3. The Importance of This Problem in the Present Concrete Situation
Before weighing all the arguments pro and con, let us
say something about the concrete importance of this problem.
The importance of this problem for the nations under
Communist regimes is obvious.
It seems necessary for us to say something about its importance
for the Western countries, particularly with regard to Communist plans for
penetrating these countries with ideological imperialism ‑ plans which
aim at an ultimate worldwide victory of the Communists.
The fear that, in the case of such a Communist
victory, the Church will become subject everywhere to the horrors it suffered
in Mexico, Spain, Russia, Hungary, and China, constitutes the principal reason
for the decision of 500 million Catholics scattered the world over ‑
bishops, priests, monks, nuns, and laymen ‑ to resist Communism to the
death. Moreover, this same consideration, applied to the other religions, is
the principal reason for the anti‑Communist stand taken by the hundreds
of millions of persons professing these creeds.
In the order of psychological factors, this heroic
decision represents the greatest obstacle ‑ or perhaps even the only
significant one ‑ against the establishment and permanent endurance of
Communism throughout the world.
How, then, we may ask has this heroic decision been
affected by the aforementioned change in attitude of some Communist
governments toward the various religions? The fact is that, regardless of the
tactical reasons that may have determined this change in attitude, the
religious tolerance which some Communist governments practice at present, and
which their propaganda proclaims with great exaggeration to the whole world,
provides them already with an immense profit which may be stated as follows:
In view of the alternatives which this change in attitude opens up, opinions in
religious circles are divided over which policy to adopt, thereby resulting in
a breaking down of the ramparts of solid and intransigent opposition to
Communism previously maintained unanimously by those who believe in God and
worship Him.
In fact Catholics and those belonging to other
confessions are having trouble fixing an attitude toward Communism in the face
of the new religious policy of certain Communist governments, a condition
which is giving rise to perplexities, divisions, and even polemics. Many
Catholics ‑ according to their degree of fervor, optimism, or suspicion ‑continue
to believe that the only sensible and consistent attitude is one of absolute
opposition toward Communism, but others believe that accepting immediately
without further resistance a situation such as the one prevailing in Poland
would be better than fighting to the end against Communist penetration only to
fall into a much more oppressive situation such as the one prevailing in
Hungary.
Besides this it appears to these latter that acceptation
by the people still free of a Communist or quasi‑Communist regime, could
prevent the cosmic tragedy of an atomic war. There is only one reason which
would lead them to accept resignedly the risk of such a hecatomb: the duty to
fight to prevent a worldwide persecution of unprecedented proportions aimed at
the radical extermination of the Church. But they see a possibility that this
danger may not materialize, since in certain Communist countries the Church is
allowed to survive, even though reduced to a minimum of liberty; therefore,
their determination to face the danger of an atomic war becomes very much
weakened. And the idea of establishing everywhere on an almost worldwide scale
a "modus vivendi" between the Church and Communism ‑ along the
same lines as the one in Poland ‑ gains ground among these Catholics,
even though accepted as an evil, but nevertheless a lesser evil.
Between these two points of view, an immense majority
has begun to form, a majority which is disoriented and indecisive and, for this
same reason, psychologically less prepared for the struggle than it was until
recently.
If this phenomenon of a weakening in the anti-Communist
attitude can be found in persons utterly opposed to Marxism, how natural it is
for it to be more intense among the so‑called leftist Catholics, who are
becoming more and more numerous and who, without professing materialism and
atheism, are in sympathy with the economic and social aspects of Communism!
In synthesis, then, in all or in nearly all of the
countries not yet subject to the Communist yoke, millions of Catholics who only
yesterday would have gladly died in regular armies or guerrilla units to
prevent the establishment of Communism in their native countries or to
overthrow any such regime that managed to gain power, today no longer have the
same disposition. Moreover, in the event of a crisis of panic, such as the
situation arising in the face of an imminent nuclear war, this phenomenon may
be intensified further, probably leading entire nations to catastrophic
capitulations to the Communist powers.
All of this reminds us that the relative religious
tolerance of some Communist governments has placed the consciences of millions and
millions of men in our day at a crossroad, and brings into relief the
importance of studying as soon as possible the various aspects of the moral
questions inherent to that crossroad.
It is perfectly reasonable to state that a considerable
part of the world's future depends upon the solution of this problem.
|