61. The seminary is, therefore, an educational
ecclesial community, indeed a particular educating community. And it is the
specific goal which determines its physiognomy: the vocational accompanying of
future priests, and therefore discernment of a vocation; the help to respond to
it and the preparation to receive the sacrament of orders with its own graces
and responsibilities, by which the priest is configured to Jesus Christ head
and shepherd and is enabled and committed to share the mission of salvation in
the church and in the world.
Inasmuch as it is an educating community,
the seminary and its entire life -- in all its different expressions -- is
committed to formation, the human, spiritual, intellectual and pastoral
formation of future priests. Although this formation has many aspects in common
with the human and Christian formation of all the members of the Church, it
has, nevertheless, contents, modalities and characteristics which relate
specifically to the aim of preparation for the priesthood.
The content and form of the educational work
require that the seminary should have a precise program, a program of life
characterized by its being organized and unified, by its being in harmony or
correspondence with one aim which justifies the existence of the seminary:
preparation of future priests.
In this regard, the synod fathers write:
"As an educational community, (the seminary) should follow a clearly
defined program which will have, as a characteristic, a unity of leadership
expressed in the figure of the rector and his cooperators, a consistency in the
ordering of life, formational activity and the fundamental demands of community
life, which also involves the essential aspects of the task of formation. This
program should be at the service of the specific finality which alone justify
the existence of the seminary, and it should do so without hesitation or
ambiguity. That aim is the formation of future priests, pastors of the
Church."( 194) And in order to ensure that the programming is
truly apt and effective, the fundamental outlines of the program will have to
be translated into more concrete details, with the help of particular norms
that are aimed at regulating community life, establishing certain precise
instruments and timetables.
A further aspect is to be stressed here: The
educational work is by its nature an accompanying of specific individual
persons who are proceeding to a choice of and commitment to precise ideals of
life. For this very reason, the work of education should be able to bring
together into a harmonious whole a clear statement of the goal to be achieved,
the requirement that candidates proceed seriously toward the goal, and third,
attention to the "journeyer," that is, the individual person who is
embarked on this adventure, and therefore attention to a series of situations,
problems, difficulties and different rates of progress and growth. This
requires a wise flexibility. And this does not mean compromising, either as
regards values or as regards the conscious and free commitment of the
candidates. What it does mean is a true love and a sincere respect for the
person who, in conditions which are very personal, is proceeding toward the
priesthood. This applies not only to individual candidates, but also to the
diverse social and cultural contexts in which seminaries exist and to the
different life histories which they have. In this sense the educational work
requires continual renewal. The synod fathers have brought this out forcefully
also when speaking about the structure of seminaries: "Without questioning
the validity of the classical forms of seminaries, the synod desires that the
work of consultation of the episcopal conferences on the present - day needs of
formation should proceed as is established in the decree Optatam Totius (no.
1), and in the 1967 synod. The rationes of the different nations or rites
should be revised where opportune whether on the occasion of requests made by
the episcopal conferences or in relation to apostolic visitations of the
seminaries of different countries, in order to bring into them diverse forms of
formation that have proved successful, as well as to respond to the needs of
people with so - called indigenous cultures, the needs of the vocations of
adult men and the needs of vocations for the missions, etc."( 195)
|