Chapter, §

 1 Note    |      Rome from 1998 to 1999. The present text was approved in forma
 2 Intro   |        significant effect on the present, precisely because the consequences
 3 Intro   |       persist as tensions in the present.~The purification of memory
 4 Intro   |     forgiveness for the past and present sins of her sons and daughters.”1
 5 Intro   |       address this need with the present text. The text offers a
 6 Intro   | daughters of the past and of the present, in a real and profound
 7 Intro   |      both of the past and of the present, so that we might be reconciled
 8   1,  1 |      reconciliation for the sins present in the lives of the People
 9   1,  4 |     Church’s past structures her present. The doctrinal, liturgical,
10   1,  4 |        and reconciliation in the present.~The difficulty that emerges
11   2,  1 |          mention of those of the present generation.33  More frequent
12   2,  1 |   expressly to the errors of the present generation.34   We can conclude
13   2,  1 |      requests for forgiveness to present interlocutors for the sins
14   2,  2 |         idea of guilt, and amply present in the New Testament, is
15   2,  2 |          holiness of God becomes present in the holiness of the incarnate
16   2,  2 |      from the inclination to sin present in the world because of
17   2,  3 |         58:6, that Jesus uses to present the task of his life and
18   3     |    righteous and sinners, of the present as well as the past, in
19   4,  1 |          to the framework of the present, but possess an objective
20   4,  1 |        solely functional way for present interests. It is necessary,
21   4,  1 |  diversity - they propose to our present time.~Second, a certain
22   4,  1 |     could exist between past and present. This communicative bond
23   4,  1 |   communication between past and present, as indicated by one’s own
24   4,  1 |      into its application to the present. The past is grasped in
25   4,  1 |          it offers to modify the present. Memory becomes capable
26   4,  2 |          If these operations are present in every hermeneutic act,
27   4,  2 |  extraneousness between past and present. In particular, when one
28   4,  2 |        the bond between past and present is not motivated only by
29   4,  2 |         her supernatural aspect, present and operative in all times,
30   4,  2 |  particular significance for the present day. The encounter with
31   4,  2 |         particular value for the present, and be rich in a “performative”
32   4,  2 |     vision, thus making past and present interact in the conscience
33   5,  1 |          unites the past and the present in a relationship of reciprocity.
34   5,  1 |      past and their heirs in the present. It is then that it becomes
35   5,  1 |         sins and offenses in the present.~Purifying the memory means
36   5,  1 |          different effect on the present, in view of progress in
37   5,  1 |       relationships lived in the present. The memory of division
38   5,  1 |          that it may have in the present and entails some principles
39   5,  5 |         the Evils of Today.~“The present age in fact, together with
40   5,  5 |        It offers to those of the present a powerful reason to convert
41   6,  1 |       considerable effect on the present, because past sins frequently
42   6,  1 |        remain temptations in the present as well. Above all, if the
43   6,  1 |      whether we are dealing with present faults or the inheritance
44   6,  2 |  recognizing past wrongs and the present day subjects who could best
45   6,  2 |          requests which they may present.~On the pedagogical level,