1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-2000 | 2001-2500 | 2501-3000 | 3001-3500 | 3501-4000 | 4001-4500 | 4501-5000 | 5001-5500 | 5501-6000 | 6001-6500 | 6501-7000 | 7001-7500 | 7501-8000 | 8001-8500 | 8501-9000 | 9001-9500 | 9501-10000 | 10001-10500 | 10501-11000 | 11001-11500 | 11501-12000 | 12001-12500 | 12501-12988
Part, Question
1501 1, 76 | Q[76] A[2] Body Para. 1/4~I answer that, It is absolutely
1502 1, 76 | Q[76] A[2] Body Para. 2/4~It is likewise clear that
1503 1, 76 | Q[76] A[2] Body Para. 3/4~Again, this is clearly impossible,
1504 1, 76 | FP Q[76] A[2] Body Para. 4/4~However, it would be possible
1505 1, 76 | Q[76] A[2] Body Para. 4/4~However, it would be possible
1506 1, 76 | SMT FP Q[76] A[2] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Whether
1507 1, 76 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Whether the intellect be
1508 1, 76 | FP Q[76] A[3] Body Para. 4/6~Secondly, this is proved
1509 1, 76 | SMT FP Q[76] A[3] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: We
1510 1, 76 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: We must not consider the
1511 1, 76 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[76] A[4] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether
1512 1, 76 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[76] A[4] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1:
1513 1, 76 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[76] A[4] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2:
1514 1, 76 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[76] A[4] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3:
1515 1, 76 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[76] A[4] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4:
1516 1, 76 | SMT FP Q[76] A[4] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1517 1, 76 | 4] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, the human body
1518 1, 76 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[76] A[4] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary,
1519 1, 76 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[76] A[4] Body Para. 1/3~I answer
1520 1, 76 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[76] A[4] Body Para. 2/3~In order
1521 1, 76 | alteration," as we read, Phys. i, 4. ~Therefore, if besides
1522 1, 76 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[76] A[4] Body Para. 3/3~Whence we
1523 1, 76 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[76] A[4] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply
1524 1, 76 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[76] A[4] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply
1525 1, 76 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[76] A[4] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1 ~Reply
1526 1, 76 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[76] A[4] R.O. 4 Para. 1/3~Reply
1527 1, 76 | SMT FP Q[76] A[4] R.O. 4 Para. 1/3~Reply OBJ 4: Avicenna
1528 1, 76 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/3~Reply OBJ 4: Avicenna held that the
1529 1, 76 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[76] A[4] R.O. 4 Para. 2/3~Averroes
1530 1, 76 | SMT FP Q[76] A[4] R.O. 4 Para. 2/3~Averroes maintained
1531 1, 76 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[76] A[4] R.O. 4 Para. 3/3~Therefore
1532 1, 76 | SMT FP Q[76] A[4] R.O. 4 Para. 3/3~Therefore we must
1533 1, 76 | SMT FP Q[76] A[5] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1534 1, 76 | 5] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, what is susceptible
1535 1, 76 | SMT FP Q[76] A[5] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: The
1536 1, 76 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: The intellectual soul as
1537 1, 76 | as we have said ~above (A[4]). Wherefore it is impossible
1538 1, 76 | has been already said (A[4]), the more ~perfect form
1539 1, 76 | SMT FP Q[76] A[8] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1540 1, 76 | 8] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, all the powers
1541 1, 76 | Q[76] A[8] Body Para. 1/4~I answer that, As we have
1542 1, 76 | Q[76] A[8] Body Para. 2/4~That it is entire in each
1543 1, 76 | Q[76] A[8] Body Para. 3/4~Therefore if it be asked
1544 1, 76 | FP Q[76] A[8] Body Para. 4/4~Since, however, the soul
1545 1, 76 | Q[76] A[8] Body Para. 4/4~Since, however, the soul
1546 1, 76 | SMT FP Q[76] A[8] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Some
1547 1, 76 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Some of the powers of the
1548 1, 77 | distinguished from one another?~(4) Of the orders of the powers,
1549 1, 77 | Augustine says (De Trin. ix, 4), that "mind, knowledge,
1550 1, 77 | SMT FP Q[77] A[1] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1551 1, 77 | 1] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, we sense by the
1552 1, 77 | other things" (De Trin. ix, 4).~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[77] A[
1553 1, 77 | SMT FP Q[77] A[1] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: That
1554 1, 77 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: That the accidental form
1555 1, 77 | above (Q[75], A[5], ~ad 4); and for this reason it
1556 1, 77 | seen above (Q[76], AA[3],4). Therefore by the one ~
1557 1, 77 | SMT FP Q[77] A[3] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1558 1, 77 | 3] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, that which of
1559 1, 77 | Philosopher says (De Anima ii, 4) that "acts and ~operations
1560 1, 77 | SMT FP Q[77] A[3] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: The
1561 1, 77 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: The higher power of itself
1562 1, 77 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[77] A[4] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether
1563 1, 77 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[77] A[4] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1:
1564 1, 77 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[77] A[4] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2:
1565 1, 77 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[77] A[4] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3:
1566 1, 77 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[77] A[4] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary,
1567 1, 77 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[77] A[4] Body Para. 1/2~I answer
1568 1, 77 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[77] A[4] Body Para. 2/2~In the second
1569 1, 77 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[77] A[4] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply
1570 1, 77 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[77] A[4] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply
1571 1, 77 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[77] A[4] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply
1572 1, 77 | Philosopher proves (De Anima i, 4). Therefore ~the soul does
1573 1, 77 | from Metaph. vii ~(Did. vi, 4). Therefore the powers of
1574 1, 77 | has been shown above (A[4]) that among the powers
1575 1, 77 | Philosopher says (De Anima i, ~4), "If an old man were given
1576 1, 77 | SMT FP Q[77] A[8] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1577 1, 77 | 8] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, memory is a power
1578 1, 77 | SMT FP Q[77] A[8] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: The
1579 1, 77 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: The recollection spoken
1580 1, 37 | SMT FP Q[37] A[1] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1581 1, 37 | 1] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, Love belongs to
1582 1, 37 | shown above (Q[27], AA[2],3,4,5), ~there are two processions
1583 1, 37 | stated ~above (Q[27], A[4], ad 3), and yet express
1584 1, 37 | here and Q[24], A[2], ad 4).~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[37] A[
1585 1, 37 | as stated above (Q[14], A[4]), yet in such a way ~that
1586 1, 37 | SMT FP Q[37] A[1] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: As
1587 1, 37 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: As it does not belong to
1588 1, 38 | SMT FP Q[38] A[1] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, "
1589 1, 38 | 1] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, "Gift" imports
1590 1, 38 | SMT FP Q[38] A[1] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Gift
1591 1, 38 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Gift is not so called from
1592 1, 38 | Aristotle says (Topic. iv, 4) - i.e. a thing which is
1593 1, 38 | as stated above (Q[27], A[4]; Q[37], A[1]), ~He proceeds
1594 1, 39 | plural, or in the singular? ~(4) Whether notional adjectives,
1595 1, 39 | as above stated (Q[29], A[4]), signifies ~relation as
1596 1, 39 | SMT FP Q[39] A[2] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1597 1, 39 | 2] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, it is not usual
1598 1, 39 | SMT FP Q[39] A[2] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1 ~Reply OBJ 4:
1599 1, 39 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1 ~Reply OBJ 4: Form, in the absolute sense,
1600 1, 39 | SMT FP Q[39] A[3] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1601 1, 39 | 3] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, as this word "
1602 1, 39 | contrary, It is said (Dt. 6:4): "Hear, O Israel, the Lord
1603 1, 39 | above (Q[3], A[7]; Q[11], A[4]). So, names which signify ~
1604 1, 39 | SMT FP Q[39] A[3] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: The
1605 1, 39 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: The form signified by the
1606 1, 39 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[4] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether
1607 1, 39 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[4] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1:
1608 1, 39 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[4] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2:
1609 1, 39 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[4] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3:
1610 1, 39 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[4] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4:
1611 1, 39 | SMT FP Q[39] A[4] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1612 1, 39 | 4] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, if "God begot
1613 1, 39 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[4] Obj. 5 Para. 1/1~OBJ 5:
1614 1, 39 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[4] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary,
1615 1, 39 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[4] Body Para. 1/1~I answer
1616 1, 39 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[4] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply
1617 1, 39 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[4] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply
1618 1, 39 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[4] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply
1619 1, 39 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[4] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply
1620 1, 39 | SMT FP Q[39] A[4] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: This
1621 1, 39 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: This is false, "the Father
1622 1, 39 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[4] R.O. 5 Para. 1/1~Reply
1623 1, 39 | SMT FP Q[39] A[5] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1624 1, 39 | 5] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, a predicate can
1625 1, 39 | signification as ~above stated (A[4]). Now although "God" is
1626 1, 39 | as above explained (A[4]). The word ~"essence,"
1627 1, 39 | SMT FP Q[39] A[5] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: The
1628 1, 39 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: The divine essence is predicated
1629 1, 39 | says (De ~Fide Orth. iii, 4). Therefore it seems that
1630 1, 39 | essence, as above explained (A[4], ad 3), hence, as it is
1631 1, 39 | SMT FP Q[39] A[8] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Likewise
1632 1, 39 | 8] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Likewise Augustine says (
1633 1, 39 | FP Q[39] A[8] Body Para. 4/10~The second agrees with
1634 1, 39 | impulse, according to Is. 25:4: "The spirit of the strong
1635 1, 40 | the hypostases distinct?~(4) Whether the relations,
1636 1, 40 | SMT FP Q[40] A[2] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1637 1, 40 | 2] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, whatever presupposes
1638 1, 40 | Q[40] A[2] Body Para. 1/4~I answer that, In whatever
1639 1, 40 | Q[40] A[2] Body Para. 2/4~Some, then, considering
1640 1, 40 | Q[40] A[2] Body Para. 3/4~This opinion, however, cannot
1641 1, 40 | FP Q[40] A[2] Body Para. 4/4~It is therefore better
1642 1, 40 | Q[40] A[2] Body Para. 4/4~It is therefore better to
1643 1, 40 | SMT FP Q[40] A[2] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Relation
1644 1, 40 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Relation presupposes the
1645 1, 40 | Q[40] A[3] Body Para. 1/4~I answer that, Abstraction
1646 1, 40 | Q[40] A[3] Body Para. 2/4~But as regards the abstraction
1647 1, 40 | Q[40] A[3] Body Para. 3/4~If, however, the personal
1648 1, 40 | FP Q[40] A[3] Body Para. 4/4~But this is impossible,
1649 1, 40 | Q[40] A[3] Body Para. 4/4~But this is impossible,
1650 1, 40 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[40] A[4] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether
1651 1, 40 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[40] A[4] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1:
1652 1, 40 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[40] A[4] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2:
1653 1, 40 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[40] A[4] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3:
1654 1, 40 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[40] A[4] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary,
1655 1, 40 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[40] A[4] Body Para. 1/1~I answer
1656 1, 40 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[40] A[4] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply
1657 1, 40 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[40] A[4] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply
1658 1, 40 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[40] A[4] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply
1659 1, 41 | nothing or ~from something?~(4) Whether in God there exists
1660 1, 41 | Augustine says (De Trin. v, 4,5) that, "everything which ~
1661 1, 41 | SMT FP Q[41] A[2] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1662 1, 41 | 2] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, the Son proceeds
1663 1, 41 | SMT FP Q[41] A[2] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Even
1664 1, 41 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Even as regards the intellectual
1665 1, 41 | SMT FP Q[41] A[3] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1666 1, 41 | 3] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, every creature
1667 1, 41 | man within him"; and (Amos 4:13) according to another ~
1668 1, 41 | SMT FP Q[41] A[3] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: When
1669 1, 41 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: When we say "Wisdom was
1670 1, 41 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41] A[4] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether
1671 1, 41 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41] A[4] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1:
1672 1, 41 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41] A[4] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2:
1673 1, 41 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41] A[4] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3:
1674 1, 41 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41] A[4] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary,
1675 1, 41 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41] A[4] Body Para. 1/1~I answer
1676 1, 41 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41] A[4] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply
1677 1, 41 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41] A[4] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1 ~Reply
1678 1, 41 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41] A[4] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply
1679 1, 41 | FP Q[41] A[6] Body Para. 4/5~The third reason is taken
1680 1, 42 | among the divine persons?~(4) Whether the divine persons
1681 1, 42 | SMT FP Q[42] A[1] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1682 1, 42 | 1] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, equality is a
1683 1, 42 | SMT FP Q[42] A[1] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: In
1684 1, 42 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: In the divine persons there
1685 1, 42 | SMT FP Q[42] A[2] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1686 1, 42 | 2] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, if the Son be
1687 1, 42 | SMT FP Q[42] A[2] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: In
1688 1, 42 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: In time there is something
1689 1, 42 | above ~(Q[10], A[2] ad 1, A[4] ad 2). But the generation
1690 1, 42 | SMT FP Q[42] A[3] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1691 1, 42 | 3] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, the divine nature
1692 1, 42 | SMT FP Q[42] A[3] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Nature
1693 1, 42 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Nature in a certain way
1694 1, 42 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[42] A[4] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether
1695 1, 42 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[42] A[4] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1:
1696 1, 42 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[42] A[4] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2:
1697 1, 42 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[42] A[4] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3:
1698 1, 42 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[42] A[4] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary,
1699 1, 42 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[42] A[4] Body Para. 1/1~I answer
1700 1, 42 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[42] A[4] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply
1701 1, 42 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[42] A[4] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply
1702 1, 42 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[42] A[4] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply
1703 1, 42 | have seen above (Q[30], A[4]). Wherefore all ~the relations
1704 1, 42 | Now it was shown above (A[4]) that the very notion ~
1705 1, 43 | person is invisibly sent?~(4) Whether it is fitting that
1706 1, 43 | explained above (Q[42], AA[4],6).~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[43]
1707 1, 43 | contrary, It is said (Gal. 4:4): "When the fullness of
1708 1, 43 | contrary, It is said (Gal. 4:4): "When the fullness of
1709 1, 43 | SMT FP Q[43] A[3] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1710 1, 43 | 3] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, Rabanus says that
1711 1, 43 | Augustine says (De Trin. iii, 4) that "the Holy Ghost ~proceeds
1712 1, 43 | SMT FP Q[43] A[3] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: The
1713 1, 43 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: The working of miracles
1714 1, 43 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[43] A[4] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether
1715 1, 43 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[43] A[4] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1:
1716 1, 43 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[43] A[4] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2:
1717 1, 43 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[43] A[4] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3:
1718 1, 43 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[43] A[4] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary,
1719 1, 43 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[43] A[4] Body Para. 1/1~I answer
1720 1, 43 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[43] A[4] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply
1721 1, 43 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[43] A[4] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply
1722 1, 43 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[43] A[4] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply
1723 1, 43 | expounded above (AA[1],4). But the procession of
1724 1, 43 | cometh to Me," and (Ps. 38:4): "In my ~meditation a fire
1725 1, 43 | SMT FP Q[43] A[6] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1726 1, 43 | 6] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, the Sacraments
1727 1, 43 | Augustine (De Trin. iii, 4; xv, 27), the ~invisible
1728 1, 43 | As above stated (AA[3],4,5), mission in its very
1729 1, 43 | SMT FP Q[43] A[6] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Grace
1730 1, 43 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Grace resides instrumentally
1731 1, 43 | SMT FP Q[43] A[7] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1732 1, 43 | 7] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, the Son was visibly
1733 1, 43 | Augustine says (De Trin. iii, 4,5,9). So ~visible appearances,
1734 1, 43 | was Christ" (1 Cor. ~10:4). For that rock was already
1735 1, 43 | SMT FP Q[43] A[7] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: It
1736 1, 43 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: It was necessary for the
1737 1, 43 | divers tongues" (Acts 2:4). The visible mission of
1738 1, 45 | other exemplar causes?~(4) Whether He is the final
1739 1, 45 | been shown above (Q[3], A[4]) when treating ~of the
1740 1, 45 | was shown (Q[11], AA[3],4) that subsisting being must ~
1741 1, 45 | Aristotle said (Metaph. ii, text 4) that whatever is greatest
1742 1, 45 | SMT FP Q[44] A[3] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1743 1, 45 | 3] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, this likewise
1744 1, 45 | SMT FP Q[44] A[3] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: As
1745 1, 45 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: As Dionysius says (Div.
1746 1, 45 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[44] A[4] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether
1747 1, 45 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[44] A[4] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1:
1748 1, 45 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[44] A[4] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2:
1749 1, 45 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[44] A[4] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3:
1750 1, 45 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[44] A[4] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4:
1751 1, 45 | SMT FP Q[44] A[4] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1752 1, 45 | 4] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, the final cause
1753 1, 45 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[44] A[4] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary,
1754 1, 45 | contrary, It is said (Prov. 16:4): "The Lord has made all
1755 1, 45 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[44] A[4] Body Para. 1/1~I answer
1756 1, 45 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[44] A[4] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply
1757 1, 45 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[44] A[4] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply
1758 1, 45 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[44] A[4] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply
1759 1, 45 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[44] A[4] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply
1760 1, 45 | SMT FP Q[44] A[4] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Since
1761 1, 45 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Since God is the efficient,
1762 1, 46 | very nature of things?~(4) To what things it belongs
1763 1, 46 | SMT FP Q[45] A[2] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1764 1, 46 | 2] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, infinite distance
1765 1, 46 | SMT FP Q[45] A[2] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: This
1766 1, 46 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: This objection proceeds
1767 1, 46 | shown above (Q[42], A[1], ad 4), in treating of the equality ~
1768 1, 46 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[45] A[4] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether
1769 1, 46 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[45] A[4] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1:
1770 1, 46 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[45] A[4] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2:
1771 1, 46 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[45] A[4] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3:
1772 1, 46 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[45] A[4] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary,
1773 1, 46 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[45] A[4] Body Para. 1/1~I answer
1774 1, 46 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[45] A[4] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply
1775 1, 46 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[45] A[4] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply
1776 1, 46 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[45] A[4] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply
1777 1, 46 | infinity of God (Q[7], AA[2],3,4). Therefore only a ~finite
1778 1, 46 | Q[45] A[5] Body Para. 1/4~I answer that, It sufficiently
1779 1, 46 | Q[45] A[5] Body Para. 2/4~It happens, however, that
1780 1, 46 | Q[45] A[5] Body Para. 3/4~But such a thing cannot
1781 1, 46 | FP Q[45] A[5] Body Para. 4/4~And above all it is absurd
1782 1, 46 | Q[45] A[5] Body Para. 4/4~And above all it is absurd
1783 1, 46 | above (Q[14], A[8]; Q[19], A[4]), when treating of the
1784 1, 46 | SMT FP Q[45] A[8] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1785 1, 46 | 8] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, what is not created,
1786 1, 46 | alone, as shown above (A[4]), it does not belong to
1787 1, 46 | SMT FP Q[45] A[8] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: The
1788 1, 46 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: The operation of nature
1789 1, 47 | SMT FP Q[46] A[1] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1790 1, 47 | 1] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, a vacuum is where
1791 1, 47 | the above (Q[44], AA[2],3,4). Since ~therefore God is
1792 1, 47 | been shown above (Q[19], A[4]) ~that the will of God
1793 1, 47 | SMT FP Q[46] A[1] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: The
1794 1, 47 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: The notion of a vacuum
1795 1, 47 | was said above (Q[19], A[4]; Q[41], A[2]). ~Therefore,
1796 1, 47 | SMT FP Q[46] A[2] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1797 1, 47 | 2] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, it appears manifestly
1798 1, 47 | Augustine says (De Civ. Dei xi, 4), the opinion of ~philosophers
1799 1, 47 | Avicenna (Metaph. ix, text 4).~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[46] A[
1800 1, 47 | SMT FP Q[46] A[2] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Those
1801 1, 47 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Those who hold the eternity
1802 1, 47 | disproved ~above (Q[7], A[4]). Some say that the soul
1803 1, 47 | says [*Serm. xiv, De Temp. 4,5; De Haeres., haeres. 46;
1804 1, 48 | what precedes (Q[11], A[4]). Therefore He ~produces
1805 1, 48 | was shown above (Q[44]~, A[4]). Therefore the effect
1806 1, 48 | contrary, It is said (Gn. 1:4,7) that God "divided the
1807 1, 48 | FP Q[47] A[1] Body Para. 4/6~But this opinion cannot
1808 1, 48 | what we read in Gn. ~1:3,4: "God said: Be light made . . .
1809 1, 48 | was shown above (Q[19], ~A[4]), acts by an intellectual
1810 1, 48 | that it was good" (Gn. 1:4); and in like manner of
1811 1, 49 | is the subject of evil?~(4) Whether evil totally corrupts
1812 1, 49 | SMT FP Q[48] A[1] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1813 1, 49 | 1] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, what is not, acts
1814 1, 49 | SMT FP Q[48] A[1] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: A
1815 1, 49 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: A thing is said to act
1816 1, 49 | Philosopher says (Topic. iii, 4). Therefore also the good
1817 1, 49 | Dionysius says (Div. Nom. iv, 4) that "evil ~does not exist,
1818 1, 49 | SMT FP Q[48] A[3] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1819 1, 49 | 3] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, the subject of
1820 1, 49 | says ~(Metaph. iv, text 4), and such "not-being" is
1821 1, 49 | SMT FP Q[48] A[3] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: The
1822 1, 49 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: The prophet invokes woe
1823 1, 49 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[48] A[4] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether
1824 1, 49 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[48] A[4] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1:
1825 1, 49 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[48] A[4] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2:
1826 1, 49 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[48] A[4] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3:
1827 1, 49 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[48] A[4] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary,
1828 1, 49 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[48] A[4] Body Para. 1/3~I answer
1829 1, 49 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[48] A[4] Body Para. 2/3~The diminution,
1830 1, 49 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[48] A[4] Body Para. 3/3~Therefore,
1831 1, 49 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[48] A[4] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply
1832 1, 49 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[48] A[4] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply
1833 1, 49 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[48] A[4] R.O. 3 Para. 1/2~Reply
1834 1, 49 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[48] A[4] R.O. 3 Para. 2/2~Therefore
1835 1, 49 | SMT FP Q[48] A[5] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: On the
1836 1, 49 | 5] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: On the contrary, It would
1837 1, 49 | SMT FP Q[48] A[5] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: In
1838 1, 49 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: In answer to the opposite
1839 1, 50 | SMT FP Q[49] A[1] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1840 1, 50 | 1] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, Dionysius says (
1841 1, 50 | SMT FP Q[49] A[1] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Evil
1842 1, 50 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Evil has no direct cause,
1843 1, 50 | Q[2]~, A[3]; Q[6], AA[1],4), it follows that also every
1844 1, 50 | as was ~shown above (Q[4], A[1]). Hence, the evil
1845 1, 50 | Q[2], A[3]; Q[6], AA[2],4). Therefore, also, there
1846 1, 50 | SMT FP Q[49] A[3] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1847 1, 50 | 3] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, everything participated
1848 1, 50 | above (Q[2], A[3]; Q[6], A[4]). Therefore there cannot
1849 1, 50 | shown above (Q[6], AA[3],4). But nothing can be essentially
1850 1, 50 | was shown above ~(Q[48], A[4]), although evil always
1851 1, 50 | FP Q[49] A[3] Body Para. 4/6~Thirdly, because the very
1852 1, 50 | SMT FP Q[49] A[3] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: No
1853 1, 50 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: No being is called evil
1854 1, 51 | SMT FP Q[50] Out. Para. 1/4 - TREATISE ON THE ANGELS (
1855 1, 51 | SMT FP Q[50] Out. Para. 2/4~Concerning the angels, we
1856 1, 51 | SMT FP Q[50] Out. Para. 3/4~Their substance we consider
1857 1, 51 | SMT FP Q[50] Out. Para. 4/4~Concerning their substance
1858 1, 51 | SMT FP Q[50] Out. Para. 4/4~Concerning their substance
1859 1, 51 | concerning their number.~(4) Of their difference from
1860 1, 51 | and, ~farther on (verse 4), "For He spoke, and they
1861 1, 51 | contrary, It is said (Ps. 103:4): "Who makes His angels
1862 1, 51 | will (Q[14], A[8]; Q[19], A[4]~). Hence the perfection
1863 1, 51 | SMT FP Q[50] A[2] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1864 1, 51 | 2] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, form is properly
1865 1, 51 | Q[50] A[2] Body Para. 1/4~I answer that, Some assert
1866 1, 51 | Q[50] A[2] Body Para. 2/4~But one glance is enough
1867 1, 51 | Q[50] A[2] Body Para. 3/4~It is, further, impossible
1868 1, 51 | FP Q[50] A[2] Body Para. 4/4~But things distinguished
1869 1, 51 | Q[50] A[2] Body Para. 4/4~But things distinguished
1870 1, 51 | explained above (Q[3], A[4]). Hence God alone is pure ~
1871 1, 51 | SMT FP Q[50] A[2] R.O. 4 Para. 1/2~Reply OBJ 4: Every
1872 1, 51 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/2~Reply OBJ 4: Every creature is simply
1873 1, 51 | SMT FP Q[50] A[2] R.O. 4 Para. 2/2~Whence it is said (
1874 1, 51 | SMT FP Q[50] A[3] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Dionysius
1875 1, 51 | 3] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Dionysius says (Div. Nom.
1876 1, 51 | SMT FP Q[50] A[3] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: This
1877 1, 51 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: This argument comes from
1878 1, 51 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[50] A[4] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether
1879 1, 51 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[50] A[4] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1:
1880 1, 51 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[50] A[4] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2:
1881 1, 51 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[50] A[4] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3:
1882 1, 51 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[50] A[4] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4:
1883 1, 51 | SMT FP Q[50] A[4] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1884 1, 51 | 4] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, the more perfect
1885 1, 51 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[50] A[4] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary,
1886 1, 51 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[50] A[4] Body Para. 1/2~I answer
1887 1, 51 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[50] A[4] Body Para. 2/2~But this
1888 1, 51 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[50] A[4] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply
1889 1, 51 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[50] A[4] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply
1890 1, 51 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[50] A[4] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply
1891 1, 51 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[50] A[4] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply
1892 1, 51 | SMT FP Q[50] A[4] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Numerical
1893 1, 51 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Numerical multiplication,
1894 1, 52 | SMT FP Q[51] A[3] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1895 1, 52 | 3] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, speech is the
1896 1, 52 | old, men of renown" (Gn. 6:4). Consequently ~the angels
1897 1, 52 | SMT FP Q[51] A[3] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Properly
1898 1, 52 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Properly speaking, the
1899 1, 53 | FP Q[52] A[2] Body Para. 4/5~So, then, it is evident
1900 1, 54 | Q[53] A[2] Body Para. 1/4~I answer that, As was observed
1901 1, 54 | Q[53] A[2] Body Para. 2/4~But if an angel's movement
1902 1, 54 | Q[53] A[2] Body Para. 3/4~Now a movable body only
1903 1, 54 | FP Q[53] A[2] Body Para. 4/4~Now, the actual passing
1904 1, 54 | Q[53] A[2] Body Para. 4/4~Now, the actual passing
1905 1, 55 | power of intelligence?~(4) Is there in the angels
1906 1, 55 | was said above ~(Q[3], A[4]). Therefore neither the
1907 1, 55 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[54] A[4] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether
1908 1, 55 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[54] A[4] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1:
1909 1, 55 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[54] A[4] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2:
1910 1, 55 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[54] A[4] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary,
1911 1, 55 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[54] A[4] Body Para. 1/2~I answer
1912 1, 55 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[54] A[4] Body Para. 2/2~But each
1913 1, 55 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[54] A[4] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply
1914 1, 55 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[54] A[4] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply
1915 1, 57 | stated in De Anima iii, 4 understanding is a kind
1916 1, 57 | says (De Anima iii, text. 4), that if the human intellect ~
1917 1, 57 | been said ~before (Q[50], A[4]; Q[55], A[1], ad 3). Hence,
1918 1, 57 | SMT FP Q[56] A[2] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1919 1, 57 | 2] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, if one angel did
1920 1, 57 | already observed (Q[50], A[4], ad ~1,2). So the nature
1921 1, 57 | SMT FP Q[56] A[2] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: God
1922 1, 57 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: God made every creature
1923 1, 57 | already shown ~(Q[12], A[4]), an angel cannot have
1924 1, 57 | was said above (Q[12], A[4]). ~The third class comprises
1925 1, 58 | Whether they know the future?~(4) Whether they know secret
1926 1, 58 | Q[57] A[2] Body Para. 1/4~I answer that, Some have
1927 1, 58 | Q[57] A[2] Body Para. 2/4~Consequently others have
1928 1, 58 | Q[57] A[2] Body Para. 3/4~Therefore, it must be said
1929 1, 58 | FP Q[57] A[2] Body Para. 4/4~The manner in which an
1930 1, 58 | Q[57] A[2] Body Para. 4/4~The manner in which an angel
1931 1, 58 | SMT FP Q[57] A[3] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1932 1, 58 | 3] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, as a thing is
1933 1, 58 | SMT FP Q[57] A[3] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Things
1934 1, 58 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Things distant according
1935 1, 58 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[57] A[4] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether
1936 1, 58 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[57] A[4] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1:
1937 1, 58 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[57] A[4] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2:
1938 1, 58 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[57] A[4] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3:
1939 1, 58 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[57] A[4] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary,
1940 1, 58 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[57] A[4] Body Para. 1/2~I answer
1941 1, 58 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[57] A[4] Body Para. 2/2~In another
1942 1, 58 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[57] A[4] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply
1943 1, 58 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[57] A[4] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply
1944 1, 58 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[57] A[4] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply
1945 1, 58 | know. Thus we ~read (Eph. 3:4,5): "As you reading, may
1946 1, 59 | knowledge is discursive?~(4) Whether he understands
1947 1, 59 | Philosopher says (Topic. ii, 4) that "it may happen ~that
1948 1, 59 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[58] A[4] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether
1949 1, 59 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[58] A[4] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1:
1950 1, 59 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[58] A[4] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2:
1951 1, 59 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[58] A[4] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3:
1952 1, 59 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[58] A[4] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary,
1953 1, 59 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[58] A[4] Body Para. 1/2~I answer
1954 1, 59 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[58] A[4] Body Para. 2/2~Nevertheless,
1955 1, 59 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[58] A[4] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply
1956 1, 59 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[58] A[4] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply
1957 1, 59 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[58] A[4] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply
1958 1, 59 | For it has been said (A[4]) that an angel understands
1959 1, 60 | free-will in the angels?~(4) Is there an irascible and
1960 1, 60 | logically [*Cf. Q[16], A[4]]. Therefore will and ~intellect
1961 1, 60 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[59] A[4] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether
1962 1, 60 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[59] A[4] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1:
1963 1, 60 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[59] A[4] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2:
1964 1, 60 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[59] A[4] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3:
1965 1, 60 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[59] A[4] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary,
1966 1, 60 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[59] A[4] Body Para. 1/2~I answer
1967 1, 60 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[59] A[4] Body Para. 2/2~Now it is
1968 1, 60 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[59] A[4] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply
1969 1, 60 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[59] A[4] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply
1970 1, 60 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[59] A[4] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply
1971 1, 61 | or with love of ~choice?~(4) Whether one angel loves
1972 1, 61 | Q[60] A[2] Body Para. 1/4~I answer that, There exists
1973 1, 61 | Q[60] A[2] Body Para. 2/4~This is clearly evident
1974 1, 61 | Q[60] A[2] Body Para. 3/4~There is however a difference
1975 1, 61 | FP Q[60] A[2] Body Para. 4/4~In saying all this, we
1976 1, 61 | Q[60] A[2] Body Para. 4/4~In saying all this, we are
1977 1, 61 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[60] A[4] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether
1978 1, 61 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[60] A[4] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1:
1979 1, 61 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[60] A[4] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2:
1980 1, 61 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[60] A[4] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3:
1981 1, 61 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[60] A[4] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary,
1982 1, 61 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[60] A[4] Body Para. 1/3~I answer
1983 1, 61 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[60] A[4] Body Para. 2/3~Now it is
1984 1, 61 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[60] A[4] Body Para. 3/3~So then,
1985 1, 61 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[60] A[4] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply
1986 1, 61 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[60] A[4] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply
1987 1, 61 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[60] A[4] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply
1988 1, 61 | himself. For, as was stated (A[4]), natural love rests ~upon
1989 1, 61 | SMT FP Q[60] A[5] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further,
1990 1, 61 | 5] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, it is proper to
1991 1, 61 | SMT FP Q[60] A[5] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: God,
1992 1, 61 | R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: God, in so far as He is
1993 1, 62 | before corporeal creatures?~(4) Whether the angels were
1994 1, 62 | was shown ~above (Q[3], A[4]). From this it is clear
1995 1, 62 | as it is said Dt. ~32:4, should have created the
1996 1, 62 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[61] A[4] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether
1997 1, 62 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[61] A[4] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1:
1998 1, 62 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[61] A[4] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2:
1999 1, 62 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[61] A[4] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3:
2000 1, 62 | Aquin.: SMT FP Q[61] A[4] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary,
1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-2000 | 2001-2500 | 2501-3000 | 3001-3500 | 3501-4000 | 4001-4500 | 4501-5000 | 5001-5500 | 5501-6000 | 6001-6500 | 6501-7000 | 7001-7500 | 7501-8000 | 8001-8500 | 8501-9000 | 9001-9500 | 9501-10000 | 10001-10500 | 10501-11000 | 11001-11500 | 11501-12000 | 12001-12500 | 12501-12988 |