Chapter, §

 1 Intro         |    other version, which we call alpha, MD published four canons (
 2 Intro         |       took several readings of (alpha and included them in B[eta]
 3 Intro         |        in it, appear similar to alpha; although canons 15-16 are
 4 Intro         |        18-19 are added to B. If alpha is earlier than B, then
 5 Intro         |       that this text belongs to alpha. ~We believe the (alpha
 6 Intro         |         alpha. ~We believe the (alpha version is older than B[
 7 Intro         |       eta].For, the canons from alpha(except ll-12, 15-17) are
 8 Intro         |          as Br noted; therefore alpha seems right to omit these
 9 Intro         |      prepared our text with the alpha version as the basis. We
10 Canons,  6(26)|            or a deacon added in alpha except S ~
11 Canons,  17   | remaining canons are missing in alpha, and Msi has canons 18-19