bold = Main text
   Vol.,  Sect., Part, Chap., Par.                                               grey = Comment text

 1        I, Pref                 |                    This translation is quite correct, as far as the words go,
 2        I, Intro,    0,   0,   1|               century, to arrive at a really correct, accurate, and living understanding
 3        I, Intro,    0,   0,   4|                   One Upanishad may give the correct, another an evidently corrupt
 4        I, Intro,    0,   0,   4|                     does not follow that the correct reading may not be the result
 5        I, Intro,    0,   0,   5|     Vâgasaneyi-samhitâ, who would venture to correct so old a mistake?~Again,
 6        I, Intro,    0,   0,   5|                      critic would venture to correct a mistake, intentional or
 7        I, Intro,    0,   0,   5|                     feels tempted at once to correct the textus receptus, occur
 8        I, Intro,    0,   0,   5|                      critic would venture to correct the readings of the Brihad-âranyaka.
 9       XV, Intro                |                    done, both in restoring a correct text, and in discovering
10       XV, Intro                |                      to give to the reader a correct idea of the original.~Let
11       XV, Intro                |                    translation grammatically correct, but from the philosophical
12       XV,   1                  |                     but who would venture to correct that form? Whenever that
13       XV,   7                  | Maitrâyana-brâhmana-upanishad seems likewise correct, and Maitriyani-brilimana-upanishad,
14       XV,   7                  |               Maitrî-upanishad would also be correct, but I doubt whether Maitrî-upanishad