bold = Main text
   Vol.,  Sect., Part, Chap., Par.                                     grey = Comment text

 1        I, Intro,    0,   0,   3|            the introduction to the Aitareya-âranyaka, that that Âranyaka is in
 2        I, Intro,    0,   0,   3|         the Brâhmanas. In the same Aitareya-âranyaka, III, 2, 6, 6, a passage
 3        I, Intro,    0,   0,   5|    collated the Upanishad from the Aitareya-âranyaka, which turned out to be
 4        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|                                THE AITAREYA-ÂRANYAKA.~IN giving a translation
 5        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9| translation of that portion of the Aitareya-âranyaka which precedes the Upanishad.
 6        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|           The first chapter of the Aitareya-âranyaka is a mere continuation of
 7        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|       priests are described in the Aitareya-âranyaka; not all, however, but those
 8        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|           hesitate to speak of the Aitareya-Âranyaka as a part of the Brâhmana[
 9        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|           classed as Brâhmana.~The Aitareya-Âranyaka appears at first sight a
10        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|         composite character of the Aitareya-Âranyaka, is recognised even by native
11        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|          on the greater portion of Aitareya-Âranyaka as the works of an inspired
12        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|           first three books of the Aitareya-Âranyaka, was not the author of the
13        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|      certain MSS. the whole of the Aitareya-âranyaka is sometimes ascribed either
14        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|          school of Âsvalâyana.~The Aitareya-âranyaka consists of the following
15        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|             Röer. The whole of the Aitareya-âranyaka with Sâyana's commentary
16        I, Intro,    0,   0,  10|    literature of the Rig-veda (see Aitareya-âranyaka, Introduction, p. xcii),
17        I, Intro,    0,   0,  10|        some of the adhyâyas of the Aitareya-âranyaka, while an imperfect MS.
18        I, Intro,    0,   0,  10|             p.20) begins, like the Aitareya-âranyaka, with a description of the