bold = Main text
   Vol.,  Sect., Part, Chap., Par.                                 grey = Comment text

 1        I, Pref                |   philosophy of the Brahmans is Âtman, nom. sing. Âtmâ. It is
 2        I, Pref                | certainly not to be ascribed to Âtman. It never means, for instance,
 3        I, Pref                |   circumstances, be ascribed to Âtman.~When Âtman occurs in philosophical
 4        I, Pref                |         ascribed to Âtman.~When Âtman occurs in philosophical
 5        I, Pref                |     from a very early time, the Âtman or the self, independent
 6        I, Pref                |       accidents.~The individual âtman or self, however, was with
 7        I, Pref                |     know was to be, to know the Âtman was to be the Âtman, and
 8        I, Pref                |         the Âtman was to be the Âtman, and the reward of that
 9        I, Pref                |         of all that exists, the Âtman was identified with the
10        I, Pref                |   return to it.~If we translate Âtman by soul, mind, or spirit,
11        I, Pref                |        we could never predicate Âtman, or self, of anything else.
12        I, Pref                |        may be predicated of the Âtman, as manifested in the phenomenal
13        I, Pref                |       in the sense in which the Âtman is; they have no independent
14        I, Pref                |   independent being, apart from Âtman. Thus to translate the beginning
15        I, Pref                |     this, and has kept the word Âtman untranslated, 'Au commencement
16        I, Pref                |       cet univers n'était que l'âtman.' But while in French it
17        I, Pref                |         find any equivalent for âtman, I have ventured to translate
18        I, Pref                |      rendering of such words as âtman, sat, and satyam.~In a dialogue