bold = Main text
   Vol.,  Sect., Part, Chap., Par.                                           grey = Comment text

 1        I, Intro,    0,   0,   3|                 in the beginning~[1. See Weber. Indische Studien, IX, p.
 2        I, Intro,    0,   0,   4| Muktikâ-upanishad, is 108 [3]. Professor Weber thinks that their number,
 3        I, Intro,    0,   0,   4|          Sanskrit Literature, p. 193.~4. Weber, History of Sanskrit Literature,
 4        I, Intro,    0,   0,   4|              have been made by Professor Weber and M. Regnaud to fix in
 5        I, Intro,    0,   0,   5|                  made out from Professor Weber's essay on the Upanishads,
 6        I, Intro,    0,   0,   7|               Indica. Calcutta, 1870.~A. Weber, Die Vagrasûkî des Asvaghosha.
 7        I, Intro,    0,   0,   7|             Asvaghosha. Berlin, 1860.~A. Weber, Die Râma-tâpanîya Upanishad.
 8        I, Intro,    0,   0,   7|              Upanishad. Berlin, 1864.~A. Weber, Analyse der in Anquetil
 9        I, Intro,    0,   0,   8|                   1827-34). Professor A. Weber has treated of this Upanishad
10        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|         Colebrooke, Windischmann, Poley, Weber, Röer, Gough, and Regnaud
11        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|                 nachtnachgewiesen sind.' Weber Indische Studien VIII, 68.
12        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|               Sarvasâra, which Professor Weber thinks was corrupted into
13        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|                 ed. Stenzier). Professor Weber takes Aitareya and Mabaitareya
14        I, Intro,    0,   0,  10|                 Royal Library at Berlin (Weber, Catalogue, p.20) begins,
15        I, Intro,    0,   0,  10|                  Preface, p. v).~[1. See Weber, History of Sanskrit Literature,
16       XV, Intro                |                Bibliotheca Indica.~2 Dr. Weber's statement that Sankara
17       XV,   1                  |                Roy, Windischmann, Poley, Weber, Muir, Regnaud, Gough, and
18       XV,   1                  |         Taittirîya Upanishads. Professor Weber thinks that vallî, creeper,
19       XV,   1                  |                 unfair to hold Professor Weber responsible for his remarks
20       XV,   3                  |                 of theÂtreyî school (see Weber, Indische Studien, II, p.
21       XV,   4                  |                 been edited by Professor Weber, the Upanishad, consisting
22       XV,   4                  |                 been carefully edited by Weber in his great editi.on of
23       XV,   5                  |                   271 a; p. 222 a.~3 See Weber, Ind. Stud. I, pp. 400,
24       XV,   5                  |         suspected in this Upanishad,~[1. Weber, Ind. Stud. I, 422; and
25       XV,   5                  |    Sânkhya-pravakana-bhâshya, p. 9 seq.; Weber, Ind. Stud. I, p. 433.~2.
26       XV,   5                  |                 Ind. Stud. I, p. 433.~2. Weber, Hist. of Indian Literature,
27       XV,   5                  |                 no facts, may be seen in Weber's Indische Studien, vol.