|
5. HOW IS ONE TO EVALUATE MORALLY THE USE
FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES OF EMBRYOS OBTAINED BY FERTILIZATION 'IN VITRO'?
Human embryos obtained in vitro are
human beings and subjects with rights: their dignity and right to life must be
respected from the first moment of their existence. It is immoral to produce
human embryos destined to be exploited as disposable "biological
material". In the usual practice of in vitro fertilization, not
all of the embryos are transferred to the woman's body; some are destroyed.
Just as the Church condemns induced abortion, so she also forbids acts against
the life of these human beings. It is a duty to condemn the particular
gravity of the voluntary destruction of human embryos obtained 'in vitro' for
the sole purpose of research, either by means of artificial insemination of by
means of "twin fission". By acting in this way the researcher
usurps the place of God; and, even though he may be unaware of this, he sets
himself up as the master of the destiny of others inasmuch as he arbitrarily
chooses whom he will allow to live and whom he will send to death and kills
defenceless human beings.
Methods of observation or experimentation
which damage or impose grave and disproportionate risks upon embryos obtained in
vitro are morally illicit for the same reasons. every human being is to be
respected for himself, and cannot be reduced in worth to a pure and simple
instrument for the advantage of others. It is therefore not in conformity
with the moral law deliberately to expose to death human embryos obtained 'in
vitro'. In consequence of the fact that they have been produced in vitro,
those embryos which art not transferred into the body of the mother and are
called "spare" are exposed to an absurd fate, with no possibility of
their being offered safe means of survival which can be licitly pursued.
|