Part, Question
1 1, 13 | ways that a relation is real or ~logical. Sometimes from
2 1, 13 | in science and in sense a real relation ~exists, because
3 1, 13 | hence in them there is no real relation to ~science and
4 1, 13 | whereas in God there is no ~real relation to creatures, but
5 1, 13 | relations in ~creatures are real. Nor is it incongruous that
6 1, 13 | relation of subjection is ~real in the creature, it follows
7 1, 15 | these relations are either real in creatures only, or in ~
8 1, 15 | relations. But if they are real in God, it ~follows that
9 1, 15 | follows that there is a real plurality in God other than
10 1, 15 | in God. Yet they are not real relations, such as those
11 1, 18 | not life in them in its real ~sense, since this movement
12 1, 20 | conversely its goodness, whether real or imaginary, ~calls forth
13 1, 23 | Destination sometimes denotes a real mission of someone to ~a
14 1, 28 | inquiry:~(1) Whether there are real relations in God?~(2) Whether
15 1, 28 | Para. 1/1~Whether there are real relations in God?~Aquin.:
16 1, 28 | would seem that there are no real relations in God. For ~Boethius
17 1, 28 | predicated of Him. ~Therefore no real relation exists in God.~
18 1, 28 | logical one; for every real relation requires and implies
19 1, 28 | divine relations are not real relations, but are ~formed
20 1, 28 | creatures does not ~import any real relation, but only a logical
21 1, 28 | paternity in ~God is not a real relation; while the same
22 1, 28 | filiation. Therefore, if no real paternity or filiation ~
23 1, 28 | relations are necessarily real relations; ~as in a heavy
24 1, 28 | order; and then they have real relations ~to each other.
25 1, 28 | processions, are necessarily real relations.~Aquin.: SMT FP
26 1, 28 | Therefore there is no real ~relation in God to the
27 1, 28 | in creatures there is a real ~relation to God; because
28 1, 28 | relations only, but are real ~relations; inasmuch as
29 1, 28 | intellect and the reason are real things, and ~are really
30 1, 28 | paternity and filiation are real relations in God.~Aquin.:
31 1, 28 | distinction does not make any real distinction of the divine ~
32 1, 28 | neither does it make any real distinction ~of paternity
33 1, 28 | Further, in God there is no real distinction but that of
34 1, 28 | other, there would ~be no real trinity in God, but only
35 1, 28 | So as in God ~there is a real relation (A[1]), there must
36 1, 28 | there must also be a real opposition. ~The very nature
37 1, 28 | distinction. Hence, there ~must be real distinction in God, not,
38 1, 28 | other, if the identity be real and logical; as, for ~instance,
39 1, 28 | God there are only four real relations - paternity, filiation, ~
40 1, 28 | there are not only four real ~relations - paternity,
41 1, 28 | object ~willed; which are real relations not comprised
42 1, 28 | there are not only four real relations in God.~Aquin.:
43 1, 28 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, real relations in God are understood
44 1, 28 | exists an ~infinite series of real relations.~Aquin.: SMT FP
45 1, 28 | i, 1) it follows that ~a real relation in God can be based
46 1, 28 | God to creatures are not real in Him ~(Q[13], A[7]). Hence,
47 1, 28 | Hence, it follows that real relations in God can be ~
48 1, 28 | object, there can be a ~real relation, both of science
49 1, 28 | kinds of relations are not real; as ~neither is the relation
50 1, 28 | relation ~to the word is a real relation; because the word
51 1, 28 | similitude in God are not real relations; but ~are only
52 1, 30 | that there are several real ~relations in God; and hence
53 1, 30 | distinct from each other. But a real ~distinction between the
54 1, 30 | God there exists only one real operation - that is, His
55 1, 30 | numeral terms denote anything real in God?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
56 1, 30 | numeral terms denote something real in ~God. For the divine
57 1, 30 | therefore it denotes something real in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
58 1, 30 | terms denote ~something real in creatures; therefore
59 1, 30 | terms do not denote anything real in God, ~and are introduced
60 1, 30 | numeral terms denote something real in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
61 1, 30 | terms do not denote anything real in God, but ~remove something
62 1, 30 | which denotes something real in creatures, is a ~species
63 1, 30 | this is not community of a real thing, as if one essence
64 1, 30 | argument is founded on a real community.~Aquin.: SMT FP
65 1, 30 | community is logical and not real, yet it ~does not follow
66 1, 32 | is no need to admit any real relation to the ~creature (
67 1, 32 | the Father there must be a real ~relation to the Son and
68 1, 32 | notions or relations are real, as stated ~above (Q[28],
69 1, 32 | also on account ~of the real identity, substantive terms,
70 1, 32 | 1~Reply OBJ 3: Since the real plurality in God is founded
71 1, 37 | in himself, not only by real identity, but also as the ~
72 1, 39 | opposite relation, it has a real ~distinction by virtue of
73 1, 39 | there really existed any real "supposition" ~or "subjection."~
74 1, 39 | predicated, owing to the real ~identity of essence and
75 1, 40 | divine simplicity, a twofold real identity exists as ~regards
76 1, 41 | not enough to explain the real meaning of the words. ~For
77 1, 41 | things said of God: one is a real distinction, the ~other
78 1, 41 | distinction of reason only. By a real distinction, God by His ~
79 1, 42 | thing to itself is not a real relation. Nor, again, is
80 1, 42 | divine ~persons is not a real relation distinct from the
81 1, 42 | that in God there exist real true paternity and ~filiation.
82 1, 45 | to ~the creature is not a real relation, but only a relation
83 1, 45 | the creature to God is a real relation, as was ~said above (
84 1, 45 | of creation, taken as a real relation, and is ~prior
85 1, 57 | and not according to their real natures. But some things
86 1, 68 | however, is more nominal than real. For ~Chrysostom means by
87 1, 75 | asserted ~that only bodies were real things; and that what is
88 1, 76 | then there would ~not be a real mixture which is in respect
89 1, 37 | in himself, not only by real identity, but also as the ~
90 1, 39 | opposite relation, it has a real ~distinction by virtue of
91 1, 39 | there really existed any real "supposition" ~or "subjection."~
92 1, 39 | predicated, owing to the real ~identity of essence and
93 1, 40 | divine simplicity, a twofold real identity exists as ~regards
94 1, 41 | not enough to explain the real meaning of the words. ~For
95 1, 41 | things said of God: one is a real distinction, the ~other
96 1, 41 | distinction of reason only. By a real distinction, God by His ~
97 1, 42 | thing to itself is not a real relation. Nor, again, is
98 1, 42 | divine ~persons is not a real relation distinct from the
99 1, 42 | that in God there exist real true paternity and ~filiation.
100 1, 46 | to ~the creature is not a real relation, but only a relation
101 1, 46 | the creature to God is a real relation, as was ~said above (
102 1, 46 | of creation, taken as a real relation, and is ~prior
103 1, 58 | and not according to their real natures. But some things
104 1, 69 | however, is more nominal than real. For ~Chrysostom means by
105 1, 74 | asserted ~that only bodies were real things; and that what is
106 1, 75 | then there would ~not be a real mixture which is in respect
107 1, 84 | with subject: and to this ~real composition corresponds
108 1, 104 | the sake of ~some good, real or apparent; and nothing
109 1, 113 | 4) Whether they can work real miracles for the purpose
110 1, 113 | lead men astray by means of real miracles?~Aquin.: SMT FP
111 1, 113 | men astray by means of ~real miracles. For the activity
112 1, 113 | the ~demons cannot work real miracles. ~Aquin.: SMT FP
113 1, 113 | both ways. If ~therefore real miracles can be wrought
114 1, 113 | marvelous to us are not real miracles, they are sometimes ~
115 1, 113 | nevertheless something real. Thus the magicians of Pharaoh
116 1, 113 | demons' ~power produced real serpents and frogs. And "
117 1, 113 | or because, if he work real prodigies, they will lead ~
118 1, 113 | operation of demons, it is not real but a mere semblance of
119 1, 115 | think that fate is anything real."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[116]
120 1, 115 | that fate is something ~real, as referred to the Divine
121 2, 4 | anything; secondly, by a real relation of ~the lover to
122 2, 5 | happens that where there is no real distinction, there ~may
123 2, 25 | beloved is twofold. There is real ~union, consisting in the
124 2, 28 | is twofold. The first is ~real union; for instance, when
125 2, 28 | to unite," ~he refers to real union.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[
126 2, 28 | This argument is true of real union. That is necessary
127 2, 28 | cause; desire implies the real absence of the ~beloved:
128 2, 28 | effect of ~love. This is real union, which the lover seeks
129 2, 32 | according ~as one thing is in real conjunction of any kind
130 2, 32 | or potentially. And since real conjunction is greater than ~
131 2, 32 | implying a certainty of the real ~presence of the pleasing
132 2, 35 | outward pain arises from the real conjunction of some contrary;
133 2, 45 | excellence attaches thereto, real or imaginary, ~either in
134 2, 48 | pleasure caused by the ~real presence of vengeance, which
135 2, 54 | specific ~contraries is a real distinction yet they are
136 2, 58 | desire to do, cannot be real virtues." But ~prudence
137 2, 61 | temperate and just; no real justice, without prudence, ~
138 2, 64 | mean of moral virtue is the real mean or the rational ~mean?~(
139 2, 64 | mean of moral virtue is the real mean, or the rational mean?~
140 2, 64 | rational ~mean, but the real mean. For the good of moral
141 2, 64 | mean of moral virtue is a real mean.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[64]
142 2, 64 | not the ~rational, but the real mean.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[64]
143 2, 64 | geometrical proportion is a real mean. Now such is the mean
144 2, 64 | not the ~rational, but the real mean.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[64]
145 2, 64 | rational mean is also the real mean: ~in which case the
146 2, 64 | mean of moral virtue is the real mean, for instance, in ~
147 2, 64 | rational mean is not the real ~mean, but is considered
148 2, 64 | justice is the same as the real mean, in ~so far, to wit
149 2, 80 | proper object, which is a real or apparent good of ~reason.
150 2, 98 | stiff-necked people": but the real reason is given in the ~
151 2, 103 | the legal ceremonies in real earnest; but ~only by a
152 2, 1 | in accordance with its ~real meaning, as derived from
153 2, 4 | although there are no ~real virtues, unless faith be
154 2, 28 | sanctifying grace, ~peace is not real but merely apparent.~Aquin.:
155 2, 28 | Secondly, it happens through real union, for instance when
156 2, 33 | sorrow also which is about ~a real evil, is evil in its effect,
157 2, 56 | the mean of justice is the real mean?~(11) Whether the act
158 2, 56 | the mean of justice is the real mean?~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[58]
159 2, 56 | mean of justice is not the real mean. For ~the generic nature
160 2, 56 | the rational ~and not the real mean.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[58]
161 2, 56 | justice ~does not observe the real mean.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[58]
162 2, 56 | the ~rational and not the real mean, is because in their
163 2, 56 | also observes, not ~the real, but the rational mean.~
164 2, 56 | proportion, so that ~it is the real mean.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[58]
165 2, 56 | person. Now equality is the real mean between greater and
166 2, 56 | wherefore ~justice observes the real mean.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[58]
167 2, 56 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: This real mean is also the rational
168 2, 56 | way: and this ~implies a real and not merely a rational
169 2, 59 | virtues the rational, not the real mean, ~is to be followed:
170 2, 59 | but justice follows the real mean; wherefore the mean, ~
171 2, 59 | justice since this is the real mean and does not depend
172 2, 75 | justice we consider chiefly real equality. ~On the other
173 2, 75 | man sell instead of the real metal, ~silver or gold produced
174 2, 75 | and unjust, especially as ~real gold and silver can produce
175 2, 75 | certain maladies. Moreover real gold can be employed ~more
176 2, 75 | counterfeit gold. If however real gold were to be produced
177 2, 76 | Further, just as there is real remuneration, so is there
178 2, 76 | expected or exacted some real remuneration, because both
179 2, 98 | spirituals?~(5) Whether real remuneration alone makes
180 2, 98 | comes ~under the head of "real remuneration," so too does
181 2, 109 | that are apparent and not real: while it ~accomplishes
182 2, 115 | natural riches are more real than artificial riches, ~
183 2, 152 | the imaginary ~from the real union of bodies, the flesh
184 2, 152 | imagination as though they were real, as stated above in ~the
185 2, 176 | because, though they be real wonders, they will seduce
186 2, 176 | believe." They are said to be real, because the things ~themselves
187 2, 176 | things ~themselves will be real, just as Pharaoh's magicians
188 2, 176 | Pharaoh's magicians made real frogs and ~real serpents;
189 2, 176 | magicians made real frogs and ~real serpents; but they will
190 2, 176 | serpents; but they will not be real miracles, because they will
191 2, 183 | ecclesiastical goods. For they have real ~dominion over their own
192 3, 5 | of ~Christ were not in a real body, but by visions in
193 3, 5 | in the world was not in a real ~body, but only in imagination.~
194 3, 5 | body; but His body was ~real. The proof of this is threefold.
195 3, 5 | consequently have assumed a real body. The ~second reason
196 3, 5 | For if His body was not real but imaginary, He neither ~
197 3, 5 | He neither ~underwent a real death, nor of those things
198 3, 5 | would also follow that the real salvation of man has not
199 3, 5 | the ~world should be in a real body, being the thing prefigured
200 3, 28 | to show that His body was real, He ~was born of a woman.
201 3, 35 | does ~not put something real in the eternal God, but
202 3, 35 | to His Mother cannot be a real ~relation, but only a relation
203 3, 35 | filiation in Christ is a real relation. ~Nevertheless,
204 3, 35 | which is implied in the real relation by which the ~creature
205 3, 35 | although lordship is not a real relation ~in God, yet is
206 3, 35 | really Lord through the real subjection of the creature ~
207 3, 35 | Virgin Mother ~through the real relation of her motherhood
208 3, 35 | Temporal nativity would cause a real temporal filiation in ~Christ
209 3, 35 | relation there is something real, whereas in the other there
210 3, 35 | there is not ~something real, but merely a certain aspect,
211 3, 35 | one ~way there is only one real filiation in Christ, which
212 3, 39 | Whether that dove was a real animal?~(8) Of the voice
213 3, 39 | baptism, in a measure, was real, inasmuch as ~it induced
214 3, 39 | human nature is shown to be real, by its ~making bodily progress
215 3, 39 | Holy Ghost appeared was real?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[39] A[
216 3, 39 | Ghost appeared was ~not real. For that seems to be a
217 3, 39 | Therefore it was not a real dove, but ~a semblance of
218 3, 39 | Augustine says (De Trin. ii), a real dove ~would have been useless:
219 3, 39 | Therefore it was not a real dove.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[39]
220 3, 39 | therefore, this were a real dove, its properties would
221 3, 39 | signified the nature of the real animal, and not the effect
222 3, 39 | seems that it was not a real dove.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[39]
223 3, 39 | Jesus Christ alone had a real ~body, and that the Holy
224 3, 39 | that both those bodies were real."~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[39] A[
225 3, 39 | not an imaginary, but a real body. And since ~the Holy
226 3, 39 | therefore He too made a real dove in which to appear,
227 3, 39 | to frame the ~body of a real dove without the help of
228 3, 39 | sense that the dove was not real, but in ~order to show that
229 3, 39 | not superfluous to form a real dove, in which the ~Holy
230 3, 44 | fast, He knew Him to be a real man: but when He failed
231 3, 45 | body was not imaginary, but real, as stated above (Q[5],
232 3, 45 | or aerial body for His ~real body. The Evangelist describes
233 3, 62 | to justify, also by the real use of sacramental things
234 3, 64 | that effect which is both real and sacramental, viz. ~the
235 3, 66 | because it is ~something real signified by the outward
236 3, 66 | process of ~condensation into real water, a result which cannot
237 3, 76 | the sacrament, but from real concomitance. For since
238 3, 76 | the sacrament, nor from real ~concomitance. But since "
239 3, 76 | sacrament, but His soul from real concomitance.~Aquin.: SMT
240 3, 76 | the blood is there ~from real concomitance, as stated
241 3, 76 | sacrament, and His body by real concomitance, ~as is also
242 3, 76 | of the sacrament, but by real concomitance: ~and therefore
243 3, 76 | quantity is there by reason of real concomitance, ~consequently
244 3, 76 | sacrament; in ~another, from real concomitance. By the power
245 3, 76 | comes that by reason of real concomitance the whole dimensive
246 3, 76 | are ~in this sacrament by real concomitance. And therefore
247 3, 78 | sacrament, and the blood by real ~concomitance; but afterwards
248 3, 78 | sacrament, and the body ~by real concomitance, so that the
249 3, 81 | are in this sacrament by real concomitance, but not by
250 3, 81 | separated from His body; by real concomitance, both His blood
251 3, 81 | is ~in this sacrament by real concomitance; because it
252 3, 84 | that his former penance was real, because the ~reality of
253 Suppl, 5 | slight as not to ~suffice for real contrition, e.g. if a sin
254 Suppl, 5 | slack as not to suffice for real charity. The other sorrow
255 Suppl, 5 | this is no hindrance to real contrition, ~because it
256 Suppl, 8 | priest, although it is a real ~sacrament that one receives
257 Suppl, 59| Further, in marriage there is real chastity. But according
258 Suppl, 59| Conjug. i, 18) there is no real chastity between an ~unbeliever
259 Suppl, 59| unbelievers are said not ~to be real, because they cannot attain
260 Suppl, 59| cannot attain the end of real virtue, which is ~real happiness.
261 Suppl, 59| of real virtue, which is ~real happiness. Thus we say it
262 Suppl, 59| Thus we say it is not a real wine if it has not the ~
263 Suppl, 70| an imaginary fire, but a real corporeal fire, we must ~
264 Suppl, 70| apprehension: for although a real passion of sorrow or pain
265 Suppl, 70| suffering would be more unlike real ~suffering than that which
266 Suppl, 70| is stated to result from real images of things, which
267 Suppl, 71| had a ~certain joy, not real but imaginary, in the fulfillment
268 Suppl, 78| inordinately, as though they were real ~pleasures: just as a man
269 Suppl, 79| reception does not result in real sensation, because every ~
270 Suppl, 79| of the imagination) have real ~sensations, but that it
271 Suppl, 80| are not ~reduced to the real mean that is measured according
272 Suppl, 88| understood by some to mean a real lessening of light. Nor
273 Suppl, 88| diminishment to mean, not a real lessening ~of light, but
|