Part, Question
1 1, 1 | not as parts or species or accidents ~but as in some way related
2 1, 3 | all the individualizing accidents, is not included in the
3 1, 3 | Whether in God there are any accidents?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[3] A[6]
4 1, 3 | It seems that there are accidents in God. For substance cannot
5 1, 3 | and the like, which are ~accidents in us, are attributes of
6 1, 3 | Therefore in God there are ~accidents.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[3] A[6]
7 1, 3 | there are ~many "genera" of accidents. If, therefore, the primal
8 1, 3 | subject is compared to its accidents as ~potentiality to actuality;
9 1, 3 | sense made actual by ~its accidents. But there can be no potentiality
10 1, 3 | can He have ~any essential accidents (as the capability of laughing
11 1, 3 | accident of man), because such accidents are caused by the constituent ~
12 1, 3 | not follow that there are accidents in God as ~there are in
13 1, 3 | substance is prior to its accidents, the principles ~of accidents
14 1, 3 | accidents, the principles ~of accidents are reducible to the principles
15 1, 6 | secondly, in ~respect of any accidents being added as necessary
16 1, 6 | existence; in Whom there are no accidents; ~since whatever belongs
17 1, 7 | form. Since therefore ~the accidents follow upon the substantial
18 1, 7 | necessary that ~determinate accidents should follow upon a determinate
19 1, 7 | determinate form; and among ~these accidents is quantity. So every natural
20 1, 8 | matter how; and thus the accidents of a place ~are in place;
21 1, 11 | in subject may have many accidents; or because it is undivided
22 1, 11 | whole; and what are many in ~accidents, are one in subject; and
23 1, 15 | genera, singulars, and accidents. But there are not ideas
24 1, 15 | same is the case with those accidents that inseparably ~accompany
25 1, 15 | with their ~subject. But accidents which supervene to the subject,
26 1, 15 | form of the house all the ~accidents that originally accompany
27 1, 17 | naturally deals with external ~accidents, therefore those external
28 1, 17 | therefore those external accidents, which resemble things ~
29 1, 18 | proper objects are ~external accidents. Hence from external appearances
30 1, 25 | existence as regards the accidents, although not as ~regards
31 1, 28 | each of ~the nine genera of accidents there are two points for
32 1, 29 | by itself; ~whereas the accidents are individualized by the
33 1, 29 | and dry body: for proper accidents are the effects of substantial
34 1, 29 | thing. As it underlies the accidents, it is called ~"hypostasis,"
35 1, 29 | things in relation to the accidents, which are outside ~the
36 1, 29 | signifies what is the subject of accidents, which do not exist in God. ~
37 1, 29 | nor is He the ~subject of accidents, so as to be called a substance.
38 1, 29 | since He does not underlie accidents; but it applies to ~Him
39 1, 39 | signified by the name. But as accidents have their existence in
40 1, 44 | except as regards certain accidents, for instance, in relation
41 1, 45 | own being. But ~forms and accidents and the like are called
42 1, 45 | a being." Therefore, as accidents and forms and the ~like
43 1, 46 | various corruptions and accidents, were subject to an ~infinite
44 1, 57 | but only ~their outward accidents. In like manner neither
45 1, 66 | consequent forms would ~be merely accidents, implying not generation,
46 1, 67 | quality. But qualities are accidents, and as such should have,
47 1, 75 | do not ~subsist, such as accidents and material forms, acquire
48 1, 76 | dispositions to a form are accidents. ~Therefore we must presuppose
49 1, 76 | Therefore we must presuppose accidents to be in matter before the ~
50 1, 76 | genus" follow its own proper accidents. Therefore ~as matter is
51 1, 76 | corporeal, and so on; so those accidents which belong to ~existence
52 1, 76 | Dimensions of quantity are accidents consequent to the ~corporeity
53 1, 77 | powers of the soul are not accidents; and so it would seem ~that
54 1, 77 | are ~not in the soul as accidents in a subject, this must
55 1, 77 | us, are known by their accidents; nothing prevents us from
56 1, 77 | sometimes ~substituting accidents for substantial differences.~
57 1, 77 | the cause of its proper accidents; whence also it is ~included
58 1, 77 | The emanation of proper accidents from their subject is ~not
59 1, 77 | and nutritive parts. Now accidents cannot remain after ~the
60 1, 39 | signified by the name. But as accidents have their existence in
61 1, 45 | except as regards certain accidents, for instance, in relation
62 1, 46 | own being. But ~forms and accidents and the like are called
63 1, 46 | a being." Therefore, as accidents and forms and the ~like
64 1, 47 | various corruptions and accidents, were subject to an ~infinite
65 1, 58 | but only ~their outward accidents. In like manner neither
66 1, 67 | consequent forms would ~be merely accidents, implying not generation,
67 1, 68 | quality. But qualities are accidents, and as such should have,
68 1, 74 | do not ~subsist, such as accidents and material forms, acquire
69 1, 75 | dispositions to a form are accidents. ~Therefore we must presuppose
70 1, 75 | Therefore we must presuppose accidents to be in matter before the ~
71 1, 75 | genus" follow its own proper accidents. Therefore ~as matter is
72 1, 75 | corporeal, and so on; so those accidents which belong to ~existence
73 1, 75 | Dimensions of quantity are accidents consequent to the ~corporeity
74 1, 76 | powers of the soul are not accidents; and so it would seem ~that
75 1, 76 | are ~not in the soul as accidents in a subject, this must
76 1, 76 | us, are known by their accidents; nothing prevents us from
77 1, 76 | sometimes ~substituting accidents for substantial differences.~
78 1, 76 | the cause of its proper accidents; whence also it is ~included
79 1, 76 | The emanation of proper accidents from their subject is ~not
80 1, 76 | and nutritive parts. Now accidents cannot remain after ~the
81 1, 77 | there are many kinds of accidents. Therefore, as powers are
82 1, 77 | the number of the kinds of accidents. ~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[78] A[
83 1, 78 | demonstrates their proper accidents. ~On the other hand, it
84 1, 84 | effect, and substance through accidents. ~Wherefore the universal
85 1, 84 | understands the properties, accidents, and the various ~relations
86 1, 99 | innocence. But ~individual accidents do not necessarily exist
87 1, 100 | respect, but only in those accidents which were ~natural or conferred
88 1, 103 | OBJ 3: Further, forms and accidents have no matter as part of ~
89 1, 103 | 1~Reply OBJ 3: Forms and accidents are not complete beings,
90 1, 114 | separate; while he referred accidents ~to the material principles
91 1, 114 | diversified ~save according to accidents of that kind, the principles
92 1, 114 | it is clear that those accidents are merely ~material dispositions
93 2, 7 | the circumstances ~are not accidents of human acts.~Aquin.: SMT
94 2, 7 | human acts themselves ~are accidents. Therefore the circumstances
95 2, 7 | the circumstances are not accidents of acts.~Aquin.: SMT FS
96 2, 7 | called its individuating accidents. But the Philosopher (Ethic.
97 2, 7 | circumstances are ~individual accidents of human acts.~Aquin.: SMT
98 2, 7 | should be called their ~accidents.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[7] A[1]
99 2, 7 | circumstances are said to be the accidents of ~human acts.~Aquin.:
100 2, 7 | First, in so far as two accidents ~are both related to the
101 2, 7 | Socrates. Secondly, when ~such accidents are related to one another;
102 2, 7 | Further, circumstances are the accidents of acts. But one thing ~
103 2, 7 | subject to an infinity of accidents; hence the Philosopher says ~(
104 2, 7 | 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Accidents which are altogether accidental
105 2, 7 | infinity. But such like ~accidents are not what we call circumstances;
106 2, 7 | being related to it. ~Proper accidents, however, come under the
107 2, 18 | since circumstances are ~accidents of actions, it seems that
108 2, 18 | derives much from ~supervening accidents, as man does from shape,
109 2, 18 | and ~if any one of these accidents be out of due proportion,
110 2, 18 | it by reason of certain accidents: and such are its due circumstances. ~
111 2, 18 | they are in an action as accidents thereof. ~Thus, too, accidents
112 2, 18 | accidents thereof. ~Thus, too, accidents in natural substances are
113 2, 18 | subject; for some ~are proper accidents; and of these every art
114 2, 18 | respect, as it were, of its accidents. Fourthly, it has ~goodness
115 2, 18 | circumstances, which are its accidents, as it were; just as ~something
116 2, 18 | reason of his individual accidents, which ~does not belong
117 2, 18 | Further, circumstances are as accidents in relation to the moral ~
118 2, 19 | circumstances, which are accidents, as ~it were, of the act.~
119 2, 31 | senses stop at the outward ~accidents of a thing, whereas the
120 2, 35 | Metaph. viii, ~2; and in accidents the subject takes the place
121 2, 46 | specific differences from accidents. But these three ~are diversified
122 2, 50 | accident. But ~since among accidents themselves there is a certain
123 2, 50 | angels) after the manner of ~accidents, as in us: as though one
124 2, 50 | of material ~habits and accidents.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[50] A[
125 2, 52 | stated above (A[1]), certain accidents are of ~themselves susceptible
126 2, 53 | the nose." But if we take accidents in the concrete, the ~relation
127 2, 53 | and ~decrease in certain accidents: wherefore to be more or
128 2, 54 | there cannot be diversity of accidents; for the subject is the
129 2, 54 | subject is the cause of ~its accidents; and it does not appear
130 2, 55 | however, observe that, as accidents and ~non-subsistent forms
131 2, 81 | also transmitted, since accidents do not pass from one ~subject
132 2, 81 | be strong, even certain accidents of ~the individual pertaining
133 2, 83 | a subject to its proper accidents, which follow ~their subject
134 2, 85 | remains the same when its accidents ~are changed. But nature
135 2, 1 | directed to such and such ~accidents of bread, but to the fact
136 2, 4 | says (In Categ. Arist. i), "accidents cannot ~be altered." Now
137 2, 8 | speak. Thus, under the ~accidents lies hidden the nature of
138 2, 127 | there accrue certain fixed accidents by way of bodily ~movements.
139 2, 146 | circumstances, being the accidents of an act, do not differentiate ~
140 2, 178 | forwards; if it be about ~accidents that surround a thing near
141 3, 2 | notion of the species, viz. accidents and individuating principles,
142 3, 2 | numerically can underlie different accidents. But it does not ~happen
143 3, 7 | quantity is due, even as other accidents are determined. Hence ~the
144 3, 74 | sacrament; fourthly, the accidents of bread and wine which
145 3, 74 | some unlikeness as to the accidents, owing either to the matter, ~
146 3, 74 | taste, color, and other accidents are changed; hence ~the
147 3, 74 | leavened or unleavened are mere accidents of bread, ~which do not
148 3, 74 | regarding the variation of the ~accidents, as to whether it be salt
149 3, 75 | Christ?~(4) Whether the accidents remain after the change?~(
150 3, 75 | substance is known by its accidents.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[75] A[
151 3, 75 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the accidents of the bread and wine remain
152 3, 75 | OBJ 1: It seems that the accidents of the bread and wine do
153 3, 75 | sacrament, it seems that ~its accidents cannot remain.~Aquin.: SMT
154 3, 75 | we judge of substance by accidents. It seems, then, that human ~
155 3, 75 | deceived, if, while the accidents remain, the substance of ~
156 3, 75 | this ~sacrament for the accidents of bread to remain subject
157 3, 75 | change. If therefore the accidents of the bread remain ~after
158 3, 75 | effected, it seems that the accidents are the ~subject of the
159 3, 75 | Metaph. iii). Therefore the accidents of the bread and ~wine ought
160 3, 75 | evident to sense that all the accidents of the ~bread and wine remain
161 3, 75 | this sacrament; for the accidents ~which are discerned by
162 3, 75 | ad 1); nevertheless the accidents which remain have some ~
163 3, 75 | been said (A[5]) that the ~accidents remain after the consecration.
164 3, 75 | consecration not only ~do the accidents of the bread remain, but
165 3, 75 | this sacrament: because the accidents ~of the bread remain in
166 3, 75 | follow it by reason of the ~accidents, such as to affect the senses,
167 3, 75 | consecration on account of the ~accidents which remain. But some other
168 3, 75 | bestowed ~miraculously upon the accidents themselves, as will be said
169 3, 75 | this sacrament the same accidents remain.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
170 3, 75 | remains the same, namely, the accidents of the bread, as stated
171 3, 75 | this ~difficulty that the accidents remain while the substance
172 3, 76 | wine into ~His blood, the accidents of both remain. From which
173 3, 76 | dimensive quantity and its other accidents, hence it ~comes that by
174 3, 76 | s body and all its other accidents are in this sacrament.~Aquin.:
175 3, 76 | quantity, and with all its accidents. But to ~be in a place is
176 3, 76 | among ~the nine kinds of accidents. Therefore Christ's body
177 3, 76 | stated above (A[4]), the accidents of Christ's body are ~in
178 3, 76 | concomitance. And therefore those accidents of ~Christ's body which
179 3, 76 | the medium, through its accidents. Now the accidents of ~Christ'
180 3, 76 | through its accidents. Now the accidents of ~Christ's body are in
181 3, 76 | substance; so that ~the accidents of Christ's body have no
182 3, 76 | sacrament, not through its own accidents, but ~through the sacramental
183 3, 76 | change wrought in the other ~accidents, such as shape, color, and
184 3, 76 | foundation of the other accidents, as we shall see later on (
185 3, 76 | is wrought in the other accidents, as stated ~above.~
186 3, 77 | Out. Para. 1/1 - OF THE ACCIDENTS WHICH REMAIN IN THIS SACRAMENT (
187 3, 77 | We must now consider the accidents which remain in this sacrament;
188 3, 77 | inquiry:~(1) Whether the accidents which remain are without
189 3, 77 | the subject of the other accidents?~(3) Whether such accidents
190 3, 77 | accidents?~(3) Whether such accidents can affect an extrinsic
191 3, 77 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the accidents remain in this sacrament
192 3, 77 | OBJ 1: It seems that the accidents do not remain in this sacrament ~
193 3, 77 | sacrament of truth. But for accidents to be without a ~subject
194 3, 77 | to savor of deceit, since accidents are naturally ~the signs
195 3, 77 | the subject. Therefore the accidents are not ~without a subject
196 3, 77 | even by ~miracle, that the accidents exist without a subject
197 3, 77 | subject. If therefore ~the accidents remain in this sacrament
198 3, 77 | 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, the accidents after the consecration of
199 3, 77 | at the same time these ~accidents are perceptible to the senses.
200 3, 77 | in this sacrament the ~accidents do not remain without a
201 3, 77 | is ~manifest that these accidents are not subjected in the
202 3, 77 | way be affected by such accidents; nor is it possible for
203 3, 77 | is not susceptive of such accidents. Secondly, because these ~
204 3, 77 | Secondly, because these ~accidents are not where the atmosphere
205 3, 77 | species. Thirdly, because accidents do ~not pass from subject
206 3, 77 | not deprived of its own accidents, it would have at the one
207 3, 77 | at the one time its ~own accidents and others foreign to it.
208 3, 77 | Therefore it follows that the accidents continue in this sacrament ~
209 3, 77 | the order of grace, the accidents exist in this ~sacrament
210 3, 77 | virtue of ~their essence that accidents are not in a subject, but
211 3, 77 | they do not cease to be ~accidents, because neither is the
212 3, 77 | 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: These accidents acquired individual being
213 3, 77 | 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: These accidents had no being of their own
214 3, 77 | of their own nor other ~accidents, so long as the substance
215 3, 77 | after the consecration the accidents which remain ~have being;
216 3, 77 | the subject of the other accidents?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[77] A[
217 3, 77 | the subject of the other accidents. For accident is ~not the
218 3, 77 | the subject of the other ~accidents.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[77] A[
219 3, 77 | so also ~are the other accidents. If, then, the dimensive
220 3, 77 | for like reason the other accidents remain individuated ~according
221 3, 77 | Further, among the other accidents that remain, of the bread
222 3, 77 | can be the subject of the ~accidents which remain in this sacrament.~
223 3, 77 | Since, then, ~the remaining accidents in this sacrament are sensible,
224 3, 77 | quantity is the subject of the accidents ~which remain in this sacrament.~
225 3, 77 | necessary to say that the other accidents which ~remain in this sacrament
226 3, 77 | color and affected by other accidents is perceived by the ~senses;
227 3, 77 | consequence is ~that all other accidents are related to their subject
228 3, 77 | subject is withdrawn, the accidents remain according to the
229 3, 77 | before, it follows that all accidents remain founded upon ~dimensive
230 3, 77 | of individuation of ~the accidents, it is necessary for what
231 3, 77 | as the subject of ~some accidents to be somehow the principle
232 3, 77 | the subject of the other ~accidents, rather than the other way
233 3, 77 | 1~Reply OBJ 2: The other accidents, even as they were in the
234 3, 77 | the subject of the other ~accidents remaining in this sacrament,
235 3, 77 | dimensions; ~just as all other accidents likewise follow from the
236 3, 77 | And consequently, as the accidents are preserved by Divine ~
237 3, 77 | sacramental species are accidents. ~Therefore they cannot
238 3, 77 | Consequently, as the being of those accidents ~could be corrupted while
239 3, 77 | Body Para. 2/4~But such accidents could have been previously
240 3, 77 | one. And in ~this way such accidents can be corrupted manifestly
241 3, 77 | alteration regarding the accidents.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[77] A[
242 3, 77 | change on the part of the accidents as would not have sufficed
243 3, 77 | sacramental species ~are accidents, it seems that no substance
244 3, 77 | be without their proper ~accidents, which is impossible. Unless
245 3, 77 | sacramental species are indeed accidents, yet they ~have the act
246 3, 77 | sacramental species are ~accidents, whereas man is not made
247 3, 77 | whereas man is not made of accidents, because accident is not ~
248 3, 77 | subject, just as the other accidents. And as the ~sacramental
249 3, 77 | species, because ~those accidents are without a subject, as
250 3, 77 | sacramental species, which are ~accidents; nor from the liquid and
251 3, 77 | as the diversity of the ~accidents shows: for instance, if
252 3, 77 | writes thus: "The very ~accidents appear to affect the wine
253 3, 77 | result is, then, that the ~accidents change the subject, just
254 3, 77 | just as subject changes accidents; for ~nature yields to miracle,
255 3, 77 | action; because the remaining accidents ~of the wine retain the
256 3, 77 | blood, but, mixed with the ~accidents of the previous wine, it
257 3, 78 | substance, but only as to the accidents whereby it ~comes under
258 3, 78 | relative to the sensible accidents which ~continue; but the
259 3, 78 | Christ's body nor even its ~accidents. Therefore this expression, "
260 3, 78 | this" does not indicate the accidents, but the ~substance underlying
261 3, 78 | substance underlying the accidents, which at first was bread,
262 3, 78 | although not informed by those ~accidents, is yet contained under
263 3, 81 | above (Q[76], A[4]), the accidents of Christ's ~body are in
264 3, 81 | this sacrament, whatever accidents ~really exist in it.~Aquin.:
265 Suppl, 2 | another body, that all ~the accidents contrary to the thing generated,
266 Suppl, 2 | generated, and which were the ~accidents of the thing corrupted,
267 Suppl, 54| matter and that all forms are accidents: ~which is false.~Aquin.:
268 Suppl, 70| they are of the genus of accidents. Hence the comparison fails.~
269 Suppl, 78| as well as all the other accidents ought to agree. Therefore
270 Suppl, 79| qualities are the proper accidents of the ~elements, being
271 Suppl, 80| Trin. i): "Difference of accidents ~makes distinction in number.
272 Suppl, 80| in ~species, but in their accidents. If we were to remove absolutely
273 Suppl, 80| matter, form, and natural accidents, all of ~which pertain to
274 Suppl, 80| matter, or form, or natural ~accidents, namely heat, cold, and
275 Suppl, 80| requires ~this difference of accidents. Now subtlety does not deprive
276 Suppl, 80| quantity differs from all other accidents ~in that it has a special
277 Suppl, 80| common to it and all other ~accidents, arising namely from the
|