bold = Main text
   Vol.,  Sect., Part, Chap., Par.                                       grey = Comment text

 1        I, Intro,    0,   0,   4|             of thought, is quoted by Sankara in his commentary on the
 2        I, Intro,    0,   0,   4|              explained and quoted by Sankara, by Sâyana, and other more
 3        I, Intro,    0,   0,   5|           The text, therefore, which Sankara had before his eyes, or,
 4        I, Intro,    0,   0,   5|              It may be objected that Sankara's text belonged to one locality
 5        I, Intro,    0,   0,   5|              also been supposed that Sankara, who, in writing his commentaries
 6        I, Intro,    0,   0,   5|         which served as the basis of Sankara's commentaries, we have
 7        I, Intro,    0,   0,   5|            into the text long before Sankara composed his commentaries.~
 8        I, Intro,    0,   0,   5|          tadu sarvasya bâhyatah; yet Sankara evidently read sarvasyâsya,
 9        I, Intro,    0,   0,   5|          made sometimes to go beyond Sankara, and to restore the text,
10        I, Intro,    0,   0,   5|           but as it was no longer in Sankara's time. It is one thing
11        I, Intro,    0,   0,   5|           thing to decline to follow Sankara in every one of his interpretations,
12        I, Intro,    0,   0,   5|             sa mene na vadishya iti. Sankara adopted the latter reading,
13        I, Intro,    0,   0,   5|              sentence which follows. Sankara saw clearly that what had
14        I, Intro,    0,   0,   5|          reject an interpretation of Sankara's, without at the same time
15        I, Intro,    0,   0,   5|           the text, to remember that Sankara, where he is not blinded
16        I, Intro,    0,   0,   5|         ruling, I have no doubt that Sankara likewise was fully aware
17        I, Intro,    0,   0,   5| interpretation becomes bolder still. Sankara does not explain the passage
18        I, Intro,    0,   0,   6|              explanation proposed by Sankara in his commentary on the
19        I, Intro,    0,   0,   7|      extracts from the commentary of Sankara; Bibliotheca Indica. Calcutta,
20        I, Intro,    0,   0,   8|     Upanishad with the commentary of Sankara and the gloss of Ânandagiri
21        I, Intro,    0,   0,   8|              W. Windischmann, in his Sankara, seu de theologumenis Vedanticorum. (
22        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|           other Upanishads also [1]. Sankara, in his commentary, tells
23        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|             the description given by Sankara in the Khândogya-upanishad,
24        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|             the description given by Sankara. In a letter dated Tanjore,
25        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|          contents, exactly with what Sankara says, but not in the,divisions.
26        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|     beginning of a ninth chapter, as Sankara remarks.'~The Kena-upanishad
27        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|             still earlier authority, Sankara, by calling the Aitareya-upanishad
28        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|              restore that text which Sankara (the pupil of Govinda) and
29        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|           Upanishad portion, follows Sankara's commentary, of which we
30        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|             gloss by Nârâyanendra on Sankara's commentary, and another
31       XV, Intro                |        principal Upanishads to which Sankara appeals in his great commentary
32       XV, Intro                |          Vedânta, Einleitung, p. 38. Sankara occasionally refers also
33       XV, Intro                |            Upanishads were chosen by Sankara or deserving the honour
34       XV, Intro                |               Weber's statement that Sankara wrote a commentary on the
35       XV, Intro                |            list of works ascribed to Sankara may be seen in Regnaud,
36       XV, Intro                |             existed at the time when Sankara wrote his commentaries.
37       XV, Intro                |           wrote his commentaries. As Sankara lived during the ninth century
38       XV, Intro                |       commentaries, besides those of Sankara, it became quite clear that
39       XV, Intro                |       Bibliotheca Indica, p. 384. In Sankara's commentary also the same
40       XV, Intro                |            to creation, all this~[1. Sankara says (p. 398, 1. 5): ekam
41       XV,   1                  |         Upanishad, the commentary of Sankara (MS. 127 Chambers), and
42       XV,   1                  |           The text and commentary of Sankara and the gloss of Ânandagiri
43       XV,   1                  |          predecessors, not excepting Sankara, I may have succeeded in
44       XV,   2                  |             own copy of the text and Sankara's commentary from the MS.
45       XV,   2                  |           text, the comcommentary by Sankara, a gloss by Ânandagñâna,
46       XV,   3                  |              and supplementary work.~Sankara, in his commentary on the
47       XV,   3                  |        always-have three[1], the~[1. Sankara (ed. Roer, p. 141) himself
48       XV,   4                  |       consisting of six adhyâyas.~As Sankara's commentary and the gloss
49       XV,   4                  |             with large extracts from Sankara's commentary.~
50       XV,   5                  |            and it was singled out by Sankara as worthy of a special commentary.~
51       XV,   5                  |           what the commentators say. Sankara first explains kapilam by
52       XV,   5                  |             Bibliotheca Indica, with Sankara's commentary. I have consulted
53       XV,   6                  |            of the principal teacher.~Sankara, in the beginning of his
54       XV,   6                  |              mere repetition, and if Sankara calls the beginning of it