bold = Main text
   Vol.,  Sect., Part, Chap., Par.                                    grey = Comment text

 1        I, Intro,    0,   0,   1|          1801 and 1802, under the title of 'Oupnek'hat, id est,
 2        I, Intro,    0,   0,   1|      Duperron gives the following title of the Persian translation: '
 3        I, Intro,    0,   0,   4|           so high a number, every title of an Upanishad would have
 4        I, Intro,    0,   0,   6|          or is simply used as the title of the philosophic treatises
 5        I, Intro,    0,   0,   6|      besides being the recognised title of certain philosophical
 6        I, Intro,    0,   0,   6|       received such knowledge.~4. Title of the books containing
 7        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|         hardly be considered as a title. It means 'the teaching
 8        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|      having been mistaken for the title of the whole work than to
 9        I, Intro,    0,   0,  10| translated into Persian under the title of Kokhenk, and has been
10       XV,   2                  |       translation with notes.~The title of the Upanishad, Mundaka,
11       XV,   2                  |           illusion and error. The title is all the more strange
12       XV,   7                  |       attempt to settle its right title. Professor Cowell, in his
13       XV,   7                  |       four books.~In his MSS. the title varied between Maitry-upanishad
14       XV,   7                  |    received from Dr. Burnell, the title of our Upanishad is Maitriyani-brâhmana-upanishad,
15       XV,   7                  |     teacher Maitrî or Maitra, the title of Maitrî-upanishad would
16       XV,   7                  |       which can hardly be a right title, and p. 36b a Maitrâyanîya
17       XV,   7                  |     smaller Maitreyopanishad. The title of Maitreyî-brâhmana has,