bold = Main text
   Vol.,  Sect., Part, Chap., Par.                                    grey = Comment text

 1        I, Intro,    0,   0,   4|         possibly found in another Sâkhâ, and borrowed from there
 2        I, Intro,    0,   0,   4| commentator explains that another Sâkhâ reads 'vigighatsa, and that
 3        I, Intro,    0,   0,   4|  Upanishad, as handed down in one Sâkhâ, do not prove that the same
 4        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|         Upanishad belonged to the Sâkhâ of the Talavakâras.~All
 5        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|    Gaiminîya-brâhmana,' after the Sâkhâ of the Sâma-veda which they
 6        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|          described in a different Sâkhâ, see Taittirîya Samhitâ
 7        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|          their rules to their own Sâkhâ only.~There are many legends
 8       XV,   7                  |           a lost Brâhmana of that Sâkhâ, being preceded by the sacrificial (
 9       XV,   7                  |         Maitrâyanîyanâmnî yâgushî sâkhâ, and he mentions Maitra (
10       XV,   7                  |     Maitrî) as the author of that Sâkhâ. (vv. 55,150).~In the Muktikâ-upanishad[
11       XV,   7                  |         derives its name from the Sâkhâ of the Maitrâyanas, and
12       XV,   7                  |         Maitrâyana-sâkhâ. In that Sâkhâ final unaccented as and
13       XV,   7                  |     distinctive of the Maitrâyanî sâkhâ. Thus we read Maitr. Up.
14       XV,   7                  |     indicatory of that particular Sâkhâ, namely the Maitrâyanî.~
15       XV,   7                  |       stranger peculiarity of our Sâkhâ is the change of a final