bold = Main text
   Vol.,  Sect., Part, Chap., Par.                                             grey = Comment text

 1        I, Intro,    0,   0,   8|              commentary of Sankara and the gloss of Ânandagiri has been published
 2        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|             commentary, of which we have a gloss by Ânandagñâna.~Colebrooke
 3        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9| Atharvana-upanishads, p.394]~possessed one gloss by Nârâyanendra on Sankara'
 4        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|                Ânandatîrtha on a different gloss for the entire Upanishad.
 5        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|                  the entire Upanishad. The gloss by Nârâyanendra [1], however,
 6        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|                   so far as I can see, the gloss contained in MS. E. I. H.
 7        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|                Colebrooke refers, is not a gloss by Ânandatîrtha at all,
 8        I, Intro,    0,   0,   9|                 Ânandatîrtha at all, but a gloss by Visvesvaratîrtha on a
 9        I, Intro,    0,   0,  10|     Âtmashatkabhâshyatîkâ, begins like the gloss edited by Dr. Röer, and
10       XV,   1                  |                     127 Chambers), and the gloss of Gopâlayogin (MS. 224
11       XV,   1                  |              commentary of Sankara and the gloss of Ânandagiri have since
12       XV,   2                  |                comcommentary by Sankara, a gloss by Ânandagñâna, and an English
13       XV,   4                  |               Sankara's commentary and the gloss of Anandatirtha, edited
14       XV,   4                  |                   the text, commentary and gloss of this Upanishad, there