Part, Question
1 1, 13 | by relation, inasmuch as ~relations serve to recall a thing
2 1, 13 | And the same applies to relations ~between "being" and "non-being"
3 1, 13 | extreme. The same is true of relations that follow upon ~an act
4 1, 13 | 3/5 ~Now there are other relations which are realities as regards
5 1, 13 | both; as is clear of all ~relations, consequent upon quantity;
6 1, 13 | and the same applies ~to relations consequent upon action and
7 1, 13 | apprehends ~them as terms of the relations of science and sense. Hence
8 1, 13 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: As relations applied to God temporally
9 1, 13 | therefore names signifying relations following upon the action ~
10 1, 13 | 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Relations signified by these names
11 1, 13 | in idea; but the opposite relations in ~creatures are real.
12 1, 13 | should be denominated ~from relations really existing in the thing,
13 1, 13 | yet so that the opposite ~relations in God should also be understood
14 1, 13 | Reply OBJ 6: To know whether relations are simultaneous by nature
15 1, 13 | belong but the meaning of the relations themselves. For if one in ~
16 1, 14 | Creator" and the like, import relations to ~creatures in so far
17 1, 14 | and the like, import the relations consequent upon the acts
18 1, 14 | themselves; and thus these relations are attributed to God variously, ~
19 1, 14 | and ~the like, import relations consequent upon the acts
20 1, 15 | multiplied according to ~their relations to different creatures,
21 1, 15 | 1 ~OBJ 4: Further, these relations are either real in creatures
22 1, 15 | only according to these relations. But if they are real in
23 1, 15 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Such relations, whereby ideas are multiplied,
24 1, 15 | 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Relations multiplying ideas do not
25 1, 15 | God. Yet they are not real relations, such as those whereby the ~
26 1, 15 | Persons are distinguished, but relations understood by God.~Aquin.:
27 1, 19 | good stands in various relations to the divine goodness,
28 1, 27 | other ~according to the relations of origin, the order of
29 1, 27 | procession; secondly, the ~relations of origin; thirdly, the
30 1, 28 | Para. 1/1 - THE DIVINE RELATIONS (FOUR ARTICLES)~The divine
31 1, 28 | FOUR ARTICLES)~The divine relations are next to be considered,
32 1, 28 | Whether there are real relations in God?~(2) Whether those
33 1, 28 | in God?~(2) Whether those relations are the divine essence itself,
34 1, 28 | God there can be several relations distinct from each ~other?~(
35 1, 28 | 4) The number of these relations.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[28] A[
36 1, 28 | 1~Whether there are real relations in God?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
37 1, 28 | seem that there are no real relations in God. For ~Boethius says (
38 1, 28 | terms. Therefore the divine relations are not real relations,
39 1, 28 | divine relations are not real relations, but are ~formed only by
40 1, 28 | same reason to ~the other relations in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
41 1, 28 | intelligible ~word. But the relations following upon the operation
42 1, 28 | the intellect are ~logical relations. Therefore paternity and
43 1, 28 | generation, are only logical relations.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[28] A[
44 1, 28 | Para. 1/1~I answer that, relations exist in God really; in
45 1, 28 | we may ~consider that in relations alone is found something
46 1, 28 | mutual inclination; and such relations are necessarily real relations; ~
47 1, 28 | relations are necessarily real relations; ~as in a heavy body is
48 1, 28 | and then they have real relations ~to each other. Therefore
49 1, 28 | Q[27], AA[2],4), these relations, ~according to the divine
50 1, 28 | processions, are necessarily real relations.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[28] A[
51 1, 28 | Boethius likens the ~divine relations to a relation of identity,
52 1, 28 | not diversified by these ~relations, as neither is it by relation
53 1, 28 | 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Relations which result from the mental
54 1, 28 | objects understood are logical relations only, inasmuch as reason ~
55 1, 28 | perceived by the mind. ~Those relations, however, which follow the
56 1, 28 | proceeds, are not logical relations only, but are real ~relations;
57 1, 28 | relations only, but are real ~relations; inasmuch as the intellect
58 1, 28 | paternity and filiation are real relations in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
59 1, 28 | is a man." Therefore, if relations exist in God, there ~must
60 1, 28 | he said ~that the divine relations are assistant, or externally
61 1, 28 | consider even in creatures, relations formally as such, in that
62 1, 28 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the relations in God are really distinguished
63 1, 28 | would seem that the divine relations are not really ~distinguished
64 1, 28 | divine essence. Therefore the relations are not really ~distinguished
65 1, 28 | another. Therefore the ~relations are not really distinguished
66 1, 28 | trinity." Therefore, if ~the relations were not really distinguished
67 1, 28 | 1~Reply OBJ 3: Although relations, properly speaking, do not
68 1, 28 | there are only four real relations - paternity, filiation, ~
69 1, 28 | are not only four real ~relations - paternity, filiation,
70 1, 28 | that in God there exist the relations of the intelligent ~agent
71 1, 28 | willed; which are real relations not comprised under those
72 1, 28 | there are not only four real relations in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
73 1, 28 | 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, real relations in God are understood as
74 1, 28 | the Word. But intelligible relations are ~infinitely multiplied,
75 1, 28 | infinite series of real relations.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[28] A[
76 1, 28 | there are many more eternal relations.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[28] A[
77 1, 28 | likeness, and identity are relations: and ~they are in God from
78 1, 28 | Therefore several more relations are ~eternal in God than
79 1, 28 | said that there are fewer ~relations in God than those above
80 1, 28 | thus there are not four ~relations in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
81 1, 28 | based only on action. Such relations are ~not based on the actions
82 1, 28 | procession, ~forasmuch as the relations of God to creatures are
83 1, 28 | Hence, it follows that real relations in God can be ~understood
84 1, 28 | processions two opposite relations arise; one of which is the
85 1, 28 | neither have the ensuing relations ~a proper name of their
86 1, 28 | themselves, and not to the relations.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[28] A[
87 1, 28 | that in God these kinds of relations are not real; as ~neither
88 1, 28 | Reply OBJ 2: Intelligible relations in ourselves are infinitely ~
89 1, 28 | and consequently also the relations understood. ~This does not
90 1, 28 | 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Ideal relations exist as understood by God.
91 1, 28 | plurality that there are many relations in God; but ~that God knows
92 1, 28 | that God knows these many relations.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[28] A[
93 1, 28 | similitude in God are not real relations; but ~are only logical relations (
94 1, 28 | relations; but ~are only logical relations (Q[42], A[3], ad 4).~Aquin.:
95 1, 28 | nevertheless the mutual relations are not the same. Hence,
96 1, 29 | the ~processions and the relations, we must now approach the
97 1, 30 | effected by a plurality of relations. But in God there ~is no
98 1, 30 | is no plurality but of relations (Q[28], A[3]). Therefore
99 1, 30 | there are several real ~relations in God; and hence it follows
100 1, 30 | things, but not plurality of relations. Because ~relations are
101 1, 30 | plurality of relations. Because ~relations are predicated relatively,
102 1, 30 | relatively, and thus the relations do not import ~composition
103 1, 30 | 1]). But there are four relations in God as ~stated above (
104 1, 30 | the several ~subsisting relations really distinct from each
105 1, 30 | distinction between the divine relations can come only from relative ~
106 1, 30 | Therefore two opposite relations must needs refer to two ~
107 1, 30 | two ~persons: and if any relations are not opposite they must
108 1, 30 | filiation are opposite ~relations, they belong necessarily
109 1, 30 | of the Son. The other two relations are not ~opposed to each
110 1, 30 | Although there are four relations in God, one of them, ~spiration,
111 1, 30 | constituting a person. The three ~relations - paternity, filiation,
112 1, 30 | except by the ~personal relations. So goodness belongs to
113 1, 31 | Yet it does not mean the relations themselves of the Persons,
114 1, 32 | related to the ~Father by two relations. For, since the very specific
115 1, 32 | it must be said that two relations are not ~specifically different
116 1, 32 | admitting ~in God, many logical relations. But in the Father there
117 1, 32 | corresponding to the ~two relations of the Son and of the Holy
118 1, 32 | we must understand two relations in the Father, whereby He ~
119 1, 32 | it is necessary that the relations should be ~separately signified
120 1, 32 | in God these notions or relations are real, as stated ~above (
121 1, 32 | proper to the persons are the relations whereby they are distinguished ~
122 1, 32 | from each other. But the relations in God are only four (Q[
123 1, 32 | Of these only four are relations, for ~"innascibility" is
124 1, 32 | OBJ 1: Besides the four relations, another notion must be ~
125 1, 33 | terms which import personal relations; because the person proceeding
126 1, 34 | according to their various ~relations to creatures. Therefore
127 1, 34 | in the Word are implied relations to ~non-beings; which appears
128 1, 34 | 1~Reply OBJ 2: Since the relations result from actions, some
129 1, 35 | is not by reason ~of the relations that we consider either
130 1, 36 | A[4], ad 3). Hence the relations also which follow from this
131 1, 36 | to signify the aforesaid relations, as when ~we use the names
132 1, 36 | the notional acts than the relations; so to ~signify the divine
133 1, 36 | each other only by the relations. Now the relations cannot
134 1, 36 | by the relations. Now the relations cannot distinguish ~the
135 1, 36 | forasmuch as they are opposite relations; which ~appears from the
136 1, 36 | that the Father has two relations, by one of which ~He is
137 1, 36 | these ~are not opposite relations, and therefore they do not
138 1, 36 | Holy Ghost there were two relations only, whereby each of them ~
139 1, 36 | related to the Father, these relations would not be opposite to
140 1, 36 | neither would be the two relations whereby the Father is ~related
141 1, 36 | would be one, ~having two relations opposed to the two relations
142 1, 36 | relations opposed to the two relations of the Father. But this ~
143 1, 36 | each other by opposite ~relations. Now there cannot be in
144 1, 36 | there cannot be in God any relations opposed to each ~other,
145 1, 36 | opposed to each ~other, except relations of origin, as proved above (
146 1, 36 | A[44]). And ~opposite relations of origin are to be understood
147 1, 36 | belongs to the opposite relations, whereby the Father and
148 1, 37 | person Who proceeds, and the relations following from this ~procession
149 1, 37 | vocabulary, we ~express these relations by the words "love" and "
150 1, 39 | forasmuch as they held the relations to be "adjacent"; ~considering
151 1, 39 | considering only in the relations the idea of "reference to
152 1, 39 | to another," and ~not the relations as realities. But as it
153 1, 39 | 28], A[2]) ~in creatures relations are accidental, whereas
154 1, 39 | in creatures ~by means of relations, but only by essential principles;
155 1, 39 | principles; because in ~creatures relations are not subsistent. But
156 1, 39 | not subsistent. But in God relations are ~subsistent, and so
157 1, 39 | distinguished, ~because the relations themselves are not distinguished
158 1, 40 | PERSONS AS COMPARED TO THE RELATIONS OR PROPERTIES (FOUR ARTICLES)~
159 1, 40 | persons in connection with the relations, or ~properties; and there
160 1, 40 | person?~(2) Whether the relations distinguish and constitute
161 1, 40 | mental abstraction of the relations from the persons leaves ~
162 1, 40 | distinct?~(4) Whether the relations, according to our mode of
163 1, 40 | person there are several relations; as in the ~person of the
164 1, 40 | of signification of the ~relations, which do not indeed signify
165 1, 40 | Whence, they styled the relations ~"assistant," as above explained (
166 1, 40 | are distinguished by the relations?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[40] A[
167 1, 40 | not distinguished by the ~relations. For simple things are distinct
168 1, 40 | cannot be distinguished by relations.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[40] A[
169 1, 40 | not distinguished by the relations.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[40] A[
170 1, 40 | begotten. Further, that the relations, or the ~properties, make
171 1, 40 | from each other by the ~relations. Secondly: because the distinction
172 1, 40 | which are distinct. Now the ~relations or the properties distinguish
173 1, 40 | distinguished rather by relations than by origin. For, although
174 1, 40 | distinguished chiefly and firstly by relations; whence this name ~"Father"
175 1, 40 | persons are the subsisting relations themselves. Hence ~it is
176 1, 40 | be ~distinguished by the relations.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[40] A[
177 1, 40 | hypostases remain if the relations are mentally abstracted ~
178 1, 40 | remain if the properties or ~relations are mentally abstracted
179 1, 40 | follows ~that if the personal relations are mentally abstracted,
180 1, 40 | not distinguished by the relations, but only by origin; so ~
181 1, 40 | And that the consequent ~relations which are to be regarded
182 1, 40 | properties." Hence, ~if these relations are mentally abstracted,
183 1, 40 | reasons: first, because the relations ~distinguish and constitute
184 1, 40 | absolutely say that the ~relations in our mode of understanding
185 1, 40 | if we suppose that ~the relations distinguish and constitute
186 1, 41 | whatever belongs to the relations, by the names ~of the persons,
187 1, 41 | persons are the mutual relations of the persons, as is clear
188 1, 41 | notional acts differ from the relations of the persons ~only in
189 1, 41 | which habitudes are the relations, or the notions. ~Nevertheless
190 1, 41 | movement, differ from ~the relations which result from action
191 1, 41 | separately after the manner of relations. Thus it is ~evident that
192 1, 41 | reason is in regard to the relations by which alone are the ~
193 1, 41 | the divine Persons are the relations ~themselves as subsistent,
194 1, 42 | distinct by reason of the relations. ~Therefore equality is
195 1, 42 | they have in common and the relations in which they ~are distinct.
196 1, 42 | distinct from the personal relations: but ~in its concept it
197 1, 42 | concept it includes both the relations which distinguish the ~persons,
198 1, 42 | however, we consider the relations of cause and effect, or ~
199 1, 42 | the other. But in God the ~relations themselves are the persons
200 1, 42 | nature, nor on the part the relations, can one ~person be prior
201 1, 42 | the distinction of the relations. Wherefore Augustine says (
202 1, 42 | predicated of each of the relations; because all the relations
203 1, 42 | relations; because all the relations are one in ~essence and
204 1, 42 | 4]). Wherefore all ~the relations together are not greater
205 1, 42 | manifest that as regards the relations, each of two relative ~opposites
206 1, 42 | the distinction of the ~relations, not by any kind of essential
207 1, 44 | though multiplied by their relations to things, ~in reality are
208 1, 45 | only according ~to diverse relations (Phys. iii, text 20,21),
209 1, 45 | withdrawn, only diverse relations remain in the Creator and
210 1, 45 | in ~its creation; because relations, or their entire nature
211 1, 45 | not referred by any other relations, but by themselves; ~as
212 1, 45 | by their processions and relations. Therefore whatever difference
213 1, 45 | to the ~processions and relations of the Persons. But the
214 1, 45 | according to ~processions and relations. ~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[45] A[
215 1, 45 | in creating according to relations ~and processions.~Aquin.:
216 1, 45 | nature, and not to the ~relations whereby the Persons are
217 1, 57 | future do not bear the same relations to the species. ~Present
218 1, 75 | But in another way their relations differ, inasmuch as the
219 1, 37 | person Who proceeds, and the relations following from this ~procession
220 1, 37 | vocabulary, we ~express these relations by the words "love" and "
221 1, 39 | forasmuch as they held the relations to be "adjacent"; ~considering
222 1, 39 | considering only in the relations the idea of "reference to
223 1, 39 | to another," and ~not the relations as realities. But as it
224 1, 39 | 28], A[2]) ~in creatures relations are accidental, whereas
225 1, 39 | in creatures ~by means of relations, but only by essential principles;
226 1, 39 | principles; because in ~creatures relations are not subsistent. But
227 1, 39 | not subsistent. But in God relations are ~subsistent, and so
228 1, 39 | distinguished, ~because the relations themselves are not distinguished
229 1, 40 | PERSONS AS COMPARED TO THE RELATIONS OR PROPERTIES (FOUR ARTICLES)~
230 1, 40 | persons in connection with the relations, or ~properties; and there
231 1, 40 | person?~(2) Whether the relations distinguish and constitute
232 1, 40 | mental abstraction of the relations from the persons leaves ~
233 1, 40 | distinct?~(4) Whether the relations, according to our mode of
234 1, 40 | person there are several relations; as in the ~person of the
235 1, 40 | of signification of the ~relations, which do not indeed signify
236 1, 40 | Whence, they styled the relations ~"assistant," as above explained (
237 1, 40 | are distinguished by the relations?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[40] A[
238 1, 40 | not distinguished by the ~relations. For simple things are distinct
239 1, 40 | cannot be distinguished by relations.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[40] A[
240 1, 40 | not distinguished by the relations.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[40] A[
241 1, 40 | begotten. Further, that the relations, or the ~properties, make
242 1, 40 | from each other by the ~relations. Secondly: because the distinction
243 1, 40 | which are distinct. Now the ~relations or the properties distinguish
244 1, 40 | distinguished rather by relations than by origin. For, although
245 1, 40 | distinguished chiefly and firstly by relations; whence this name ~"Father"
246 1, 40 | persons are the subsisting relations themselves. Hence ~it is
247 1, 40 | be ~distinguished by the relations.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[40] A[
248 1, 40 | hypostases remain if the relations are mentally abstracted ~
249 1, 40 | remain if the properties or ~relations are mentally abstracted
250 1, 40 | follows ~that if the personal relations are mentally abstracted,
251 1, 40 | not distinguished by the relations, but only by origin; so ~
252 1, 40 | And that the consequent ~relations which are to be regarded
253 1, 40 | properties." Hence, ~if these relations are mentally abstracted,
254 1, 40 | reasons: first, because the relations distinguish and constitute
255 1, 40 | absolutely say that the ~relations in our mode of understanding
256 1, 40 | if we suppose that ~the relations distinguish and constitute
257 1, 41 | whatever belongs to the relations, by the names ~of the persons,
258 1, 41 | persons are the mutual relations of the persons, as is clear
259 1, 41 | notional acts differ from the relations of the persons ~only in
260 1, 41 | which habitudes are the relations, or the notions. ~Nevertheless
261 1, 41 | movement, differ from ~the relations which result from action
262 1, 41 | separately after the manner of relations. Thus it is ~evident that
263 1, 41 | reason is in regard to the relations by which alone are the ~
264 1, 41 | the divine Persons are the relations ~themselves as subsistent,
265 1, 42 | distinct by reason of the relations. ~Therefore equality is
266 1, 42 | they have in common and the relations in which they ~are distinct.
267 1, 42 | distinct from the personal relations: but ~in its concept it
268 1, 42 | concept it includes both the relations which distinguish the ~persons,
269 1, 42 | however, we consider the relations of cause and effect, or ~
270 1, 42 | the other. But in God the ~relations themselves are the persons
271 1, 42 | nature, nor on the part the relations, can one ~person be prior
272 1, 42 | the distinction of the relations. Wherefore Augustine says (
273 1, 42 | predicated of each of the relations; because all the relations
274 1, 42 | relations; because all the relations are one in ~essence and
275 1, 42 | 4]). Wherefore all ~the relations together are not greater
276 1, 42 | manifest that as regards the relations, each of two relative ~opposites
277 1, 42 | the distinction of the ~relations, not by any kind of essential
278 1, 45 | though multiplied by their relations to things, ~in reality are
279 1, 46 | only according ~to diverse relations (Phys. iii, text 20,21),
280 1, 46 | withdrawn, only diverse relations remain in the Creator and
281 1, 46 | in ~its creation; because relations, or their entire nature
282 1, 46 | not referred by any other relations, but by themselves; ~as
283 1, 46 | by their processions and relations. Therefore whatever difference
284 1, 46 | to the ~processions and relations of the Persons. But the
285 1, 46 | according to ~processions and relations.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[45] A[
286 1, 46 | in creating according to relations ~and processions.~Aquin.:
287 1, 46 | nature, and not to the ~relations whereby the Persons are
288 1, 58 | future do not bear the same relations to the species. ~Present
289 1, 74 | But in another way their relations differ, inasmuch as the
290 1, 82 | this is clear from their ~relations to their respective objects
291 1, 84 | accidents, and the various ~relations of the essence. Thus it
292 1, 91 | that office; ~hence near relations are debarred from intermarriage,
293 1, 92 | according to origin, or, rather, relations of ~origin. Now the mode
294 1, 118 | than to his father or other relations.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[119] A[
295 2, 16 | But choice implies two relations: ~one, of the thing chosen,
296 2, 21 | Reason stands in different relations to the productions of ~art,
297 2, 35 | contraries; whereas contrary relations ~to contrary things, implies
298 2, 52 | three-cubits-long, and of ~relations of quantity, as double and
299 2, 60 | according to their various relations to ~reason: so that it follows
300 2, 60 | according to its various ~relations to reason, the directing
301 2, 60 | account of the various ~relations of the receiving matter,
302 2, 60 | external things, has various relations to reason, and ~consequently
303 2, 60 | unless ~they bear different relations to reason.~Aquin.: SMT FS
304 2, 68 | matters touching a man's relations to another, is ~perfected
305 2, 69 | happiness stand in different relations to future ~beatitude, by
306 2, 69 | consists chiefly in man's relations with his neighbor, ~either
307 2, 69 | which perfects man in his relations to others; meekness to ~
308 2, 69 | virtues directing man in his relations to his neighbor: from ~which
309 2, 82 | the nature of guilt; for relations cannot be more or ~less.
310 2, 93 | according to their ~different relations to things, as stated in
311 2, 100 | are well ordered in their relations to God. Now man is united ~
312 2, 100 | precepts directing man in his relations to himself, but only such
313 2, 100 | such as ~direct him in his relations to God and himself, it seems
314 2, 100 | human law ~direct man in his relations to the human community,
315 2, 100 | Divine law direct man in his relations to a community or commonwealth ~
316 2, 100 | precepts ordering ~man in his relations to God; and in the second
317 2, 100 | precepts ~ordering man in his relations to other men who are his
318 2, 100 | that direct man in ~his relations to his neighbor, the first
319 2, 103 | as the determining of our relations with our neighbor is ~a
320 2, 104 | which ~directed man in his relations to his neighbor. For judicial
321 2, 104 | which directed man in his relations to ~his neighbor.~Aquin.:
322 2, 104 | those which directed the relations ~between man and man.~Aquin.:
323 2, 104 | when they refer to man's relations to ~other men, they are
324 2, 104 | that they refer ~to man's relations to other men; secondly,
325 2, 104 | which ~direct man in his relations to his neighbor, and derive
326 2, 104 | take note that, since the ~relations of man to his neighbor are
327 2, 104 | subject to reason than the ~relations of man to God, there are
328 2, 104 | man is directed ~in his relations to his neighbor, than whereby
329 2, 104 | precepts direct men in ~their relations to one another. But those
330 2, 104 | were ~directed in their relations to one another, are subject
331 2, 104 | pertaining to the ordering of relations between one ~man and another
332 2, 104 | according to the different relations in which one ~man stands
333 2, 105 | suitably framed as to the relations of ~one man with another?~
334 2, 105 | suitably framed ~as regards the relations of one man with another.
335 2, 105 | matters pertaining to the relations of one man with another ~
336 2, 105 | nation that ~the mutual relations of the citizens be ordered
337 2, 105 | ordered by just laws. Now the ~relations of one man with another
338 2, 105 | respect of each of these relations between one man and ~another.
339 2, 105 | sufficiently concerning the mutual relations of one man with ~another.~
340 2, 105 | 1/2~I answer that, Man's relations with foreigners are twofold:
341 2, 105 | opportunities of ~peaceful relations with foreigners. First,
342 2, 105 | nations that had close relations with the Jews (viz., the
343 2, 105 | others (with whom their ~relations had been hostile, such as
344 2, 105 | manner with regard to hostile relations with foreigners, the Law ~
345 2, 105 | And so lest the surviving relations should ~be the more grieved
346 2, 105 | answer that, The mutual relations of the members of a household
347 2, 105 | Accordingly the mutual relations of the members of a household
348 2, 1 | Persons, which is by the relations of ~origin, knowledge of
349 2, 2 | same act having different relations to the object of faith.~
350 2, 10 | regard to their different relations ~to the virtue: and in this
351 2, 10 | respect of various ~inordinate relations to God, so too, faith is
352 2, 24 | the origin of friendly relations with others lies ~in our
353 2, 24 | with others lies ~in our relations to ourselves." Thus too
354 2, 24 | Reply OBJ 1: The different relations between a lover and the
355 2, 25 | that "a man's ~friendly relations with others arise from his
356 2, 25 | arise from his friendly relations with ~himself." Now the
357 2, 25 | is speaking of friendly relations towards ~another person
358 2, 25 | way; and not of friendly relations with ~another in whom the
359 2, 25 | that friendship among blood relations is ~based upon their connection
360 2, 25 | in matters ~concerning relations between citizens, we should
361 2, 25 | to act, for we invite our relations ~to a wedding . . . It would
362 2, 42 | origin ~of our friendly relations with others lies in our
363 2, 55 | virtues, to direct man in his relations with others: because it
364 2, 55 | certain laws regulating the relations of father ~to his son, and
365 2, 56 | 2]) directs man in his ~relations with other men. Now this
366 2, 56 | secondly as regards his relations ~with others in general,
367 2, 56 | sufficiently in all his ~relations with other men. Therefore
368 2, 56 | justice to direct man in his relations to other individuals.~Aquin.:
369 2, 56 | man sufficiently in his ~relations towards others. As regards
370 2, 56 | justice ~is about man's relations with another, and we are
371 2, 77 | establish equality in our relations with ~others, as shown above (
372 2, 78 | two ~would seem to regard relations between equals, namely, "
373 2, 78 | internally; two regard our relations ~toward superiors, namely, "
374 2, 78 | God; ~while two regard our relations towards inferiors, namely, ~"
375 2, 79 | to our human kindred and ~relations as also to those who are
376 2, 99 | there are many other mutual relations ~besides those of kindred
377 2, 99 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: The relations of a man with his kindred
378 2, 99 | of his being than other relations: ~wherefore the term piety
379 2, 100 | actions are connected with the relations between man and man.~Aquin.:
380 2, 100 | consideration the different relations in which other ~persons
381 2, 100 | stand to ourselves, which relations both virtues regard. Now
382 2, 112 | as regards their mutual relations with ~one another, in point
383 2, 139 | since justice regards the relations between one man and ~another,
384 2, 152 | therefore to his other blood relations, who are descended in ~near
385 2, 152 | reason is because blood relations must needs live in close ~
386 2, 152 | to wife, all his wife's ~relations are united to him by a special
387 2, 179 | active life regards only ~our relations with other persons: hence
388 2, 179 | many things that regard our relations with other people he ~adds
389 2, 179 | we are directed in our relations to others, not by all the
390 2, 179 | man ~is directed in his relations towards another, as the
391 2, 179 | described with reference to our ~relations with other people, because
392 2, 183 | themselves, or give to their relations or friends, their surplus ~
393 2, 183 | goods from their parents and relations should be supported ~from
394 2, 183 | use, and give it to his relations or others, he sins not so
395 2, 187 | deliberation with one's relations and friends is ~requisite
396 3, 2 | same as assumption. For ~relations, as motions, are specified
397 3, 2 | together in one Person. Now all relations which begin in time are
398 3, 3 | they are distinguished by ~relations only which must be together
399 3, 9 | The human mind has two relations - one to higher things, ~
400 3, 20 | names ~of the nature, but of relations, as the words 'paternity'
401 3, 20 | eternal; and especially those relations which seem more ~properly
402 3, 35 | that in consequence the relations differ ~in species: wherefore
403 3, 35 | nothing hinders several such relations being in the ~same subject.
404 3, 35 | same man may have different relations as the master ~of different
405 3, 35 | corresponding to the two ~relations in the parents, as considered
406 Suppl, 3 | according to their respective relations to the common good. In ~
407 Suppl, 44| equal subjects. But the relations of ~matrimony, on the one
408 Suppl, 53| a marriage between blood relations is ~annulled by the commandment
409 Suppl, 54| has been said that blood relations ~agree not only in the specific
410 Suppl, 55| other. Now a person's blood relations are separate ~from one another.
411 Suppl, 55| Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, relations result from certain things
412 Suppl, 55| Now there are certain ~relations which have for their cause
413 Suppl, 55| movement, for instance the relations between the motive power
414 Suppl, 55| is no reason why diverse relations should not be in ~the same
415 Suppl, 55| wife contracts the same relations with all ~her husband's
416 Suppl, 56| reason ~of this is that the relations between priest and penitent
417 Suppl, 65| fornication destroys the due relations of the ~parent with the
418 Suppl, 89| their ~mansions; (3) Their relations with the damned; (4) Their
419 Suppl, 89| various ~properties and relations to other things: and it
420 Suppl, 91| Out. Para. 1/1 - OF THE RELATIONS OF THE SAINTS TOWARDS THE
421 Suppl, 91| We must next consider the relations of the saints towards the
|