Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 1, 6, 8 | that causes these unreal appearances. Therefore this doctrine (
2 1, 6, 13 | the case with phenomena or appearances, but not with reality. Growth
3 1, 6, 13 | are the ebb and flow of appearances in the ocean of reality,
4 1, 6, 13 | world of sense or phenomenal appearances, but not of reality. The
5 1, 6, 13 | reflected. On this account appearances are subject to limitations,
6 1, 6, 13 | assertion that the world of appearances is valueless, as it is limited,
7 1, 6, 14 | into the illusive ideas of appearances, and throws its dark shadow
8 1, 6, 14 | unknowable existing behind appearances.~According to their opinion,
9 1, 6, 14 | imagine about the world, is appearances or phenomena, but not reality
10 1, 6, 14 | but not reality itself. Appearances are 'things known as,' but
11 1, 6, 14 | or reality, lies behind appearances permanently beyond our ken.
12 1, 6, 14 | that it lies hidden behind appearances or presentations. Take,
13 1, 6, 14 | coloured in itself, since these appearances are wholly due to the difference
14 1, 6, 15 | hidden behind or beyond appearances? They investigated all the
15 1, 6, 15 | and put them all aside as appearances, and brooded on the thing-in-itself,
16 1, 6, 15 | reality as transcendental to appearances. Reality exists as appearances,
17 1, 6, 15 | appearances. Reality exists as appearances, and appearances are reality
18 1, 6, 15 | exists as appearances, and appearances are reality known to human
19 1, 6, 15 | beings. You cannot separate appearances from reality, and hold out
20 Appen, 2, 1 | Substance (behind their appearances). What, then, is the chief
21 Appen, 2, 4 | that causes these unreal appearances. Therefore this doctrine,
22 Appen, 3 (2)| originally transcends all appearances which axe unreal, and that
|