Chapter, §
1 Intro | without encroaching on the judgement of God, who alone knows
2 Intro | historical and theological judgement? Who will be addressed?
3 Intro | historical and theological judgement is a decisive element for
4 1, 4 | because of the historical judgement which this requires. In
5 1, 4 | it be denied that ethical judgement is always possible, given
6 4 | 4. Historical Judgement and Theological Judgement~
7 4 | Judgement and Theological Judgement~The determination of the
8 4 | all, a correct historical judgement, which is also the foundation
9 4 | relationship between “historical judgement” and “theological judgement”
10 4 | judgement” and “theological judgement” is therefore as complex
11 4 | historians, not to furnish a judgement of natural ethics, which
12 4, 2 | within which historical judgement and theological judgement
13 4, 2 | judgement and theological judgement come to be integrated. This
14 4, 2 | correlation of historical judgement and theological judgement
15 4, 2 | judgement and theological judgement must take into account the
16 4, 2 | an accurate historical judgement cannot prescind from careful
17 5, 1 | rigorous historical-theological judgement, which becomes the foundation
18 5, 1 | authoritative interpretative judgement may have for the entire
19 5, 1 | combination of historical judgement and theological judgement
20 5, 1 | judgement and theological judgement in the process of interpreting
21 5, 1 | relationship between historical judgement and theological judgement.
22 5, 1 | judgement and theological judgement. These are:~a. The principle
23 5, 1 | conscience. Conscience, as “moral judgement” and as “moral imperative,”
24 5, 3 | because of weakness or bad judgement, to what was done or said
25 5 (83)| This is the judgement of the recent document of
|