CHAPTER VIII: The Intelligence, the Will, and the Sensibility in the
Determination of Human Acts
The
previous considerations call for an explication on the role of the
intelligence, the will, and the sensibility in the relations between error and
passion.
It
could seem that we are affirming that every error is conceived by the
intelligence to justify some disorderly passion. Thus, a moralist who affirms a
liberal maxim would always be moved by a liberal tendency.
That
is not what we think. The moralist may arrive at a liberal conclusion solely
through weakness of the intelligence affected by Original Sin. In such a case
would there necessarily be some moral fault of another nature, carelessness,
for instance? This is a question beyond the scope of our study.
What
we do affirm is that, historically, this Revolution had its ultimate origin in
an extremely violent ferment of the passions. And we are far from denying the great
role of doctrinal errors in this process.
Authors of great worth -- de Maistre, de Bonald, Donoso Cortes, and so many
others -- have written numerous studies on these errors and the way each was derived
from the other, from the fifteenth to the sixteenth century, and so on till the
twentieth century. Therefore, it is not our intention to insist on this matter
here.
It
does seem to us, however, particularly opportune to focus on the importance of
the passional factors and their influence in strictly ideological aspects of
the revolutionary process in which we find ourselves. For, as we see it, little
heed is paid to this point. On account of this, people do not see the
Revolution in its entirety and consequently adopt inadequate
counter-revolutionary methods.
We
will now add something about the way in which passions can influence ideas.
|