Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1     1,   1  (2)  |         He was followed by Tsing Tsz (Jo-ji) and Chan Hieh (Shin-ketsu,
 2     1,   1  (1)  |          it was completed by Chu Tsz (Shu-shi, died in 1200),
 3     1,   3, 6    |          an angel sings."~Chwang Tsz (So-shi), the greatest of
 4     1,   3, 7    |          Duke Hwan," says Chwang Tsz,2 "seated above in his hall,
 5     1,   3  (2)  |                           Chwang Tsz, vol. ii., p. 24.~
 6     1,   4, 6    |           as expressed in Chwang Tsz (Su-shi):1~"When Kwang-zze
 7     1,   4  (1)  |                           Chwang Tsz,' vol. vi., p. 23.
 8     1,   4, 10   |        sir," asked a monk of Teu tsz (To-shi), "that all the
 9     1,   4, 10   |          certainly," replied Teu tsz. "What is, reverend sir,"
10     1,   4, 14   |        divine law. Therefore Teu Tsz Jo-shi), pointing to a stone
11     1,   4, 16   |       Chi Man (Chi-mon), and Teu Tsz (To-shi), the first of whom
12     1,   5, 2    |    Bad-natured according to Siün Tsz 1 (Jun-shi).~The weaknesses
13     1,   5, 2    |        theory propounded by Siün Tsz (Jun-shi) and his followers. '
14     1,   5, 2    |          bad-natured,' says Siün Tsz, 'since he has inborn lust,
15     1,   5  (1)  |                             Siün Tsz's date is later by some
16     1,   5  (1)  |         years than Mencius. Siün Tsz gives the reason why man
17     1,   5, 2    |         essentially bad, as Siün Tsz holds, how can he cultivate
18     1,   5, 9    |          the Robber Kih.3~Chwang Tsz (So-shi) remarks in a humorous
19     1,   6, 5    |          sentient beings. Chwang Tsz1 (So-shi) is right when
20     1,   6  (1)  |                           Chwang Tsz, vol. i., p. 20.~
21     1,   7  (1)  |       account is given by Chwang Tsz in his book, vol. xviii.,
22     1,   8, 5    |      mind is distracted.'~Chwang Tsz seems to have noticed that
23     1,   8  (1)  |                           Chwang Tsz, vol. iii., p. 2.~
24     1,   8, 7    | equilibrium of your mind. Chwang Tsz1 thought that calmness of
25     1,   8  (1)  |                           Chwang Tsz, vol. v., p. 5.~
26     1,   8, 16   |           The dead," says Chwang Tsz, "have no tyrannical king
27 Appen, Intro  (2)|       King (Do-toku-kyo), by Lao Tsz (Ro-shi, 604-522 B.C.).~
28 Appen, Intro     |          in fact.~Confucius, Lao Tsz, and Shakya, however, were
29 Appen,   1       |         are the teachings of Lao Tsz and Chwang Tsz?1 The Path,
30 Appen,   1       |  teachings of Lao Tsz and Chwang Tsz?1 The Path, besides, should
31 Appen,   1       | miraculous medicine. Why did Lao Tsz, Chwang Tsz, Cheu Kung2
32 Appen,   1       |          Why did Lao Tsz, Chwang Tsz, Cheu Kung2 and Confucius
33 Appen,   2, 2    |  spiritual, and omnipresent. Lao Tsz, led by his mistaken idea,
34 Appen,   2, 2    |          of Chaos. Therefore Lao Tsz said, 'The Path brings forth
35 Appen,   2, 2    |   sediment are the Earth. So Lao Tsz said, 'One produces two.'
36 Appen,   2, 2    |      human beings. Therefore Lao Tsz said, 'The two produce three.'