|     Part, Question1   1, 1   |      morality. But these belong to separate philosophical ~sciences.
  2   1, 6   |        Plato held the existence of separate ideas (Q[84], A[4]) of all ~
  3   1, 6   |           as participating in ~the separate ideas; for instance, that
  4   1, 6   |       called man according ~to the separate idea of man. Now just as
  5   1, 6   |           Now just as he laid down separate ideas of ~man and horse
  6   1, 6   |          so ~likewise he laid down separate ideas of "being" and of "
  7   1, 6   |          unreasonable in affirming separate ~ideas of natural things
  8   1, 10  |         Who commandest time to ~be separate from aeviternity."~Aquin.:
  9   1, 10  |         multitude, because by one ~separate measure many things can
 10   1, 11  |           were ~gods, and also the separate parts of the world. Hence
 11   1, 12  |       nature, ~still it is able to separate that existence by its intellect;
 12   1, 12  |        grace be raised up to ~know separate subsisting substance, and
 13   1, 12  |          subsisting substance, and separate subsisting existence.~Aquin.:
 14   1, 14  |         simple things are known by separate substances. God therefore ~
 15   1, 18  |         fact, Plato held that the "separate" man was the true man; and
 16   1, 22  |          heavens; that is, certain separate substances, which ~move
 17   1, 29  |        although ~it may exist in a separate state, yet since it ever
 18   1, 31  |            Father and the ~Son are separate in Godhead." We must avoid
 19   1, 31  |           alone, not because He is separate from ~the Son, or from the
 20   1, 32  |           the existence of a third separate substance which might correspond ~
 21   1, 39  |          clear in the case of all ~separate substances. For in those
 22   1, 44  |         superior species, such as ~separate substances. The same applies
 23   1, 45  |          things, as in the case of separate substances, or ~composite,
 24   1, 45  |           asserted that the first ~separate substance created by God
 25   1, 45  |          were given or caused by a separate ~agent by way of creation;
 26   1, 45  |       their forms are created by a separate agent. ~However, for the
 27   1, 50  |      immaterial things there is no separate determinator and thing ~
 28   1, 50  |           that whiteness ~existing separate is infinite as regards the
 29   1, 50  |           the proper effect of the separate substances seems to be ~
 30   1, 50  |       regard to the ~number of the separate substances. Plato contended
 31   1, 50  |           Plato contended that the separate ~substances are the species
 32   1, 50  |             that human nature is a separate substance of itself: and
 33   1, 50  |  maintained that the number of the separate ~substances is the number
 34   1, 50  |           things. Consequently the separate ~substances cannot be the
 35   1, 50  |        find out the number of ~the separate substances according to
 36   1, 50  |        conclude necessarily if the separate substances were made for ~
 37   1, 52  | philosophers do ~not hold that one separate substance moves all the
 38   1, 56  |         action passes is something separate from the agent, as the ~
 39   1, 58  |      acquire Divine knowledge from separate discourses, nor are they
 40   1, 61  |          But no part is perfect if separate from the whole. Consequently ~
 41   1, 64  |           is quite natural for one separate substance to know ~another;
 42   1, 65  |    impression received from these ~separate forms, by a kind of assimilation,
 43   1, 65  |  corresponds to the order of those separate substances; for ~example,
 44   1, 65  |             that there is a single separate substance, which is horse
 45   1, 65  |       horses, whilst above this is separate life, or "per se" ~life,
 46   1, 66  |            and that its form ~is a separate substance united to it as
 47   1, 66  |             then, in ~thought, the separate substance stated to be endowed
 48   1, 66  |            sufficiently ~strong to separate what is outside it from
 49   1, 74  |         are from one another. But ~separate days are assigned to distinction
 50   1, 74  |          adornment, and therefore ~separate days should be assigned
 51   1, 75  |       diversity of species. For a ~separate form cannot be understood
 52   1, 75  |         species; thus, supposing a separate whiteness to exist, it could
 53   1, 76  |            that the ~intellect is "separate," and that it is not the
 54   1, 76  |              Q[75], A[6]), remains separate from the body, after the
 55   1, 76  | philosopher is directed is ~indeed separate; yet it exists in matter.
 56   1, 76  |            man from matter." It is separate indeed ~according to its
 57   1, 76  |             that ~the intellect is separate, because it is not the faculty
 58   1, 76  |      universals; ~otherwise, since separate intellects are subsistent
 59   1, 76  |            natures of things exist separate from matter.~Aquin.: SMT
 60   1, 76  |           lucid and light were two separate ~things, but because a thing
 61   1, 76  |  separately: so that if each had a separate ~existence, many means of
 62   1, 77  |         soul. But it is clear that separate souls grieve ~or rejoice
 63   1, 77  | concupiscible power remains in the separate soul. ~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
 64   1, 77  |            death the soul is quite separate from ~the body. But the
 65   1, 77  |      sensitive part remains in the separate soul; and ~consequently
 66   1, 77  |         these powers remain in the separate soul; because these ~powers
 67   1, 77  |            actually remain in the ~separate soul, are not the properties
 68   1, 77  |            1/1~Reply OBJ 5: In the separate soul, sorrow and joy are
 69   1, 39  |          clear in the case of all ~separate substances. For in those
 70   1, 45  |         superior species, such as ~separate substances. The same applies
 71   1, 46  |          things, as in the case of separate substances, or ~composite,
 72   1, 46  |           asserted that the first ~separate substance created by God
 73   1, 46  |          were given or caused by a separate ~agent by way of creation;
 74   1, 46  |       their forms are created by a separate agent. ~However, for the
 75   1, 51  |      immaterial things there is no separate determinator and thing ~
 76   1, 51  |           that whiteness ~existing separate is infinite as regards the
 77   1, 51  |           the proper effect of the separate substances seems to be ~
 78   1, 51  |       regard to the ~number of the separate substances. Plato contended
 79   1, 51  |           Plato contended that the separate ~substances are the species
 80   1, 51  |             that human nature is a separate substance of itself: and
 81   1, 51  |  maintained that the number of the separate ~substances is the number
 82   1, 51  |           things. Consequently the separate ~substances cannot be the
 83   1, 51  |        find out the number of ~the separate substances according to
 84   1, 51  |        conclude necessarily if the separate substances were made for ~
 85   1, 53  | philosophers do ~not hold that one separate substance moves all the
 86   1, 57  |         action passes is something separate from the agent, as the ~
 87   1, 59  |      acquire Divine knowledge from separate discourses, nor are they
 88   1, 62  |          But no part is perfect if separate from the whole. Consequently ~
 89   1, 65  |           is quite natural for one separate substance to know ~another;
 90   1, 66  |    impression received from these ~separate forms, by a kind of assimilation,
 91   1, 66  |  corresponds to the order of those separate substances; for ~example,
 92   1, 66  |             that there is a single separate substance, which is horse
 93   1, 66  |       horses, whilst above this is separate life, or "per se" ~life,
 94   1, 67  |            and that its form ~is a separate substance united to it as
 95   1, 67  |             then, in ~thought, the separate substance stated to be endowed
 96   1, 67  |            sufficiently ~strong to separate what is outside it from
 97   1, 73  |         are from one another. But ~separate days are assigned to distinction
 98   1, 73  |          adornment, and therefore ~separate days should be assigned
 99   1, 74  |       diversity of species. For a ~separate form cannot be understood
100   1, 74  |         species; thus, supposing a separate whiteness to exist, it could
101   1, 75  |            that the ~intellect is "separate," and that it is not the
102   1, 75  |              Q[75], A[6]), remains separate from the body, after the
103   1, 75  | philosopher is directed is ~indeed separate; yet it exists in matter.
104   1, 75  |            man from matter." It is separate indeed ~according to its
105   1, 75  |             that ~the intellect is separate, because it is not the faculty
106   1, 75  |      universals; ~otherwise, since separate intellects are subsistent
107   1, 75  |            natures of things exist separate from matter.~Aquin.: SMT
108   1, 75  |           lucid and light were two separate ~things, but because a thing
109   1, 75  |  separately: so that if each had a separate ~existence, many means of
110   1, 76  |         soul. But it is clear that separate souls grieve ~or rejoice
111   1, 76  | concupiscible power remains in the separate soul. ~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
112   1, 76  |            death the soul is quite separate from ~the body. But the
113   1, 76  |      sensitive part remains in the separate soul; and ~consequently
114   1, 76  |         these powers remain in the separate soul; because these ~powers
115   1, 76  |            actually remain in the ~separate soul, are not the properties
116   1, 76  |            1/1~Reply OBJ 5: In the separate soul, sorrow and joy are
117   1, 77  |           senses, however, are not separate from one another in their
118   1, 78  |           intellect, substantially separate, is the ~active intellect,
119   1, 78  |           the existence of ~such a separate active intellect, it would
120   1, 78  |           while Plato compared the separate intellect ~impressing the
121   1, 78  |          on ~De Anima iii. But the separate intellect, according to
122   1, 78  |            the soul, or something ~separate from the soul.~Aquin.: SMT
123   1, 78  |     intellect in all. For what ~is separate from the body is not multiplied
124   1, 78  |           the active intellect is "separate," as the Philosopher says ~(
125   1, 78  |            the soul, but were some separate substance, there would be ~
126   1, 78  |           the active intellect is ~separate, by the fact that the passive
127   1, 78  |           the passive intellect is separate: because, as ~he says (De
128   1, 78  |            intellect is said to be separate, because it is not the ~
129   1, 78  |         intellect is ~also called "separate"; but not as a separate
130   1, 78  |            separate"; but not as a separate substance.~Aquin.: SMT FP
131   1, 78  |           proves the unity of the ~separate intellect, which Plato compares
132   1, 78  |   intellect, which he held to be a separate ~substance, in order that
133   1, 78  |         But intelligence is an act separate from others ~attributed
134   1, 78  |    translated from the Arabic, the separate substances which we call
135   1, 83  |           by the soul from certain separate ~immaterial forms?~(5) Whether
136   1, 83  |           another genus of beings, separate from matter ~and movement,
137   1, 83  |       those beings ~immaterial and separate: so that according to this
138   1, 83  |          corporeal things, but the separate species thereof.~Aquin.:
139   1, 83  |         have a knowledge of those ~separate substances, we cannot for
140   1, 83  |          by the soul from certain ~separate forms?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
141   1, 83  |     derived by the ~soul from some separate forms. For whatever is such
142   1, 83  |    understands, are caused by some separate forms.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
143   1, 83  |           nothing else than forms ~separate from matter. Therefore the
144   1, 83  |   intellect ~are derived from some separate substances.~Aquin.: SMT
145   1, 83  |       always in act. But this is a separate ~intellect. Therefore the
146   1, 83  |     understand, are caused by some separate substances.~Aquin.: SMT
147   1, 83  |           are derived from certain separate forms or substances. And
148   1, 83  |      pre-exist immaterially in the separate ~intellects: from the first
149   1, 83  |      second, and so on to the last separate intellect which he called
150   1, 83  |           are derived from certain separate forms; but these Plato held ~
151   1, 83  |          influence of only certain separate ~principles, and were not
152   1, 83  |         which it receives from the separate ~principles: even this seems
153   1, 83  |  understands, are not derived from separate ~forms.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
154   1, 83  |           79], A[4]); and not by a separate ~intelligence, as proximate
155   1, 83  |    affecting the intellect, but by separate intelligible ~forms being
156   1, 83  |           active intellect must be separate, namely, because ~"the agent
157   1, 83  |      intellect, ~which is entirely separate from a body, is an intelligible
158   1, 83  |            intelligible substance ~separate from a body. Whereas the
159   1, 83  |            of our intellect were a separate form; or if, as the ~Platonists
160   1, 84  |          in proportion as they are separate from matter." Therefore ~
161   1, 84  |      objects of ~the intellect are separate ideas; and that we understand
162   1, 84  |          some other, or that it is separate therefrom. Secondly, by
163   1, 84  |        colored body, or that it is separate from it, there ~would be
164   1, 84  |           participation of certain separate ~indivisible (forms), as
165   1, 86  |            actual by participating separate intelligible forms, it would ~
166   1, 86  |           are ~immaterial - as the separate substances called angels,
167   1, 86  |            quoted is ~true only of separate substances; because in a
168   1, 87  |         arrive at the knowledge of separate ~substances by being coupled
169   1, 87  |          coupled or united to some separate substance, which ~he calls
170   1, 87  |     intellect," and which, being a separate substance ~itself, can naturally
171   1, 87  |           can naturally understand separate substances. Hence, when
172   1, 87  |        shall be able to understand separate substances, as in ~the present
173   1, 87  |           of happiness understands separate ~substances by the instrumentality
174   1, 87  |    intellect ~can never understand separate substances (because according
175   1, 87  |  corruptible), but man understands separate substances by means of the ~
176   1, 87  |          active ~intellect to be a separate substance, we could not
177   1, 87  |    intellect, supposing it to be a separate substance, would not be
178   1, 87  |       greater thing to ~understand separate substances than to understand
179   1, 87  |      instrumentality to understand separate substances.~Aquin.: SMT
180   1, 87  |            man in the knowledge of separate ~substances, obtainable
181   1, 87  |         active intellect is not a ~separate substance; but a faculty
182   1, 87  |          life we cannot understand separate immaterial substances ~in
183   1, 87  |     principle for the knowledge of separate substances. For by knowing ~
184   1, 87  |           ways. ~First, because if separate substances are not understood
185   1, 87  |            by us is not the end of separate substances: ~while only
186   1, 88  |             Whether it understands separate substances?~(3) Whether
187   1, 88  |   exemplified in the case of other separate ~substances. In that case,
188   1, 88  |     objects, as is proper to other separate substances. ~Hence it is
189   1, 88  |     understand in the same way ~as separate substances, it would follow
190   1, 88  |            by the soul as by other separate substances; though in a ~
191   1, 88  |         separated soul understands separate substances?~Aquin.: SMT
192   1, 88  |          soul does not understand ~separate substances. For the soul
193   1, 88  |           body does not understand separate substances ~as shown above (
194   1, 88  |            or by ~its species. But separate substances cannot be known
195   1, 88  |           cannot at all understand separate ~substances.~Aquin.: SMT
196   1, 88  |       consists in the knowledge of separate substances. If, therefore,
197   1, 88  |      separated soul can understand separate substances, its happiness
198   1, 88  |           judge how it knows other separate things. Now ~it was said
199   1, 88  |         through itself. Now, every separate substance ~"understands
200   1, 88  |           in the knowledge of ~any separate substances; but in the knowledge
201   1, 88  |             The knowledge of other separate substances if perfectly
202   1, 88  |            natural things exist in separate substances. ~Therefore,
203   1, 88  |            as separated souls know separate substances, they also know ~
204   1, 88  |            things because it knows separate substances after a fashion.~
205   1, 88  |          not perfectly ~understand separate substances, so neither does
206   1, 88  |            14], A[2]), so likewise separate ~substances can know singulars
207   1, 93  |           Whether he could see the separate substances, that is, the
208   1, 93  |     impeded from the ~knowledge of separate substances by union with
209   1, 93  |          Wis. 9:15. Wherefore the ~separate soul can see separate substances,
210   1, 93  |         the ~separate soul can see separate substances, as above explained (
211   1, 93  |       Therefore he was able to see separate ~substances.~Aquin.: SMT
212   1, 93  |            1/1~OBJ 3: Further, one separate substance knows another
213   1, 93  |            substance knows another separate substance, ~by knowing itself (
214   1, 93  |          itself. Therefore it knew separate substances.~Aquin.: SMT
215   1, 93  |        souls cannot now understand separate substances. Therefore neither ~
216   1, 93  |        this point the state of the separate soul is distinguished from
217   1, 93  |           the knowledge ~regarding separate substances, was not owing
218   1, 93  |         short of the excellence of separate substances. We, in our present
219   1, 93  |            arrive at ~knowledge of separate substances by means of its
220   1, 93  |         shown above; for even each separate substance knows others in
221   1, 104 |      because the power of no other separate ~substance extends over
222   1, 112 |           womb it is not ~entirely separate, but by reason of a certain
223   1, 112 |         its birth, when it becomes separate from the mother, an angel
224   1, 114 |          limited thereto; and that separate forms are absolute and ~
225   1, 114 |       wherefore he said that these separate forms are the ~causes of
226   1, 114 |           if the form of fire were separate, as the ~Platonists supposed,
227   1, 114 |            substantial forms to be separate; while he referred accidents ~
228   1, 114 |              because seed is not a separate principle; and because miracles
229   1, 114 |        maintained the existence of separate species, ~by participation
230   1, 114 |           not seem enough. For the separate species, since ~they are
231   1, 116 |            matter?~(4) Whether the separate soul of man can move bodies
232   1, 116 |      through the ~participation of separate forms, as stated above (
233   1, 116 |    acquires by a ~participation of separate substances. But against
234   1, 116 |        Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the separate human soul can move bodies
235   1, 116 |           OBJ 1: It seems that the separate human soul can move bodies
236   1, 116 |             Q[110], A[5]). But the separate soul is a ~spiritual substance.
237   1, 116 |           to place. Therefore, the separate soul has the power ~to move
238   1, 116 |             1/1~I answer that, The separate soul cannot by its natural
239   1, 116 |           body is quickened by the separate ~soul. Therefore within
240   1, 116 |           of its natural power the separate soul ~cannot command the
241   1, 116 |           if the motive power of a separate substance is naturally ~
242   2, 3   |            in the consideration of separate substances viz. ~angels?~(
243   2, 3   |       sensibles, the ~knowledge of separate substances, which are above
244   2, 3   |       consists in the knowledge of separate substances, ~namely, angels?~
245   2, 3   |      consists in the knowledge of ~separate substances, namely, angels.
246   2, 4   |          neither has a part, while separate from its whole; it seems
247   2, 4   |           But the operation of the separate soul is hindered; because, ~
248   2, 17  |             whatever things can be separate from one another, are ~distinct:
249   2, 17  |    sometimes the commanded ~act is separate from the command: for sometimes
250   2, 17  |      because each is as it were a ~separate animal being, in so far
251   2, 40  |            the apprehension of the separate Intellect, Who is ~the Author
252   2, 50  |        Whether there is a habit in separate substances?~Aquin.: SMT
253   2, 50  |           the intellect, ~which is separate, but in some power which
254   2, 50  |   intellect, ~for the intellect is separate, as ran the argument, given
255   2, 53  |          subject, that form can be separate, as stated in ~De Anima
256   2, 63  |         forms originated from some separate ~cause. Others, however,
257   2, 67  |      during which the soul will be separate from the body; the ~other,
258   2, 76  |          do not ~coincide, but are separate. It may happen, if the first
259   2, 102 |        from among ~them, and be ye separate . . . and touch not the
260   2, 105 |           The third day thou shalt separate another tithe . . . and
261   2, 105 |           The Lord will divide and separate me from His people. And ~
262   2, 111 |            the army; the second is separate from the ~multitude, viz.
263   2, 111 |           grace is ordained to the separate common good, which is God. ~
264   2, 37  |        wilfully and ~intentionally separate themselves from the unity
265   2, 41  |        Active scandal can be found separate from other sins, as ~when
266   2, 41  |        life . . . shall be able to separate us from ~the love of God."~
267   2, 55  |          man, is something ~having separate existence and distinct from
268   2, 79  |        death, nor life . . . shall separate me [*Vulg.: 'shall ~be able
269   2, 79  |          Vulg.: 'shall ~be able to separate us'] from the love of God."~
270   2, 82  |          for we ~genuflect at each separate invocation of Them [*At
271   2, 85  |         The ~third year thou shalt separate another tithe of all things
272   2, 103 |     grievous (even if we mentally ~separate the disobedience from the
273   2, 139 |             i, 27) that "we cannot separate ~the beautiful from the
274   2, 182 |            8:35, "Who . . . shall ~separate us from the love of Christ?
275   2, 183 |         hopeth not . . . and shall separate ~him," namely from the fellowship
276   3, 2   |            as if ~they were wholly separate, but because the suppositum
277   3, 2   |        said that human nature is a separate idea, just as the ~Platonists
278   3, 2   |           these two were ~mutually separate, and were united to the
279   3, 4   |            Plato believed that the separate man was only in the ~Divine
280   3, 5   |          of the soul, Who seeks to separate it from the sin of wilful ~
281   3, 6   |            away the medium and you separate what were joined ~by the
282   3, 11  |          are no phantasms, such as separate substances. ~Hence, since
283   3, 11  |         knowledge He did not know ~separate substances.~Aquin.: SMT
284   3, 11  |       phantasms, cannot understand separate substances. But after the
285   3, 11  |        able, in a measure, to know separate ~substances by itself, as
286   3, 11  |         hence ~His soul could know separate substances in the same way
287   3, 11  |          known by the senses, viz. separate substances. Therefore it
288   3, 12  |          not know the essences of ~separate substances, nor past, present,
289   3, 16  |          subsisting of itself ~and separate from all else; otherwise,
290   3, 46  |      suffered and was ~disposed to separate from the soul, the entire
291   3, 50  |           His soul: but this is to separate it from ~Himself. Consequently,
292   3, 55  |        Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Each separate argument would not suffice
293   3, 62  |   instrument is twofold. the one, ~separate, as a stick, for instance;
294   3, 62  |          as a hand. ~Moreover, the separate instrument is moved by means
295   3, 62  |      whereas the sacrament is as a separate instrument. ~Consequently,
296   3, 68  |          he was not endowed with a separate existence." But the faith
297   3, 75  |           But if it were to remain separate ~from matter, it would then
298   3, 76  |       together, even though one be separate from its subject, and the
299 Suppl, 3 |          than sin. If, however, we separate from these ~punishments
300 Suppl, 54|         married would not have to ~separate, because no impediment supervening
301 Suppl, 54|       contract, because they could separate if they wished. ~Nevertheless,
302 Suppl, 55|      Further, if certain things be separate from one another and ~something
303 Suppl, 55|       person's blood relations are separate ~from one another. Therefore
304 Suppl, 55|       Blood-relations are in a way separate, and in a way ~connected:
305 Suppl, 55|     prevent, it ~belongs to her to separate those between whom there
306 Suppl, 62|           Therefore he is bound to separate from her.~Aquin.: SMT XP
307 Suppl, 62|      divorce did ~not bind them to separate, but allowed them to do
308 Suppl, 69|            held that the order of ~separate substances is according
309 Suppl, 69|         not ~immediately united to separate substances, since their
310 Suppl, 72|            to unite rather than to separate; ~wherefore the natural
311 Suppl, 80|           if we suppose dimensions separate from ~matter, those dimensions
312 Suppl, 80|        body, which is nothing but ~separate dimensions, to be together
313 Suppl, 80|         Thus take the example of a separate line, ~supposing there to
314 Suppl, 80|            the dimensions will be ~separate: which is impossible, since
315 Suppl, 83|        passible, the souls will be separate from the bodies through
316 Suppl, 89|          never ~come to understand separate substances. thus Alfarabius
317 Suppl, 89|           Divine essence and ~from separate substances. For since the
318 Suppl, 89|          regards the vision of any separate substances. But this ~opinion
319 Suppl, 89|         our souls emanate from the separate ~substances, so that finally
320 Suppl, 89|           attain to the vision of ~separate substances.~Aquin.: SMT
321 Suppl, 89|        attains to the vision ~of a separate substance. To prove this
322 Suppl, 89|          such is the quiddity of a separate substance. ~Hence, when
323 Suppl, 89|   understands the quiddity of the ~separate substance that is similar
324 Suppl, 89|   understands the quiddity of ~the separate substance which has a like
325 Suppl, 89|            like disposition, since separate ~substances are subsisting
326 Suppl, 89|            what we understand by a separate quiddity [*Cf. FP, ~Q[88],
327 Suppl, 89|      nature as the quiddity of the separate substances, and ~consequently
328 Suppl, 89|           knows the ~quiddity of a separate substance, especially of
329 Suppl, 89|        lead to the knowledge of a ~separate substance, except in the
330 Suppl, 89|           know God thus, or other ~separate substances, is not to see
331 Suppl, 89|          God or the quiddity of ~a separate substance, but to know Him
332 Suppl, 89|      another way ~of understanding separate substances, to wit that
333 Suppl, 89|            substances, to wit that separate substances are ~understood
334 Suppl, 89|          is perfected so as to see separate substances ~is neither a
335 Suppl, 89|           on our intellect ~by the separate substance, as the second
336 Suppl, 89|         opinion affirmed; but the ~separate substance itself united
337 Suppl, 89|         may be the case with other separate substances, we must ~nevertheless
338 Suppl, 89|        refers to the knowledge of ~separate substances, in so far as
339 Suppl, 89|            not the case with other separate substances. Nor ~will that
340 Suppl, 89|            10: A substance that is separate from matter understands
341 Suppl, 89|        since the very essence of a separate substance is of itself ~
342 Suppl, 89|          and actual, through being separate from matter, it is clear ~
343 Suppl, 89|           it is clear ~that when a separate substance understands itself,
344 Suppl, 90|           body - than when it is a separate part. But as regards the
345 Suppl, 90|        absolutely speaking a power separate from matter is ~more effective.~
346 Appen1, 1|       object of such action be the separate soul, on which ~it is clear
347 Appen1, 2|          is more ~passive than the separate soul, both because it has
348 Appen1, 2|      greater it is. Now the whole ~separate soul is punished, since
349 Appen1, 2|        being the punishment of the separate soul, is ~greater than any
350 Appen1, 2|           will no longer be in the separate soul that is in Purgatory,
351 Appen1, 2|       grace, which will be in the ~separate soul in Purgatory. Hence
 
 |