bold = Main text
   Vol.,  Sect., Part, Chap., Par.                                        grey = Comment text

 1        I, Pref                    |        higher objects. Thus in one passage we are told at first that
 2        I, Pref                    |          ventured to translate the passage in the following way:~'That
 3        I, Translat                |           of our knowledge, many a passage which now seems clear and
 4        I, Intro,    0,   0,   3   | Aitareya-âranyaka, III, 2, 6, 6, a passage of the Upanishad is spoken
 5        I, Intro,    0,   0,   4   |       student. Thus instead of the passage as found in the Khândogya-upanishad
 6        I, Intro,    0,   0,   5   |           right in translating the passage in the Khând. Up. V, 3,
 7        I, Intro,    0,   0,   5   |    intelligible. But when the same passage occurs again in the Brihad-âranyaka,
 8        I, Intro,    0,   0,   5   |       Prâna, or breath, in another passage also, viz. Brihad-âranyaka-up.
 9        I, Intro,    0,   0,   5   |       Sankara does not explain the passage at all, which is strange,
10        I, Intro,    0,   0,   5   |           Cowell has pointed out a passage to me, where we must go
11        I, Intro,    0,   0,   6   |           stated, however, that no passage has yet been met with in
12        I, Intro,    0,   0,   6   |         Khand. Up. VI, 7, 2.]~only passage in which upanishasâda occurs (
13        I, Intro,    0,   0,   8   |            of each Veda. A curious passage is found in the Gautama-sûtras
14       XV, Intro                   |             6, quotes, on p. 39, a passage from the Khândogya-upanishad,
15       XV, Intro                   |          attempting to translate a passage without considering the
16       XV, Intro                   |         occasion to translate this passage from the Khândogya-upanishad,
17       XV, Intro                   |           what I felt, that in our passage a strictly literal translation
18       XV, Intro                   |            gender, and this in our passage is of great importance,
19       XV, Intro                   |           clearer still in another passage, Maitr. Up. VI, 17, where
20       XV,   5                     |           the Îsvara, Deva, in the passage quoted, is perhaps the nearest
21       XV,   5                     |      theories[4], there is not one passage in it which, if rightly
22       XV,   5                     | instructive is this, that our very passage, which may have suggested
23       XV,   5                     |         that had been made of this passage, even in certain passages
24       XV,   7                     |          on this page, I subjoin a passage from the Abhidharma-kosha-vyâkhyi,
25       XV,  14,    0,   3          |          came forth by the urinary passage, was built up with bones,
26       XV,  14,    0,   6          |            the twelfth part of the passage of the sun through the twenty-seven
27       XV,  14,    0,   6          |     Brahmarandhra), serving as the passage of the Prana, is divided