bold = Main text
Vol., Sect., Part, Chap., Par. grey = Comment text
1 I, Pref | would be mere noise to an Indian ear, an Indian Sangita seems
2 I, Pref | noise to an Indian ear, an Indian Sangita seems to us without
3 I, Pref | lose all that distinguishes Indian from Greek thought. It may
4 I, Pref | advantage in the study of Indian philosophy, the opportunity
5 I, Intro, 0, 0, 1| his initiation in primeval Indian wisdom, and received it
6 I, Intro, 0, 0, 1| holy and earnest spirit. Indian air surrounds us, and original
7 I, Intro, 0, 0, 1| has been so readily called Indian mysticism. That Schelling
8 I, Intro, 0, 0, 2| Galilee. On the contrary, Indian wisdom will flow back upon
9 I, Intro, 0, 0, 3| truly scholarlike study of Indian literature must begin with
10 I, Intro, 0, 0, 4| Literature, p. 155 note.~5. Indian Antiquary, II, 267.]~(p.
11 I, Intro, 0, 0, 4| very different periods of Indian thought, any attempt to
12 I, Intro, 0, 0, 5| the eyes of the ancient Indian Aryas, be considered as
13 I, Intro, 0, 0, 5| since been sent to me by the Indian Government. It is written
14 XV, Intro | the Bibliography of the Indian Philosophical Systems, pp.
15 XV, Intro | Fitzedward Hall's Index of Indian Philosophical Systems.~5.
16 XV, Intro | a European, not with an Indian scholar, I should venture
17 XV, 1 | hesitate~[1. History of Indian Literature, p. 93, note;
18 XV, 5 | I, 422; and History of Indian Literature, p. 238.~2. The
19 XV, 5 | 433.~2. Weber, Hist. of Indian Literature, p. 236.~3. This
20 XV, 5 | and even in his History of Indian Literature, published in
21 XV, 5 | attempts of most of the Indian commentators at explaining
22 XV, 7 | specimen of that peculiar Indian style, so common in the
|