Theological Reasons Behind Ongoing Formation
70. "I remind you to rekindle the gift
of God that is within you" (2 Tm. 1:6).
The words of St. Paul to Timothy can
appropriately be applied to the ongoing formation to which all priests are
called by virtue of the "gift of God" which they have received at
their ordination. The passage helps us to grasp the full truth, the absolute
uniqueness of the permanent formation of priests. Here we are also helped by
another text of St. Paul, who once more writes to Timothy: "Do not
neglect the gift you have, which was given you by prophetic utterance when the
elders laid their hands upon you. Practice these duties, devote yourself to
them, so that all may see your progress. Take heed to yourself and to your
teaching; hold to that, for by so doing you will save both yourself and your
hearers" (1 Tm. 4:14-16).
Paul asks Timothy to "rekindle," or stir into flame, the divine
gift he has received, much as one might do with the embers of a fire, in the
sense of welcoming it and living it out without ever losing or forgetting that
"permanent novelty" which is characteristic of every gift from God,
who makes all things new (cf. Rv. 21:5), and thus living it out in its unfading
freshness and original beauty.
But this "rekindling" is not only
the outcome of a task entrusted to the personal responsibility of Timothy, nor
only the result of his efforts to use his mind and will. It is also the effect
of a dynamism of grace intrinsic to God's gift. God himself, in other words,
rekindles his own gift, so as better to release all the extraordinary riches of
grace and responsibility contained in it. With the sacramental outpouring of
the Holy Spirit who consecrates and sends forth, the priest is configured to
the likeness of Jesus Christ, head and shepherd of the Church, and is sent
forth to carry out a pastoral ministry. In this way the priest is marked
permanently and indelibly in his inner being as a minister of Jesus and of the
Church. He comes to share in a permanent and irreversible way of life and is
entrusted with a pastoral ministry which, because it is rooted in his being and
involves his entire life, is itself permanent. The sacrament of holy orders
confers upon the priest sacramental grace which gives him a share not only in
Jesus' saving "power" and "ministry" but also in his pastoral
"love." At the same time it ensures that the priest can count on all
the actual graces he needs, whenever they are necessary and useful for the
worthy and perfect exercise of the ministry he has received.
We thus see that the proper foundation and
original motivation for ongoing formation is contained in the dynamism of the
sacrament of holy orders.
Certainly there are also purely human
reasons which call for the priest to engage in ongoing formation. This
formation is demanded by his own continuing personal growth. Every life is a
constant path toward maturity, a maturity which cannot be attained except by
constant formation. It is also demanded by the priestly ministry seen in a
general way and taken in common with other professions, that is, as a service
directed to others. There is no profession, job or work which does not require
constant updating if it is to remain current and effective. The need to
"keep pace" with the path of history is another human reason
justifying ongoing formation.
But these and other motivations are taken up
and become even clearer by the theological motivations mentioned previously and
which demand further reflection.
The sacrament of holy orders, by its nature
(common to all the sacraments) as a "sign" may be considered, and
truly is, a word of God. It is a word of God which calls and sends forth. It is
the strongest expression of the priest's vocation and mission. By the sacrament
of holy orders, God calls the candidate "to" the priesthood
"coram ecclesia. " The "come, follow me" of Jesus is
proclaimed fully and definitively in the sacramental celebration of his Church.
It is made manifest and communicated by the Church's voice, which is heard in
the words of the bishop who prays and imposes his hands. The priest then gives his
response, in faith, to Jesus' call. "I am coming, to follow you."
From this moment there begins that response which, as a fundamental choice,
must be expressed anew and reaffirmed through the years of his priesthood in
countless other responses, all of them rooted in and enlivened by that
"yes" of holy orders.
In this sense one can speak of a vocation
"within" the priesthood The fact is that God continues to call and
send forth, revealing his saving plan in the historical development of the
priest's life and the life of the Church and of society. It is in this
perspective that the meaning of ongoing formation emerges. Permanent formation
is necessary in order to discern and follow this constant call or will of God.
Thus the apostle Peter is called to follow Jesus even after the risen Lord has
entrusted his flock to him: "Jesus said to him, 'Feed my sheep. Truly,
truly, I say to you, when you were young, you girded yourself and walked where
you would; but when you are old, you will stretch out your hands, and another
will gird you and carry you where you do not wish to go.' (This he said to show
by what kind of death he was to glorify God .) And after this he said to him, '
Follow me. .. "' (Jn. 21 :17-19). Consequently there is a "follow me"
which accompanies the apostle's whole life and mission. It is a "follow
me" in line with the call and demand of faithfulness unto death (cf. Jn.
21:22), a "follow me" which can signify a sequela Christi to the
point of total self - giving in martyrdom.( 214)
The synod fathers explained the reason
justifying the need for ongoing formation, while at the same time revealing its
deep nature as "faithfulness" to the priestly ministry and as a
"process of continual conversion."( 215) It is the Holy
Spirit, poured out in the sacrament, who sustains the priest in this
faithfulness and accompanies him and encourages him along this path of unending
conversion. The gift of the Spirit does not take away the freedom of the
priest. It calls on the priest to make use of his freedom in order to cooperate
responsibly and accept permanent formation as a task entrusted to him. Thus
permanent formation is a requirement of the priest's own faithfulness to his
ministry, to his very being. It is love for Jesus Christ and fidelity to
oneself. But it is also an act of love for the People of God, at whose service
the priest is placed. Indeed, an act of true and proper justice: The priest
owes it to God's people, whose fundamental "right" to receive the
word of God, the sacraments and the service of charity, the original and
irreplaceable content of the priest's own pastoral ministry, he is called to
acknowledge and foster. Ongoing formation is necessary to ensure that the
priest can properly respond to this right of the People of God. The heart and form
of the priest's ongoing formation is pastoral charity: The Holy Spirit, who
infuses pastoral charity, introduces and accompanies the priest to an ever
deeper knowledge of the mystery of Christ, which is unfathomable in its
richness (cf. Eph. 3;14ff.) and, in turn, to a knowledge of the mystery of
Christian priesthood. Pastoral charity itself impels the priest to an ever
deeper knowledge of the hopes, the needs, the problems, the sensibilities of
the people to whom he ministers, taken in their specific situations, as
individuals, in their families, in society and in history.
All this constitutes the object of ongoing
formation, understood as a conscious and free decision to live out the dynamism
of pastoral charity and of the Holy Spirit who is its first source and constant
nourishment. In this sense ongoing formation is an intrinsic requirement of the
gift and sacramental ministry received; and it proves necessary in every age.
It is particularly urgent today, not only because of rapid changes in the social
and cultural conditions of individuals and peoples among whom priestly ministry
is exercised, but also because of that "new evangelization" which
constitutes the essential and pressing task of the Church at the end of the
second millennium.
|