E. Ecclesiastical
Tribalism and Pentecostalism
Obviously, it is not only the temporal realm that the Fourth Revolution wants to
reduce to tribalism. It wants to do the same with the spiritual realm. How this
is to be done can already be clearly seen in the currents of theologians and
canonists who intend to transform the noble, bone-like rigidity of the
ecclesiastical structure – as Our Lord Jesus Christ instituted it and twenty
centuries of religious life molded it – into a cartilaginous, soft, and
amorphous texture of dioceses and parishes without territories and of religious
groups in which the firm canonical authority is gradually replaced by the
ascendancy of Pentecostalist "prophets," the counterparts of the
structuralist-tribalist witch doctors. Eventually, these prophets will be
indistinguishable from witch doctors. The same goes for the
progressivist-Pentecostalist parish or diocese, which will take on the
appearances of the cell-tribe of structuralism.
COMMENTARY
The “Demonarchization” of the Ecclesiastical Authorities
In
this historical/conjectural perspective, certain modifications in themselves
alien to this process could be seen as steps in a transition between the
pre-Conciliar status quo and the extreme opposite indicated here.
An
example of this would be the trend toward a collegiality viewed as (1) the only
acceptable means for exercising power inside the Church and (2) an expression
of a “demonarchization” of ecclesiastical authority, whose different levels
would become ipso facto much more conditioned by the levels immediately below
them.
All
this taken to its last consequences could tend toward the stable and universal
establishment of popular suffrage inside the Church – not that on occasion she
did not use it to fill certain hierarchical offices. In keeping with the dream
of the advocates of tribalism, it could eventually result in an indefensible
dependence of the whole hierarchy on the laity, as supposedly the only voice of
God. Of God? Or of some witch doctor, whether a Pentecostalist guru or a
sorcerer, who feeds his “mystical revelation” to a tribalistic laity? Would it
be by obeying this laity that the Church hierarchy would fulfill its mission of
obeying the will of God Himself?
|