bold = Main text
Vol., Sect., Part, Chap., Par. grey = Comment text
1 I, Intro, 0, 0, 4| irregular forms which even the commentator can account for only as
2 I, Intro, 0, 0, 4| which startled even the commentator, but is explained away by
3 I, Intro, 0, 0, 4| vipâsah. But here again the commentator explains that another Sâkhâ
4 I, Intro, 0, 0, 4| place (Maitr. Up. II, 4) the commentator treats such irregularities
5 I, Intro, 0, 0, 5| Kânvas, that, though the commentator explains them, they are
6 I, Intro, 0, 0, 5| This, according to the commentator, is addressed to Prâna,
7 I, Intro, 0, 0, 5| Mâdhyandina-sâkhâ, we find the commentator proposing the following
8 I, Intro, 0, 0, 5| is the reading which the commentator seems anxious to explain,
9 I, Intro, 0, 0, 5| thought that possibly the commentator might have had before him
10 I, Intro, 0, 0, 8| other Upanishads, as the commentator says, but not in the last
11 I, Intro, 0, 0, 9| for even the Vaishnava commentator does not attempt to take
12 I, Intro, 0, 0, 10| at least two texts. The commentator, in some of its MSS., refers
13 I, Intro, 0, 0, 10| p. 50.]~The style of the commentator differs in so marked a manner
14 I, 3, 1, 1, 3 | khanda. According to the commentator, the third khanda was intended
15 XV, 1 | ceremony called~[1. The commentator explains punar-mrityu as
16 XV, 7 | accretions. The Sanskrit commentator himself declares the sixth
17 XV, 7 | Kratu. This is called by the commentator (see p. 331, note) a Vyâkhyâna,
18 XV, 7 | instead of te etasya, the commentator seems to have read te vâ
19 XV, 7 | compounds, too, as in I, 4, the commentator has recourse to a khândasa
|