3. Following the texts of the Second Vatican Council
regarding the ministry of priests and their formation,( 4) and with the
intention of applying to various situations their rich and authoritative
teaching, the Church has on various occasions dealt with the subject of the
life, ministry and formation of priests She has done this in a more solemn way
during the Synods of Bishops. Already in October 1967, the first general
ordinary assembly of the synod devoted five general congregations to the
subject of the renewal of seminaries. This work gave a decisive impulse to the
formulation of the document of the Congregation for Catholic Education titled
Fundamental Norms for Priestly Formation.( 5)
The second ordinary general assembly held in
1971 spent half its time on the ministerial priesthood. The fruit of the
lengthy synodal discussion, incorporated and condensed in some
"recommendations," which were submitted to my predecessor Pope Paul
VI and read at the opening of the 1974 synod, referred principally to the
teaching on the ministerial priesthood and to some aspects of priestly
spirituality and ministry.
On many other occasions the Church's
magisterium has shown its concern for the life and ministry of priests. It may
be said that in the years since the Council there has not been any subject
treated by the magisterium which has not in some way, explicitly or implicitly,
had to do with the presence of priests in the community as well as their role
and the need for them in the life of the Church and the world.
In recent years some have voiced a need to
return to the theme of the priesthood, treating it from a relatively new point
of view, one that was more adapted to present ecclesial and cultural
circumstances. Attention has shifted from the question of the priest's identity
to that connected with the process of formation for the priesthood and the
quality of priestly life. The new generation of those called to the ministerial
priesthood display different characteristics in comparison to those of their
immediate predecessors. In addition, they live in a world which in many
respects is new and undergoing rapid and continual evolution. All of this
cannot be ignored when it comes to programming and carrying out the various
phases of formation for those approaching the ministerial priesthood.
Moreover, priests who have been actively
involved in the ministry for a more or less lengthy period of time seem to be
suffering today from an excessive loss of energy in their ever increasing
pastoral activities. Likewise, faced with the difficulties of contemporary
culture and society, they feel compelled to re - examine their way of life and
their pastoral priorities, and they are more and more aware of their need for
ongoing formation.
The concern of the 1990 Synod of Bishops and
its discussion focused on the increase of vocations to the priesthood and the
formation of candidates in an attempt to help them come to know and follow
Jesus -- as they prepare to be ordained and to live the sacrament of holy
orders, which configures them to Christ the head and shepherd, the servant and
spouse of the Church. At the same time, the synod searched for forms of ongoing
formation to provide realistic and effective means of support for priests in
their spiritual life and ministry.
This same synod also sought to answer a
request which was made at the previous synod on the vocation and mission of the
laity in the Church and in the world. Lay people themselves had asked that
priests commit themselves to their formation so that they, the laity, could be
suitably helped to fulfill their role in the ecclesial mission which is shared
by all. Indeed, "the more the lay apostolate develops, the more strongly
is perceived the need to have well - formed holy priests. Thus the very life of
the People of God manifests the teaching of the Second Vatican Council
concerning the relationship between the common priesthood and the ministerial
or hierarchical priesthood. For within the mystery of the Church the hierarchy
has a ministerial character (cf. Lumen Gentium, 10). The more the laity's own
sense of vocation is deepened, the more what is proper to the priest stands
out."( 6)
|