bold = Main text
Vol., Sect., Part, Chap., Par. grey = Comment text
1 I, Pref | through volumes of tedious commentary. What we want here, as everywhere
2 I, Pref | This is clear from the commentary, and from later paragraphs,
3 I, Pref | which is, is meant. The commentary explains sa âtmâ by tat
4 I, Intro, 0, 0, 4| quoted by Sankara in his commentary on the Vedânta-sûtras [1];
5 I, Intro, 0, 0, 5| presupposed by Sâyana's commentary and even by earlier works,
6 I, Intro, 0, 0, 5| of the text and by the commentary.~Such instances, where every
7 I, Intro, 0, 0, 5| of the Rig-veda and its commentary by Sâyanâkârya, and my convictions
8 I, Intro, 0, 0, 5| edition, but in most cases the commentary would have been sufficient
9 I, Intro, 0, 0, 6| proposed by Sankara in his commentary on the Taittirîya-upanishad
10 I, Intro, 0, 0, 7| with extracts from the commentary of Sankara; Bibliotheca
11 I, Intro, 0, 0, 8| Khândogya-upanishad and its commentary are frequent, no MSS. of
12 I, Intro, 0, 0, 8| though as yet he has seen no commentary attached to the Brâhmana
13 I, Intro, 0, 0, 8| of the Upanishad with the commentary of Sankara and the gloss
14 I, Intro, 0, 0, 9| also [1]. Sankara, in his commentary, tells us that this Upanishad
15 I, Intro, 0, 0, 9| in the MSS. of Sâyana's commentary on the Rig-veda. The story
16 I, Intro, 0, 0, 9| quoted by Slyana in his commentary on the Rig-veda, VIII, 80,
17 I, Intro, 0, 0, 9| Visvesvaratîrtha, whose commentary he explains, treated the
18 I, Intro, 0, 0, 9| Sâyana, when quoting in his commentary on the Rig-veda from the
19 I, Intro, 0, 0, 9| Aitareya-âranyaka with Sâyana's commentary was published in the same
20 I, Intro, 0, 0, 9| several MSS. of the text and commentary at my disposal, I have derived
21 I, Intro, 0, 0, 9| portion, follows Sankara's commentary, of which we have a gloss
22 I, Intro, 0, 0, 9| Nârâyanendra on Sankara's commentary, and another by Ânandatîrtha
23 I, Intro, 0, 0, 9| by Visvesvaratîrtha on a commentary by Ânandatîrthabhagavatpâdâkârya,
24 I, Intro, 0, 0, 10| Indica, with Sankarânanda's commentary and an excellent translation
25 I, Intro, 0, 0, 10| Kaushîtakins [2].~From a commentary discovered by Professor
26 I, Intro, 0, 0, 10| and ends like Sâyana's commentary on the seventh adhyâya,
27 I, Intro, 0, 0, 10| divisions. In one MS. of the commentary (MS. A), the four adhyâyas
28 I, Intro, 0, 0, 10| followed the text of the commentary, while Sankarâkârya, if
29 I, Intro, 0, 0, 10| trust to extracts in his commentary on the Vedânta-sûtras, followed
30 I, Intro, 0, 0, 10| fact that the author of the commentary on the Kaushîtaki-upanishad
31 I, Intro, 0, 0, 10| Kaushîtaki-upanishad, not only the text and commentary as edited by Professor Cowell,
32 XV, Intro | Sankara appeals in his great commentary on the Vedânta-Sûtras 1,
33 XV, Intro | the honour of a special commentary. We possess his commentaries
34 XV, Intro | We likewise possess his commentary on the Mândûkya-upanishad,
35 XV, Intro | published its text with the commentary of Sankarâkârya in the Bibliotheca
36 XV, Intro | confirmation. There is another commentary on this Upanishad by Nârâyanabhatta,
37 XV, Intro | statement that Sankara wrote a commentary on the Kaushîtaki-upanishad
38 XV, Intro | Nrisimhapûrvatâparî-upanishad, with commentary.~Nrisimhottaratâpanî-upanishad,
39 XV, Intro | Nrisimhottaratâpanî-upanishad, with commentary.~Shatkakra-upanishad, with
40 XV, Intro | Shatkakra-upanishad, with commentary by Nârâyana.~Lastly, Harakandra
41 XV, Intro | Gopâlatâpani-upanishad, with commentary by Visvesvara.~These editions
42 XV, Intro | Indica, p. 384. In Sankara's commentary also the same form is given.
43 XV, 1 | text of this Upanishad, the commentary of Sankara (MS. 127 Chambers),
44 XV, 1 | Chambers). The text and commentary of Sankara and the gloss
45 XV, 1 | the Chambers MS. of the commentary also it is said to belong
46 XV, 2 | of the text and Sankara's commentary from the MS. in the Chambers
47 XV, 3 | supplementary work.~Sankara, in his commentary on the Taittirîyaka-upanishad,
48 XV, 3 | Samhitî-upanishad.~Sâyana[3], in his commentary on the Taittirîya-âranyaka,
49 XV, 3 | as Sâmhitî-upanishad. His commentary, however, is called Sikshâ-bhâshya.
50 XV, 4 | fourteenth book.~There is a commentary on the Brihadâranyaka-upanishad
51 XV, 4 | six adhyâyas.~As Sankara's commentary and the gloss of Anandatirtha,
52 XV, 4 | Roer's edition of the text, commentary and gloss of this Upanishad,
53 XV, 4 | extracts from Sankara's commentary.~
54 XV, 5 | Sankara as worthy of a special commentary.~The Svetâsvatara-upanishad
55 XV, 5 | Bibliotheca Indica, with Sankara's commentary. I have consulted besides,
56 XV, 5 | have consulted besides, the commentary of Vigñânâtman, the pupil
57 XV, 5 | I. O. 1133; and a third commentary, by Sahkarânanda, the pupil
58 XV, 6 | in the beginning of his commentary, says: Mantroktasyârthasya
|