B. The Decline in the
Capacity of Leadership
This
decrease in the Red creed's direct persuasive power over the multitudes - which
the recourse to these indirect, slow, and laborious methods denotes - is
accompanied by a correlative decline in communism's leadership capacity.
Let
us examine how these correlative phenomena are manifested and what their fruits
are.
– Hatred, Class Struggle, Revolution
Essentially, the communist movement is and considers itself to be a revolution
born of class hatred. Violence is the method most consistent with it. This is
the direct and fulminating method, from which the mentors of communism expected
the greatest results with the least risk in the shortest possible time.
This
method presupposes a leadership capacity in the communist parties. In the past,
this capacity enabled them to create discontent, transform it into hatred,
articulate this hatred in an immense conspiracy, and thus succeed, with the
"atomic" force of this hatred's impetus, in destroying the present
order and implanting communism.
– The Decline in Guidance of Hatred and in Use of Violence
But
the capacity to guide hatred is also slipping from the hands of the communists.
We
will not extend this writing by going into an explanation of the complex causes
of this fact. We limit ourselves to observing that violence resulted in fewer
and fewer advantages for the communists during these twenty years. To prove
this, we need only recall the invariable failure of the guerrilla warfare and
terrorism spread throughout Latin America.
It is
quite true that violence has been dragging virtually all of Africa toward
communism. But this says very little about the tendencies of public opinion in
the rest of the world. The primitivism of most of Africa's aboriginal
populations places them in special and unequivocal conditions. The growth of
violence there has been due not so much to ideological motives as to
anti-colonialist resentments, which communist propaganda exploited with its
customary astuteness.
– The Fruit and
Proof of This Decline: The Third Revolution Metamorphoses Into a Smiling
Revolution
The
clearest proof that over the last twenty or thirty years the Third Revolution
has been losing its capacity to create and direct the revolutionary hatred lies
in its self-imposed metamorphosis.
During the post-Stalinist thaw with the West, the Third Revolution donned a
smiling mask, exchanged polemics for dialogue, pretended to be changing its
mentality and attitude, and welcomed all sorts of collaboration with the
adversaries it had tried to crush through violence.
In
the international sphere, the Revolution thus successively passed from the Cold
War to peaceful coexistence, then to the "dropping of ideological
barriers," and finally to frank collaboration with the capitalist powers,
labeled, in the language of publicity, “Ostpolitik” or "detente."
In
the internal sphere of the various Western countries, the politique de la main
tendue (policy of the extended hand), which had been a mere artifice for
deceiving a small minority of leftist Catholics during the Stalin era, became a
true detente between communists and pro-capitalists. It was an ideal way for
the Reds to initiate cordial relations and fraudulent approximations with all
their adversaries, whether religious or temporal.
Out
of this came a series of "friendly" tactics: the fellow travelers,
the legalistic "Eurocommunism" (affable, and cautious toward Moscow),
the "historic compromise," and the like.
As we
have said, these stratagems provide advantages for the Third Revolution today.
But they are slow, gradual, and dependent on a myriad of variables for their
fruition.
At
the height of its power, the Third Revolution ceased to threaten and attack and
began to smile and request. It ceased advancing in military cadence, shod in
cossack boots, in order to progress slowly at a discreet pace. It abandoned the
straight path - the shortest and chose a zigzag path marked with uncertainty.
What
an enormous change in twenty years!
|