1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-2000 | 2001-2500 | 2501-3000 | 3001-3500 | 3501-4000 | 4001-4500 | 4501-5000 | 5001-5500 | 5501-6000 | 6001-6500 | 6501-7000 | 7001-7500 | 7501-8000 | 8001-8500 | 8501-9000 | 9001-9500 | 9501-10000 | 10001-10500 | 10501-11000 | 11001-11500 | 11501-12000 | 12001-12500 | 12501-13000 | 13001-13500 | 13501-14000 | 14001-14347
Part, Question
10501 3, 3 | God is said of the Son of ~Man, and conversely. Hence,
10502 3, 3 | Persons would be said of the man; and conversely, what was
10503 3, 3 | conversely, what was said of the ~man could be said of each of
10504 3, 3 | Son, would be said of the man, and ~consequently would
10505 3, 3 | assume ~one and the same man to unity of Person."~Aquin.:
10506 3, 3 | the three Persons were one man, ~because of the one human
10507 3, 3 | true to say they are one man on account of the one human
10508 3, 3 | the three Persons were one man they were ~one simply. For
10509 3, 3 | of God and the spirit of man are by nature different, ~
10510 3, 3 | was unbegotten, so the man was unbegotten, inasmuch
10511 3, 3 | unbegotten, inasmuch as "man" stood for ~the Person of
10512 3, 3 | were to go on to say, "The man is ~unbegotten; the Son
10513 3, 3 | unbegotten; the Son is man; therefore the Son is unbegotten,"
10514 3, 3 | Person incarnate was one man, seeing that He would not
10515 3, 3 | perfect God and perfect man, complete God and complete ~
10516 3, 3 | complete God and complete ~man," as Damascene says (De
10517 3, 3 | Persons would be called one man, on ~account of the one
10518 3, 3 | several supposita. For a man who has on two garments
10519 3, 3 | unity of ~suppositum, one man having two human natures.
10520 3, 3 | would be said to be one ~man, as stated (A[6], ad 1),
10521 3, 3 | eternal Wisdom, from Whom all man's wisdom is ~derived. And
10522 3, 3 | wisdom is ~derived. And hence man is perfected in wisdom (
10523 3, 3 | consummate perfection of man it was fitting that the ~
10524 3, 3 | the remedy. For the ~first man sinned by seeking knowledge,
10525 3, 3 | the ~serpent, promising to man the knowledge of good and
10526 3, 3 | the Word of true knowledge man might be led back to God, ~
10527 3, 3 | hence it was more fitting to man's justification ~that the
10528 3, 4 | 3) Whether He assumed a man?~(4) Whether it was becoming
10529 3, 4 | assume human nature in any ~man begotten of the stock of
10530 3, 4 | found in angels, even as in man, according to ~Job 4:18: "
10531 3, 4 | assumption as the nature of man.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[4] A[1]
10532 3, 4 | God absorbed the person of man." Therefore it would seem
10533 3, 4 | seem that ~the person of man existed previous to its
10534 3, 4 | nature, not the person, of man."~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[4] A[
10535 3, 4 | Divine Person assumed a man?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[4] A[3]
10536 3, 4 | Divine Person assumed a man. For it is ~written (Ps.
10537 3, 4 | The Son of God assumed a man, and in him bore things
10538 3, 4 | OBJ 2: Further, the word "man" signifies a human nature.
10539 3, 4 | Therefore He assumed a man.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[4] A[3]
10540 3, 4 | Further, the Son of God is a man. But He is not one of the
10541 3, 4 | would be Peter or any other man. ~Therefore He is the man
10542 3, 4 | man. ~Therefore He is the man whom He assumed.~Aquin.:
10543 3, 4 | Word of God, ~and not a man assumed by God, in such
10544 3, 4 | of God did not assume a man, so that there be another ~
10545 3, 4 | assumption. Now this word "man" signifies human nature,
10546 3, 4 | said that the Son assumed a man, granted (as it must be,
10547 3, 4 | the Son of God assumed a man. ~Hence the first opinion
10548 3, 4 | iii, D. 6, grants that a man was ~assumed. But this opinion
10549 3, 4 | doctors; so as to ~say that a man was assumed, inasmuch as
10550 3, 4 | that the Son of God is man.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[4] A[3]
10551 3, 4 | 1~Reply OBJ 2: The word "man" signifies human nature
10552 3, 4 | assumed, so we cannot say a man was assumed.~Aquin.: SMT
10553 3, 4 | The Son of God is not the man whom He assumed, but the
10554 3, 4 | whom He assumed, but the man ~whose nature He assumed.~
10555 3, 4 | assumed self-existing [per se] man, which, according to ~Platonists,
10556 3, 4 | is signified by the word "man," as was said above (A[3]).
10557 3, 4 | answer that, The nature of man or of any other sensible
10558 3, 4 | bones in ~the definition of man. Hence human nature cannot
10559 3, 4 | operations, according to which man neither merits nor demerits, ~
10560 3, 4 | Self-existing [per se] man is not to be found in nature
10561 3, 4 | believed that the separate man was only in the ~Divine
10562 3, 4 | most ~fitting that by one man all the rest should be saved.~
10563 3, 4 | Secondly, it ~pertains to man's greater dignity that the
10564 3, 5 | that the real salvation of man has not taken place; ~since
10565 3, 5 | Cor. 15:41): "The first man was of ~the earth, earthy;
10566 3, 5 | earth, earthy; the second man from heaven, heavenly."
10567 3, 5 | heavenly." But the first ~man, i.e. Adam, was of the earth
10568 3, 5 | 1. Therefore the second man, i.e. Christ, was of heaven
10569 3, 5 | For since the ~form of man is a natural thing, it requires
10570 3, 5 | placed in the definition of man, as is ~plain from the Philosopher (
10571 3, 5 | according to Jn. 3:13: "No man hath ~ascended into heaven,
10572 3, 5 | from heaven, the Son of Man, ~Who is in heaven."~Aquin.:
10573 3, 5 | I call Christ a heavenly man because He was not ~conceived
10574 3, 5 | flesh' to mean that the man had no soul ~nor any other
10575 3, 5 | nor any other part of a man, save flesh."~Aquin.: SMT
10576 3, 5 | the Incarnation, which is ~man's liberation. For Augustine [*
10577 3, 5 | and the other parts of man receive their species through
10578 3, 5 | is taken ~for the whole man, as if we were to say, "
10579 3, 5 | say, "The Word was made man," as Is. ~40:5: "All flesh
10580 3, 5 | spoken." And the whole man is signified by flesh, because,
10581 3, 5 | image is not required. But ~man is made to God's image,
10582 3, 5 | which enlighteneth every man that cometh into this ~world,"
10583 3, 5 | 20:27): "The spirit of a man is the ~lamp of the Lord."
10584 3, 5 | is the ~justification of man from sin. For the human
10585 3, 5 | seal, and as the image of man is reflected in the mirror
10586 3, 5 | the intellect or mind of ~man is, as it were, a light
10587 3, 5 | of the Word the mind of man is perfected rather ~than
10588 3, 6 | so as to raise the whole man to something ~higher."~Aquin.:
10589 3, 6 | angels are midway between man and God; secondly, as regards
10590 3, 6 | conceived from the seed of man, and Christ is not. But
10591 3, 6 | and in this way the whole man." But the spirit, soul,
10592 3, 6 | are ~parts of the whole man. Therefore He assumed all,
10593 3, 6 | spiritual holiness of the man is an effect following the
10594 3, 6 | understand that because this Man (as a result of the union)
10595 3, 7 | CHRIST AS AN INDIVIDUAL MAN (THIRTEEN ARTICLES)~We must
10596 3, 7 | as ~He is an individual man; (2) His grace as He is
10597 3, 7 | Further, grace is necessary to man, that he may operate well, ~
10598 3, 7 | indeed, is said to be in man by habitual ~grace, as was
10599 3, 7 | human race. For Christ, as man, is the ~"Mediator of God
10600 3, 7 | to Mt. ~8:20: "The Son of man hath not where to lay His
10601 3, 7 | OBJ 1: Grace suffices a man for all whereby he is ordained
10602 3, 7 | which is the more perfect in man, as he is without evil ~
10603 3, 7 | vii, 9), the ~temperate man differs from the continent
10604 3, 7 | consists in this - that man through ~obedience assents
10605 3, 7 | of hope is that whereby a man hopes in God. Therefore
10606 3, 7 | written (Rm. 8:24): "What a man seeth, why doth ~he hope
10607 3, 7 | object, the fruition of Whom ~man chiefly expects by the virtue
10608 3, 7 | shall take hold ~of one man": on which a gloss says: "
10609 3, 7 | something of a higher nature; as man, however perfect, needs
10610 3, 7 | God and receives ~them as man. Hence Gregory says (Moral.
10611 3, 7 | reverence." For ~Christ as man had this act of reverence
10612 3, 7 | him. But it was due to the man Christ that He should abound ~
10613 3, 7 | seem that a habit which a man does not use is ~for the
10614 3, 7 | Giezi (4 Kgs. 5:26) how ~the man had leaped down from his
10615 3, 7 | instance, I may say that some man has whiteness ~fully, because
10616 3, 7 | works of life; and thus man ~has life fully, but senseless
10617 3, 7 | regards power," by reason of a man having the help of ~grace
10618 3, 7 | in comparison with what man is divinely ~pre-ordained
10619 3, 7 | finite the grace of any other man could increase to such an
10620 3, 7 | quantity. But the grace of any ~man is compared to the grace
10621 3, 7 | strength, so the grace of a man, no matter how much ~it
10622 3, 7 | subject, since Christ as man was a ~true and full comprehensor
10623 3, 7 | works, to prove Himself true man, both in the things ~of
10624 3, 7 | God, and in the things of man.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[7] A[13]
10625 3, 7 | Praedest. Sanct. ~xv): "Every man becomes a Christian from
10626 3, 7 | same grace whereby this Man from His beginning became
10627 3, 7 | For grace is caused in man ~by the presence of the
10628 3, 7 | gratis; and hence every man is said to be made a ~Christian
10629 3, 7 | the same grace whereby a Man became Christ, since both
10630 3, 7 | a manner natural ~to the Man Christ."~Aquin.: SMT TP
10631 3, 8 | habitual grace as an individual man?~(6) Whether to be Head
10632 3, 8 | not belong to Christ as man to be Head ~of the Church.
10633 3, 8 | not imparted to us by ~the Man Christ, because, as Augustine
10634 3, 8 | not ~even Christ, as man, but only as God, bestows
10635 3, 8 | does not belong to Him as man to be Head of the Church.~
10636 3, 8 | is the Head of Christ, as man, according to 1 Cor. 11:
10637 3, 8 | Furthermore, the head of a man is a particular member,
10638 3, 8 | to the natural body of a man, which in divers members
10639 3, 8 | head is the first part of man, beginning from ~the higher
10640 3, 8 | it belongs also to Him as man, ~inasmuch as His manhood
10641 3, 8 | Augustine denies ~that Christ as man gives the Holy Ghost authoritatively.
10642 3, 8 | visible ~nature in which man is set over man.~Aquin.:
10643 3, 8 | in which man is set over man.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[8] A[2]
10644 3, 8 | belong specifically to man; but inasmuch as the soul
10645 3, 8 | between the natural body of man ~and the Church's mystical
10646 3, 8 | not simply, viz. so that man partake of the life of grace.
10647 3, 8 | lifeless limb were moved by a man to some extent.~Aquin.:
10648 3, 8 | would seem that Christ as man is not the head of the angels. ~
10649 3, 8 | one nature. But Christ as man is not of ~the same nature
10650 3, 8 | hold." Therefore Christ as man is not the head ~of the
10651 3, 8 | 7). Therefore Christ as man is not head of ~the angels.~
10652 3, 8 | made flesh is Christ as man. Therefore Christ as man
10653 3, 8 | man. Therefore Christ as man does not give life ~to angels,
10654 3, 8 | to angels, and hence as man He is not the head of the
10655 3, 8 | more fully, not only than man, but even than angels; and
10656 3, 8 | grace, inasmuch as He is Man?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[8] A[5]
10657 3, 8 | individual grace of the Man are not the same. For the
10658 3, 8 | gift, by the grace of one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded ~
10659 3, 8 | individual grace of the Man. Now the individual grace
10660 3, 8 | corruption the sin of ~the first man is transmitted to posterity,
10661 3, 8 | with equal reason any other man than Christ might be head
10662 3, 8 | are rooted in the ~head, man is guided in his exterior
10663 3, 8 | 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Man does not distribute grace
10664 3, 8 | Further, by every sin a man is made evil. But not every
10665 3, 8 | likewise not every sin of man ~proceeds from the devil,
10666 3, 8 | has endeavored to lead man from obeying the Divine
10667 3, 9 | upon Himself the sense ~of man, but not the swollen sense
10668 3, 9 | pertains to the sense of man. Therefore in Christ there
10669 3, 9 | which enlighteneth every man that cometh into ~this world,"
10670 3, 9 | one hypostasis of God and ~man, the things of God are attributed
10671 3, 9 | of God are attributed to man, and the things of man are ~
10672 3, 9 | to man, and the things of man are ~attributed to God,
10673 3, 9 | Thou hast sent." But this Man ~was blessed through being
10674 3, 9 | 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, to man belongs a double knowledge -
10675 3, 9 | of God, is not natural to man, but above his nature. But
10676 3, 9 | God fully, even as He was man, according to Jn. 8:55: ~"
10677 3, 9 | must itself be hot. Now man is in ~potentiality to the
10678 3, 9 | OBJ 2: By the union this Man is blessed with the uncreated ~
10679 3, 9 | the passive ~intellect of man is in potentiality to all
10680 3, 9 | wondered, saying: How doth this Man know letters, having never
10681 3, 10 | only to Itself and to the Man assumed." ~Therefore the
10682 3, 10 | assumed." ~Therefore the Man assumed communicates with
10683 3, 10 | by ~grace to the Son of Man, as Augustine says (De Trin.
10684 3, 10 | belongs by grace to the Son of Man; and thus it seems that ~
10685 3, 10 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The Man assumed is reckoned with
10686 3, 10 | also said of the Son of Man on account of the identity ~
10687 3, 10 | be said that the Son of Man is a ~comprehensor of the
10688 3, 10 | also say that the Son of Man is the Creator.~Aquin.:
10689 3, 10 | But of that day or hour no man ~knoweth, neither the angels
10690 3, 10 | because He is the Son of Man," as is said Jn. 5:27; and
10691 3, 10 | For He knew what was in man," can be understood not ~
10692 3, 10 | it is given to Christ as man to know how to judge - which
10693 3, 11 | can be known by force of a man's active intellect, e.g. ~
10694 3, 11 | all things made known to man by Divine revelation, whether
10695 3, 11 | phantasms are compared to man's intellective soul as ~
10696 3, 11 | Further, senses are given to man to help his intellect. Hence,
10697 3, 11 | the body. But the soul of man on earth needs to ~turn
10698 3, 11 | senses are not afforded to man solely for intellectual
10699 3, 11 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, man needs comparison and discursion
10700 3, 12 | He learned anything from man?~(4) Whether He received
10701 3, 12 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, man acquires knowledge through
10702 3, 12 | of the active intellect man can go on to ~understand
10703 3, 12 | knowable by the light of man's active ~intellect. Hence
10704 3, 12 | is ~a natural action of man's active intellect, it seems
10705 3, 12 | Christ learned anything from man?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[12] A[
10706 3, 12 | Christ learned something from man. For it is ~written (Lk.
10707 3, 12 | learned ~something from man.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[12] A[
10708 3, 12 | acquire knowledge from a man's teaching seems more ~noble
10709 3, 12 | since in the soul of the ~man who teaches the intelligible
10710 3, 12 | knowledge by the teaching of any man.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[12] A[
10711 3, 12 | should be taught by any man.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[12] A[
10712 3, 12 | OBJ 2: Whoever learns from man does not receive knowledge ~
10713 3, 12 | Now as ~words formed by a man are signs of his intellectual
10714 3, 12 | be taught by God than by man, so it is better to ~receive
10715 3, 12 | sensible creatures and not by man's teaching.~Aquin.: SMT
10716 3, 12 | fitting age is required for a man to acquire ~knowledge by
10717 3, 12 | creature; but having become man, even as it was ~for our
10718 3, 13 | God ~had naturally, the Man was about to receive in
10719 3, 13 | it is the chief part of man. Hence ~since the Son of
10720 3, 13 | union with the Person, the Man receives omnipotence in ~
10721 3, 13 | which union ~is that as the Man is said to be God, so is
10722 3, 13 | that the omnipotence of the Man is distinct (as neither
10723 3, 13 | is one Person of God and ~man.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[13] A[
10724 3, 13 | Him," ~i.e. to Christ as man, "Who a little while before
10725 3, 13 | was brought about that a Man ~was omnipotent, as was
10726 3, 13 | state of innocence that a man's soul should have the power
10727 3, 13 | He had wished. But ~since man has three states - viz.
10728 3, 13 | house, He would that no man should know it, and He could ~
10729 3, 13 | opened, saying: "See that no ~man know this. But they going
10730 3, 13 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, a man does not ask from another
10731 3, 14 | Further, no reasonable man assumes what keeps him from
10732 3, 14 | the most ~abject of men, a man of sorrows and acquainted
10733 3, 14 | power to be overcome and man's weakness ~healed, by strength
10734 3, 14 | according to Rm. 5:12: "By one man sin ~entered into this world,
10735 3, 14 | not have seemed to be true man, nor to have true, but ~
10736 3, 14 | and in habit found as a man." Hence, Thomas, by the ~
10737 3, 14 | according to ~Rm. 5:12: "By one man sin entered into this world
10738 3, 14 | before the fall of the first man." For He received human
10739 3, 14 | about by the fault of the man, e.g. from ~inordinate eating;
10740 3, 15 | Agone Christ. xi), "in the man ~Christ the Son of God gave
10741 3, 15 | pattern of living." Now man ~needs a pattern not merely
10742 3, 15 | is said that God became man, and that He suffered for
10743 3, 15 | spring from the seed of man, but far otherwise - from
10744 3, 15 | the ~virtues are in any man, the weaker the "fomes"
10745 3, 15 | appetite; but the flesh of man, who is a ~rational animal,
10746 3, 15 | enslaved"; hence he adds: "For man's nature is a slave of Him" (
10747 3, 15 | He had been ~some time a man without knowing it; but "
10748 3, 15 | know" (i.e. before He ~is a man having human knowledge) -
10749 3, 15 | as all else pertaining to man's nature. ~Hence Augustine
10750 3, 15 | willed; even as He became man when He willed." Thirdly,
10751 3, 15 | Whatever shall befall the ~just man, it shall not make him sad."
10752 3, 15 | his goods. Now ~the just man esteems only justice and
10753 3, 15 | lose; otherwise the just man would be subject to fortune
10754 3, 15 | De Trin. ii.) that "as a man He had ~sorrow; for He bore
10755 3, 15 | in the soul of the wise man, viz. for desire, ~will -
10756 3, 15 | in the soul of the wise man, for sorrow regards evil ~
10757 3, 15 | evil could befall a wise man; ~and for this reason, because
10758 3, 15 | although what is virtuous is man's ~chief good, and what
10759 3, 15 | good, and what is sinful is man's chief evil, since these
10760 3, 15 | reason which is supreme in man, yet there are certain secondary
10761 3, 15 | certain secondary goods ~of man, which pertain to the body,
10762 3, 15 | in the soul of the wise man there may be ~sorrow in
10763 3, 15 | whatsoever shall befall the just man, it shall not make him sad," ~
10764 3, 15 | seems only to regard what a man cannot avoid. Now ~Christ
10765 3, 15 | 1~Reply OBJ 1: The just man is said to be "without dread,"
10766 3, 15 | perfect passion drawing man from what reason dictates. ~
10767 3, 15 | 3) that the "magnanimous man does not ~wonder." But Christ
10768 3, 15 | 1/1 ~OBJ 3: Further, no man wonders at what he himself
10769 3, 15 | James 1:20): "The anger of man worketh not the justice
10770 3, 15 | Moral. v), anger is in man in two ~ways - sometimes
10771 3, 15 | understand that "the ~anger of man worketh not the justice
10772 3, 15 | it, does not pertain ~to man's body, but to his soul;
10773 3, 15 | land, and as a wayfaring man turning in to lodge?"~Aquin.:
10774 3, 15 | Para. 1/1~I answer that, A man is called a wayfarer from
10775 3, 15 | Douay: ~'obtain']". Now man's perfect beatitude consists
10776 3, 15 | different respect - as when a man is at once acquainted with
10777 3, 16 | Whether this is true: "God is man"?~(2) Whether this is true: "
10778 3, 16 | Whether this is true: "Man is God"?~(3) Whether Christ
10779 3, 16 | Christ may be called a lordly man?~(4) Whether what belongs
10780 3, 16 | what belongs to the Son of Man may be predicated of the
10781 3, 16 | what belongs to the Son of Man may be predicated of the ~
10782 3, 16 | The Son of God was made man"?~(7) Whether this is true: "
10783 3, 16 | Whether this is true: "Man became God"?~(8) Whether
10784 3, 16 | Whether this is true: "This man," pointing out Christ, "
10785 3, 16 | this is true: "Christ as man is a creature"?~(11) Whether
10786 3, 16 | this is true: "Christ as man is God"?~(12) Whether this
10787 3, 16 | this is true: "Christ as man is a hypostasis or person"?~
10788 3, 16 | Whether this is true: "God is man"?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
10789 3, 16 | that this is false: "God is man." For every ~affirmative
10790 3, 16 | this proposition, ~"God is man," is on remote matter, since
10791 3, 16 | God by saying that God is man. ~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
10792 3, 16 | soul and the ~flesh are one man, so are God and man one
10793 3, 16 | one man, so are God and man one Christ." But this is
10794 3, 16 | this also is false: "God is man."~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
10795 3, 16 | Persons. But this word "man" is not relative, ~but absolute.
10796 3, 16 | and each of the Persons is man; and this is clearly false.~
10797 3, 16 | made in ~the likeness of man, and in habit found as a
10798 3, 16 | and in habit found as a man"; and thus He Who is in ~
10799 3, 16 | is in ~the form of God is man. Now He Who is in the form
10800 3, 16 | is God. ~Therefore God is man.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
10801 3, 16 | This proposition "God is man," is admitted by all ~Christians,
10802 3, 16 | Manicheans say the Word of God is man, not indeed true, but fictitious ~
10803 3, 16 | indeed true, but fictitious ~man, inasmuch as they say that
10804 3, 16 | and thus God is called man as a bronze figure is called
10805 3, 16 | bronze figure is called man if it has the ~figure of
10806 3, 16 | it has the ~figure of a man. So, too, those who held
10807 3, 16 | not say that God is true man, but that He is ~figuratively
10808 3, 16 | is ~figuratively called man by reason of the parts.
10809 3, 16 | the reality on the part of man, but deny the ~reality on
10810 3, 16 | that Christ, Who is God and man, ~is God not naturally,
10811 3, 16 | it is ~said that "God is man," God does not stand for
10812 3, 16 | Christ is true God and true man; yet they do not ~preserve
10813 3, 16 | predication. For they say that man is ~predicated of God by
10814 3, 16 | Nestorius held God to be man - nothing further being
10815 3, 16 | than that God ~is joined to man by such a conjunction that
10816 3, 16 | such a conjunction that man is dwelt in by God, and ~
10817 3, 16 | true and ~proper, "God is man" - not only by the truth
10818 3, 16 | Christ is true God and true man, but by the truth of the
10819 3, 16 | common nature, as this word "man" may stand for any ~individual
10820 3, 16 | stand for any ~individual man. And thus this word "God,"
10821 3, 16 | nature in the concrete, as ~"man" may properly and truly
10822 3, 16 | of human nature this word man may be truly and properly ~
10823 3, 16 | but in natural matter; and man is ~not predicated of God
10824 3, 16 | the other hand, "God" and "man." Hence in both cases ~the
10825 3, 16 | Reply OBJ 4: This word "man" is predicated of God, because
10826 3, 16 | 1~Whether this is true: "Man is God"?~Aquin.: SMT TP
10827 3, 16 | seem that this is false: "Man is God." For God is an ~
10828 3, 16 | should be predicated of man.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
10829 3, 16 | Therefore, if it is true that "Man is God," it seems ~that
10830 3, 16 | that this also is true: "Man is the Father," or "Man
10831 3, 16 | Man is the Father," or "Man is the Trinity." But ~these
10832 3, 16 | no new God in ~thee." But man is something new; for Christ
10833 3, 16 | for Christ was not always man. Therefore ~this is false: "
10834 3, 16 | Therefore ~this is false: "Man is God."~Aquin.: SMT TP
10835 3, 16 | according to the flesh, is man. Therefore this is true: "
10836 3, 16 | Therefore this is true: "Man is God."~Aquin.: SMT TP
10837 3, 16 | this is true and ~proper: "Man is God," even as this: "
10838 3, 16 | even as this: "God is man." For this word "man" may ~
10839 3, 16 | is man." For this word "man" may ~stand for any hypostasis
10840 3, 16 | this is true and proper: "Man is God."~Aquin.: SMT TP
10841 3, 16 | name of the Deity ~to the man in His human nature, but
10842 3, 16 | predicated of this word ~"Man," of which the Word "God"
10843 3, 16 | predicated, inasmuch as "Man" stands ~for the Person
10844 3, 16 | word "God" is predicated of man not on account of the human
10845 3, 16 | follow, if we held that "Man" stands for a created ~suppositum:
10846 3, 16 | Christ can be called a lordly man?~[*The question is hardly
10847 3, 16 | homo ~dominicus' (a lordly man)].~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16]
10848 3, 16 | Christ can be called a lordly man. For ~Augustine says (Qq.
10849 3, 16 | that were in the Lordly Man"; and he is speaking of
10850 3, 16 | that Christ was a lordly man.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
10851 3, 16 | manifests the conjunction with man." Hence ~with like reason
10852 3, 16 | denominatively that this man is lordly.~Aquin.: SMT TP
10853 3, 16 | Christ be called a lordly ~man.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
10854 3, 16 | call Jesus Christ a lordly man, since He is the Lord Himself."~
10855 3, 16 | ad 3), when we say "the Man ~Christ Jesus," we signify
10856 3, 16 | properly be said that this Man is lordly, ~but rather that
10857 3, 16 | But if, when we say "the Man Christ Jesus," ~we mean
10858 3, 16 | supposita in ~Christ, this man might be called lordly,
10859 3, 16 | Christ Jesus is a lordly man, "I ~wish it unsaid, having
10860 3, 16 | that He was called a lordly man by reason of the human nature,
10861 3, 16 | nature, which this ~word "man" signifies, and not by reason
10862 3, 16 | not that it assumed a man, ~but that it assumed human
10863 3, 16 | a "deified" or "lordly" man.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
10864 3, 16 | are not wont to ~call a man who is a lord, lordly; but
10865 3, 16 | possession." And hence the man Christ, Who is our Lord,
10866 3, 16 | not be predicated of the Man. Hence Nestorius said: ~"
10867 3, 16 | of a virgin, or that the Man was from eternity. ~Catholics
10868 3, 16 | said either of ~God or of man. Hence Cyril says [*Council
10869 3, 16 | are to be applied to the Man, and apportions some to
10870 3, 16 | nature. Thus whether we say "man" or "God," the ~hypostasis
10871 3, 16 | signified. And hence, of the Man ~may be said what belongs
10872 3, 16 | which is the occasion of man's salvation. For no ~lowliness
10873 3, 16 | can be predicated only of man. Now ~in the mystery of
10874 3, 16 | manhood alone, ~as this word "Man" or "Jesus." Hence Pope
10875 3, 16 | same ~is altogether Son of Man by His flesh, and altogether
10876 3, 16 | this is true: "God was made man"?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
10877 3, 16 | is false: "God was made man." For since ~man signifies
10878 3, 16 | was made man." For since ~man signifies a substance, to
10879 3, 16 | a substance, to be made man is to be made simply. But
10880 3, 16 | is false: "God was made ~man."~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
10881 3, 16 | OBJ 2: Further, to be made man is to be changed. But God
10882 3, 16 | is false: "God was made man."~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
10883 3, 16 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, man as predicated of Christ
10884 3, 16 | is false: "God was made man."~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
10885 3, 16 | were said that God was made man."~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
10886 3, 16 | the first time. Now to be man is truly predicated ~of
10887 3, 16 | it pertains to God ~to be man, not from eternity, but
10888 3, 16 | this is true, "God was made man"; though it is understood ~
10889 3, 16 | some: even as this, "God is man," as we said above (A[1]).~
10890 3, 16 | Reply OBJ 1: To be made man is to be made simply, in
10891 3, 16 | said ~to have been made man, inasmuch as the human nature
10892 3, 16 | hence for God ~to be made man does not mean that God was
10893 3, 16 | without its ~change, as a man may be made to be on the
10894 3, 16 | Ps. 89:1). Now to ~be man belongs to God by reason
10895 3, 16 | relation. And ~hence to be man is newly predicated of God
10896 3, 16 | it is said, "God was made man," we understand no change
10897 3, 16 | 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Man stands not for the bare
10898 3, 16 | is true: "God was ~made man" by being united to human
10899 3, 16 | 1~Whether this is true: "Man was made God"?~Aquin.: SMT
10900 3, 16 | seem that this is true: "Man was made God." For it is ~
10901 3, 16 | the flesh." Now Christ, as man, is of the seed of ~David
10902 3, 16 | to the flesh. Therefore man was made the Son of God.~
10903 3, 16 | assumption, which made God man, and man God." But by reason
10904 3, 16 | which made God man, and man God." But by reason of this ~
10905 3, 16 | this is true: "God was made man." Therefore, in like manner, ~
10906 3, 16 | manner, ~this is true: "Man was made God."~Aquin.: SMT
10907 3, 16 | God was ~humanized and man was deified, or whatever
10908 3, 16 | humanized by being made man. Therefore with equal ~reason
10909 3, 16 | Therefore with equal ~reason man is said to be deified by
10910 3, 16 | and thus it is true ~that "Man was made God."~Aquin.: SMT
10911 3, 16 | said that "God was made man," the subject of ~the making
10912 3, 16 | nature, which the word "man" ~signifies. Now that seems
10913 3, 16 | making is attributed. Hence "Man was made God" is truer than "
10914 3, 16 | truer than "God was ~made man."~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
10915 3, 16 | 2): "We do not say ~that man was deified, but that God
10916 3, 16 | deified. Hence this is false: "Man was made God."~Aquin.: SMT
10917 3, 16 | that, This proposition, Man was made God, may be understood
10918 3, 16 | false, since ~neither the Man of Whom it is predicated
10919 3, 16 | is false: "God was ~made man." But it is not of this
10920 3, 16 | composition, with this meaning: "Man was made God, i.e. it was
10921 3, 16 | was brought ~about that Man is God." And in this sense
10922 3, 16 | both are true, viz. that "Man ~was made God" and that "
10923 3, 16 | and that "God was made Man." But this is not the proper ~
10924 3, 16 | are to understand that "man" ~has not a personal but
10925 3, 16 | supposition. For although "this man" was ~not made God, because
10926 3, 16 | was eternally God, yet man, speaking commonly, was
10927 3, 16 | made" attaches making to ~man with relation to God, as
10928 3, 16 | the ~suppositum of God and Man, as was shown (Q[2], AA[
10929 3, 16 | because, when it is said, "Man was made God," "man" has
10930 3, 16 | said, "Man was made God," "man" has a ~personal suppositum:
10931 3, 16 | God is not verified of the Man in His ~human nature, but
10932 3, 16 | cannot be said that this ~Man began to be God, or is made
10933 3, 16 | different hypostasis of God and man, so that "to be ~God" was
10934 3, 16 | God" was predicated of the man, and, conversely, by reason
10935 3, 16 | reason might it be ~said that Man was made God, i.e. joined
10936 3, 16 | and that God was made ~Man, i.e. joined to man.~Aquin.:
10937 3, 16 | made ~Man, i.e. joined to man.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
10938 3, 16 | was brought about ~that Man is God and God is Man; and
10939 3, 16 | that Man is God and God is Man; and in this sense both
10940 3, 16 | Hence when it is said that "Man was made God," the ~being
10941 3, 16 | said that "God was made Man," the ~making is taken to
10942 3, 16 | this is true: "God was made Man," and this is false: "Man
10943 3, 16 | Man," and this is false: "Man was ~made God"; even as
10944 3, 16 | Socrates, who was already a man, were made white, ~and were
10945 3, 16 | this would be true: "This man was made white ~today,"
10946 3, 16 | This white thing was made man today." ~Nevertheless, if
10947 3, 16 | the principal part of a man is the soul rather than
10948 3, 16 | understood the qualification, "as man."~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
10949 3, 16 | that "Christ Who God and Man, is called created and ~
10950 3, 16 | Para. 1/1~Whether this Man, i.e. Christ, began to be?~
10951 3, 16 | It would seem that this Man, i.e. Christ, began to be.
10952 3, 16 | Mediator of God and men - the Man Jesus Christ." But ~what
10953 3, 16 | begun to be. Therefore this Man, i.e. Christ, ~began to
10954 3, 16 | Further, Christ began to be Man. But to be man is to be
10955 3, 16 | began to be Man. But to be man is to be simply. ~Therefore
10956 3, 16 | simply. ~Therefore this man began to be, simply.~Aquin.:
10957 3, 16 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, "man" implies a suppositum of
10958 3, 16 | human nature. Therefore this Man began to ~be.~Aquin.: SMT
10959 3, 16 | must not say that "this Man" - pointing to ~Christ - "
10960 3, 16 | this, when we ~say "this Man," pointing to Christ, the
10961 3, 16 | Hence ~this is false: "This Man began to be." Nor does it
10962 3, 16 | signified by this word "man"; ~because the term placed
10963 3, 16 | i.e. we must say that ~the Man Jesus Christ was not, before
10964 3, 16 | simply is higher than to be man. Hence this does ~not follow: "
10965 3, 16 | follow: "Christ began to be Man - therefore He began to
10966 3, 16 | Reply OBJ 3: This word "Man," as it is taken for Christ,
10967 3, 16 | therefore this is false: "The Man Christ began ~to be": but
10968 3, 16 | true: "Christ began to be Man."~~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16]
10969 3, 16 | this is true: "Christ as Man is a creature"?~Aquin.:
10970 3, 16 | this is false: "Christ as Man is a creature," ~or "began
10971 3, 16 | this is false: "Christ as Man is the human nature." Therefore ~
10972 3, 16 | is also false; Christ as Man is a creature.~Aquin.: SMT
10973 3, 16 | absolutely grant that "the ~Man Christ is a creature"; nor
10974 3, 16 | consequently that "Christ as Man is a ~creature."~Aquin.:
10975 3, 16 | whatever is predicated of a man as man is predicated of ~
10976 3, 16 | is predicated of a man as man is predicated of ~him "per
10977 3, 16 | this is false: "Christ as ~Man is per se and simply a creature."
10978 3, 16 | too, is false; "Christ ~as Man is a creature."~Aquin.:
10979 3, 16 | this is ~false: "Christ as Man is Creator." Therefore this
10980 3, 16 | this is true: "Christ as Man ~is a creature."~Aquin.:
10981 3, 16 | When we say "Christ as Man" this word "man" may be
10982 3, 16 | Christ as Man" this word "man" may be added ~in the reduplication,
10983 3, 16 | will be false: "Christ as Man is a creature." But if it
10984 3, 16 | same to ~say "Christ as Man" and to say "Christ as He
10985 3, 16 | to say "Christ as He is a Man." Hence this is to ~be granted
10986 3, 16 | than denied: "Christ as Man is a creature." But if ~
10987 3, 16 | say: "Christ as ~'this' Man is a creature."~Aquin.:
10988 3, 16 | is a ~creature" and that "man is a creature."~Aquin.:
10989 3, 16 | 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Man as placed in the subject
10990 3, 16 | is not granted that "this man is a creature," yet ~it
10991 3, 16 | granted that "Christ as Man is a creature."~Aquin.:
10992 3, 16 | OBJ 3: It belongs to every man who is a suppositum of human
10993 3, 16 | that if it is a creature as man, it is a creature ~simply.
10994 3, 16 | if He is a creature as Man, He is a creature simply.~
10995 3, 16 | this is true: "Christ as Man is God"?~Aquin.: SMT TP
10996 3, 16 | would seem that Christ, as Man, is God. For Christ is God
10997 3, 16 | of union. But Christ, as Man, has the grace of union.
10998 3, 16 | union. Therefore ~Christ as Man is God.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
10999 3, 16 | own sake." But Christ ~as Man forgives sin, according
11000 3, 16 | may know that ~the Son of Man hath power on earth to forgive
1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-2000 | 2001-2500 | 2501-3000 | 3001-3500 | 3501-4000 | 4001-4500 | 4501-5000 | 5001-5500 | 5501-6000 | 6001-6500 | 6501-7000 | 7001-7500 | 7501-8000 | 8001-8500 | 8501-9000 | 9001-9500 | 9501-10000 | 10001-10500 | 10501-11000 | 11001-11500 | 11501-12000 | 12001-12500 | 12501-13000 | 13001-13500 | 13501-14000 | 14001-14347 |