Part, Question
1 1, 3 | is of ~the essence of an irrational animal to be without reason.
2 1, 3 | differences, rational and irrational; which differences, however,
3 1, 20 | friendship. Now God does not love irrational creatures with the ~love
4 1, 20 | can be no friendship with irrational ~creatures, as the Philosopher
5 1, 20 | speaking exercised. But irrational creatures cannot attain
6 1, 20 | therefore, God does not love irrational creatures with ~the love
7 1, 22 | may say the same of ~other irrational creatures. Thus everything
8 1, 22 | however, that individual ~irrational creatures escape the care
9 1, 23 | 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Irrational creatures are not capable
10 1, 23 | which by ~no means can be irrational; since predestination is "
11 1, 33 | trace, for ~instance of irrational creatures, according to
12 1, 39 | however, appears to be irrational; ~since, according to the
13 1, 48 | 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, in irrational creatures there is neither
14 1, 50 | Scriptures for ~the powers of irrational things to be designated
15 1, 50 | would be necessary ~that all irrational animals be of the same species;
16 1, 50 | sensible soul. Therefore ~irrational animals differ in species
17 1, 59 | from free-will, such as irrational animals; for the ~sheep
18 1, 63 | 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, some irrational animals have wicked dispositions
19 1, 77 | otherwise. Hence "rational" and "irrational" are differences ~dividing
20 1, 39 | however, appears to be irrational; ~since, according to the
21 1, 49 | 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, in irrational creatures there is neither
22 1, 51 | Scriptures for ~the powers of irrational things to be designated
23 1, 51 | would be necessary ~that all irrational animals be of the same species;
24 1, 51 | sensible soul. Therefore ~irrational animals differ in species
25 1, 60 | from free-will, such as irrational animals; for the ~sheep
26 1, 64 | 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, some irrational animals have wicked dispositions
27 1, 76 | otherwise. Hence "rational" and "irrational" are differences ~dividing
28 1, 78 | that in ~which man excels irrational animals is reason, or mind,
29 1, 81 | Nat. Hom.) says "that ~the irrational" part of the soul is divided
30 1, 81 | in reason, while in ~the irrational part of the soul are concupiscence
31 1, 84 | know it as ~"rational" or "irrational animal," that is, to know
32 1, 89 | difference of ~rational and irrational; but we cannot say that
33 1, 92 | Whether the image of God is in irrational creatures?~(3) Whether the
34 1, 92 | of God is to be found in irrational creatures?~Aquin.: SMT FP
35 1, 92 | of God is to be found in irrational ~creatures. For Dionysius
36 1, 92 | of rational, but ~also of irrational creatures. Therefore the
37 1, 92 | of God is to be found ~in irrational creatures.~Aquin.: SMT FP
38 1, 95 | no ~mastership over the irrational animals.~Aquin.: SMT FP
39 1, 95 | should rule over none but irrational creatures; not over men,
40 1, 101 | Fide Orth. ~ii, 11): "No irrational animal inhabited paradise";
41 1, 102 | rewards and punishments. But ~irrational creatures which do not act
42 2, 1 | man. Now man differs from irrational ~animals in this, that he
43 2, 1 | idea of an end as such, as irrational animals. Therefore it seems
44 2, 1 | another. For ~the entire irrational nature is in comparison
45 2, 1 | whereas it is ~proper to the irrational nature to tend to an end,
46 2, 1 | apprehend the end, as do irrational animals, or do ~not apprehend
47 2, 1 | end. And it is thus with irrational ~creatures.~Aquin.: SMT
48 2, 1 | And this can belong to an irrational ~nature, but owing to some
49 2, 1 | acquisition of the end, then irrational creatures do ~not concur
50 2, 2 | wise and foolish, and even ~irrational creatures. Therefore delight
51 2, 3 | Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Irrational animals have the sensitive
52 2, 3 | prudence is ~in certain irrational animals, who are possessed
53 2, 5 | in several ~passages. But irrational animals that have the sensitive
54 2, 5 | since man is more noble than irrational creatures, it ~seems that
55 2, 5 | equipped than they. But irrational creatures ~can attain their
56 2, 5 | is more ~perfect than the irrational creature, which is not capable
57 2, 6 | human acts?~(2) Whether in irrational animals? ~(3) Whether there
58 2, 6 | is anything voluntary in irrational animals?~Aquin.: SMT FS
59 2, 6 | is nothing voluntary in irrational ~animals. For a thing is
60 2, 6 | iii, 9), it cannot be in ~irrational animals. Therefore neither
61 2, 6 | master of his actions. But irrational animals are not masters
62 2, 6 | thing as a ~voluntary act in irrational animals.~Aquin.: SMT FS
63 2, 6 | blame is due to the ~acts of irrational minds. Therefore such acts
64 2, 6 | that "both ~children and irrational animals participate in the
65 2, 6 | the end is ~exercised by irrational animals, through their senses
66 2, 6 | within the competency of even irrational animals.~Aquin.: SMT FS
67 2, 6 | action is attributed to ~irrational animals, in so far as they
68 2, 6 | that voluntariness is in irrational animals, ~as stated above.~
69 2, 6 | as is not to be found in ~irrational animals.~Aquin.: SMT FS
70 2, 10 | same is to be said as of irrational animals, which follow, of ~
71 2, 11 | creature alone, or also to ~irrational animals?~(3) Whether enjoyment
72 2, 11 | creature alone, or also to ~irrational animals? ~Aquin.: SMT FS
73 2, 11 | relates to the last end. But irrational animals ~cannot obtain the
74 2, 11 | enjoyment is not ~possible for irrational animals.~Aquin.: SMT FS
75 2, 11 | particular. Such knowledge is in irrational animals: whose ~appetitive
76 2, 11 | in a perfect degree; to irrational ~animals, imperfectly; to
77 2, 12 | within the competency of irrational animals?~Aquin.: SMT FS
78 2, 12 | within the competency of irrational animals?~Aquin.: SMT FS
79 2, 12 | OBJ 1: It would seem that irrational animals intend the end.
80 2, 12 | the sensitive nature in irrational animals. But nature ~intends
81 2, 12 | Much more, therefore, do irrational animals intend the end.~
82 2, 12 | enjoyment. But ~enjoyment is in irrational animals, as stated above (
83 2, 12 | to tend to something. But irrational ~animals act for an end;
84 2, 12 | something of the kind. Therefore irrational animals intend an end.~Aquin.:
85 2, 12 | reason. Since therefore irrational animals are void ~of reason,
86 2, 12 | archer. And in this way, irrational ~animals intend an end,
87 2, 12 | reason alone. Wherefore irrational ~animals do not intend an
88 2, 12 | 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Irrational animals are moved to an
89 2, 13 | choice is to be found in irrational animals?~(3) Whether choice
90 2, 13 | choice is to be found in irrational animals?~Aquin.: SMT FS
91 2, 13 | OBJ 1: It would seem that irrational animals are able to choose.
92 2, 13 | in Ethic. iii, 2,3. But irrational animals desire something
93 2, 13 | Therefore choice is ~in irrational animals.~Aquin.: SMT FS
94 2, 13 | preference to others. But irrational animals take ~something
95 2, 13 | Therefore choice is ~in irrational animals.~Aquin.: SMT FS
96 2, 13 | But prudence is found in irrational ~animals: hence it is said
97 2, 13 | Therefore it ~seems that irrational animals are able to choose.~
98 2, 13 | says ~that "children and irrational animals act willingly but
99 2, 13 | Therefore choice is not in irrational animals.~Aquin.: SMT FS
100 2, 13 | appetite which is all that irrational animals have. Wherefore ~
101 2, 13 | animals have. Wherefore ~irrational animals are not competent
102 2, 13 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: An irrational animal takes one thing in
103 2, 13 | is that in the works of irrational ~animals we notice certain
104 2, 15 | Whether it is to be found in irrational animals?~(3) Whether it
105 2, 15 | consent is to be found in irrational animals?~Aquin.: SMT FS
106 2, 15 | consent is to be found in irrational animals. ~For consent implies
107 2, 15 | thing. But the ~appetite of irrational animals is determinate to
108 2, 15 | consent is to be found in irrational animals.~Aquin.: SMT FS
109 2, 15 | there were no ~consent in irrational animals, there would be
110 2, 15 | instance, or anger. But irrational ~animals act through passion.
111 2, 15 | But counsel is not in ~irrational animals. Therefore neither
112 2, 15 | properly speaking, is not in irrational animals. ~The reason of
113 2, 15 | of moving the stick. But ~irrational animals have not the command
114 2, 15 | natural instinct. Hence in the irrational animal, ~there is indeed
115 2, 15 | And hence it is that the irrational ~animal is not properly
116 2, 15 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: In irrational animals the determination
117 2, 15 | appetite, such as is found ~in irrational animals.~Aquin.: SMT FS
118 2, 15 | follow the ~passion: whereas irrational animals have not that power.
119 2, 16 | Whether it is to be found in irrational animals?~(3) Whether it
120 2, 16 | Whether use is to be found in irrational animals?~Aquin.: SMT FS
121 2, 16 | that use is to be found in irrational animals. For ~it is better
122 2, 16 | enjoyment is to be found in irrational animals, as stated ~above (
123 2, 16 | action is to use them. But ~irrational animals apply their members
124 2, 16 | Therefore it is possible for ~irrational animals to use.~Aquin.:
125 2, 17 | Whether command belongs to irrational animals?~(3) Of the order
126 2, 17 | Whether command belongs to irrational animals?~Aquin.: SMT FS
127 2, 17 | that command belongs to irrational animals. ~Because, according
128 2, 17 | But both powers are in irrational animals. Therefore command
129 2, 17 | command is ~to be found in irrational animals.~Aquin.: SMT FS
130 2, 17 | commanded by ~the soul, even in irrational animals, since they are
131 2, 17 | action is to be found in irrational animals, as Damascene ~says (
132 2, 17 | command is to be found in ~irrational animals.~Aquin.: SMT FS
133 2, 17 | stated above (A[1]). ~But in irrational animals there is no reason.
134 2, 17 | Wherefore it is impossible that irrational animals should ~command
135 2, 17 | this is only in man. In irrational ~animals the appetitive
136 2, 17 | Reply OBJ 2: The body of the irrational animal is competent to obey;
137 2, 17 | Impulse to action is in irrational animals otherwise than ~
138 2, 17 | hand, the ~impulse of the irrational animal arises from natural
139 2, 18 | divided into rational and ~irrational; and the irrational into
140 2, 18 | and ~irrational; and the irrational into animals with wings,
141 2, 18 | essential ~determinations of the irrational being. But the following
142 2, 22 | passion is a movement of ~the irrational soul, when we think of good
143 2, 24 | wit, as movements of the irrational appetite, thus there is
144 2, 24 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: In irrational animals the sensitive appetite
145 2, 26 | from free-will. Such is, in irrational animals, ~the "sensitive
146 2, 29 | is ~pleasant: thus also irrational animals refrain from pleasure
147 2, 30 | Orth. ii, 12) that "the ~irrational part which is subject and
148 2, 30 | concupiscence and anger. This is the irrational part of ~the soul, passive
149 2, 30 | former concupiscences are "irrational," but the ~latter, "rational."
150 2, 30 | the ~Philosopher calls "irrational" (Rhet. i, 11); or by apprehension
151 2, 31 | We do not speak of joy in irrational animals; whereas ~we do
152 2, 31 | we do not ascribe ~joy to irrational animals, but only delight.~
153 2, 31 | common to us and to the irrational animals. ~Therefore it is
154 2, 31 | we have in common ~with irrational animals.~Aquin.: SMT FS
155 2, 40 | Consequently, in the ~actions of irrational animals and of other natural
156 2, 46 | justice between man and ~irrational beings. And yet sometimes
157 2, 46 | sometimes one is angry with irrational beings; ~thus, out of anger,
158 2, 46 | movement of anger even ~against irrational and inanimate beings, which
159 2, 50 | the nutritive power is an irrational part, so ~is the sensitive
160 2, 50 | fortitude, "belong to the irrational ~part."~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[
161 2, 55 | are virtues even of the ~irrational parts; as the Philosopher
162 2, 55 | Virtue cannot be in the irrational part of the soul, except ~
163 2, 56 | these virtues belong to the irrational part of the ~soul."~Aquin.:
164 2, 60 | something in common with irrational ~animals. Accordingly in
165 2, 67 | moral virtues, are ~in the irrational parts of the soul, as the
166 2, 67 | Ethic. ~iii, 10). Now the irrational parts of the soul are corrupted,
167 2, 67 | state of resurrection, the irrational powers will be in ~the bodily
168 2, 67 | preceding the resurrection, the irrational parts ~will not be in the
169 2, 72 | species, e.g. "rational" and "irrational," ~"animate," and "inanimate":
170 2, 73 | which are common to us and irrational minds": ~hence, by these
171 2, 74 | sensuality ~is common to us and irrational animals. Therefore sin cannot
172 2, 74 | part are ~common to us and irrational animals, nevertheless, in
173 2, 74 | fortitude are virtues of the ~irrational parts, as the Philosopher
174 2, 91 | nature, as is the case in irrational creatures, ~which act for
175 2, 91 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Even irrational animals partake in their
176 2, 91 | stated above (Q[90], A[1]). Irrational creatures, however, do ~
177 2, 91 | more self-sufficing than irrational ~creatures. But irrational
178 2, 91 | irrational ~creatures. But irrational creatures have no Divine
179 2, 91 | 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Irrational creatures are not ordained
180 2, 93 | done regarding the use of irrational things ~subject to man,
181 2, 93 | those things, ~for these irrational creatures do not move themselves,
182 2, 93 | man cannot impose laws ~on irrational beings, however much they
183 2, 93 | eternal law. ~Consequently irrational creatures are subject to
184 2, 93 | 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Irrational creatures neither partake
185 2, 93 | subordinate to reason; so too irrational creatures are moved ~by
186 2, 93 | and in this second way, irrational creatures are subject to ~
187 2, 95 | soul either rational or ~irrational is contained in the notion
188 2, 95 | of its being rational or ~irrational; but not in the point of
189 2, 102 | therefore, neither of other irrational animals. ~Therefore without
190 2, 102 | cruelty even in regard to irrational ~animals, so as to be less
191 2, 102 | since it happens that even irrational animals ~are sensible to
192 2, 109 | nature, not only rational but irrational, and ~even to inanimate
193 2, 10 | he differs ~not from an irrational animal; so that even as
194 2, 24 | of charity?~(3) Whether irrational creatures ought to be loved
195 2, 24 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether irrational creatures also ought to
196 2, 24 | OBJ 1: It would seem that irrational creatures also ought to
197 2, 24 | conformed to ~God. Now God loves irrational creatures out of charity,
198 2, 24 | Therefore we also should love irrational creatures out of ~charity.~
199 2, 24 | image, so ~too, are the irrational creatures, in as much as
200 2, 24 | charity extends ~also to irrational creatures.~Aquin.: SMT SS
201 2, 24 | faith. Now faith extends to irrational creatures, since we believe ~
202 2, 24 | charity extends also to irrational creatures.~Aquin.: SMT SS
203 2, 24 | neighbor cannot be extended to irrational ~creatures, since they have
204 2, 24 | charity does not extend to irrational creatures.~Aquin.: SMT SS
205 2, 24 | regard to the first, no irrational creature can be loved out
206 2, 24 | friendship, which cannot have an irrational creature for its ~object:
207 2, 24 | wish good things to an ~irrational creature, because it is
208 2, 24 | proves ~(Ethic. viii, 5). Now irrational creatures can have no fellowship
209 2, 24 | reason. Hence friendship with irrational ~creatures is impossible,
210 2, 24 | happiness, to which the irrational creature cannot attain. ~
211 2, 24 | friendship of charity towards an irrational ~creature.~Aquin.: SMT SS
212 2, 24 | Nevertheless we can love irrational creatures out of charity,
213 2, 24 | himself: wherefore even irrational ~creatures naturally desire
214 2, 24 | Now everything, ~even an irrational being, naturally hates its
215 2, 24 | good. In this way we love irrational creatures out of ~charity,
216 2, 45 | Further, man surpasses irrational beings by his reason, but
217 2, 45 | what man is in relation to irrational ~creatures. Now man is the
218 2, 45 | creatures. Now man is the end of irrational creatures, according to ~
219 2, 48 | command, but otherwise than as irrational and inanimate beings ~are
220 2, 48 | motion by their movers. For irrational and inanimate beings ~are
221 2, 62 | they have no sense, nor to irrational animals, because they have
222 2, 74 | one may lawfully curse an irrational creature?~(3) Whether cursing
223 2, 74 | it is lawful to curse an irrational creature?~Aquin.: SMT SS
224 2, 74 | is unlawful to curse an irrational ~creature. Cursing would
225 2, 74 | relation to ~punishment. Now irrational creatures are not competent
226 2, 74 | 1~OBJ 2: Further, in an irrational creature there is nothing
227 2, 74 | nowise lawful to curse an ~irrational creature.~Aquin.: SMT SS
228 2, 74 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, irrational creatures are either stable,
229 2, 74 | nowise lawful to curse an irrational creature.~Aquin.: SMT SS
230 2, 74 | evil are said to happen to irrational creatures in relation to ~
231 2, 74 | ministration, in ~so far as irrational creatures minister to the
232 2, 74 | Moral. ~iv, 3). Again the irrational creature is related to the
233 2, 74 | signification of Judea. Thirdly, the irrational creature is related to ~
234 2, 74 | Body Para. 2/3~But to curse irrational beings, considered as creatures
235 2, 88 | Whether it is lawful to adjure irrational creatures?~Aquin.: SMT SS
236 2, 88 | it is lawful to adjure an irrational creature?~Aquin.: SMT SS
237 2, 88 | seem unlawful to adjure an irrational creature. An ~adjuration
238 2, 88 | understands not, such as an irrational creature. Therefore it is ~
239 2, 88 | and unlawful to adjure an irrational creature.~Aquin.: SMT SS
240 2, 88 | is not consistent with an irrational ~creature. Therefore it
241 2, 88 | cannot be employed towards ~irrational creatures, since they are
242 2, 88 | not the ~power to command irrational creatures, but only He of
243 2, 88 | is it lawful to adjure irrational creatures.~Aquin.: SMT SS
244 2, 88 | Para. 1/3~I answer that, Irrational creatures are directed to
245 2, 88 | Wherefore the operation of the irrational ~creature is ascribed not
246 2, 88 | permission, makes use of irrational creatures in order to ~inflict
247 2, 88 | Accordingly the adjuration of an irrational creature may be of two ~
248 2, 88 | adjuration is referred to the irrational ~creature in itself: and
249 2, 88 | would be vain to adjure an ~irrational creature. Secondly, so that
250 2, 88 | director and ~mover of the irrational creature, and in this sense
251 2, 88 | the devil, who uses the irrational ~creature for our harm.
252 2, 88 | demons is expelled from ~an irrational creature. But it is not
253 2, 101 | is honored, so too in the irrational creature we ~find the trace
254 2, 101 | honor is shown to certain irrational creatures, as, for instance,
255 2, 101 | subjection nor honor to an irrational ~creature considered in
256 2, 102 | will, but because, unlike ~irrational creatures, he is not compelled
257 2, 106 | dumb animals and ~any other irrational creatures, because in this
258 2, 163 | Further, the serpent is an irrational animal. Now wisdom, speech, ~
259 2, 163 | punishment are not befitting an irrational animal. Therefore the ~serpent
260 2, 187 | perfect species, even as the irrational to the rational ~animal.
261 3, 4 | likeness of image, so in irrational ~creatures we find the image
262 3, 4 | of trace. Therefore the irrational creature ~was as capable
263 3, 4 | nature alone. ~For in the irrational creature the fitness of
264 3, 4 | does ~not imply that the irrational creature, in which such
265 3, 4 | operation. And hence the ~irrational creature which falls short
266 3, 5 | had true human flesh, but irrational flesh, since our soul ~differs
267 3, 13 | spirit of life, and the irrational spirit of life by the rational
268 3, 15 | virtues, which are in the ~irrational part of the soul, make it
269 3, 23 | called the Father even of the irrational ~creature, according to
270 3, 23 | called the Father of the irrational creature, not ~properly
271 3, 44 | miracles which He worked in irrational creatures.~Aquin.: SMT TP
272 3, 44 | worked miracles fittingly on irrational creatures?~Aquin.: SMT TP
273 3, 44 | miracles unfittingly on ~irrational creatures. For brute animals
274 3, 44 | His miracles ~in regard to irrational creatures seem to have been
275 3, 44 | only on man, but also on ~irrational creatures.~Aquin.: SMT TP
276 3, 68 | OBJ 2: Further, man excels irrational animals in that he has reason.
277 3, 68 | therefore, that just as irrational animals are not baptized,
278 3, 68 | bodily organ; but not like irrational ~animals through want of
279 3, 77 | remains a man, he can be an irrational animal. ~For it would follow
280 3, 80 | abominable before God than the ~irrational creature: for it is said
281 3, 80 | made like to them." But an irrational animal, such as a mouse ~
282 3, 80 | must not be ~said that the irrational animal eats the body of
283 3, 80 | this sacrament than any ~irrational creature. Hence he would
284 Suppl, 49| that act, which moves ~even irrational animals in which there is
285 Suppl, 55| divided into rational and irrational and not into white and ~
|