Part, Question

 2501   1, 28  |               two predicaments only in God, since other ~predicaments
 2502   1, 28  |                nothing that exists in ~God can have any relation to
 2503   1, 28  |        identity; and this by reason of God's ~supreme simplicity.~Aquin.:
 2504   1, 28  |                so the same applies to ~God, yet not in the same way.
 2505   1, 28  |              that relation; whereas in God there is no distinction,
 2506   1, 28  |           follow that there ~exists in God anything besides relation
 2507   1, 28  |              any other name applied to God signify something ~imperfect,
 2508   1, 28  |               Whether the relations in God are really distinguished
 2509   1, 28  |           other. But every relation in God is really ~the same as the
 2510   1, 28  |                 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, in God there is no real distinction
 2511   1, 28  |                says (De Trin.) that in God "the substance ~contains
 2512   1, 28  |           would ~be no real trinity in God, but only an ideal trinity,
 2513   1, 28  |           opposed to another. So as in God ~there is a real relation (
 2514   1, 28  |            must be real distinction in God, not, indeed, according
 2515   1, 28  |             Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether in God there are only four real
 2516   1, 28  |               1: It would seem that in God there are not only four
 2517   1, 28  |              must ~be observed that in God there exist the relations
 2518   1, 28  |            only four real relations in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[28] A[
 2519   1, 28  |             Further, real relations in God are understood as coming
 2520   1, 28  |            Avicenna says. Therefore in God there exists an ~infinite
 2521   1, 28  |               OBJ 3: Further, ideas in God are eternal (Q[15], A[1]);
 2522   1, 28  |             above stated. Therefore in God there are many more eternal
 2523   1, 28  |            relations: and ~they are in God from eternity. Therefore
 2524   1, 28  |              relations are ~eternal in God than the above named.~Aquin.:
 2525   1, 28  |                are fewer ~relations in God than those above named.
 2526   1, 28  |             are not four ~relations in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[28] A[
 2527   1, 28  |                there is no quantity in God, for He is ~great without
 2528   1, 28  |               that ~a real relation in God can be based only on action.
 2529   1, 28  |                based on the actions of God according to any extrinsic
 2530   1, 28  |          forasmuch as the relations of God to creatures are not real
 2531   1, 28  |         follows that real relations in God can be ~understood only
 2532   1, 28  |               external, processions in God. These processions are two ~
 2533   1, 28  |              to the ~object willed. In God, however, the intellect
 2534   1, 28  |              by understanding Himself, God understands all other ~things;
 2535   1, 28  |               Hence it follows that in God these kinds of relations
 2536   1, 28  |                 This does not apply to God, inasmuch as He understands
 2537   1, 28  |       relations exist as understood by God. Hence it does ~not follow
 2538   1, 28  |            there are many relations in God; but ~that God knows these
 2539   1, 28  |            relations in God; but ~that God knows these many relations.~
 2540   1, 28  |             Equality and similitude in God are not real relations;
 2541   1, 29  |               of person is becoming to God?~(4) What does it signify
 2542   1, 29  |                things immovable, as in God, and ~in the angels. Therefore
 2543   1, 29  |               that ~is, by the Word of God. It is, however, better
 2544   1, 29  |             there are three persons in God, so we say ~there are three
 2545   1, 29  |              are three subsistences in God; which implies that "person"
 2546   1, 29  |             three persons" plurally in God, and "three ~subsistences,"
 2547   1, 29  |              person" should be said of God?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[29] A[
 2548   1, 29  |          person" should not be said of God. ~For Dionysius says (Div.
 2549   1, 29  |               is ~not to be applied to God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[29] A[
 2550   1, 29  |                 however, can ~apply to God only in a metaphorical sense.
 2551   1, 29  |            person" is ~only applied to God metaphorically.~Aquin.:
 2552   1, 29  |         hypostasis" ~does not apply to God, since, as Boethius says (
 2553   1, 29  |       accidents, which do not exist in God. ~Jerome also says (Ep.
 2554   1, 29  |          person" should not be said of God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[29] A[
 2555   1, 29  |              above, ~does not apply to God. Both because reason implies
 2556   1, 29  |                which does not apply to God, as we proved above (Q[14],
 2557   1, 29  |               Q[14], A[12]~); and thus God cannot be said to have "
 2558   1, 29  |             nature." And also ~because God cannot be called an individual
 2559   1, 29  |         individuation is matter; while God is immaterial: nor is He
 2560   1, 29  |                not to be attributed to God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[29] A[
 2561   1, 29  |          perfect must be attributed to God, forasmuch as ~His essence
 2562   1, 29  |               is fittingly ~applied to God; not, however, as it is
 2563   1, 29  |             creatures, we attribute to God; as we showed above when
 2564   1, 29  |               treating of the names of God (Q[13], A[2]).~Aquin.: SMT
 2565   1, 29  |                is not found applied to God in ~Scripture, either in
 2566   1, 29  |                found to be affirmed of God in many places of Scripture;
 2567   1, 29  |            being. If we could speak of God only in the very terms ~
 2568   1, 29  |              no one could speak about ~God in any but the original
 2569   1, 29  |                the ancient faith about God. Nor is such a kind of novelty
 2570   1, 29  |              person" may not belong to God as ~regards the origin of
 2571   1, 29  |                excellently belongs to ~God in its objective meaning.
 2572   1, 29  |               pre-eminently belongs to God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[29] A[
 2573   1, 29  |          hypostasis" does not apply to God as regards its ~source of
 2574   1, 29  |             OBJ 4: It may be said that God has a rational "nature,"
 2575   1, 29  |                intelligent nature. But God cannot be called an "individual"
 2576   1, 29  |           Substance" can be applied to God in the sense ~of signifying
 2577   1, 29  |            when speaking of persons in God. Therefore ~Richard of St.
 2578   1, 29  |               adding that "Person" in ~God is "the incommunicable existence
 2579   1, 29  |                 person," as applied to God, does ~not signify relation,
 2580   1, 29  |             absolute. Therefore, if in God it signified relation, it
 2581   1, 29  |                an equivocal meaning in God, in man, and in angels.~
 2582   1, 29  |              of this word ~"person" in God, from the fact that it is
 2583   1, 29  |          divine essence; as this name "God" and this word "Wise"; ~
 2584   1, 29  |            that this word "person" ~in God signifies both the essence
 2585   1, 29  |                 person" ~as applied to God. For "person" in general
 2586   1, 29  |                 4/4~Now distinction in God is only by relation of origin,
 2587   1, 29  |               2],3), while relation in God is not as an accident in
 2588   1, 29  |           Therefore, as the Godhead is God so the ~divine paternity
 2589   1, 29  |               the ~divine paternity is God the Father, Who is a divine
 2590   1, 29  |              the ~hypostasis: while in God the hypostasis is expressed
 2591   1, 29  |                essence, inasmuch as in God essence is the same as the ~
 2592   1, 29  |                 hypostasis, because in God what He is, and whereby
 2593   1, 29  |              Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: In God the individual - i.e. distinct
 2594   1, 29  |              can be said univocally of God and creatures ~(Q[13], A[
 2595   1, 30  |                PLURALITY OF PERSONS IN GOD (FOUR ARTICLES)~We are now
 2596   1, 30  |           there are several persons in God?~(2) How many are they?~(
 2597   1, 30  |               numeral terms signify in God?~(4) The community of the
 2598   1, 30  |           there are several persons in God?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[30] A[
 2599   1, 30  |             are not several persons in God. For ~person is "the individual
 2600   1, 30  |                 are several persons in God, there must be several substances;
 2601   1, 30  |      distinction of persons, either in God, or in ourselves. Much less ~
 2602   1, 30  |         plurality of relations. But in God there ~is no plurality but
 2603   1, 30  |          cannot be ~several persons in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[30] A[
 2604   1, 30  |              Further, Boethius says of God (De Trin. i), that "this
 2605   1, 30  |             are not several persons in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[30] A[
 2606   1, 30  |           whole and part. Thus, if in ~God there exist a number of
 2607   1, 30  |              must be whole and part in God; ~which is inconsistent
 2608   1, 30  |                are several ~persons in God. For it was shown above (
 2609   1, 30  |            word ~"person" signifies in God a relation as subsisting
 2610   1, 30  |             several real ~relations in God; and hence it follows that
 2611   1, 30  |                are ~several persons in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[30] A[
 2612   1, 30  |             The absolute properties in God, such as goodness and ~wisdom,
 2613   1, 30  |             the relative properties in God subsist, and ~are really
 2614   1, 30  |                plurality of persons in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[30] A[
 2615   1, 30  |                unity and simplicity of God exclude every kind ~of plurality
 2616   1, 30  |               horses. So, if number in God is taken absolutely or abstractedly,
 2617   1, 30  |             but this does not apply to God, because the ~Father is
 2618   1, 30  |             more than three persons in God?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[30] A[
 2619   1, 30  |             more than three persons in God. For ~the plurality of persons
 2620   1, 30  |                plurality of persons in God arises from the plurality
 2621   1, 30  |            there are four relations in God as ~stated above (Q[28],
 2622   1, 30  |              there are four persons in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[30] A[
 2623   1, 30  |               1/1~OBJ 2: The nature of God does not differ from His
 2624   1, 30  |            from ~His intellect. But in God, one person proceeds from
 2625   1, 30  |             not only three ~persons in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[30] A[
 2626   1, 30  |             beyond other ~animals. But God infinitely excels every
 2627   1, 30  |           every creature. Therefore in God not ~only is there a person
 2628   1, 30  |          infinite number of persons in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[30] A[
 2629   1, 30  |               are but three persons in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[30] A[
 2630   1, 30  |              be only three persons ~in God. For it was shown above
 2631   1, 30  |               the intellect, which in ~God is generation, wherefrom
 2632   1, 30  |            only three persons exist in God, the Father, the Son, and
 2633   1, 30  |            there are four relations in God, one of them, ~spiration,
 2634   1, 30  |              it proceeds; ~although in God love is co-essential as
 2635   1, 30  |               not called generation in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[30] A[
 2636   1, 30  |               feeling, or the like. In God there exists only one real
 2637   1, 30  |              other persons ~who are in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[30] A[
 2638   1, 30  |              applied to the persons in God, the notion of measure has
 2639   1, 30  |                denote anything real in God?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[30] A[
 2640   1, 30  |              denote something real in ~God. For the divine unity is
 2641   1, 30  |        Therefore every numeral term in God signifies the ~essence;
 2642   1, 30  |              denotes something real in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[30] A[
 2643   1, 30  |           Further, whatever is said of God and of creatures, belongs
 2644   1, 30  |               of creatures, belongs to God ~in a more eminent manner
 2645   1, 30  |              therefore much more so in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[30] A[
 2646   1, 30  |                denote anything real in God, ~and are introduced simply
 2647   1, 30  |               denote something real in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[30] A[
 2648   1, 30  |              Fide i): "When we say one God, unity ~excludes plurality
 2649   1, 30  |             does not imply quantity in God." Hence we ~see that these
 2650   1, 30  |             these terms are applied to God in order to remove something;
 2651   1, 30  |            denote anything positive in God, but have only a negative ~
 2652   1, 30  |               quantity has no place in God, ~asserted that the numeral
 2653   1, 30  |                denote anything real in God, but ~remove something from
 2654   1, 30  |            that as knowledge exists in God according to the strict ~
 2655   1, 30  |              sense of its genus (as in God there is ~no such thing
 2656   1, 30  |          quality), so number exists in God in the proper sense of number,
 2657   1, 30  |            numeral terms predicated of God are not derived from ~number,
 2658   1, 30  |               a ~metaphorical sense in God, like other corporeal properties,
 2659   1, 30  |         Therefore the numeral terms in God signify the things of which
 2660   1, 30  |        likewise is multitude; hence in God ~it may mean both substance
 2661   1, 30  |               be used when speaking of God: unlike ~transcendental
 2662   1, 30  |             multitude is applicable to God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[30] A[
 2663   1, 30  |           would be a universal. But in God there is neither ~universal
 2664   1, 30  |                does not follow that in God there is universal or particular,
 2665   1, 31  |              THE UNITY OR PLURALITY IN GOD (FOUR ARTICLES)~We now consider
 2666   1, 31  |              the unity or plurality in God; which ~gives rise to four
 2667   1, 31  |                to an essential name in God?~(4) Whether it can be joined
 2668   1, 31  |            Whether there is trinity in God?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[31] A[
 2669   1, 31  |                there is not trinity in God. For every name in God ~
 2670   1, 31  |              in God. For every name in God ~signifies substance or
 2671   1, 31  |               is not to be applied ~to God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[31] A[
 2672   1, 31  |               a word does not apply to God; as the unity ~of a collective
 2673   1, 31  |           least of unities, whereas in God there exists ~the greatest
 2674   1, 31  |            trinity" does not apply ~to God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[31] A[
 2675   1, 31  |             trine is threefold. But in God there is not ~triplicity;
 2676   1, 31  |           neither ~is there trinity in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[31] A[
 2677   1, 31  |            Further, all that exists in God exists in the unity of the
 2678   1, 31  |               divine ~essence; because God is His own essence. Therefore,
 2679   1, 31  |       Therefore, if Trinity exists in ~God, it exists in the unity
 2680   1, 31  |            divine essence; and thus in God there ~would be three essential
 2681   1, 31  |                 in all that is said of God, the concrete is predicated ~
 2682   1, 31  |             the abstract; for Deity is God and paternity is the Father.
 2683   1, 31  |            would be nine realities ~in God; which, of course, is erroneous.
 2684   1, 31  |               is not ~to be applied to God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[31] A[
 2685   1, 31  |            that, The name "Trinity" in God signifies the determinate ~
 2686   1, 31  |                plurality of persons in God requires that ~we should
 2687   1, 31  |           Arithm. i, 23). Therefore in God there is not triplicity,
 2688   1, 31  |              Trinity; as when we say, "God is trine," it follows ~that
 2689   1, 31  |            diversity and difference in God, lest we take away the unity
 2690   1, 31  |          Hilary, ~as quoted above, "in God there is nothing alien,
 2691   1, 31  |                 book: "We exclude from God the idea of singularity
 2692   1, 31  |             say "the only Son," for in God there is no plurality of ~
 2693   1, 31  |                we do not say "the only God," for the Deity is common
 2694   1, 31  |               a solitary nor a diverse God."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[31] A[
 2695   1, 31  |            form. There is one form ~in God, as appears from the text, "
 2696   1, 31  |             when He was in the form of God" ~(Phil. 2:6). Therefore
 2697   1, 31  |            does not properly apply to ~God, as appears from the authority
 2698   1, 31  |          mortal animal. So, because in God ~distinction is by the persons,
 2699   1, 31  |              to the essential term ~in God?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[31] A[
 2700   1, 31  |                to an essential term in God. For, according to the Philosopher ~(
 2701   1, 31  |              is not with another." But God is with ~the angels and
 2702   1, 31  |           Therefore we cannot say that God ~is alone.~Aquin.: SMT FP
 2703   1, 31  |               to the essential term in God can be ~predicated of every
 2704   1, 31  |               we can properly say that God is wise, we can say the
 2705   1, 31  |              say the Father is a ~wise God; and the Trinity is a wise
 2706   1, 31  |              and the Trinity is a wise God. But Augustine says (De
 2707   1, 31  |            that the Father is not true God alone." ~Therefore God cannot
 2708   1, 31  |            true God alone." ~Therefore God cannot be said to be alone. ~
 2709   1, 31  |               as it is false to ~say, "God alone is Father," since
 2710   1, 31  |                this saying were true, "God ~alone creates," it would
 2711   1, 31  |                as ~whatever is said of God can be said of the Father;
 2712   1, 31  |                to an essential term in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[31] A[
 2713   1, 31  |         immortal, invisible, ~the only God" (1 Tim. 1:17).~Aquin.:
 2714   1, 31  |              be joined to any ~term in God; for it would mean solitude
 2715   1, 31  |               and it would follow that God was solitary, against what
 2716   1, 31  |               to any essential term in God, as excluding the ~predicate
 2717   1, 31  |          predicate from all things but God; as if we said "God alone
 2718   1, 31  |                but God; as if we said "God alone is eternal," ~because
 2719   1, 31  |         eternal," ~because nothing but God is eternal.~Aquin.: SMT
 2720   1, 31  |                saints are always ~with God, nevertheless, if plurality
 2721   1, 31  |               persons did not exist in God, He ~would be alone or solitary.
 2722   1, 31  |              in the ~garden. Likewise, God would be alone or solitary,
 2723   1, 31  |                absolute ~solitude from God; much less does it remove
 2724   1, 31  |                said that the Father is God alone, or the ~Trinity is
 2725   1, 31  |              alone, or the ~Trinity is God alone, unless some implied
 2726   1, 31  |              instance, "The Trinity is God Who alone is God." In ~that
 2727   1, 31  |            Trinity is God Who alone is God." In ~that sense it can
 2728   1, 31  |                that the Father is that God Who alone is ~God, if the
 2729   1, 31  |              is that God Who alone is ~God, if the relative be referred
 2730   1, 31  |            says that the Father is not God alone, ~but that the Trinity
 2731   1, 31  |                but that the Trinity is God alone, he speaks expositively,
 2732   1, 31  |              ages, invisible, the only God," as ~applying not to the
 2733   1, 31  |                 For this proposition, "God alone is Father," can mean
 2734   1, 31  |            Likewise it is true to ~say God alone creates; nor, does
 2735   1, 31  |               know Thee, the only true God" (Jn. ~17:3). Therefore
 2736   1, 31  |               the Father alone is true God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[31] A[
 2737   1, 31  |               say, The Father alone is God, we do not exclude the Son,
 2738   1, 31  |       proposition "The Father alone is God" includes two ~assertions -
 2739   1, 31  |             namely, that the Father is God, and that no other besides ~
 2740   1, 31  |           other besides ~the Father is God. But this second proposition
 2741   1, 31  |             from the Father, and He is God. Therefore this is false,
 2742   1, 31  |            false, The ~Father alone is God; and the same of the like
 2743   1, 31  |              say, "The Father alone is God," such a ~proposition can
 2744   1, 31  |             being "the Father alone is God" - that is, "He who with
 2745   1, 31  |               other is ~the Father, is God." In this way Augustine
 2746   1, 31  |                is called the Father is God." But in the strict sense
 2747   1, 31  |               say, "Thee the only true God," we do not understand ~
 2748   1, 31  |            Holy Ghost, in the glory of God ~the Father."~
 2749   1, 32  |               came to the knowledge of God not ~otherwise than by natural
 2750   1, 32  |       acknowledge the greatness of one God, surpassing all things created."
 2751   1, 32  |            Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God," ~
 2752   1, 32  |             with God, and the Word was God," ~and so on; in which passage
 2753   1, 32  |               the infinite goodness of God, who ~communicates Himself
 2754   1, 32  |                obtain the knowledge of God by natural reason except
 2755   1, 32  |            lead us to the knowledge of God, as effects do ~to their
 2756   1, 32  |          natural reason we can know of God that ~only which of necessity
 2757   1, 32  |               principle in treating of God as above (Q[12], ~A[12]).
 2758   1, 32  |             Now, the creative power of God is common to the whole Trinity; ~
 2759   1, 32  |                we speak ~the wisdom of God in a mystery which is hidden" (
 2760   1, 32  |                We speak ~the wisdom of God which none of the princes
 2761   1, 32  |         affirmed a threefold number in God, but that he wished to say
 2762   1, 32  |                the ~Person begotten in God, but as meaning the ideal
 2763   1, 32  |         meaning the ideal type whereby God made ~all things, and which
 2764   1, 32  |                Ghost, ~in that knowing God "they did not glorify Him
 2765   1, 32  |            they did not glorify Him as God" (Rm. 1); or, ~because the
 2766   1, 32  |      production of the world. For one ~God produced one world by reason
 2767   1, 32  |           first way, we can prove that God is one; and ~the like. In
 2768   1, 32  |              the infinite goodness of ~God is manifested also in creation,
 2769   1, 32  |              of infinite power. For if God communicates Himself by
 2770   1, 32  |            effect should proceed from ~God: but that according to its
 2771   1, 32  |          adequate proof in the case of God, forasmuch as the intellect
 2772   1, 32  |               the intellect is not in ~God and ourselves univocally.
 2773   1, 32  |                The fact of saying that God made all things by His Word ~
 2774   1, 32  |            error of those who say that God produced things by ~necessity.
 2775   1, 32  |      procession of love, we ~show that God produced creatures not because
 2776   1, 32  |                said, "In the beginning God created ~heaven and earth,"
 2777   1, 32  |                and earth," subjoined, "God said, Let there be light,"
 2778   1, 32  |           divine Word; and then said, "God saw the light that it was
 2779   1, 32  |           Whether there are notions in God?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[32] A[
 2780   1, 32  |               1: It would seem that in God there are no notions. For
 2781   1, 32  |                dare to say anything of God but what is ~taught to us
 2782   1, 32  |            Therefore there are none in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[32] A[
 2783   1, 32  |            Further, all that exists in God concerns the unity of the
 2784   1, 32  |               do not exist ~notions in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[32] A[
 2785   1, 32  |              to suppose any notions in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[32] A[
 2786   1, 32  |              properties and notions in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[32] A[
 2787   1, 32  |             the persons, ~said that in God there were no properties
 2788   1, 32  |               we speak of paternity in God, we mean God the Father.~
 2789   1, 32  |              paternity in God, we mean God the Father.~Aquin.: SMT
 2790   1, 32  |        concrete and abstract ~names in God is not in any way repugnant
 2791   1, 32  |               as when we say Deity and God; or wisdom and wise; but
 2792   1, 32  |              the ~Holy Ghost to be one God and three persons, to those
 2793   1, 32  |                  Whereby ~are They one God? and whereby are They three
 2794   1, 32  |               is because one person in God is related to two ~persons -
 2795   1, 32  |             with Prepositivus that ~as God is related in one way to
 2796   1, 32  |              creatures are related to ~God as His creatures by one
 2797   1, 32  |             Body Para. 6/6~Further, in God there is no need to admit
 2798   1, 32  |              against our admitting ~in God, many logical relations.
 2799   1, 32  |              Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: In God the notions have their significance
 2800   1, 32  |                are ~known; although in God these notions or relations
 2801   1, 32  |               created ~conditions from God, can be predicated of the
 2802   1, 32  |              can say that paternity is God, ~and that paternity is
 2803   1, 32  |            other. But the relations in God are only four (Q[28], A[
 2804   1, 32  |           there is only one essence in God, He is called one ~God,
 2805   1, 32  |              in God, He is called one ~God, and because in Him there
 2806   1, 32  |                He is called the Trine ~God. Therefore, if in God there
 2807   1, 32  |           Trine ~God. Therefore, if in God there are five notions,
 2808   1, 32  |               for the three persons in God, ~there must be in some
 2809   1, 32  |              there are Five notions in God: "innascibility," "paternity," ~"
 2810   1, 32  |           persons. Therefore, although God is one by unity ~of essence,
 2811   1, 32  |            Since the real plurality in God is founded only on relative ~
 2812   1, 32  |              the trinity and ~unity of God, the Incarnation of the
 2813   1, 33  |                 3) Whether "Father" in God is said personally before
 2814   1, 33  |            taken from priority. But in God ~there is no "before" and "
 2815   1, 33  |              Therefore in ~speaking of God we ought not to used the
 2816   1, 33  |        indifferently, when speaking of God; whereas the Latin Doctors
 2817   1, 33  |                it is to use as regards God (Q[13], A[11]), because
 2818   1, 33  |              more ~properly applied to God, as stated above (Q[13],
 2819   1, 33  |               principle of the Word in God is not properly called Father.~
 2820   1, 33  |              which is said properly of God, is said of God ~first before
 2821   1, 33  |            properly of God, is said of God ~first before creatures.
 2822   1, 33  |             apply to creatures ~before God; because generation seems
 2823   1, 33  |              relation of a ~person. In God, however, it is not so,
 2824   1, 33  |               wrongly thought; for in ~God the relation signified by
 2825   1, 33  |                  this name "person" in God ~signifies a relation subsisting
 2826   1, 33  |             terms ~properly applied to God, are said of God before
 2827   1, 33  |            applied to God, are said of God before creatures as regards
 2828   1, 33  |               paternity, is applied to God before ~creatures. Hence
 2829   1, 33  |            Hence the very fact that in God a distinction exists of
 2830   1, 33  |            name "Father" is applied to God, firstly as a personal name?~
 2831   1, 33  |              Father" is not applied to God, ~firstly as a personal
 2832   1, 33  |                  Therefore "Father" in God is not taken as an essential
 2833   1, 33  |                image of the ~invisible God, the first-born of every
 2834   1, 33  |               before the temporal. But God is the ~Father of the Son
 2835   1, 33  |                 Therefore paternity in God is taken in a personal sense
 2836   1, 33  |            filiation is to be found in God the ~Father, and in God
 2837   1, 33  |                God the ~Father, and in God the Son, because one is
 2838   1, 33  |               is found in relation ~to God, not in a perfect manner,
 2839   1, 33  |            true idea of filiation. For God is ~called the Father of
 2840   1, 33  |                that we are the sons of God; and if sons, heirs also."
 2841   1, 33  |               the glory of the sons of God." Therefore it is plain ~
 2842   1, 33  |               paternity" is applied to God first, as importing regard
 2843   1, 33  |               it imports the regard of God to ~creatures.~Aquin.: SMT
 2844   1, 33  |              the person of the Father, God is understood; but not conversely.
 2845   1, 33  |              the person proceeding in ~God proceeds as the principle
 2846   1, 33  |               the image of the Son ~of God. But the Son of God possesses
 2847   1, 33  |                 of God. But the Son of God possesses a position of
 2848   1, 33  |                 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, in God, "unbegotten" does not signify
 2849   1, 33  |             there are more than one in God proceeding from another,
 2850   1, 33  |              and ~authority signify in God nothing but the principle
 2851   1, 33  |         principle taken personally ~in God. Or that there be understood
 2852   1, 33  |         begotten" implies ~relation in God, "unbegotten" belongs also
 2853   1, 33  |              Synod.): "As there is one God, so there cannot be two
 2854   1, 34  |                is an essential term in God, or a personal term?~(2)
 2855   1, 34  |              Para. 1/1~Whether Word in God is a personal name?~Aquin.:
 2856   1, 34  |                would seem that Word in God is not a personal name.
 2857   1, 34  |          personal names are applied to God in a proper sense, as Father
 2858   1, 34  |                 But Word is applied to God metaphorically, as Origen
 2859   1, 34  |                not a personal name in ~God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[34] A[
 2860   1, 34  |                 are essential terms in God. Therefore Word is not a ~
 2861   1, 34  |                not a ~personal term in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[34] A[
 2862   1, 34  |                as an essential term in God, and ~not in a personal
 2863   1, 34  |               is made. But the Word of God is ~something made. For
 2864   1, 34  |                not a personal name in ~God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[34] A[
 2865   1, 34  |              that, The name of Word in God, if taken in its proper
 2866   1, 34  |              word is taken strictly in God, as signifying the concept
 2867   1, 34  |               use the term strictly of God, ~signifies something proceeding
 2868   1, 34  |           nature ~of personal terms in God, inasmuch as the divine
 2869   1, 34  |               use the term strictly of God, is to be taken as said
 2870   1, 34  |         maintain ~that when the Son of God is called the Word, this
 2871   1, 34  |                confess that the Son of God is of the same substance
 2872   1, 34  |                said ~metaphorically of God, we must still admit Word
 2873   1, 34  |              may be ~sometimes said of God metaphorically, nevertheless
 2874   1, 34  |            intellect can be applied to God ~personally, except word
 2875   1, 34  |         explained how "to speak" is in God ~"to see by thought," forasmuch
 2876   1, 34  |         properly apply to ~the Word of God. For Augustine says (De
 2877   1, 34  |               we ~speak of the Word of God, and not of the Thought
 2878   1, 34  |              and not of the Thought of God, lest we believe ~that in
 2879   1, 34  |               lest we believe ~that in God there is something unstable,
 2880   1, 34  |              and this has ~no place in God. But when the intellect
 2881   1, 34  |             properly speaking, Word in God is said personally, and ~
 2882   1, 34  |            understood as not ~alone in God, but as being with that
 2883   1, 34  |                to one ~person alone in God does it belong to be spoken
 2884   1, 34  |              the thing ~understood. In God, however, it means complete
 2885   1, 34  |          complete identity, because in God ~the intellect and the thing
 2886   1, 34  |              the Word is "speaker" in ~God, although each Person understands
 2887   1, 34  |                said ~to do the word of God, as executing any effect,
 2888   1, 34  |              is a subsisting person in God. But word does not signify
 2889   1, 34  |            several more ~properties in God than those above mentioned.~
 2890   1, 34  |           answer that, "Word," said of God in its proper sense, is
 2891   1, 34  |                person Who proceeds in ~God, by way of emanation of
 2892   1, 34  |                properly called Word in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[34] A[
 2893   1, 34  |          belong to our nature. ~But in God "to be" and "to understand"
 2894   1, 34  |               same: hence the ~Word of God is not an accident in Him,
 2895   1, 34  |           whatever is in the nature of God subsists; and so Damascene
 2896   1, 34  |               i, 18) that "the Word of God is substantial and has a ~
 2897   1, 34  |               it ~belongs to Him to be God, since to understand is
 2898   1, 34  |               to understand is said of God essentially, ~as stated
 2899   1, 34  |               AA[2],4). Now the Son is God begotten, and not ~God begetting;
 2900   1, 34  |              is God begotten, and not ~God begetting; and hence He
 2901   1, 34  |            proceeding; forasmuch as in God the Word proceeding does
 2902   1, 34  |              in creatures, is said ~of God essentially. But Word is
 2903   1, 34  |                to creatures is said of God in ~time; as "Lord" and "
 2904   1, 34  |          Creator." But Word is said of God from eternity. ~Therefore
 2905   1, 34  |              OBJ 4: Further, ideas (in God) are many according to their
 2906   1, 34  |         creatures, ~it follows that in God there is not one Word only,
 2907   1, 34  |         because creatures are known by God. But God does not know beings
 2908   1, 34  |        creatures are known by God. But God does not know beings only; ~
 2909   1, 34  |             relation to creatures. For God by knowing ~Himself, knows
 2910   1, 34  |                understand. But because God by one act understands Himself
 2911   1, 34  |                And as the knowledge of God is only cognitive as regards
 2912   1, 34  |              only cognitive as regards God, whereas as ~regards creatures,
 2913   1, 34  |              operative, so the Word of God ~is only expressive of what
 2914   1, 34  |               expressive of what is in God the Father, but is both
 2915   1, 34  |                operative ~idea of what God makes.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
 2916   1, 34  |         properly ~belongs to Him to be God begotten, or the Creator
 2917   1, 34  |                import ~the relation of God to creatures, which relation
 2918   1, 34  |              follows on the action of ~God which passes into some exterior
 2919   1, 34  |                the like are applied to God in time. But others import
 2920   1, 34  |               such are not applied to ~God in time; and this kind of
 2921   1, 34  |                import the relation ~of God to creatures are applied
 2922   1, 34  |             following on the action of God ~passing into exterior effect.~
 2923   1, 34  |                 Creatures are known to God not by a knowledge derived
 2924   1, 34  |           applied in a plural sense to God; and it ~is not said personally.
 2925   1, 34  |                creatures, inasmuch as ~God, by understanding Himself,
 2926   1, 34  |             there ~is only one Word in God, and that is a personal
 2927   1, 34  |               5 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 5: God's knowledge of non-beings
 2928   1, 34  |            knowledge of non-beings and God's Word about ~non-beings
 2929   1, 34  |              same; because the Word of God contains no less than ~does
 2930   1, 34  |            than ~does the knowledge of God, as Augustine says (De Trin.
 2931   1, 35  |         inquiry: ~(1) Whether Image in God is said personally?~(2)
 2932   1, 35  |             Para. 1/1~Whether image in God is said personally?~Aquin.:
 2933   1, 35  |              is not said personally of God. For ~Augustine (Fulgentius,
 2934   1, 35  |            Therefore ~Image is said of God essentially, and not personally.~
 2935   1, 35  |             species or form is said of God ~essentially. Therefore
 2936   1, 35  |           cannot be a personal name in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[35] A[
 2937   1, 35  |                Therefore the Image in ~God is a relation, and is thus
 2938   1, 35  |                procession or origin in God, belongs to the ~persons.
 2939   1, 35  |              Reply OBJ 3: Imitation in God does not signify posteriority,
 2940   1, 35  |               also called the image of God, according to 1 Cor. ~11:
 2941   1, 35  |                image and the ~glory of God." Therefore Image is not
 2942   1, 35  |                 Image of the invisible God, the firstborn of creatures" (
 2943   1, 35  |              equality or inequality in God, ~as Augustine says (De
 2944   1, 35  |                 is called the image of God; and therefore in order
 2945   1, 35  |                be said that the Son of God is "to ~the image," because
 2946   1, 36  |              also the Love and Gift of God. ~Concerning the name "Holy
 2947   1, 36  |          Trubled ~gost is sacrifice of God" (Prose Psalter, A.D. 1325),
 2948   1, 36  |              the ghost." As applied to God, and not specially to the
 2949   1, 36  |              shows that the "Spirit of God" ~sometimes means the Father,
 2950   1, 36  |               says: "In ~the Spirit of God I cast out devils" (Mt.
 2951   1, 36  |           there are two processions in God, one of these, the ~procession
 2952   1, 36  |              to whatever is ordered to God. Therefore ~because the
 2953   1, 36  |                way of the love whereby God is ~loved, that person is
 2954   1, 36  |             all who believe in the one God the Father, and in ~His
 2955   1, 36  |               32), and much less so in God. But it is ~possible for
 2956   1, 36  |          everything that is ~spoken of God in an absolute sense, belongs
 2957   1, 36  |                 Now there cannot be in God any relations opposed to
 2958   1, 36  |              We ought not to say about God anything which is not found ~
 2959   1, 36  |               Reply OBJ 5: The Word in God is not taken after the similitude
 2960   1, 36  |            Father and the Son ~are one God, by reason of the unity
 2961   1, 36  |               signified by this ~word "God"; so they are one principle
 2962   1, 36  |         similitude or dissimilitude in God, but by reason of the essence.
 2963   1, 37  |          answer that, The name Love in God can be taken essentially
 2964   1, 37  |           there are two processions in God, one by way of the intellect,
 2965   1, 37  |           speak," and "word." Hence in God, "to understand" is applied
 2966   1, 37  |              by word, or loved. But in God, in whom ~there is nothing
 2967   1, 37  |                 must say that since in God "to love" is taken in two
 2968   1, 37  |              taken only essentially in God; ~therefore we cannot say
 2969   1, 38  |               imports a distinction in God. But the name of "Gift"
 2970   1, 38  |                import a distinction in God; for Augustine says (De
 2971   1, 38  |              Holy Ghost is so given as God's Gift, that He also gives ~
 2972   1, 38  |              He also gives ~Himself as God." Therefore "Gift" is not
 2973   1, 38  |              thus ~seems to be said of God in time. But personal names
 2974   1, 38  |             personal names are said of God from ~eternity; as "Father,"
 2975   1, 38  |            rational creature united to God. Other ~creatures can be
 2976   1, 38  |      proceeding, so as freely to ~know God truly and to love God rightly.
 2977   1, 38  |             know God truly and to love God rightly. Hence the rational
 2978   1, 38  |             the giver; and the gift of God so taken is a ~created thing.
 2979   1, 38  |             Gift as a personal name in God does not imply subjection, ~
 2980   1, 38  |              the gift of any man, but "God's Gift" only. ~Therefore
 2981   1, 38  |             Ghost, 'to be the ~Gift of God' is to proceed from Father
 2982   1, 38  |              Gift, taken personally in God, is the proper name of the ~
 2983   1, 38  |               according to the words, "God so loved the ~world, as
 2984   1, 38  |               of ~man, but the Gift of God giving. When, however, it
 2985   1, 39  |                 Whether the essence in God is the same as the person?~(
 2986   1, 39  |             Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether in God the essence is the same
 2987   1, 39  |               1: It would seem that in God the essence is not the same
 2988   1, 39  |           apart from the other. But in God there is ~one essence and
 2989   1, 39  |            simplicity requires that in God essence is the same as ~"
 2990   1, 39  |              some have thought that in God essence and person ~differ,
 2991   1, 39  |             are accidental, whereas in God they are the divine ~essence
 2992   1, 39  |              Thence it follows that in God essence is not really ~distinct
 2993   1, 39  |             are not subsistent. But in God relations are ~subsistent,
 2994   1, 39  |               As essence and person in God differ in our way of thinking, ~
 2995   1, 39  |                  But the substance of ~God is His essence. Therefore
 2996   1, 39  |           nothing is to be affirmed of God except what can be ~confirmed
 2997   1, 39  |            essence and the persons ~in God. But prepositions which
 2998   1, 39  |              nothing should be said of God which can be occasion of ~
 2999   1, 39  |                of the form; so also in God the essence is taken as
 3000   1, 39  |                 In like manner, as ~in God the persons are multiplied,