Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1     1,   5, 1 |       good-natured; (2) man is bad-natured; (3) man is good-natured
 2     1,   5, 1 |        man is good-natured and bad-natured as well; (4) man is neither
 3     1,   5, 1 |       neither good-natured nor bad-natured. The first of these opinions
 4     1,   5, 2 |                      2. Man is Bad-natured according to Siün Tsz 1 (
 5     1,   5, 2 |     and his followers. 'Man is bad-natured,' says Siün Tsz, 'since
 6     1,   5, 3 |       is both Good-natured and Bad-natured according to Yan Hiung1 (
 7     1,   5, 4 |       neither Good-natured nor Bad-natured according to Su Shih (So-shoku).1~
 8     1,   5, 4 |       neither good-natured nor bad-natured. According to this opinion
 9     1,   5, 5 | good-natured, some persons are bad-natured, some persons are good-natured
10     1,   5, 5 |   persons are good-natured and bad-natured as well, and some persons
11     1,   5, 5 |       neither good-natured nor bad-natured. There is no contradiction
12     1,   5, 8 |        is not Good-natured nor Bad-natured, but Buddha-natured.~We
13     1,   5, 8 |        is not good-natured nor bad-natured in the relative sense, as
14     1,   5, 10|       conviction that they are bad-natured. We greatly regret that
15     1,   5, 11|        and murderers be called bad-natured, reformers and revolutionists