Part, Question
1 1, 9 | also are ~incorporeal and immaterial substances." Still, there
2 1, 10 | according as it is shared by ~immaterial substances. Hence, also,
3 1, 13 | things below itself in an immaterial manner; not that it ~understands
4 1, 13 | understands them to be immaterial things; but its manner of
5 1, 13 | manner of understanding ~is immaterial. Likewise, when it understands
6 1, 14 | according as they are the more immaterial, approach more nearly to ~
7 1, 14 | divine ~intellect is more immaterial than the human intellect.
8 1, 14 | know the universal and ~immaterial, and by another we know
9 1, 14 | the essence of ~God, is immaterial not by abstraction, but
10 1, 14 | its power extends to both immaterial and ~material things.~Aquin.:
11 1, 14 | the soul understands is immaterial," this ~is to be understood
12 1, 14 | be understood that it is immaterial as it is in the intellect,
13 1, 18 | the mind of the architect immaterial and ~intelligible being;
14 1, 29 | is matter; while God is immaterial: nor is He the ~subject
15 1, 30 | multitude is found only in immaterial things.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
16 1, 36 | sense of "spirit," as an immaterial ~substance. Thus, we read
17 1, 36 | we apply this term to all immaterial and ~invisible substances.
18 1, 36 | is inept to signify the immaterial procession of the ~divine
19 1, 39 | form, as appears ~in all immaterial things. So, when we say, "
20 1, 45 | make its own likeness. But immaterial creatures are more ~perfect
21 1, 45 | begets man. Therefore an ~immaterial substance can make a substance
22 1, 45 | substance like to itself. But immaterial ~substance can be made only
23 1, 45 | own likeness. But in an ~immaterial substance it is not possible
24 1, 45 | subsisting form. Therefore an immaterial substance ~cannot produce
25 1, 45 | cannot produce another immaterial substance like to itself
26 1, 50 | said to be incorporeal and immaterial as regards us; but ~compared
27 1, 50 | are ~understood to be as immaterial as they are incorporeal."~
28 1, 50 | understand is an altogether immaterial ~operation, as appears from
29 1, 50 | substance is altogether immaterial.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[50] A[
30 1, 50 | difference." ~Whereas in immaterial things there is no separate
31 1, 50 | that of matter, but of an ~immaterial substance.~Aquin.: SMT FP
32 1, 50 | which ~receives it. But immaterial created substances are finite
33 1, 50 | intellectual substances are immaterial, as was ~shown above (A[
34 1, 50 | so far as they are styled immaterial substances, are multiplied
35 1, 50 | even inasmuch as they are ~immaterial substances, exist in exceeding
36 1, 50 | reasonable to conclude that the immaterial substances as it were ~incomparably
37 1, 50 | substances. For thus the immaterial substances would exist to ~
38 1, 50 | it is not true that the immaterial substances exist on ~account
39 1, 50 | devising the various orders of immaterial substances.~Aquin.: SMT
40 1, 54 | exist outside the soul, as immaterial and actually ~intelligible,
41 1, 54 | principally ~understand immaterial things, as will appear later (
42 1, 55 | precisely because ~it is immaterial.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[55] A[
43 1, 56 | THE ANGEL'S KNOWLEDGE OF IMMATERIAL THINGS (THREE ARTICLES)~
44 1, 56 | their knowledge, first, of ~immaterial things, secondly of things
45 1, 56 | itself. And since an angel is immaterial, he is a subsisting ~form;
46 1, 56 | mind for ~understanding immaterial things. Therefore, since
47 1, 56 | understood, since each is immaterial. Therefore in no way does
48 1, 56 | according to material and immaterial nature, but according to ~
49 1, 57 | 50], A[2]), an angel is ~immaterial, while matter is the principle
50 1, 57 | apprehending universals ~and immaterial things by his intellect,
51 1, 61 | unity." But the angels ~are immaterial forms, as was shown above (
52 1, 65 | held that there exists an ~immaterial man, and an immaterial horse,
53 1, 65 | immaterial man, and an immaterial horse, and so forth, and
54 1, 65 | of corporeal forms in any immaterial form, but in something that
55 1, 65 | as emanations from some immaterial form, but ~by matter being
56 1, 65 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: By immaterial forms Boethius understands
57 1, 65 | might be made." But if by immaterial ~forms he understands the
58 1, 67 | also gives to colors their immaterial being, by making them actually ~
59 1, 76 | capable of the knowledge of immaterial and ~universal objects,
60 1, 76 | intellect may understand immaterial things ~and universals,
61 1, 76 | intellect in all ~men. For an immaterial substance is not multiplied
62 1, 76 | But the human soul is an immaterial substance; since it is not ~
63 1, 76 | intellectual soul is a perfectly immaterial form; a ~proof whereof is
64 1, 39 | form, as appears ~in all immaterial things. So, when we say, "
65 1, 46 | make its own likeness. But immaterial creatures are more ~perfect
66 1, 46 | begets man. Therefore an ~immaterial substance can make a substance
67 1, 46 | substance like to itself. But immaterial ~substance can be made only
68 1, 46 | own likeness. But in an ~immaterial substance it is not possible
69 1, 46 | subsisting form. Therefore an immaterial substance ~cannot produce
70 1, 46 | cannot produce another immaterial substance like to itself
71 1, 51 | said to be incorporeal and immaterial as regards us; but ~compared
72 1, 51 | are ~understood to be as immaterial as they are incorporeal."~
73 1, 51 | understand is an altogether immaterial ~operation, as appears from
74 1, 51 | substance is altogether immaterial.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[50] A[
75 1, 51 | difference." ~Whereas in immaterial things there is no separate
76 1, 51 | that of matter, but of an ~immaterial substance.~Aquin.: SMT FP
77 1, 51 | which ~receives it. But immaterial created substances are finite
78 1, 51 | intellectual substances are immaterial, as was ~shown above (A[
79 1, 51 | so far as they are styled immaterial substances, are ~multiplied
80 1, 51 | even inasmuch as they are ~immaterial substances, exist in exceeding
81 1, 51 | reasonable to conclude that the immaterial substances as it were ~incomparably
82 1, 51 | substances. For thus the immaterial substances would exist to ~
83 1, 51 | it is not true that the immaterial substances exist on ~account
84 1, 51 | devising the various orders of immaterial substances.~Aquin.: SMT
85 1, 55 | exist outside the soul, as immaterial and actually ~intelligible,
86 1, 55 | principally ~understand immaterial things, as will appear later (
87 1, 56 | precisely because ~it is immaterial.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[55] A[
88 1, 57 | THE ANGEL'S KNOWLEDGE OF IMMATERIAL THINGS (THREE ARTICLES)~
89 1, 57 | their knowledge, first, of ~immaterial things, secondly of things
90 1, 57 | itself. And since an angel is immaterial, he is a subsisting ~form;
91 1, 57 | mind for ~understanding immaterial things. Therefore, since
92 1, 57 | understood, since each is immaterial. Therefore in no way does
93 1, 57 | according to material and immaterial nature, but according to ~
94 1, 58 | 50], A[2]), an angel is ~immaterial, while matter is the principle
95 1, 58 | apprehending universals ~and immaterial things by his intellect,
96 1, 62 | unity." But the angels ~are immaterial forms, as was shown above (
97 1, 66 | held that there exists an ~immaterial man, and an immaterial horse,
98 1, 66 | immaterial man, and an immaterial horse, and so forth, and
99 1, 66 | of corporeal forms in any immaterial form, but in something that
100 1, 66 | as emanations from some immaterial form, but ~by matter being
101 1, 66 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: By immaterial forms Boethius understands
102 1, 66 | might be made." But if by immaterial ~forms he understands the
103 1, 68 | also gives to colors their immaterial being, by making them actually ~
104 1, 75 | capable of the knowledge of immaterial and ~universal objects,
105 1, 75 | intellect may understand immaterial things ~and universals,
106 1, 75 | intellect in all ~men. For an immaterial substance is not multiplied
107 1, 75 | But the human soul is an immaterial substance; since it is not ~
108 1, 75 | intellectual soul is a perfectly immaterial form; a ~proof whereof is
109 1, 78 | by the fact that it is ~immaterial. But the soul is immaterial
110 1, 78 | immaterial. But the soul is immaterial through its essence. Therefore
111 1, 78 | passive intellect is an ~immaterial power. Therefore its immaterial
112 1, 78 | immaterial power. Therefore its immaterial nature suffices for forms
113 1, 78 | the very fact that it is immaterial. Therefore there is no need
114 1, 78 | the very ~fact that it is immaterial. And he called such forms "
115 1, 78 | to understand them, the immaterial nature of the passive intellect
116 1, 78 | soul is indeed actually immaterial, but it ~is in potentiality
117 1, 78 | certain species, but are immaterial in potentiality. ~Wherefore
118 1, 78 | inasmuch as it is ~actually immaterial, having one power by which
119 1, 78 | it makes things actually ~immaterial, by abstraction from the
120 1, 78 | the essence of the soul is immaterial, created by the ~supreme
121 1, 78 | intellect inasmuch as it is immaterial.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[79] A[
122 1, 78 | something individual, is yet an immaterial ~act, as we have said above
123 1, 79 | appetite we may desire the immaterial good, which is not ~apprehended
124 1, 83 | 3) How it understands immaterial ~substances, which are above
125 1, 83 | soul from certain separate ~immaterial forms?~(5) Whether our soul
126 1, 83 | bodies, but to those beings ~immaterial and separate: so that according
127 1, 83 | since ~those species are immaterial and immovable, knowledge
128 1, 83 | by ~a knowledge which is immaterial, universal, and necessary.~
129 1, 83 | corporeal species; but through immaterial and ~intelligible species,
130 1, 83 | intellectual soul has an immaterial nature, and an immaterial
131 1, 83 | immaterial nature, and an immaterial mode of ~knowledge, held
132 1, 83 | more perfect is ~the more immaterial.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[84] A[
133 1, 83 | senses: and that it is an immaterial power not making use of
134 1, 84 | them ~save in something immaterial, namely, either in themselves
135 1, 84 | acquire some knowledge of immaterial things, just as, ~on the
136 1, 84 | material things through the immaterial.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[85] A[
137 1, 84 | matter, as is plain regarding immaterial things. ~Because Plato failed
138 1, 85 | Therefore if there be an immaterial singular such as the ~intellect,
139 1, 86 | Phys. i, 7. Consequently ~immaterial substances are intelligible
140 1, 86 | understood in that it is immaterial. But a ~distinction must
141 1, 86 | essences of some things are ~immaterial - as the separate substances
142 1, 86 | essences ~are not wholly immaterial, but only the abstract likenesses
143 1, 87 | what is above itself, viz. ~immaterial substances. Under this head
144 1, 87 | life can understand ~the immaterial substances called angels,
145 1, 87 | of life can understand ~immaterial substances in themselves?~
146 1, 87 | of life ~can understand immaterial substances in themselves.
147 1, 87 | things." But these are the immaterial ~substances. Therefore the
148 1, 87 | the human mind understands immaterial substances.~Aquin.: SMT
149 1, 87 | human mind is more akin ~to immaterial than to material things;
150 1, 87 | since its own nature is ~immaterial, as is clear from what we
151 1, 87 | is it able to ~understand immaterial things.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
152 1, 87 | themselves whose nature is ~immaterial. Therefore they are much
153 1, 87 | purposeless. ~Therefore immaterial substances can be understood
154 1, 87 | even the superior ~and immaterial.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[88] A[
155 1, 87 | heaven," etc. Therefore ~immaterial substances cannot be known
156 1, 87 | In the opinion of Plato, immaterial substances are not ~only
157 1, 87 | For Plato taught that immaterial subsisting forms, which
158 1, 87 | the ~intelligible truth of immaterial things.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
159 1, 87 | it clearly appears ~that immaterial substances which do not
160 1, 87 | all things material ~and immaterial. In this he makes the ultimate
161 1, 87 | enable us to understand immaterial substances; just as ~when
162 1, 87 | cannot understand separate immaterial substances ~in themselves,
163 1, 87 | material things rather than immaterial ~substances.~Aquin.: SMT
164 1, 87 | power. And thus it is that immaterial substances are ~improportionate
165 1, 87 | follow, therefore, that immaterial substances are ~purposeless,
166 1, 87 | understand material and immaterial substances in the same way.
167 1, 87 | no phantasms of what is immaterial.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[88] A[
168 1, 87 | intellect can understand immaterial substances through its ~
169 1, 87 | that our intellect can know immaterial substances ~through the
170 1, 87 | mind cannot be raised up to immaterial contemplation ~of the heavenly
171 1, 87 | material things to know immaterial substances.~Aquin.: SMT
172 1, 87 | sciences ~and definitions of immaterial substances; for Damascene
173 1, 87 | and ~philosophy. Therefore immaterial substances can be understood
174 1, 87 | belongs to the genus of immaterial ~substances. But it can
175 1, 87 | Therefore other created immaterial substances can be ~understood
176 1, 87 | principles, to the knowledge of immaterial substances. For ~since the
177 1, 87 | arrive at length at some ~immaterial quiddity, absolutely without
178 1, 87 | be the ~understanding of immaterial substance.~Aquin.: SMT FP
179 1, 87 | opinion would be true, were immaterial substances the forms and ~
180 1, 87 | supposing, on the contrary, that immaterial substances differ altogether ~
181 1, 87 | arrive at anything akin to immaterial substance. Therefore we
182 1, 87 | perfectly to understand immaterial substances through material ~
183 1, 87 | some kind of knowledge ~of immaterial things, but not to the perfect
184 1, 87 | proportion between material and immaterial ~things, and the likenesses
185 1, 87 | for the ~understanding of immaterial things are very dissimilar
186 1, 87 | follows that much ~less can immaterial substances be known by us
187 1, 87 | the power and nature of immaterial substances cannot be ~perfectly
188 1, 87 | 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Created immaterial substances are not in the
189 1, 87 | logical genus, because even ~immaterial substances are in the predicament
190 1, 87 | cannot understand even immaterial created substances (A[1]),
191 1, 88 | separated ~soul understands immaterial substances, which are in
192 1, 90 | matter are derived ~from some immaterial forms; but the Philosopher
193 1, 90 | though He ~is absolutely immaterial, can alone by His own power
194 1, 96 | possessing an intellectual immaterial power.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
195 1, 103 | annihilated. For, ~either they are immaterial, and therefore have no potentiality
196 1, 104 | ways. For He is the First ~immaterial Being; and as intellectuality
197 1, 109 | here and now"; whereas immaterial forms are ~absolute and
198 1, 109 | different opinions about immaterial ~substances. For Plato laid
199 1, 109 | For Plato laid down that immaterial substances were types and ~
200 1, 109 | others; and so he held that immaterial substances preside immediately ~
201 1, 109 | But ~Aristotle held that immaterial substances are not the species
202 1, 109 | things are derived from immaterial substances. But he differed ~
203 1, 109 | because he supposed only one immaterial substance to preside ~over
204 1, 109 | in matter are caused by immaterial ~forms, because they said
205 1, 109 | forms are participations of ~immaterial forms. Avicenna followed
206 1, 114 | that the spiritual ~and immaterial form alone, which is not
207 1, 114 | substantial form is due to an immaterial principle. And this is the ~
208 1, 117 | to the production of an immaterial effect. Now it is ~manifest
209 1, 117 | Moreover, since it is an immaterial ~substance it cannot be
210 2, 2 | down to the body: just as immaterial things are in a way infinite
211 2, 9 | absolutely incorporeal and immaterial. But it is evident ~that
212 2, 9 | because things incorporeal and immaterial have a power more formal
213 2, 9 | body, but of some superior immaterial substance. ~Therefore there
214 2, 10 | therefore, the will is an immaterial power like the intellect,
215 2, 10 | just as the will is an immaterial power, so is the ~intellect:
216 2, 17 | 1~Reply OBJ 1: The more immaterial an act is, the more noble
217 2, 35 | as this ~likeness is more immaterial and abstract. Consequently
218 2, 50 | considered that ~angels are immaterial substances, and that there
219 2, 50 | are they like simple and immaterial images which ~it contains
220 2, 50 | angels, since they are immaterial.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[50] A[
221 2, 52 | said that qualities and immaterial forms are not susceptible
222 2, 77 | OBJ 3: Further, nothing immaterial can be moved by that which
223 2, 77 | material. Now the will is an immaterial power, because it does not
224 2, 85 | forms are; indeed it has an immaterial operation of its own, as
225 2, 47 | cognizance of universal and immaterial ~objects (De Anima iii,
226 3, 11 | wisdom, the knowledge ~of all immaterial things to understanding,
227 3, 11 | OBJ 3: Further, the more immaterial knowledge is, the greater
228 3, 11 | knowledge of the angels is more immaterial than the knowledge of ~Christ'
229 3, 77 | any ~one; and in this way immaterial separated forms, subsisting
230 Suppl, 89| happiness is to understand immaterial substances according to
231 Suppl, 89| therefrom, since they are immaterial, but impressed thereby on
232 Suppl, 89| to the knowledge of the immaterial, as the ~intellect is proportionate
233 Suppl, 89| to the knowledge of any immaterial object ~whatsoever. It is
|