the parts are being and substances in the ~whole. But those
344 2, 18 | too, accidents in natural substances are outside the essence.~
345 2, 35 | by absolute forms, ~e.g. substances and qualities; whereas other
346 2, 50 | there is a habit in separate substances?~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[50] A[
347 2, 50 | therefore, angels are simple substances, it seems that ~there are
348 2, 50 | that ~angels are immaterial substances, and that there is no material ~
349 2, 72 | thing; and ~consequently substances differ in respect of their
350 2, 93 | stability of incorporeal substances and of the heavenly bodies.
351 2, 94 | he has in common with all substances: inasmuch as every ~substance
352 2, 102 | which is that of spiritual substances: ~while that part which
353 2, 102 | between us ~and incorporeal substances. Hence the high-priest alone,
354 2, 102 | higher world ~of spiritual substances, hence that tabernacle contained
355 2, 102 | world ~there are spiritual substances called angels. These are
356 2, 24 | since they are created substances; ~nor is it, seemingly,
357 2, 29 | most ~plentifully on the substances which are nearest to Him,
358 2, 81 | since they are intellectual ~substances. Now prayer is becoming
359 2, 92 | placed certain spiritual substances created by ~the supreme
360 2, 169 | pertaining to spiritual substances, by whom we are urged to
361 2, 170 | the influence of spiritual substances ~[*Cf. FP, Q[88], A[4],
362 2, 170 | revelation of spiritual substances, or from a corporeal cause,
363 2, 170 | impressions either of spiritual ~substances, or even of natural causes;
364 2, 178 | sublime beings and godlike ~substances, and though we grasp them
365 3, 6 | acts upon the more remote ~substances through the less remote.
366 3, 6 | to angels, since they are substances ~entirely free from matter.~
367 3, 11 | phantasms, such as separate substances. ~Hence, since this knowledge
368 3, 11 | He did not know ~separate substances.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[11] A[
369 3, 11 | cannot understand separate substances. But after the state of ~
370 3, 11 | measure, to know separate ~substances by itself, as was said in
371 3, 11 | soul could know separate substances in the same way that a separated ~
372 3, 11 | the senses, viz. separate substances. Therefore it could ~understand
373 3, 12 | the essences of ~separate substances, nor past, present, or future
374 3, 12 | substance of supercelestial ~substances - when without change He
375 3, 12 | midway between spiritual ~substances and corporeal things, it
376 3, 12 | illumination of spiritual substances. Now in ~both these ways
377 3, 16 | ascribes to two persons or substances," i.e. hypostases, "such ~
378 3, 19 | where there are different ~substances?"~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[19] A[
379 3, 35 | man is ~made out of two substances. And so we confess that
380 3, 36 | For angels are spiritual substances, according to ~Ps. 103:4: "
381 3, 44 | which He worked in spiritual substances;~(2) The miracles which
382 3, 44 | Christ worked in spiritual ~substances?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[44] A[
383 3, 44 | Christ ~worked in spiritual substances. For among spiritual substances
384 3, 44 | substances. For among spiritual substances the holy ~angels are above
385 3, 56 | first ~enlightens those substances which are closer to Him,
386 3, 57 | contact, as regards spiritual ~substances; thus a heavenly place which
387 3, 57 | becomingly due to spiritual substances, since they are highest
388 3, 57 | highest in the ~order of substances. But although Christ's body
389 3, 57 | body is beneath spiritual ~substances, if we weigh the conditions
390 3, 57 | surpasses all spiritual substances in dignity, when we ~call
391 3, 57 | corporeal and ~spiritual substances, still in either case this
392 3, 75 | implies a certain order of substances, one ~of which is changed
393 3, 75 | the other, it is in both substances as in a ~subject, just as
394 3, 76 | therefore Christ exists in three substances, namely, the Godhead, soul ~
395 3, 76 | as forms and spiritual ~substances. And to this mode can be
396 3, 77 | that dimensions are ~the substances of bodies, as is said in
397 3, 77 | as is seen in spiritual substances. But the sacramental species
398 3, 77 | animated bodies, such as the substances of the bread and ~wine are
399 Suppl, 69| certain other ~spiritual substances, are indifferent to all
400 Suppl, 69| that, Although spiritual substances do not depend on a body
401 Suppl, 69| of congruity of spiritual substances to corporeal ~substances,
402 Suppl, 69| substances to corporeal ~substances, in that the more noble
403 Suppl, 69| adapted to the more noble ~substances: wherefore also the philosophers
404 Suppl, 69| that the order of ~separate substances is according to the order
405 Suppl, 69| manner befitting spiritual ~substances, a manner that cannot be
406 Suppl, 69| immediately united to separate substances, since their entire knowledge ~
407 Suppl, 70| Eccl. Dogm. xix): "Of two substances ~alone does man consist,
408 Suppl, 72| that evil and good are two ~substances in some places severed from
409 Suppl, 80| subtlety whereby spiritual substances are said to be ~subtle:
410 Suppl, 89| to understand immaterial substances according to their ~being.
411 Suppl, 89| come to understand separate substances. thus Alfarabius expresses
412 Suppl, 89| essence and ~from separate substances. For since the intellect
413 Suppl, 89| the vision of any separate substances. But this ~opinion is altogether
414 Suppl, 89| emanate from the separate ~substances, so that finally we may
415 Suppl, 89| able to understand these ~substances. Consequently, according
416 Suppl, 89| the vision of ~separate substances.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[92] A[
417 Suppl, 89| disposition, since separate ~substances are subsisting quiddities
418 Suppl, 89| quiddity of the separate substances, and ~consequently from
419 Suppl, 89| quiddities of ~material substances and knows them, it does
420 Suppl, 89| thus, or other ~separate substances, is not to see the essence
421 Suppl, 89| of understanding separate substances, to wit that separate substances
422 Suppl, 89| substances, to wit that separate substances are ~understood by us by
423 Suppl, 89| intentions being images of their substances, not indeed abstracted ~
424 Suppl, 89| perfected so as to see separate substances ~is neither a quiddity abstracted
425 Suppl, 89| case with other separate substances, we must ~nevertheless allow
426 Suppl, 89| the knowledge of ~separate substances, in so far as they are known
427 Suppl, 89| case with other separate substances. Nor ~will that knowledge
|