bold = Main text
Vol., Sect., Part, Chap., Par. grey = Comment text
1 I, Pref | and the Tripitaka. The idea of keeping the original
2 I, Pref | apocryphal accretions was an idea of later growth, that could
3 I, Pref | give classical scholars an idea of the chaotic state from
4 I, Pref | give us a totally false idea. M. Regnaud in his 'Matériaux
5 I, Translat | I first put forward the idea of a translation of the
6 I, Translat | the Eddas alone give us an idea of what the religious and
7 I, Intro, 0, 0, 5 | he forgets that such an idea is foreign to the ordinary
8 I, Intro, 0, 0, 6 | that it would express the idea of session, or assembly
9 XV, Intro | to the reader a correct idea of the original.~Let us
10 XV, Intro | that is foreign to your idea of what a revelation ought
11 XV, 1 | necklace, and hence arose the idea that Death must have offered
12 XV, 5 | taken for granted that the idea of the Highest Self was
13 XV, 5 | than those in which the idea of the Brahman or the Highest
14 XV, 5 | nearest approach to our own idea of a personal God, though
15 XV, 5 | Self, and this is the very idea which is here expressed
16 XV, 5 | Historically, no doubt, the idea of the Îsvara, the personal
17 XV, 5 | omnipotent, existed before the idea of the absolute Brahman,
18 XV, 5 | absolute Brahman, and after the idea of the Brahman had been
19 XV, 7 | be used in support of the idea that, being a descendant
|