Part, Question
1 1, 1 | Testament has a fourfold division as to history, etiology,
2 1, 1 | spiritual sense has a threefold division. For as the Apostle says ~(
3 1, 2 | there will be a threefold division, for we shall ~consider: (
4 1, 5 | 1~OBJ 2: Further, every division is made by opposites. But
5 1, 5 | ought to be the case if the division were made by ~opposites,
6 1, 5 | Offic. ii). Therefore this division is incorrect.~Aquin.: SMT
7 1, 5 | Ambrose makes use of this division of goodness (De ~Offic.
8 1, 5 | 1/1~I answer that, This division properly concerns human
9 1, 5 | we shall find that this division properly concerns goodness
10 1, 5 | ten predicaments. But this division belongs to it according
11 1, 5 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: This division is not by opposite things;
12 1, 7 | therefore addition is opposed to division, and increase opposed to ~
13 1, 7 | belongs to ~matter. Now by division of the whole we approach
14 1, 7 | of magnitude, but only in division.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[7] A[3]
15 1, 7 | multitude follows upon the ~division of magnitude; since the
16 1, 7 | found ~potentially in the division of the continuous, because
17 1, 11 | but is only a ~negation of division; for "one" means undivided "
18 1, 11 | of "multitude" contains division. Therefore "one" and ~"many"
19 1, 11 | idea of "many" involves division. Hence division must be
20 1, 11 | involves division. Hence division must be prior to unity, ~
21 1, 11 | definition of "one." ~But division comes to be understood from
22 1, 11 | being, and thus we apprehend division as a consequence; thirdly,
23 1, 11 | called ~from the privation of division. But privation cannot be
24 1, 11 | potentially, by ~any mode of division; since He is altogether
25 1, 14 | He reaches "even to ~the division of the soul and the spirit,
26 1, 14 | are known by ~privation of division. This is because simple
27 1, 14 | there were composition or ~division of enunciations; for He
28 1, 14 | by way of composition or ~division, by forming an enunciation.
29 1, 14 | enunciation, by ~composition and division, as occurs in our intellect.
30 1, 16 | is." Now composition and ~division are neither in the senses
31 1, 16 | is not composition and ~division. Therefore in Him there
32 1, 16 | neither ~composition nor division, yet in His simple act of
33 1, 19 | not come rightly under one division, not being of one ~order.~
34 1, 30 | plurality is a ~consequence of division. Now division is twofold;
35 1, 30 | consequence of division. Now division is twofold; one is material,
36 1, 30 | one is material, and is ~division of the continuous; from
37 1, 30 | quantity. The other kind of division is called formal, and is ~
38 1, 30 | forms; and this kind of division results ~in a multitude,
39 1, 30 | being, ~except a negation of division, as we saw when treating
40 1, 30 | names adds a negation of division, beyond ~substance and relation;
41 1, 30 | not exclude multitude, but division, which ~logically precedes
42 1, 30 | does not remove unity, but ~division from each of the individuals
43 1, 31 | terms "separation" ~and "division," which belong to the parts
44 1, 39 | nature does not ~result from division, or from union or from community
45 1, 44 | are opposite members of a division. ~But as the first active
46 1, 48 | totally corrupts good?~(5) The division of evil into pain and fault.~(
47 1, 48 | infinitely divisible, if the division be made in an ever same
48 1, 48 | avail here. For when in a ~division we keep the same proportion,
49 1, 48 | It would seem that this division is superfluous: ~for, as
50 1, 50 | quantity, and follows the division of a continuous ~body. But
51 1, 50 | quantity, ~brought about by division of what is continuous, but
52 1, 50 | indeed, according to the division ~of quantity, since they
53 1, 58 | there is composition and division in the angel's mind.~Aquin.:
54 1, 58 | signs of ~composition and of division in the intellect; as is
55 1, 58 | without composition and division. ~Therefore the angel understands
56 1, 58 | understands without composition or division.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[58] A[
57 1, 58 | the composition and the division of ~enunciations, just as
58 1, 58 | know both composition and division: yet not that ~they know
59 1, 58 | dividing process, as when, by ~division and demonstration, we seek
60 1, 58 | referred to some composition or division.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[58] A[
61 1, 67 | Q[62], A[3]). Thus the division of light ~from darkness
62 1, 70 | Reply OBJ 3: The general division of time into day and night
63 1, 76 | Therefore, according to the division of ~matter, there are many
64 1, 76 | are unintelligible without division ~in measurable quantities.
65 1, 76 | corresponding to three kinds of division. There is a whole ~which
66 1, 77 | things which come under one division, there is no ~before and
67 1, 39 | nature does not ~result from division, or from union or from community
68 1, 45 | are opposite members of a division. ~But as the first active
69 1, 49 | totally corrupts good?~(5) The division of evil into pain and fault.~(
70 1, 49 | infinitely divisible, if the division be made in an ever same
71 1, 49 | avail here. For when in a ~division we keep the same proportion,
72 1, 49 | It would seem that this division is superfluous: ~for, as
73 1, 51 | quantity, and follows the division of a continuous ~body. But
74 1, 51 | quantity, ~brought about by division of what is continuous, but
75 1, 51 | indeed, according to the division ~of quantity, since they
76 1, 59 | there is composition and division in the angel's mind.~Aquin.:
77 1, 59 | signs of ~composition and of division in the intellect; as is
78 1, 59 | without composition and division. ~Therefore the angel understands
79 1, 59 | understands without composition or division.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[58] A[
80 1, 59 | the composition and the division of ~enunciations, just as
81 1, 59 | know both composition and division: yet not that ~they know
82 1, 59 | dividing process, as when, by ~division and demonstration, we seek
83 1, 59 | referred to some composition or division.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[58] A[
84 1, 68 | Q[62], A[3]). Thus the division of light ~from darkness
85 1, 71 | Reply OBJ 3: The general division of time into day and night
86 1, 75 | Therefore, according to the division of ~matter, there are many
87 1, 75 | are unintelligible without division ~in measurable quantities.
88 1, 75 | corresponding to three kinds of division. There is a whole ~which
89 1, 76 | things which come under one division, there is no ~before and
90 1, 78 | is from power. And such a division is recognized even by the ~
91 1, 78 | things which fall under one division, seem to be of ~the same
92 1, 78 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The division given by Jerome is taken
93 1, 80 | things which come under one division seem to be of one ~genus.
94 1, 84 | process of composition and ~division?~(6) Whether the intellect
95 1, 84 | way of ~composition and division; thus we may understand
96 1, 84 | forms a definition, or a ~division, or a composition, expressed
97 1, 84 | conveys the ~intellect's division or composition. Words do
98 1, 84 | understands by composition and division?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[85] A[
99 1, 84 | understand by ~composition and division. For composition and division
100 1, 84 | division. For composition and division are only of many; ~whereas
101 1, 84 | understand by composition and division.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[85] A[
102 1, 84 | Further, every composition and division implies past, present, or ~
103 1, 84 | understand by ~composition and division. ~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[85] A[
104 1, 84 | them. But composition and division are not in things, for ~
105 1, 84 | not act by composition and division.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[85] A[
106 1, 84 | we find composition and ~division, as appears in affirmative
107 1, 84 | acts by composition and division.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[85] A[
108 1, 84 | understand by ~composition and division. For since the intellect
109 1, 84 | another by composition or division; and from one composition
110 1, 84 | from one composition and division ~it proceeds to another,
111 1, 84 | can know by composition, division, and reasoning. ~Therefore
112 1, 84 | intellect knows by composition, division and ~reasoning. But the
113 1, 84 | know, ~indeed, composition, division, and reasoning, not by the
114 1, 84 | Reply OBJ 1: Composition and division of the intellect are made
115 1, 84 | things by ~composition and division, as by knowing the difference
116 1, 84 | phantasms, ~composition and division of the intellect involve
117 1, 84 | to the ~composition and division of the intellect; but it
118 1, 84 | as regards composition or division, or also in the process
119 1, 84 | regard to composition and division. The same answer applies
120 1, 84 | known ~to us before its division, which is a division into
121 1, 84 | its division, which is a division into parts: because ~confused
122 1, 84 | is ~understood before its division into logical parts, as we
123 1, 88 | regards mental composition and division, ~or also reasoning; so
124 1, 92 | As unity means absence of division, a species is said to be ~
125 1, 97 | of masters requires the division of property, to avoid confusion
126 1, 97 | been necessary to make a division of rights when the human
127 1, 97 | In our present state a division of possessions is necessary ~
128 1, 102 | observe that things resist division, as ~far as they can; and
129 1, 118 | it can only result from ~division. Therefore some other substance
130 1, 118 | animal would be a mere division, as mud is generated from
131 2, 2 | OBJ 1: Inasmuch as this division includes all goods that
132 2, 18 | divide it accidentally, the division is ~incorrect: as, if one
133 2, 18 | being. But the following division would ~be correct: "Some
134 2, 18 | many": because the latter ~division is an essential determination
135 2, 20 | differences make an essential division ~in a genus, according to
136 2, 26 | cannot be the member of a division of passions. Therefore love ~
137 2, 26 | another member of the same ~division; for man is not a member
138 2, 26 | not a member of the same division as "animal." But ~concupiscence
139 2, 26 | is a member of the same division as love, as a passion ~distinct
140 2, 26 | Therefore concupiscence is not a division of love.~Aquin.: SMT FS
141 2, 26 | Now the members of this division are related as primary and
142 2, 28 | whole, except by means of ~a division of the whole. But it is
143 2, 29 | the ~opposite members of a division are naturally simultaneous" (
144 2, 29 | are opposite members of a division, since they are ~contrary
145 2, 29 | The opposite members of a division are sometimes naturally ~
146 2, 35 | s (De Fide Orth. ii, 14) division of ~sorrow into four species
147 2, 35 | species. Therefore this division ~is insufficient.~Aquin.:
148 2, 35 | Further, the members of a division should be things that are ~
149 2, 35 | speechless. Therefore this division is correct.~Aquin.: SMT
150 2, 35 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: This division is not according to opposite
151 2, 36 | the cause of pleasure, and division [*Aristotle ~wrote {endeian}, '
152 2, 36 | pertains ~to unity, and division is the cause of multitude.~
153 2, 36 | feeling of impatience of division or corruption?"~Aquin.:
154 2, 40 | power. ~For such is the division of the possible given in
155 2, 41 | derived ~from the proper division of the object of fear itself.~
156 2, 46 | Therefore Damascene's division is ~imperfect, since it
157 2, 55 | 2) its subject; (3) the division of virtue; (4) the cause
158 2, 61 | the opposite members of a division are by nature ~simultaneous" (
159 2, 61 | opposite members of the division of the ~genus "virtue."
160 2, 61 | species, the ~members of the division are on a par in the point
161 2, 61 | to accident. Such ~is the division of virtue into various kinds
162 2, 72 | reckoned as a part in the division of ~sin. But it is common
163 2, 72 | reckoned a part of ~the division of sin.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[
164 2, 72 | 1~OBJ 2: Further, every division should consist of things
165 2, 72 | Summo Bono), in giving the division of ~sins, says that "man
166 2, 72 | This may be seen in the division of numbers and figures:
167 2, 72 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the division of sins according to their
168 2, 72 | It would seem that the division of sins according to their
169 2, 72 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: This division in respect of commission
170 2, 72 | added. Therefore the ~first division was unfitting.~Aquin.: SMT
171 2, 88 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The division of sin into venial and mortal
172 2, 88 | venial and mortal is not a ~division of a genus into its species
173 2, 88 | generic nature: but it is the division of an analogous term into
174 2, 95 | 3) Its quality.~(4) Its division.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[95] A[
175 2, 95 | Para. 1/1~Whether Isidore's division of human laws is appropriate?~
176 2, 95 | infinity. Therefore this division of human laws is not appropriate.~
177 2, 95 | it seems that, as ~this division includes "military law,"
178 2, 101 | above. Therefore the above division of ~ceremonies is unsuitable.~
179 2, 102 | the Church, so also the division of the ~tabernacle or temple
180 2, 102 | are thus betokened by the ~division of the tabernacle. For that
181 2, 102 | in signification. Because division of the hoof is ~a figure
182 2, 104 | Their duration;~(4) Their division.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[104] A[
183 2, 104 | possible to assign a distinct division of the judicial ~precepts?~
184 2, 104 | impossible to assign a distinct division ~of the judicial precepts.
185 2, 104 | men, are not subject to division, since they are ~infinite
186 2, 104 | possible to assign a distinct ~division of the judicial precepts.~
187 2, 104 | not seem to be capable of division, except in so ~far as they
188 2, 104 | Therefore ~there is no distinct division of the judicial precepts.~
189 2, 104 | because there is a distinct division of the ceremonial ~precepts,
190 2, 104 | the Law alludes to this division, by describing some as ~"
191 2, 104 | contains no allusion ~to a division of the judicial precepts.
192 2, 104 | that they have ~no distinct division.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[104] A[
193 2, 104 | order there must needs be division. ~But the notion of order
194 2, 104 | they should have a distinct division.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[104] A[
195 2, 104 | art there is a distinct division in ~the rules of art, so,
196 2, 104 | there must be a distinct division of ~precepts: else the law
197 2, 104 | another, are subject to division ~according to the divers
198 2, 104 | The Law alludes to the division of the judicial precepts
199 2, 105 | was brought about by the division of the ~kingdom. But the
200 2, 105 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: The division of the kingdom, and a number
201 2, 109 | to its essence; ~(3) its division.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[109] Out.
202 2, 111 | Out. Para. 1/1 - OF THE DIVISION OF GRACE (FIVE ARTICLES)~
203 2, 111 | We must now consider the division of grace; under which head
204 2, 111 | sanctifying grace?~(2) Of the division into operating and cooperating
205 2, 111 | cooperating grace; ~(3) Of the division of it into prevenient and
206 2, 111 | subsequent grace;~(4) Of the division of gratuitous grace;~(5)
207 2, 111 | 3: Further, members of a division are mutually opposed. But
208 2, 111 | thus the two parts of ~the division are opposed as sanctifying
209 2, 111 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, division ought to rest on opposition.
210 2, 111 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The division into prevenient and subsequent
211 2, 111 | contained under any certain division.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[111] A[
212 2, 113 | This enumeration is not the division of a genus into its ~species,
213 2, 113 | simultaneous; but it is ~division of the things required for
214 2, 1 | be taken of a ~material division of matters of faith into
215 2, 4 | are ~opposite members of a division, one cannot be the form
216 2, 4 | be opposite members of a division, as ~different species of
217 2, 16 | order to decide under what division we must place hope, we ~
218 2, 18 | to be feared?~(2) Of the division of fear into filial, initial,
219 2, 18 | are not ~mentioned in the division in question. Therefore this
220 2, 18 | question. Therefore this division of fear ~seems unfitting.~
221 2, 18 | Therefore the aforesaid division of fear is ~insufficient.~
222 2, 18 | the soul: whereas ~this division of fear is taken from its
223 2, 23 | aforesaid three, even as every ~division of continuous things is
224 2, 37 | et Pancrat.), "denotes a ~division." But every sin causes a
225 2, 37 | But every sin causes a division, according to Is. 59:: "
226 2, 37 | the word schism denotes a division, it would seem not to ~differ,
227 2, 37 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The division between man and God that
228 2, 40 | sedition denotes a kind of division. Now schism takes ~its name
229 2, 47 | things are members of a division, one is not part of the
230 2, 64 | frequently where there is no division ~of the things possessed.~
231 2, 64 | s own: but because the ~division of possessions is not according
232 2, 64 | their means. Wherefore the division ~and appropriation of things
233 2, 71 | the occasional cause of ~division among those who were united,
234 2, 79 | are opposite members of a division are not ~identified with
235 2, 86 | in contrast with this division. For this reason the Church ~
236 2, 93 | unable to agree upon the division of ~something or other,
237 2, 93 | willing to draw lots for its division, thus ~leaving to chance
238 2, 108 | mischievous" lies. For a division should be made according ~
239 2, 108 | result from one act. Now this division ~is made according to the
240 2, 108 | it seems that the first division of lies is insufficient.~
241 2, 108 | seems ~that the aforesaid division of lies is inadequate.~Aquin.:
242 2, 108 | the proper and essential division of ~lying. In this way,
243 2, 108 | belongs to "irony." This division is an essential division
244 2, 108 | division is an essential division of lying ~itself, because
245 2, 108 | gravity: and in this way the division comprises eight kinds, as
246 2, 152 | species. ~Now the aforesaid division is made with regard to diversity
247 2, 152 | contrary, The aforesaid division is given in the Decretals
248 2, 153 | co-ordinate members of the same division. But continence is ~co-ordinated
249 2, 153 | includes continence in the same division ~with virtue in so far as
250 2, 156 | it seems that the above division of anger is not fitting.~
251 2, 156 | ill-tempered." The same division is given by Damascene (De
252 2, 156 | Therefore the aforesaid division assigned by the Philosopher
253 2, 160 | Therefore ~the aforesaid division does not sufficiently account
254 2, 165 | are members of the same division (1 ~Jn. 2:16), it seems
255 2, 169 | prophetic knowledge; (4) the division of prophecy.~Aquin.: SMT
256 2, 169 | Para. 1/2~Reply OBJ 1: This division of the Philosopher's does
257 2, 172 | Out. Para. 1/1 - OF THE DIVISION OF PROPHECY (SIX ARTICLES)~
258 2, 172 | We must now consider the division of prophecy, and under this
259 2, 172 | points of inquiry:~(1) The division of prophecy into its species;~(
260 2, 172 | included in the aforesaid division. Therefore it is insufficient.~
261 2, 177 | Out. Para. 1/2 - OF THE DIVISION OF LIFE INTO ACTIVE AND
262 2, 177 | be fourfold: (1) Of the division of life into active and ~
263 2, 177 | Whether this is an adequate division?~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[179] A[
264 2, 177 | 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, the division of that which comes afterwards
265 2, 177 | intellect, wherefore the same division applies to intellect and
266 2, 177 | contemplative" ~life. Therefore the division of life into active and
267 2, 177 | above (A[1], ad 2), this division applies to ~the human life
268 2, 177 | is not included in this division of the life of a man into
269 2, 181 | liberty." Wherefore the same division applies to charity as to ~
270 3, 2 | without change, ~without division, without separation - the
271 3, 2 | Nestorius, maintaining division, introduce a union of purpose.
272 3, 3 | multiplied according to the division of matter. And hence, ~if
273 3, 3 | nature, on account of the division of matter, without ~distinction
274 3, 7 | xiv in Joan.) says: "The division of the gifts is ~a measurement.
275 3, 33 | divided ~according to the division of the thing moved, as is
276 3, 44 | disturbance in the atmosphere or a division of waters. ~Hence the Apostle
277 3, 57 | space, according to the division of which time ~is reckoned,
278 3, 64 | sacraments, giving rise to division in the ~Church; as may be
279 3, 75 | and substituted another division of the matter under discussion,
280 3, 75 | ignored St. Thomas's original division, and give the one to which
281 3, 76 | Reply OBJ 1: Number follows division, and therefore so long as
282 3, 77 | sacrament are ~divided by the division of dimensive quantity, as
283 3, 77 | not, but by addition or division; for, as is said in Metaph. ~
284 3, 77 | dimension is dissolved by division, and two dimensions result; ~
285 3, 77 | which remains can receive division and ~addition; and since
286 3, 77 | Breaking arises from the division of that which has ~quantity.
287 3, 90 | parts are they?~(4) Of its division into subjective parts.~Aquin.:
288 3, 90 | I answer that, This is a division of penance as a virtue.
289 Suppl, 29| concern the building or division of the Church. As a matter
290 Suppl, 34| unsuitable; ~because the division of a sacrament into those
291 Suppl, 34| those three things is not a ~division into integral parts, properly
292 Suppl, 37| divided, the parts of the division are either ~integral or
293 Suppl, 37| them. Therefore it is a division into ~subjective parts.
294 Suppl, 37| Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The division of Order is not that of
295 Suppl, 40| schismatics as causing ~a division in the unity of the Church.
296 Suppl, 66| Consequently whether we find division of the flesh on the ~part
297 Suppl, 66| effected by ~virginity or division of the flesh.~Aquin.: SMT
298 Suppl, 71| and is never destroyed by division, if it be ~diminished not
299 Suppl, 71| it seems that indefinite division which is ~applicable to
300 Suppl, 71| fourthly, because in the division of a line we come at length
301 Suppl, 77| divisibility into parts. But division into parts belongs to a ~
302 Suppl, 77| substantial form. Consequently division which is made ~according
303 Suppl, 77| substantial form; ~wherefore division that is made in reference
304 Suppl, 86| and of the dead." Now this division ~comprises all men, no matter
|