CHAPTER II: The Apogee and Crisis of the Third Revolution
1. THE APOGEE OF THE
THIRD REVOLUTION
As we
have seen, 69 three great revolutions constituted the chief stages of the
process to gradually demolish the Church and Christian civilization: in the
sixteenth century, humanism, the Renaissance, and Protestantism (First
Revolution); in the eighteenth century, the French Revolution (Second
Revolution); and in the second decade of this century, Communism (Third
Revolution).
These
three revolutions can only be understood as parts of an immense whole that is
the Revolution.
Since
the Revolution is a process, it is obvious that, from 1917 to the present, the
Third Revolution has continued its course. It is now at a true apogee.
When
we consider the territories and populations subject to communist regimes, we
see that the Third Revolution holds sway over a world empire without precedent
in history. This empire is a continuous cause of insecurity and disunion among
the greatest noncommunist nations. Moreover, the leaders of the Third
Revolution control the strings that move, throughout the noncommunist world,
the openly communist parties and the immense network of cryptocommunists,
paracommunists, and useful idiots infiltrated not only into the noncommunist,
socialist, and other parties, but also into the churches, 70
professional and cultural associations, banks, the press, television, radio,
the movie industry, and the like. And as if this were not enough, the Third
Revolution applies with devastating efficacy - as we shall subsequently explain
- the tactics of psychological conquest. With these tactics, communism is
succeeding in reducing immense segments of the noncommunist Western public
opinion to a foolish apathy. Such tactics enable the Third Revolution to
expect, in this terrain, yet more remarkable successes that are even more
disconcerting to observers who analyze events from outside the Third
Revolution.
COMMENTARY
Crisis in the Third Revolution: An Inevitable Fruit of the Marxist
Utopias
The international dimensions of the Third Revolution’s apogee was
already notorious, as the text notes. With the passing of time, the general
picture of this apogee became even clearer, whether on account of the
geographical and populational expansion of communist domination, the worldwide
diffusion of Red propaganda and the weight of the communist parties in the
Western world, or the penetration of communist tendencies into national
cultures.
These
factors – heightened by a global panic of the atomic threat that Soviet
aggressiveness posed to all continents – led to a policy of almost universal softness
and capitulation in relation to Moscow: the German and Vatican Ostpolitiken,
the sweeping wind of unconditional pacifism, the proliferation of political
slogans and formulas that prepared so many bourgeois to view the triumph of
communism as inevitable in the near future.
Have
we not all lived under the psychological pressure of this leftist optimism,
which was enigmatic as a sphinx for the indolent centrists and threatening as a
leviathan for those – like the TFPs and followers of Revolution and
Counter-Revolution in so many countries – who well discerned the
“apocalypse” to which this was leading?
How
few then were those who perceived that this leviathan was afflicted by a
worsening crisis it could not overcome since it was an inevitable fruit of
Marxist utopias!
This
crisis now seems to have disintegrated the leviathan. But, as will be seen
further on, this disintegration has spread an even more deadly climate of
crisis throughout the world.
The
inertia - when not the overt and substantial collaboration - of so many
"democratic" governments and crafty private economic powers of the
West in face of communism (already so powerful) paints a dreadful global
panorama.
Under
these conditions, should the course of the revolutionary process continue as it
has heretofore, it is humanly inevitable that the general triumph of the Third
Revolution will ultimately impose itself on the whole world. How soon? Many
would be alarmed if; as a mere hypothesis, we were to suggest twenty years. To
them, this period would seem surprisingly brief. In reality, who can guarantee
that this outcome will not take place within ten years, five years, or even
less?
The
proximity, indeed the eventual imminence, of this utter devastation is
indubitably one of the notes that indicate the greatest change in the world
conjuncture when we contrast the horizons of 1959 and 1976.
|